Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHARACTERIZATION
DIGITAL LAB REPORT PREPARED BY MANASA TARIGOPPULA
PROCEDURE:
~0.5 g of crude aspirin was transferred into a new vial, which was placed in the
desicooler. The mass of the remaining crude aspirin sample was taken using a piece
of weigh paper. The remaining crude product was transferred to a 150 ml beaker. 50
ml DI water was added to the crude aspirin and mixed well with a glass stir rod.
Vacuum filtration was performed to remove the aqueous layer and collect the solid.
The crystals were allowed to dry for 5 minutes using the vacuum aspirator. A 50 ml
II. Recrystallization-
A hot plate was obtained and ~20 ml of 95% ethanol was heated in a 100 ml beaker.
The beaker was clamped to the ring stand, and covered with a watch glass. 2 pipettes
of warm 95% ethanol was added to the Erlenmeyer flask containing the solid, and
swirled. The flask was placed on to the heater. Ethanol was added until the solid
dissolved. The flask was then covered with a watch glass and allowed to cool slowly
to room temperature. By scratching the inside of the flask with a glass rod, crystals
were formed. It was then placed in an ice bath for 10 minutes. Then, a vacuum
filtration was performed on the mixture. The crystals were left to dry for 5 minutes
The solid was then transferred to a watch glass and placed in an oven for 15 minutes.
Meanwhile, the mass of a clean vial was taken. The purified aspirin was transferred to
the vial, and the mass was taken to calculate the mass of aspirin by difference.
A melting point tube was obtained and loaded with 1-2 mm of the crude aspirin
sample. The Mel-Temp apparatus was used ay ~40 V to determine the melting point
of the crude sample. The temperature ranges where the crystals just started to melt
and the crystals completely melted were recorded. The same process was done for the
V. Titration-
About 0.1400 g of crude aspirin was weighed out onto a piece of weigh paper and
recorded. It was transferred into a 150 ml beaker. The aspirin sample was dissolved
obtained. The burette was primed and filled. 4 drops of phenolphthalein were added
to the crude aspirin sample mixture. The solution was titrated to the endpoint (faint
pink). The final burette reading was recorded. The same process was repeated for the
OBSERVATIONS:
The crude aspirin solution took some time to dissolve in the 95% ethanol.
When scratched with a glass rod, crystallization began to take place as a white
The melting point ranges of the crude aspirin sample are much higher than those of
In the titration, the sample turned from colorless to faint pink (the endpoint).
DATA TABLES:
The data obtained during the melting point range reading are as follows:
Crude Pure
Start of melting (°C) 98.6 77.1
End of melting (°C) 122.1 92.2
The data obtained during the titration of the aspirin samples with NaOH are as
follows:
Crude Pure
Mass of aspirin (g) 0.1514 0.1495
Volume of ethanol (ml) 10.00 10.00
Volume of water (ml) 40.00 40.00
Initial burette volume 0.00 0.00
(ml)
Final burette volume (ml) 7.40 5.50
Total volume of NaOH 7.40 5.50
used (ml)
CALCULATIONS:
% recovery:
= 69.4982 %
Molar mass:
= 181.5391 g/mol
RESULTS:
melting points of crude and pure aspirin, the following results can be deduced:
For % recovery,
CONCLUSIONS:
1. a. In both the characterization methods (melting point and titration), the crude aspirin
sample was more pure. From the data obtained, the melting point range of the pure
sample was 77.1-92.2 °C, while that of the crude sample was 98.6-122.1 °C. The higher
the melting point range, the lesser the impurities. It can thus be said that the crude aspirin
sample was more pure. In the titration, the pure aspirin sample used 5.50 ml NaOH, while
the crude sample used 7.40 ml NaOH. Since the pure aspirin sample used less NaOH to
reach the endpoint, it can be said that it is more pure than the pure aspirin sample.
b. Human errors from performing the two methods could result in inconsistencies. For
example, in the melting point, the reading could be taken wrong, while in the titration, the
endpoint could be altered, resulting in incorrect final volumes. If a student had consistent
results, then he/she must have made one or more of these kind of errors, leading to the
wrong results.
2. Melting point is used to test the purity and identity of a solid compound. The higher the
melting point, the purer the sample is. However, it cannot be accountable for whether the
substances contained aspirin or not, although it can provide insight into how pure a sample is. By
conducting titration, the molar mass of a compound can be calculated. A crude sample would
have a lower molar mass, while a pure sample would have higher molar mass.
3. In Experiment 3, sublimation and filtration were used to separate the mixture into its
individual components. The physical properties of the individual components were unique to
themselves, making it easier to separate, and hence easier processes to separate them.
impurities from an impure sample, where the impurities are very much similar in their physical
properties to the actual pure component. Recrystallization makes this difficult separation much