Professional Documents
Culture Documents
401
1
Preliminary Examination For Constitutional Law 1 – E.H. 401
PROCESS OF AMENDING or REVISING THE
Constitution of Government CONSTITUTION
Refers to the part of the Constitution which Article 17, Sections 1,2,3 and 4 of the 1987 Constitution
provides for the framework for the organization
of the government, sets forth the powers of the Stages of Amendment or Revision
government: 1. Proposal
a. Article 6: Legislative Branch - It is at this stage that the proposed amendments
b. Article 7: Executive Branch or revisions are being formulated.
c. Article 8: Judiciary
d. Article 9: Various constitutional commission 2. Ratification
- It is at this stage the proposed amendment or
Constitution of Sovereignty
revision would be submitted to the people for
Consists of the provisions pointing out the mode
approval or ratification.
or procedure in accordance with which formal
changes in the fundamental law may be brought PROPOSAL STAGE
about.
Who can Propose Amendments or Revisions?
RULES IN CONSTITUTIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONGRESS
¾ votes of all its members
The HOR and Senate voting separately
Verbal Legis
It means that in interpreting the provisions in the Congress must transform itself as a Constituent
Constitution that the words used there in must be Assembly:
interpreted in their ordinary or literal sense except - The reason for this is because its primary task
where technical terms are used. now is to propose amendments or revisions to
the Constitution
Ratio Legis Et Anima - By transforming itself into a “ConAs”, Congress in
If there are ambiguities in interpreting the provisions effect would propose amendments not in the
of the 1987 Constitution then we must delve into the exercise of its ordinary legislative function but it is
intent of the lawmakers behind its enactment. performing special powers to propose the change
(Francisco vs House of Representatives) in fundamental law of the land.
- Composed of members of Congress
Ut Magis Valiat Cuam Periat
The provisions of the Constitution which deals with CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
the same subject matter must be construed or This body is composed of members elected
interpreted altogether so as to give meaning and by the people particularly for the
effect to the same provisions. Constitutional Convention
(Bayan vs Zamora)
2
Preliminary Examination For Constitutional Law 1 – E.H. 401
How do we regard the Constitutional Convention as RATIFICATION STAGE
Article 17, Section 4
compared to the other body of government?
Ratification must be held not earlier than 60 days
According to Frantz vs. Aurtry:
“It is independent and coequal with the other body of
and not later than 90 days.
government as along as it confines itself within the
sphere of its jurisdiction” When will the period start:
a. Congress or Constitutional Convention
When is the best time to call for a Constitutional As of the date of approval for the proposed
Convention? amendment.
For revision or complete overhaul of the
Constitution b. For People’s Initiative
At the end of the day, the matter of calling a The period will start from the day the
constitutional assembly is addressed to the proposed amendment is found sufficient in
sound discretion of congress whether or not the form or substance.
changes proposed are for revision or
amendment only. In this stage the proposed amendments or revision
would be voted upon by the people in a plebiscite
When is it proper to call for a Constituent Assembly? called for that purpose.
For amendments and piece-meal changes in the
constitution May ratification be held simultaneously with a
general election?
Can congress call for a Constitutional Convention
and at the same time propose amendments to the Yes (Gonzales vs. COMELEC)
“According to the Supreme Court, in as much as the law
Constitution? or the Constitution mentions only of an election without
Yes, ruling of the Supreme Court: distinction as to what kind of election is that, then could
“While it is not practicable for congress to call a not make a distinction”
constitutional convention and at the same time propose
amendments to the constitutional body itself, there is “Rule as of now, that any ratification may be validly
nothing in law which would prevent the congress from done simultaneously with a general election”
doing both”
(Gonzales vs. COMELEC)
May there be a piece-meal submission of proposed
PEOPLE’S INITIATIVE amendments for ratification to the people?
(Article 17, Section 2 of the 1987 Constitution)
No (Tolentino vs. COMELEC)
Limitations of People’s Initiative: “There can never be a piece-meal submission of
amendments for ratification by the people”
The people initiative would only apply to
amendments and never to revisions. PROPOSAL vs. REFERENDUM
The petition to amend the constitution must be (Sanidad vs. COMELEC)
supported by at least 12% of the registered Referendum
voters of the Philippines provided that each and This is the process of getting the consensus of the
public in a particular public issue.
every administrative district is represented by at
Consultative in nature
least 3% of the registered voters therein.
The petition must be signed by the people Plebiscite
themselves and cannot be done on their behalf. This is associated to the process of approving or
The proposed amendatory provision must be ratifying the proposed amendments or revision to the
incorporated on the petition itself. Constitution.
The system on people’s initiative cannot be It has something to do with the approval or
exercised within 5 years following the adoption disapproval of amendments or revision to the
or ratification of the 1987 Constitution. Constitution for a particular law.
It cannot be availed of more than once every 5
years following thereafter. Can the Supreme Court or any Courts of Law review
There has to be a law to govern the system on the amendatory process or the observance thereof?
people’s initiative. Congress has to provide the Or is this issue a Political Question?
regulations on the implementation of this “The current rule is that courts of law particularly the
system. Supreme Court can now review the amendatory process
to determine whether or not the amendatory process as
The system of people’s initiative can only be enshrined in Article 17 of the Constitution is properly
used for amendments and never for revision. observed. It is no longer considered a political
question”
3
Preliminary Examination For Constitutional Law 1 – E.H. 401
“The Supreme Court has jurisdiction to review the Judicial Review
amendatory process for amendments or revision
however the wisdom of the proposed amendments
- If the question deals with the legality of an act
remains as a political question” then this may not be considered a purely
political question and so this can reviewed by
POWER of JUDICIAL REVIEW courts of law.
What happens if the petition is assailed by a person Which doctrine should we apply in a given case?
without a legal standing?
It is dismissed outright. Orthodox View
In the case of In Re: Saturnino Bermudez This view is applied when the validity of a
- The petition was dismissed outright since law is questioned immediately after it
Bermudez does not have any legal became effective.
standing on the case for he is not claiming
the position of the president which is the Operative Fact Doctrine
one he is questioning about. This view will govern when the law is
questioned of its validity only after some
Raised at Earliest Opportunity at a Forum with Jurisdiction
time or years after its passage or enactment,
Any question dealing with the validity or invalidity of taking into consideration that the law has
a law must be raised in the initiatory pleading as already taken effect which must be
either a complaint or a petition; otherwise the respected.
question cannot be concerned anymore at the
PARTIAL UNCONSTITUTIONALITY
succeeding trial or by appeal.
It must also be raised in a forum which has the Requisites:
competence to rule the validity or invalidity of a law. This will happen if there is a legislative intent to
retain the valid provisions of the law and this is
Exceptions: found on the “Separability Clause” found on the law
1. Criminal Proceeding: itself.
- The question dealing with the validity or
invalidity of law may be raised at the sound The remaining provisions must be able to
discretion of the judge. independently stand on their own.
2. Civil Proceeding: Separability Clause
- Any question dealing with the validity or - This provides that if any of the provision a law is
invalidity of a law may be raised at any stage of declared invalid then the other remaining parts
the proceeding if such issue is crucial or thereof shall remain valid.
determinative of the case.
If the questioned provision is the heart and soul of
3. Any issue regarding the jurisdiction of the tribunal
the law or it is the be-all-and-end-all of a law then if it
may also be raised at any time during the trial
except after final judgment the petitioner is already is declared unconstitutional, the result will be to
barred due to the rule of estoppel. invalidate the whole law.
6