Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maturity &
Transformation
Fundamentals
Online
Student Notebook
© TM Forum
This document contains some key illustrations Notice
This document is an annex to TM Forum Digital Maturity &
from the course to help you as you learn. Transformation Fundamentals Online Training Course.
Please print this document and use it to take No recipient of this document shall in any way interpret this document
notes as you watch the videos. You should re- as representing a position or agreement of TM Forum or its members. It
is a copyrighted document of TM Forum, provided for the sole use of
watch any material that you don’t fully the course student to make one printed copy. It is forbidden to make
understand the first time through. further paper or electronic copies for distribution.
Any use of this document by the recipient, other than as set forth
The course and this document are not an specifically herein, is at its own risk, and under no circumstances will
exhaustive guide to the TM Forum Digital TM Forum be liable for direct or indirect damages or any costs or losses
Maturity & Transformation Fundamentals. resulting from the use of this document by the recipient.
http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-
tech/our-insights/what-digital-really-means
Digital Characteristics
And beyond the definition, below are some attributes or characteristics of being
digital that should be noted and cultivated (the list is in alphabetical order):
People
Process
Technology
▪ Digital is necessary
▪ Digital is not 100% clear and
there isn’t a one size fits all map
Googling “Digital
Transformation”, “Digital” and
“Transformation” doesn’t
return a simple, yet thorough
definition. As a result, we will
take some interim steps to
build up to what we expect will
prove to be a relevant
definition.
Digitization
Content Creators /
Aggregators
Content Distributors (Cable &
Satellite)
Device Manufacturers
Network Equipment
Semiconductors
Why Digital Transformation Matters – Closing the Gap
▪ SoftBank
Revenue: ~$82.75B (2016)
Stock Price: ~$44.5 (10/16/17)
Market Cap: ~$98.5B
(10/16/17)
Industries disrupting:
• Telecommunications (e.g.
Arm Holdings, Brightstar &
Sprint)
• Internet (e.g. Alibaba &
Yahoo! Japan)
Why Digital Transformation Matters – Examples (cont.)
▪ Tencent
Founded: 1998
Revenue: ~$22B (2016)
Stock Price: ~$45.5
(10/16/17)
Market Cap: ~$420B
(10/16/17)
Industries disrupting:
• eCommerce & Payments
• Gaming
• Messaging
Why Digital Transformation Matters – Examples (cont.)
▪ Tesla
Founded: 2003
Revenue: ~$7B (2016)
Stock Price: ~$350 (10/16/17)
Market Cap: ~$58B (10/16/17)
Industries disrupting:
• Automotive
• Energy Production &
Storage
Module 2: Digital Transformation and
Why It Matters – Part IV
Commonalities
▪ What do these companies have in common?
Youth:
• 5 / 8, Alibaba, Alphabet, Facebook, Tencent & Tesla, are < 20 years old
• 1, Amazon, is < 25 years old
• 2, Apple & SoftBank, are > 35 years old, but Apple’s second act is ~20 years old
since Steve Jobs rejoined the company in 1997 and SoftBank has really taken off
in the last decade given its portfolio of companies
Iconic founders
Each company has pioneered at least one new way of doing business so is very
much a digital disruptor
Understanding “the best way to predict the future is to invent it”
Timing and luck
Digital Disruption
▪ Digitization, Digit(al)ization
and Digital Transformation
▪ Competitive Landscape
▪ Why It Matters
▪ It’s a journey as much as a
destination
Module 3: How Did We Get Here? – Part I
How Did We Get Here?
In the Beginning
(~300 BC to 1830s)
How Did We Get Here? (cont.)
Ada Lovelace
(Confidant of Charles Babbage)
How Did We Get Here? (cont.)
Modern Era
(Late 1800s to 1970s)
Module 3: How Did We Get Here? – Part II
How Did We Get Here? – Moore’s Law
▪ Moore’s Law is the observation that
the number of transistors in an
integrated circuit doubles.
▪ The observation is named after
Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel
and Fairchild Semiconductor, whose
1965 paper described a doubling
every year in the number of
components per integrated circuit
(revised in 1975 to every two years).
▪ Moore's prediction has proved
accurate for several decades so has
been used by the semiconductor
industry to guide long-term planning.
How Did We Get Here? – Post Moore’s Law
ARPANET
1969 1970
How Did We Get Here? – Internet (cont.)
Gordon Moore
(in his own words)
How Did We Get Here? (cont.)
Internet
Module 4: Why Business Needs to be More
Proactive – Part I
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive
“Digital disruption is at the heart of
all the conversations I have with
CEOs today…consider the fact that
that new digital business models
are the principal reason why just
over half of the names of
companies on the Fortune 500 have
disappeared since the year 2000.”
Pierre Nanterme
CEO, Accenture
Davos 2016
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive (cont.)
1-30
Only These 60 Companies Were in the Fortune 500 in Both 1955 and 2016
3M
Campbell Soup Deere
Hershey Lockheed
Pfizer Martin
Abbott Laboratories
Caterpillar Dow Chemical
Honeywell International Marathon
Proctor OilGamble
and
Alcoa
CBS DuPont Foods
Hormel McGraw Hill (now S&P Global)
Raytheon
Archer Daniels Midland
Celanese ExxonMobil
IBM MonsantoAutomation
Rockwell
Ashland
Chevron Freeport-McMoRan
International Paper NavistarAir
Sealed
ATT
Coca-Cola Enterprises General
Johnson Electric
and Johnson NCR
Textron
Avon Products
ConocoPhillips General Dynamics
Kellogg Northrup
United Grumman
States Steel
Boeing Holdings
Crown General Mills
Kimberley-Clark Owens Technologies
United Corning
Borg Warner
Cummins General
Kraft Foods
Motors Owens-Illinois
Weyerhaeuser
Bristol-Myers Squibb
CVS Goodyear Tire and Rubber
Lear PepsiCo
Whirlpool
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive (cont.)
31-60
Only These 60 Companies Were in the Fortune 500 in Both 1955 and 2016
3M Deere Lockheed Martin
Abbott Laboratories Dow Chemical Marathon Oil
Alcoa DuPont McGraw Hill (now S&P Global)
Archer Daniels Midland ExxonMobil Monsanto
Ashland Freeport-McMoRan Navistar
ATT General Electric NCR
Avon Products General Dynamics Northrup Grumman
Boeing General Mills Owens Corning
Borg Warner General Motors Owens-Illinois
Bristol-Myers Squibb Goodyear Tire and Rubber PepsiCo
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive (cont.)
▪ Companies who have declared bankruptcy
as a result of digital competitors:
B. Dalton Bookseller
Bankruptcy Blockbuster
Borders Books
Do not pass Go,
Circuit City
do not collect $200 Radio Shack
Sports Authority
Tower Records
Toys R Us
Etc.
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive (cont.)
X
X
X
X Taxis
Real
estate
Telco
infra
Inventory
X
X
X Actual
Content Cinemas Apps
money
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive (cont.)
Digital Disruption
(Sustaining vs. Disruptive Innovation)
Module 4: Why Business Needs to be More
Proactive – Part II
A Case Study in Being Proactive
▪ In 1985 Intel reported earnings of $.01 /
share and in 1986 the company lost $173
million due to competition from Japan in its
core memory business which led to layoffs,
plant closings, salary cuts, etc.
▪ As CEO, Andy Grove, and Gordon Moore
(Moore’s Law), exited the memory
business which at that time represented
80%+ of their revenue to focus on
microprocessors where the market at the
time was soft.
▪ The move to microprocessors succeeded
and is the primary reason Intel is the
dominant semiconductor manufacturer with
$60B+ in revenue.
A Case Study in Being Proactive (cont.)
Healthy Paranoia
Module 4: Why Business Needs to be More
Proactive – Part III
A Case Study in Being Proactive (cont.)
▪ While Netflix disrupted Blockbuster and
other video chains with its movie by mail
and no late fees service, it also saw
weakness in its business model.
▪ Netflix grew concerned about being
disrupted by streaming so in 2011 it
started the migration to streaming and in
turn raised its prices which trimmed the
stock price by ~75% to < $10 / share.
▪ Today Netflix’s stock has rebounded to
~$190 / share, after a 7 for 1 stock split
in 2015, which is far higher than its 2011
low and it’s using its primary competitor,
Amazon, to deliver its streaming
services.
Why Business Needs to be More Proactive Review
▪ Reactive
Less prepared for change
Muddies the future direction
Less flexibility
Fear of the journey
▪ Proactive
Better able to innovate and
transform
Able to see the future more clearly
More flexibility
Embraces the journey
Module 5: Embarking Upon Your Digital
Transformation Program – Part I
Embarking Upon Your Digital Transformation Program
▪ Given its 2017 and you are in this
class, we’re going to assume your
organization:
has some familiarity with the
concept of digital
transformation
considers that it has started
the process of digitally
transforming itself
▪ If one or the other of the above,
or both, aren’t accurate, we’d like
get your feedback on why you
think this is currently the case.
Embarking Upon Your Digital Transformation Program (cont.)
Perspective
Embarking Upon Your Digital Transformation Program (cont.)
Infrastructure model
Operating model
Business model
Something else?
Embarking Upon Your Digital Transformation Program (cont.)
If so, why?
To wit: Are they fundamentally changing what they do and how they do
it in order to compete effectively?
Merriam-Webster
14% 14%
as digitally mature:
8%
7%
3%
How digital is 2%
your organization? 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10
SCALE OF 1-10
EARLY DEVELOPING MATURING
MOSTLY SMALL
20% EXPERIMENTS
35%
41%
8% 45% 52% MOSTLY BIG
ENTERPRISE-WIDE
58% EFFORTS
11%
10% BOTH SMALL & BIG
ENTERPRISE-WIDE
EXPERIMENTS
Culture
Customer
Operations
Technology
Why Digital Maturity Matters – How to Gain Digital Maturity
In order to survive and thrive in the digital market, service providers are embarking on
complex and demanding digital transformation journeys. To be successful, these
transformation programs require much more than embracing new technologies and
ways to interact with our customers – they demand holistic transformation of the entire
business, fundamentally redefining how the business operates.
A maturity model is a business (e.g. survey) tool used to assess the current (As Is)
status of certain capabilities that exist within an organization and help them to be clear
where these need to transform or improve (To Be).
https://www.tmforum.org/dmm
TM Forum’s Digital Maturity Model (DMM) - Timeline
Realization DMM v1.0
of need for launch (web
a DMM TM Forum Action accessible)
from TM Live Asia Week in and Action
Forum 2016 in Lisbon, Week in
members Singapore Portugal Vancouver, BC
1st half
of 2016 Jul16 Dec16 Jan17 Feb17 May17 Sep17
▪ DMM Dimensions
Culture, People &
Organization
Customer
Operations
Strategy
Technology
And 28 sub dimensions and
179 criteria / questions
across the 5 dimensions
DMM Dimensions – Culture, People & Organization
▪ Customer:
▪ Strategy:
▪ Technology:
▪ DMM Defined
▪ DMM History
▪ 5 Dimensions (28 Sub
Dimensions and 179
Criteria / Questions)
NON-LINEAR AND
POSSIBILITY
CENTERED (e.g.
Game Changer)
LINEAR,
INCREMENTAL AND
PROBLEM-CENTERED
(e.g. Polisher)
The GC Index® - Outcomes
At the end of this course, you will have:
▪ An in-depth understanding of a framework,
The GC Index, that you can use to:
Compose powerful DMM project teams
that can deliver business objectives
Maximise the contribution of each team
member
▪ An in-depth understanding of your own
approach to leadership with a knowledge of
how to get the best from ‘Game Changing’
teams
▪ Insight into the way that leading brands are
using The GC Index to support the pursuit of
Digital Maturity objectives
The GC Index® Clients
The GC Index® - Outcomes
The GC Index® – Repertory Grid Analysis
ELEMENT JANE EMMA FRANK JUAN EMILY JULIE MICHEL ELEMENT
STRATEGIC 1 1 4 5 1 4 3 TACTICAL
IMAGINATIVE 4 1 5 3 3 4 1 PRACTICAL
PERSISTENT 4 2 5 3 1 4 4 FLEXIBLE
THE
THE THE THE
GAME
STRATEGIST PLAY MAKER = CONTEMPORARY LEADER IMPLEMENTER = CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVER
ORCHESTRATES
CHANGER BUILDS
MAPS THE
THE FUTURE TRANSFORMS THE FUTURE
FUTURE
THE FUTURE
Angela Merkel Henry Ford
THE
THE THE THE
GAME
STRATEGIST = VISIONARY LEADER PLAY MAKER IMPLEMENTER = LEADER AS COACH
CHANGER ORCHESTRATES BUILDS
MAPS THE
TRANSFORMS THE FUTURE THE FUTURE
FUTURE
THE FUTURE
Possibly influenced by who your DMM sponsor is, CEO, CXO, CIO or someone
else, there are 3 different paths for starting the assessment process.
https://www.tmforum.org/digital-maturity-model-metrics/
Recommended DMM Participation
▪ Again, depending upon who your
DMM sponsor is, we’d like to suggest
3 levels of participation:
Full (5% or more of employees
completing all 5 dimensions): with the
backing of the CEO or possibly a CXO
Medium (1% or more of employees
completing at least 3 dimensions): with
the backing of the CEO, a CXO and
possibly the CIO
Light (50+ employees completing at
least 3 dimensions): backing of the CIO
and / or someone at a divisional level
Recommended DMM Communication Process
▪ To get the ball rolling, the DMM has to be
introduced by the sponsor, CEO, CXO, CIO or
other, to the immediate stakeholders.
▪ Email is likely the best way to introduce this to
everyone, but it should reference either an
upcoming face to face meeting(s) or webinar(s)
where more information will be provided.
▪ The initial face to face meeting(s), or webinar(s),
should last at least 1.5 hours and prepare people
for how to complete the survey as well as who to
seek help from if questions arise.
▪ Survey should open to stakeholders within a
week after the last meeting / webinar.
Module 8: Preparing For and Taking the DMM
Survey – Part II
Taking the Survey
▪ So now that the participating
employees from your organization
have been prepped to take the
DMM assessment, its time to get
started with the survey.
▪ People currently have two
choices for how they can
approach this:
DMM web accessible app at the
following URL:
https://dmm.tmforum.org
Downloading the iOS app,
https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/di
gital-maturity-
model/id1233670771?mt=8
Taking the Survey – Landing Screen
▪ Landing Screen: