Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What's the difference between the Present Simple / Present Continuous and how to use
them.
We use the present simple tense when we want to talk about fixed habits or routines –
things that don’t change.
We use the present continuous to talk about actions which are happening at the present
moment, but will soon finish.
(present simple) ‘I play tennis’ tells us that playing tennis is something the speaker always
does. It is part of a routine or habit. We can call this a permanent situation.
(present continuous/ progressive) ‘I am playing tennis’ tells us that the speaker is playing
tennis right now. Soon the game will be over. We call this a temporary situation.
I play tennis
We play tennis
I am playing tennis
(Notice that the adverb comes before the main verb in the sentence.)
(Notice that the time expression can come at the start or at the end of the sentence.)
Wolfgang admired the way the light glinted off his silver medal.
You can also use the simple past to talk about a past state of being, such as the way
someone felt about something. This is often expressed with the simple past tense of the
verb to be and an adjective, noun, or prepositional phrase.
For regular verbs, add -ed to the root form of the verb (or just -d if the root form already
ends in an e):
For irregular verbs, things get more complicated. The simple past tense of some irregular
verbs looks exactly like the root form:
For other irregular verbs, including the verb to be, the simple past forms are more erratic:
The good news is that verbs in the simple past tense (except for the verb to be) don’t need
to agree in number with their subjects.
Wolfgang polished his medal. The other winners polished their medals too.
Fortunately, there is a formula for making simple past verbs negative, and it’s the same for
both regular and irregular verbs (except for the verb to be). The formula is did not + [root
form of verb]. You can also use the contraction didn’t instead of did not.
Wolfgang did not brag too much about his hula hoop skills. Wolfgang’s girlfriend didn’t
seethe contest.
For the verb to be, you don’t need the auxiliary did. When the subject of the sentence is
singular, use was not or wasn’t. When the subject is plural, use were not or weren’t.
The formula for asking a question in the simple past tense is did + [subject] + [root form of
verb].
Did Wolfgang win the gold medal or the silver medal? Where did Wolfgang go to
celebrate? Did the judges decide fairly, in your opinion?
When asking a question with the verb to be, you don’t need the auxiliary did. The formula
is was/were + [subject].
Was Wolfgang in a good mood after the contest? Were people taking lots of pictures?
in
at MONTHS, YEARS, CENTURIES and LONG on
PRECISE TIME PERIODS DAYS and DATES
Notice the use of the preposition of time at in the following standard expressions:
Expression Example
*Note that in some varieties of English people say "on the weekend" and "on Christmas".
Notice the use of the prepositions of time in and on in these common expressions:
in on
When we say last, next, every, this we do not also use at, in, on.
What were you doing at 8 o’clock last night? I was watching television.
I started watching television before 8 o’clock and I continued watching it after 8 o’clock.
2. We often use the past continuous and the past simple tense together. When this
happens, the past continuous describes a longer, ‘background’ action or situation and
the past simple describes the action or events.
When I woke up this morning it was raining and my father was singing in the kitchen.
I was walking home, whistling happily, when I saw two masked men run out of the bank.
Often, the ‘action’ described by the past simple tense interrupts the ‘situation’ described
by the past continuous tense.
Notice that the past continuous describes ‘situations’ that go on for some time – ‘skiing’
and ‘playing’ but the past simple describes ‘actions’ that happen quickly – ‘broke’ and
‘rang’.
When they arrived, Jeff was cooking dinner. Jeff started cooking before they arrived.
When they arrived, Jeff cooked dinner. Jeff started cooking dinner after they arrived.
Past
Subject Have Rest of the Sentence
Participle
Contractions
Negative Sentences
Questions
Past
Have Subject Rest of the Sentence
Participle
irregular verbs: see 2nd column of irregular irregular verbs: form of 'have' + 3rd column of irregular
verbs verbs
Example: Example:
Example: Example:
Exceptions
Example:
love - loved
admit - admitted
Example:
travel - travelled
Example:
worry - worried
Use
In British English, the use of Simple Past and Present Perfect is quite strict. As soon as a
time expression in the past is given, you have to use Simple Past. If there are no signal
words, you must decide if we just talk about an action in the past or if its consequence in
the present is important.
