Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VERSUS
RESPONDENTS
the Impugned Final Judgment and Decree dated October 29, 2014
Karkardooma Courts, New Delhi in Civil Suit No. 384 of 2012 titled
tenanted premises.
2. The contents of the accompanying appeal may kindly be read as a
part and parcel of this instant application and the same are not being
3. The Applicant/Appellant craves leave of this Hon’ble Court to refer to and rely
upon the same and all the documents annexed thereto at the time of the hearing
of this Application.
4. The present proceedings pertain to establishing that the Appellant had paid a
refundable security amount of Rs. 2.5 lakhs to the Respondent No. 2 in lieu of
reducing the monthly rental amount to be paid for the suit premises to Rs.
2,500/-.
5. It is submitted that the Ld. Civil Judge took the view that the
7. The basis for such provisional attachment is set out in Paragraphs 2 (xvi) and
said Shri Dushyant Natwarlal Dalal and his other family members,
during the period from 08.07.2005 onward, which included the sale
(Emphasis supplied)
8. Therefore, by way of the instant Application, the Applicant seeks leave of this
much as the same were not “proceeds of crime” nor derived or obtained, directly
Puloma Dushyant Dalal, Ms. Yuti Dushyant Dalal, Ms. Aashni Dushyant Dalal,
9. It is submitted that the aforesaid documents are relevant and essential to the
adjudication of the present appeal for the reasons aforesaid, and that the delay, if
a.
10. In light of the above, the delay, if any, in filing these additional documents is not
deliberate and has been occasioned due to reasons beyond the Appellant’s
control despite their best efforts and diligence and as such the delay may be
11. Furthermore, it is submitted that the aforesaid additional documents are essential
and necessary for adjudication of the instant Appeal and this Hon’ble Tribunal
would not be in a position to decide the instant Appeal appropriately without the
12. It is further stated and affirmed by the Applicant/Appellant that the each of the
document.
13. It is respectfully submitted that the present application is being filed bona fide
and in the interest of justice as the Applicant has a very good case on merits and
the balance of convenience lies in its favour. It is submitted that if the relief
prayed for herein is not granted then the Applicant would suffer grave prejudice
adjudicate the present Appeal without the benefit of the aforesaid additional
documents and it is prayed that the same may be taken on record. However, it is
submitted that no prejudice will be caused to the Respondent in the event that
PRAYER
2. Pass any other and such other order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit
Appellant/Applicant
Through
RAJSHEKHAR RAO & ZEHRA KHAN
ADVOCATES FOR THE APPELLANT/APPLICANT
Z-24, LOWER GROUND FLOOR
HAUZ KHAS, NEW DELHI – 110 016
E-MAIL: raj@rrao.in
Phone: 9811153933
New Delhi
Date: 05.05.2014
Filed on:06.05.2014