Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk
page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (December 2016)
The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the
subject. (December 2016)
Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. (December 2016)
The neutrality of this article is disputed. (November 2016)
Generation Snowflake, or Snowflake Generation, is a term referring to the young adults of the
2010s, who are perceived as more prone to taking offense and less resilient than previous
generations. The LA Times and The Guardian considers the term to be associated with and
used by the alt-right.[1][2] Collins Dictionary describes the term as informal and derogatory and
it is often associated with criticism of safe spaces and trigger warnings in academic
settings.[3][4][5][6][7] The term has also been used to refer to Millennials.[4][5][8][9] Some sources
attribute the characteristics ascribed to Generation Snowflake to parenting methods,
particularly those that focus on boosting self-esteem.[7][5]
Contents
1 Background
2 Usage
3 See also
4 References
5 Further reading
Background
The term originated in the United States,[9] a reference to parents reportedly raising their
children as "special" and "precious" snowflakes.[10][9][11] Rebecca Nicholson, writing for The
Guardian writes "a much-memed line from Chuck Palahniuk’s Fight Club expresses a very
early version of the sentiment" with the line “You are not special. You are not a beautiful and
unique snowflake.”[12]
In 2015, Claire Fox, founder of the libertarian think tank the Institute of Ideas, used the term in
her book I Find That Offensive, in reference to a confrontation between university students
shown on a viral video and Yale faculty head, Nicholas Christakis.[13][7] The confrontation
arose after Christakis' wife, Erika Christakis, a lecturer at the university, had suggested
students should "relax a bit rather than labeling fancy dress Halloween costumes as culturally
insensitive".[13] Fox described the video showing the students' reaction as a "screaming,
almost hysterical mob of students".[13] Fox said the backlash to the viral video led to the
disparaging moniker "generation snowflake" for the students.[13]
The term "snowflake generation" was one of Collins Dictionary's 2016 words of the year, with
Collins defining the term as: "the young adults of the 2010s, viewed as being less resilient and
more prone to taking offence than previous generations".[14][3][15]
Usage
According to Claire Fox, members of Generation Snowflake "are genuinely distressed by
ideas that run contrary to their worldview"; they are more likely than previous generations of
students to report that they have mental health problems.[7] Northern Irish journalist Fionola
Meredith noted a 2016 UK Higher Education Policy Institute survey of university students
which found that 76% of students supported the NUS no platform policy and 48% of students
think universities should be safe spaces where debate takes place within specific
guidelines.[6][16] Fox and journalist Bryony Gordon described these traits as being coupled
with a strong sense of entitlement.[5][7]
In 2016 some law professors at the University of Oxford began using trigger warnings, with
the purpose of alerting students of potentially distressing subject matter. This drew criticism
from Fox and GQ writer, Eleanor Halls, who related the phenomenon to Generation Snowflake,
and questioned how well law students educated with trigger warnings would function as
lawyers.[4][17] Law lecturer Laura Hoyano also criticized the use of trigger warnings. A
spokesperson for the university said that Oxford had not adopted a formal policy on trigger
warnings, leaving their use to the discretion of individual lecturers.[18] Law student Giorgia
Litwin defended the use of trigger warnings, saying "The introduction of a discretionary
trigger warning is not going to cause every law student to drop sticks and walk out of a
lecture."[19]
In her syndicated column, conservative American pundit Michelle Malkin criticized the
provision of the Affordable Care Act which requires employer-based health coverage to
extend to adult children up to 26 years of age, describing it as the "slacker mandate" and
calling these young adults "precious snowflakes". Malkim argues the provision has "cultural
consequences" in that it "reduces the incentives for 20-somethings to grow up and seek
independent lives and livelihoods".[20][21]
Fox argues that Generation Snowflake was created by over-protecting people when they were
children and she argued the emphasis on self-esteem in childhood resulted in adults
"tiptoeing around children's sensitivities" to avoid "damaging their wellbeing".[7] In the UK,
Tom Bennett was recruited by the government to address behaviour in schools. [22] He
commented that Generation Snowflake children at school can be over-protected, leading to
problems when they progress to university and are confronted with "the harsher realities of
life".[22] Bennett argues being sheltered from conflict as children can lead to university
students who react with intolerance towards people and things that they believe may offend
someone or toward people who have differing political opinions, leading to a phenomenon
called "no-platforming", where speakers on controversial topics such as abortion or atheism
are prohibited from speaking on a university campus.[22]
The negative connotations of the term Generation Snowflake have been criticized for having
been applied too widely: Bennett also commented: "It's true that, for some of these children,
losing fast wi-fi is a crisis and being offended on the internet is a disaster.... But then I
remember the other ones, and I reckon they all balance each other out."[23]
Jessica Roy, writing for the Los Angeles Times, says the "alt-right" describes those protesting
Donald Trump as "snowflakes", using the term as a pejorative.[24] Richard Brooks wrote in The
Daily Telegraph that "students have always been instrumental in turning the tide of public
opinion",[25] and Mark Kingwell, philosophy professor at University of Toronto has objected to
the use of the term to characterize political protesting as "whining", in response to protests by
Millennials following Donald Trump's election as president of the United States.[8]
Serena Smith, writing for The Tab says the term "Generation Snowflake" shows "Millennials
can never win" because they are either stereotyped as politically disengaged, or they are
called "snowflakes" when they do engage politically. Smith also states: "most, if not all, of
these comments on 'special snowflakes' originate from the baby boomer generation – i.e. the
generation that kicked up the biggest fuss of the 20th century: the 1960s. A generation that led
a sexual and cultural revolution, now telling us that we’re whining for trying to make our
voices heard? It seems slightly hypocritical."[26]
Generation Snowflake characteristics have been discussed in relation to the skills required by
entrepreneurs, with the suggestion that early risk-taking may be linked to later enterprise and
innovation.[27]
In December 2016, the term was referenced in the ABC sitcom Last Man Standing, in an
episode titled Precious Snowflake about microaggressions and politically correct speech
restrictions on a university campus.[28]
See also
Generation gap
The Great Indoors
References
1.
28. "S6 E09 Precious Snowflakes". ABC. 2 December 2016. Retrieved 7 December
2016.
Further reading
"Generation Screwed or Generation Snowflake? Britain's young are doing better than
many think". The Economist. London. 19 November 2016. Retrieved 18 November 2016.