Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- The SCOT (Social Construction of Technology) school has developed an approach to the
general study of technology revolving around the idea of relevant social groups
- Social groups are defined in this theory in terms of shared meaning, members of a group
attach the same meaning to a particular technology
o The example given by Pinch and Kline is that of the high-wheeler bicycle, women
interpreted it as an “unsafe machine”, men as a “macho machine”
- Standard approach: which held that technological development was linked to the
intrinsic properties of the technology (the basic design or structure of the technology dictated
how it would be developed)
- In addition, since different social groups bring different meanings to the artifact, the
artifact has “interpretive flexibility”, which implies that different groups can influence the
development path of the technology
- For example, in the case of the high-wheeled bicycle, the tendency of men to think of
the bicycle as a macho machine led to the use of larger wheels to increase speed, thus the
meaning influences the technological design
- However, the interpretive flexibility of technology is not permanent, over time particular
interpretations of the technology can come to dominate
- Sometimes different technologies emerge from this process (rather than one
interpretation dominating), Pinch and Kline mention jets and propeller planes
- If new problems emerge with a technology, interpretive flexibility can reemerge from a
“closed” development path (for example, pollution from internal combustion cars leading to the
adoption of electric cars)
- This is the case as meaning can transcend group membership, and relevant social groups
tend to be diverse