Note that the following explanations and exercises refer to British English only. In
American English, you can normally use Simple Past instead of Present Perfect. We cannot
accept this in our exercises, however, as this would lead to confusions amongst those who
have to learn the differences.
Do you want to express that an action happened at a certain time in the past (even if it
was just a few seconds ago) or that an action has just / already / not yet happened?
Example: Example:
Do you want to express when a certain action took place or whether / how often an action
has happened till now?
Example: Example:
He went to Canada last summer. Have you ever been to Canada? / I have been to Canada
twice.
Do you just want to express what happened in the past? Or do you want to emphasise the
result (a past action's consequence in the present)?
Example: Example:
I bought a new bike. (just telling I have bought a new bike. (With this sentence I actually want to
what I did in the past.) express that I have a new bike now.)
Signal Words
yesterday just
in 1990 up to now
(not) yet
so far
lately / recently
Comparative/superlative
Comparative is the name for the grammar used when comparing two things. The two
basic ways to compare are using as .. as or than. Examples of each are shown below:
Note: In each of the example sentences above, the comparative form of the adjective is
shown. See the foot of this page for information about the comparison of adverbs.
When comparing with as .. as, the adjective does not change. When comparing with than,
however, some changes are necessary, depending on the number of syllables the
adjective has:
Note: If the word ends: consonant-vowel-consonant, then the last consonant is usually
doubled in the comparative. Examples: big-bigger, fat-fatter, hot-hotter.
Beware: Do not confuse adjectives and adverbs. 2-syllable adverbs ending in -y must be
compared with the word more. Example: I drive more quickly (quicklier) than my brother.
Note: The comparative of some shorter 2-syllable adjectives can be formed with -er.
Examples: simple-simpler, clever-cleverer, narrow-narrower. To be sure which
comparative method to use, you will need to consult a good dictionary.
Adjectives with 3 or more syllables: use more with the unchanged adjective
In the superlative you talk about one thing only and how it is the best, worst, etc. You do
not compare two things. The following guidelines apply to the superlative:
Note: If the word ends: consonant-vowel-consonant, then the last consonant is usually
doubled in the superlative. Examples: big-biggest, fat-fattest, hot-hottest.
Beware: Do not confuse adjectives and adverbs. 2-syllable adverbs ending in -y form their
superlative with the words the most. Example: Of all the people I know my father drives
the most quickly (quickliest).
Other 2-syllable adjectives: use the most with the unchanged adjective
The most boring thing about ESL class is doing grammar exercises.
Note: The superlative of some shorter 2-syllable adjectives can be formed with -er.
Examples: simple-simplest, clever-cleverest, narrow-narrowest. To be sure which
superlative method to use, you will need to consult a good dictionary.
Adjectives with 3 or more syllables: use the most with the unchanged adjective
good-better-the best
bad-worse-the worst
I can run faster than you. / I can run the fastest in my class.
She works harder than me.† / She works the hardest of all students.
She ran more quickly than me.† / Of all the students she ran the most quickly.
† Many educated English speakers prefer to use the nominative plus a verb rather than
the accusative in such comparative sentences, especially in formal situations. They say, for
example, My sister is taller than I am. or She ran more quickly than I did.
The alternative, omitting the verb as in the following examples, is considered to be even
more formal and is avoided by most British English speakers: My sister is taller than I.
or She ran more quickly than I.
Will
from English Grammar Today
Will: form
Affirmative form
Will comes first in the verb phrase in a statement (after the subject and before another
verb). It is often contracted to ’ll in informal situations:
Not: You will must sign a contract … or You must will sign a contract …
She will be able to live nearer her parents if she gets the job.
See also:
Must and have (got) to?
Negative form
The negative form of will is won’t. We don’t use don’t, doesn’t, didn’t with will:
We use the full form will not in formal contexts or when we want to emphasise
something:
See also:
Modality: forms
Question form
The subject and will change position to form questions. We don’t use do, does, did:
You won’t forget to take the cake out of the oven, will you?
Will or ’ll?
We commonly use ’ll as the short form of will and shall. In speaking, will and shall are
usually contracted to ’ll, especially after subject pronouns (I, we, you, they, he, she, it):
We’ll meet you outside the coffee shop. (more common in speaking than We will meet you
…)
However, in some contexts ’ll is normally the only choice. In such cases, ’ll is best not seen
as a contraction of either will or shall, but as an independent form.
There’s the cinema. We’ll get out here and you can park the car over there.
A:
B:
’ll is also used for indicating decisions or arrangements where will or shall would sound
too direct and too formal:
OK. My diary says I’m free on Wednesday. So we’ll meet next Wednesday.
We’ll get the train to Paris and then the Metro to the hotel. Naoe and Dave and the
boys’ll join us as soon as they’ve finished their meetings.
Warning:
A:
But you’ll have to be quick. Everyone will be after it, won’t they?
B:
Yeah, they will.
See also:
Future: will and shall
Will: uses
One of the main uses of will is to refer to things in the future that we think are certain:
The rooms will be redecorated but all the facilities will be the same.
A:
B:
[talking to a child]
See also:
Modal verbs in past, present and future time
Making predictions
A:
Have you decided what you are going to do with the car?
B:
That’ll be Katie shouting. (The speaker is certain. He or she makes a deduction because of
what they know about the situation.)
Conditional sentences
We often use will (or the contracted form ’ll) in the main clause of a conditional sentence
when we talk about possible situations in the future:
See also:
Conditionals
Intentions and decisions
We use will for immediate intentions and decisions. We usually use ’ll, not will, after I
think:
When I go and see Marie, I think I’ll take her some flowers.
What will you do with that soup? Will you just put it in the fridge or will you freeze it?
We use will and be going to for decisions, intentions and plans. We use will when the
decision is immediate and be going to when we have already made a plan:
A:
It’s too expensive to fly on the Friday. Look it’s nearly £200. It’s only £25 to fly on Thursday.
B:
A:
Great. That’ll save us lots of money.
We’re going to drive to Birmingham on Friday, and Saturday morning we’re going todrive
to Edinburgh.
See also:
Future
Willingness and offers
A:
B:
Just the leaflet. Right, I’ll go and get you a brochure too.
Promises
See also:
Promise
Requests and invitations
[parent to child]
See also:
Commands and instructions
General truths
A:
Do you think they should try and make it easier for people to complain?
B:
No, cos some people will always complain. (cos = because in informal speech)
Habitual events
[talking about a younger sister, Celia, who doesn’t eat properly; she refers to Celia]
Celia will start to get upset if she has to eat cabbage or meat like chicken breast. My
mum will say, ‘Just try it’. And she’ll start shaking her head and going, ‘No. I don’t want
to’. Mum will put it near her mouth and she’ll start to cough.
Disapproval
Will is also used to talk about repeated behaviour which the speaker does not like or
approve of. Will is normally stressed here:
He will leave his clothes all over the floor. It drives me mad. (stronger than He leaves his
clothes all over the floor.)
Will may be used to refer to inanimate objects and how they respond to humans, most
typically in the negative form won’t:
We use will for all persons, but we often use shall with I and we. Will (’ll) is generally less
formal than shall when used with I and we:
Simply complete the form and return it to me, and I shall personally reserve your hotel
room for you.
Shall also has a special legal use for talking about rules and laws. In these cases, we often
use it with third-person subjects:
According to the basic principle of human rights, people shall not be discriminated against
because of their nationality, race, age, sex, religion, occupation and social status.
Shall and will are both used to talk about intentions and decisions. Shall is more formal
than will.
Compare
I’ll see you later. I won’t be late. informal
Spoken English:
Will is much more common than shall in both speaking and writing.
See also:
Would or will?
We use will or ’ll to express intentions or decisions, or to make offers, not the present
simple: