Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Proposed Capital
Improvement Plan
October 17, 2018
City Council Workshop
Boulder City, Nevada
DRAFT 13
Capital Improvement Program
• A Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a multi-year planning
document used by the City to identify capital improvement
projects and coordinate the financing and timing of the
projects.
• CIP funding is annually appropriated, coinciding with the City
Budget process
• A capital project is defined as new, replacement of, or
improvements to infrastructure (buildings, roads, parks, water
and sewer lines, etc) or vehicles which have a minimum life
expectancy of five years and a minimum cost of $25,000
DRAFT 14
Funding Sources
• Majority of the CIP projects are funded through non-General
Fund sources:
• Regional Transportation Commission
• Regional Flood Control
• Congestion Mitigation
• Federal Aviation Administration
• Voter Approved Capital Projects Fund
• Utility Enterprise Funds
• Court Assessment Fund
• Residential Construction Tax
• Golf Course Maintenance Surcharge Fund
• Airport Fund
DRAFT 15
Funding Sources
Funding Source Amount Funding Source Amount
General Fund $2,625,500 Res. Const. Tax $50,000
Electric Fund $4,800,000 Court Fund $80,000
Water Fund $0 Golf Surcharge $220,000
Sewer Fund $400,000 CIP#1 $1,000,000
Landfill Fund $220,000 CIP#2 $500,000
Cemetery Fund $50,000 CIP#3 $2,990,000
Airport Fund $856,000 FAA $1,983,000
RTC $16,230,000 Flood Control $200,000
Vehicle Fund $1,535,000 Congestion Mit. $120,000
DRAFT 16
Sustainable Funding
• General Fund monies are from the unassigned fund balance
(sometimes called the “reserve”). There are sufficient funds in
the fund balance for this five year CIP Plan and still maintain
the required 20% fund balance for the operating fund
• The utility project budgets were adjusted to match available
funds
• Capital Improvement Fund expenditures are based on voter-
approved ballot questions:
• #1 – up to $1M/year for City Facilities
• #2 – up to $500k/year for utilities through FY22
• #3 – Proceeds from Tract 349 land sale for Utility projects
(Storybook homes land purchase)
DRAFT 17
DRAFT 18
DRAFT 19
What the Capital Improvement Plan Includes:
• Introduction of the CIP Program and Process
• All projects as submitted, including funding sources for each category
• Projects presented by function (i.e., parks, transportation, etc)
• Projects sorted by responsible department
• Individual Project Sheets, complete with map, photo, narrative,
anticipated construction timeline, and funding source breakdown
• Strategic Asset Management Plan – the guiding document to assist city
personnel in selecting projects to include in the 5-year CIP plan
DRAFT 20
Proposed Projects - Airport
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 21
Proposed Projects – Street Projects
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 22
Proposed Projects – Cemetery
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 23
Proposed Projects – General City Facilities
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 24
Proposed Projects – Parks & Rec Facilities
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 25
Proposed Projects – Parks & Rec Facilities
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 26
Proposed Projects – Boulder Creek
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 27
Proposed Projects – Municipal Golf Course
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 28
Proposed Projects – Police Department
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 29
Proposed Projects – Municipal Court
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 30
Proposed Projects – Electric Utility
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 31
Proposed Projects – Water Utility
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 32
Proposed Projects – Sewer Utility
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 33
Proposed Projects – Landfill
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 34
Proposed Projects – Vehicles
Project FY20 Funding
DRAFT 35
Notable Projects – NOT FUNDED
Project Total Project Cost
DRAFT 36
“Green” Projects
• Conversion of street lights to more energy efficient LED light
systems
• Renovation of Municipal Golf Course Irrigation System to a
modern, water efficient system (45+ year old system)
• Replacement of gymnasium lights at ABC Park to LED light
system
• Replacement of ball field lights to field grade LED field lights
• Renovation of City Park irrigation systems to a modern, water
efficient system
• City Vehicle purchases to be alternate fuels where possible
DRAFT 37
Next Steps
• Adopt the Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Year 2020 on or
before December 11th.
• Incorporate the funding for the CIP projects into the Fiscal Year
20 General Operating Budget.
• Submit the adopted CIP to the State of Nevada by June 30,
2019.
DRAFT 38
L I V E
W O R K
P L AY
R E T I R E
DRAFT
October 8, 2018
39
City Council and Boulder City Residents,
I am pleased to present the Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2020 – 2024.
The CIP is the culmination of an annual process of capital needs assessment and prioritization
completed as part of Boulder City’s Asset Management Program. This five-year CIP identifies
a $203 million plan for investment in the community’s infrastructure needs, including our city
streets, parks, golf courses, and utilities, and represents Boulder City’s commitment to providing
high quality and reliable service into the future. The funding level of $33.9 million for FY2020 is
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
$20 million more than the amount included in last year’s financial plan. This is due to changes
in how our plan is prepared and what improvements to include. In prior years’ plans, street proj-
ects and airport projects were not included. Those two categories are responsible for the large
increase in year over year spending.
The historical funding for Fiscal Years
(FY) 2018 through 2019 and forecasted
funding for FY 2020 through 2024 are
presented in the chart to the right. As
in prior CIP’s, the vast majority of the
FY2020-2024 CIP is dedicated to the
rehabilitation of existing infrastructure
or system enhancements. The CIP in-
cludes nearly $14 million for the recon-
struction of Boulder City Parkway, $26
million for significant airport improve-
ments (including an air traffic control
tower), over $2M to make customer
service and employee safety improvements at City Hall and our City Shops. Other significant
projects include repairs to our two public golf courses, improvements to our parks and recreation
facilities, and replacing vehicles in our aging fleet.
The City’s utility infrastructure will have almost $78 million invested in improvements to our
electric, water, wastewater and landfill operations. These improvements include replacing the
transmission poles from our primary tap into the national grid, completion of the conversion from
a 4kV system to a 12kV system, and upgrades to the Waste Water Treatment Plan Headworks.
Long-term projects such as our water and sewer mains replacement program during street re-
construction projects will continue.
As with many five-year plans, there are also projects that have not been funded. Several are
dependent upon other projects occurring first, while others are at a funding level that is unattain-
able under our current funding sources. Your City Staff will continue to seek alternate funding
sources for our infrastructure needs to maximize the value of our public dollars.
2 DRAFT 40
What’s New with this Effort?
Another year, another Capital Improvement Plan. Same process and format as before, right?
Well, actually no. In an effort to be more transparent to both our governing body and our
citizenry, this Capital Improvement Plan is different. How? With this effort, a formal Executive
Summary (this document) has been prepared. The preparation effort began on July 1st
whereas in prior years it would start in October. The overall Capital Improvement Plan includes
The preparation process has been changed as well. In past efforts, City Staff would prepare
the Plan and present it to the City Council for adoption at a December City Council Meeting.
The process has been modified to include the City Council much earlier in the effort through
workshops. These workshops provide an opportunity for the Council to provide meaningful input
as well as the public.
It is not intended to say that previous Capital Improvement Plans were done incorrectly. This
new process is part of an overall effort by the City to become more transparent in our operations
and decision making.
DRAFT 3 41
Capital Improvement Plan
The City of Boulder City’s Capital Improvement Plan (“CIP”) establishes, prioritizes, and plans
funding for projects to improve existing and develop new infrastructure and facilities. A CIP
promotes better use of the City’s limited financial resources, reduces costs, and assist in the
coordination of public and private development. The City’s CIP is a five-year roadmap, which
identifies the major expenses over and above routine annual operating expenses. While the
CIP serves as a long-range plan, it is reviewed and revised annually. Priorities may be changed
due to funding opportunities or circumstances that cause a more rapid deterioration of an asset.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
There usually is not enough money available to do all of the proposed projects, so the CIP also
serves to inform citizens of the infrastructure needs that are not currently being met. The first
year’s projects in a CIP become that year’s Capital Budget. In some cities, the Capital Budget is
approved and published separately from the Operating Budget. In other cities, including Boulder
City, the Capital Budget is developed separately from the Operating Budget but incorporated
into the Operating Budget, showing all of the capital and operating expenses combined.
As a basic tool to document anticipated capital projects, the CIP includes “unfunded” projects
which have been identified, but specific solutions and funding have not necessarily been
determined.
A CIP can be a very dynamic document. In Boulder City, the CIP is revised every year. When
new priorities come up, and new needs arise, a project that may not have appeared at all in
a previous CIP could suddenly become the highest priority in the next year’s CIP. Thus, it is
important for the reader to understand that the City Council is not committing funding for any
projects beyond the first year.
Projects scheduled in the four years after 2020 are included in the CIP to show what the
Council’s priorities are at the present time. Barring unforeseen circumstances or events, this
plan shows what the Council would like to accomplish from 2020 through 2025. The list of
projects will change from year to year, and the FY21 five-year plan may have different priorities.
Capital outlays differ from annual operating expenses. They are typically large in size and
irregular in frequency and involve the construction of assets that last for decades. The effects
of major capital decisions tend to be longer lasting than annual operating and maintenance
decisions and require somewhat different planning and budgeting methods.
The Process
The CIP is the result of an ongoing infrastructure
planning process. The CIP incorporates information and
analysis from our Strategic Asset Management Plan to
identify those city facilities and infrastructure that are in
need of improvement, upgrades or expansion.
4 DRAFT 42
The Process (continued)
The CIP incorporates information and analyses gathered and incorporated into the Boulder
City Asset Management Program and other planning efforts. Projects are developed using
the guiding principles described in the asset management program’s Rehabilitation and
Replacement Forecast Model, risk prioritization models, and numerous other planning tools.
These projects are then prioritized using a CIP Prioritization Model.
ASSUMPTIONS
DRAFT 5 43
Funding
FUNDING MECHANISMS
CIP projects are paid using multiple resources maintained by the City or through grant funding
agreements. The fund(s) from which projects are financed depends on the type of project, each
funds’ financial condition, and each funds’ source of revenues. For example, construction of a
new taxiway at the City’s Municipal Airport would primarily be paid for by the Federal Aviation
Administration, with a small portion paid directly from the Airport’s Enterprise Fund.
A summary of all projects that are scheduled to be funded as well as a schedule of all unfunded
projects is included in the Projects for FY20-24 section of this document.
6 DRAFT 44
$33,900,500
FUNDING
Other Funding Sources ( Total all other funding sources: $14,830,500)
The list below covers all remaining funding sources for the FY20 CIP Project List. These 14 funding
sources provide 43% of the funding for the FY20 CIP Project List. The funding sources are listed in
alphabetical order on the following pages:
DRAFT 7 45
Capital Improvement Fund ($4,490,000)
The Capital Improvement Fund obtains its revenues from land sale proceeds (100%) and lease
revenues (20%). All expenditures from the Capital Improvement Fund must be approved by the
voters.
Voters have authorized the following expenditures from the Capital Improvement Fund for capi-
tal projects:
• 2015 – up to $1M per year for maintaining and improving City facilities and infrastructure
• 2014 – land sale on the southeast corner of Bristlecone Drive and Adams Boulevard (known
as Tract 349, more recently named “Boulder Hills Estates”) with proceeds to be used for
repairs and improvements to the City’s utility infrastructure.
• 2014 – up to $500K annually for seven (7) years for City utility infrastructure needs
• 2010 – voters approved the land sale of approximately 45 acres of City-owned land known
as Tract 350, located adjacent to and east of the Boulder Creek Golf Club for residential
development and commercial development with the proceeds to be used as follows:
• 10% for public safety capital needs
• Remaining proceeds to be used to pay other capital debt obligations of the City
Cemetery ($50,000)
A restricted funding source, the Cemetery fund covers administration, operating, construction,
and maintenance to the Municipal Cemetery.
8 DRAFT 46
RDA Long-Term Utility Capital Improvement Fund ($0)
A restricted funding source, the Long-Term Utility Capital Improvement fund was created to aid
in the improvement of public utilities that serve the RDA Plan Area. The fund receives annual
allocations by the RDA Board each budget year for an application to eligible projects as may be
identified from time to time.
$14,830,500
FUNDING
DRAFT 9 47
Project Selection Criteria
What is the general philosophy behind the funding decisions?
For most projects, the City follows a pay-as-you-go philosophy. If the money is not available in
current receipts and fund balance to pay for a proposed project, then the project is not done.
The largest projects – such as a new community swimming pool - tend to be funded via a
combination of available fund balance and debt.
Other Factors
There are instances where a project was ranked high in total points but not funded. Reasons for
not funding a project can include: Insufficient funding in the foreseeable future and project cannot
be phased, other projects must be completed prior to this project being funded, site for project not
yet identified, or may be ranked high locally but funding agency has higher priorities.
Example: The replacement swimming pool complex site has not yet been identified. As it *may*
be located on the site of the current pool, it affects other projects at that same site (the replace-
ment bathroom and new tennis courts). If the pool is located at a different site, the bathroom
project can move forward but the tennis court project is no longer necessary.
10 DRAFT 48
Planned Projects for CIP FY20 - 24
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
Airport
AIR101 Taxiway “E” - new construction 4,165,000 531,850 3,633,150
By Funding Source
FAA Grant Funds 1,983,400 7,043,079
Street Projects
28 STREET101 Boulder City Parkway Complete Street Recon- 14,200,000 14,200,000
struction
22 STREET102 Sidewalk Hazard Evaluation and Repair 50,000 50,000
19 STREET103 School Zone Crosswalk Renovation 30,000 30,000
18 STREET104 Traffic Signal Update - Veterans@Adams 120,000 120,000
By Funding Source
Regional Transportation Commission (RTC) 16,230,000 2,400,000 3,900,000 1,400,000 2,000,000
Congestion Management (CMAQ) 120,000
General Fund 180,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Cemetery
7 CEM101 Equipment Storage Building - new construction 50,000 50,000
By Funding Source
Cemetery Fund 50,000
DRAFT 11 49
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
General City Facility Improvements
28 PW101 City Hall Improvements 1,000,000 1,000,000
17 PW102 Hemenway Watershed Phase IIB 200,000 200,000
15 PW103 HVAC and Other Equipment Replacements 484,000 140,000 170,000 174,000
15 PW104 Community/Convention Center 5,500,000 500,000 CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
14 PW105 City Shops Main Building Renovation 200,000 100,000 100,000
14 PW106 City Facility Parking Lot Renovations 800,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
14 PW107 Broadbent Park Irrigation Renovations 50,000 50,000
14 PW108 Hemenway Park Irrigation Renovations 50,000 50,000
13 PW109 Park Irrigation Renovations (Oasis & Wilbur) 100,000 100,000
12 PW110 ABC Park Building & Grounds Renovations 500,000 500,000
10 PW111 Safenest/PD Storage Building Demolition 100,000 100,000
7 PW112 City Shops Renovation and Expansion 4,000,000 100,000 DESIGN ONLY - CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
PROJECTS FOR FY20-24
By Funding Source
General Fund 470,000 1,090,000 754,000 300,000 360,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 1,000,000 500,000
Regional Flood Control 200,000
Parks & Recreation Facilities
24 PARK101 Pool Complex - New Construction 30,000,000 DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
22 PARK102 Veterans Prk Multi-purpose Field - new constr 183,000 55,000 128,000
21 PARK103 Field Light Replacement (Standard lights to 250,000 100,000 150,000
LED Field Grade Lights)
20 PARK104 Whalen Field Concession Building Phase 2 230,000 230,000
19 PARK105 ABC Park Gym Lighting Conversion (LED) 25,000 25,000
18 PARK106 Safety Surface Replacement 75,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
18 PARK107 Hemenway Park Expansion 150,000 150,000
17 PARK108 Broadbent Park Bathroom Demo/Replacement 370,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
12 DRAFT 50
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
12 PARK119 Pool Replaster 53,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
12 PARK120 Renovate Landscaping at Parks/Rec Main Bldg 100,000 100,000
12 PARK121 ABC Park - Tennis/BB Court Renovations 25,000 25,000
12 PARK122 Del Prado Park Renovations 250,000 250,000
12 PARK123 Hemenway Park Renovations 30,000 30,000
12 PARK124 Broadbent Park Renovations 25,000 25,000
11 PARK125 New Gymnasium Facility Divider 25,000 25,000
11 PARK126 Veterans Park Tennis Courts - New 400,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
11 PARK127 Safekey - New Building 1,575,000 DESIGN ONLY - CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED 75,000
10 PARK128 River Mountain Trailhead Renovations 250,000 250,000
9 PARK129 Parks/Rec Main Bldg Lobby Renovations 70,000 70,000
9 PARK130 Veterans Park - Gazebo Renovations 100,000 100,000
9 PARK131 ABC Park - New Gazebo and Park Improve- 100,000 100,000
By Funding Source
General Fund 962,500 577,000 575,000 470,000 680,000
Residential Construction Tax 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved
10 BCGC114 Golf Course Equipment Lease (2nd year of 3 280,000 140,000 140,000
year lease payment)
10 BCGC115 Golf Cart Lease 360,000 3rd Year Funded FY25 120,000 120,000
Category Total 2.660.000 470.000 355.000 800.000 545.000 120.000
By Funding Source
General Fund 470,000 140,000 800,000 145,000 120,000
BCGC Golf Surcharge Fund 145,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 00,000
DRAFT 13 51
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
Municipal Golf Course
23 MUNI101 Cottonwood Tree Removal and Tree 350,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000
Replacement
22 MUNI102 Irrigation System Design and Replacement 2,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000
By Funding Source
General Fund 85,000 1,530,000 500,000 70,000 270,000
Muni Golf Surcharge Fund 220,000 70,000 70,000 25,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 1,000,000 500,000 120,000
Fire Department
16 FIRE101 Replace Cardiac Monitors 150,000 150,000
16 FIRE102 Replace Auto Extraction Equiopment 50,000 50,000
15 FIRE103 Purchase Off-Road Fire Fighting Apparatus 80,000 80,000
14 FIRE104 New Multipurpose Public Safety Facility 5,000,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
By Funding Source
General Fund 50,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 230,000
Grant
Police Department
17 POLICE101 Emergency Command Vehicle Improvements 75,000 75,000
13 POLICE102 Command Staff Vehicle ICS Communications 60,000 60,000
12 POLICE103 Employee Secure Parking at Smith Building 100,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
11 POLICE104 Smith Building Conversion to Police HQ 1,875,000 250,000 PARTIAL FUNDING 230,000 1,000,000
11 POLICE105 Dispatch Upgrade - Software 58,000 58,000
11 POLICE106 Video Security for City Facilities 400,000 150,000 150,000 100,000
By Funding Source
General Fund 458,000 253,000 100,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 32,000 230,000 1,000,000
Grant
14 DRAFT 52
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
Municipal Court
18 COURT101 Secure Parking and Electric Gates behind 80,000 80,000
Courthouse for Judge and Employees
Category Total 80,000 80,000
By Funding Source
Court Administrative Levy Fund 80,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved
Grant
By Funding Source
Electric Fund 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,750,000 5,600,000 5,300,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 1,590,000 1,900,000 2,000,000 100,000
RDA - Utility Capital Reserve Fund
DRAFT 15 53
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
Utilities - Water Division
19 WATER101 Commercial Large Meter/Vault/Backflow 500,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Replacements
18 WATER102 Install PRV at Airport and bottom of Georgia 250,000 250,000
17 WATER103 Private Cross-Connection Control Program 600,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
13 WATER104 Water Main Replacement Program 2,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
13 WATER105 Rebuild Pressure Reducing Valve Stations 200,000 100,000 100,000
13 WATER106 Copper Service Replacement Project 800,000 400,000 400,000
11 WATER107 Water Line to Eldorado Valley 13,000,000 PROJECT NOT FUNDED
10 WATER108 Eldroado Valley Waterline PRV Design 250,000 250,000
8 WATER109 Access and Security Improvements at Reser- 50,000 50,000
voirs
8 WATER110 Reservoir Valve and Piping Improvements 400,000 100,000 300,000
8 WATER111 PRV on “A” Line to service National Park Svc 250,000 250,000
PROJECTS FOR FY20-24
7 WATER112 Retaining Wall at West Tank 250,000 40,000 CONSTRUCTION NOT FUNDED
By Funding Source
Water Fund 40,000 400,000 500,000 800,000 1,350,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 1,500,000 950,000 300,000
RDA - Utility Capital Reserve Fund
By Funding Source
Sewer Fund 400,000 2,700,000 840,000 1,220,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 400,000 300,000 475,000
RDA Utility Capital Reserve Fund
16 DRAFT 54
Score Project ID Project Project FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24
Cost
Utilities - Landfill Division
12 LAND001 Landfill Expansion Phasing Plan 60,000 60,000
12 LAND002 Perimeter Fencing and Maintenance Road 1,000,000 160,000 300,000 NOT FULLY FUNDED
Design
Category Total 1,060,000 220,000 300,000
By Funding Source
Landfill Fund 160,000
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 60,000 300,000
RDA - Utility Capital Reserve Fund
By Funding Source
Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Fund 1,535,000 1,157,000 1,681,000 1,172,000 1,179,000
General Fund
Capital Improvement Fund - Voter Approved 248,000 265,000
UNFUNDED
AMOUNT:
$96,366,420
DRAFT 17 55
Several Key Projects
The following are several (but not all) key projects slated for Fiscal Year 2020.
Recent changes in Federal Law governing school zone crosswalk markings require that Boulder
City renovate our crosswalk markings. The prior markings were installed as part of a pilot pro-
gram to evaluate the effectiveness of alternating markings. The federal government determined
that consistent markings are the best practice to improve safety of pedestrians and easier to see
by vehicles. This project is funded 100% through the City’s General Fund.
18 DRAFT 56
City Hall Customer Service Renovation
All City facilities are currently under review for possible improvements for employee safety and
customer service improvements. As the primary location for our customers to visit, City Hall is
likely to be the first of several locations to be renovated to be more customer friendly while also
improving employee safety.
KEY PROJECTS
City Utilities Improvements
A best practice for maintaing underground utilities is to reconstruct aging infrastructure concur-
rently with a street reconstruction project. For example, during FY19, the City reconstructed
Arizona Street, and as part of that project the City replaced the electrical and water mains and
where needed the service connections. The City will continue this best practice for the five year
plan.
DRAFT 19 57
58