Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a. Stating in a radio interview that a judge was ignorant of the g. Want of intention is not an excuse for the disrespectful language
law and he is studying mahjong rather than studying law. used. The counsel cannot claim that his words did not mean what
any reader must have understood them as meaning.
b. Arguing in motion for reconsideration that the lawyer who
filed it was a big name “Claro M. Recto”. h. The subsequent deletion of the paragraph containing the
disrespectful language, made through an amendment, does not
c. Pleadings that uses offensive and intemperate language as a erase the fact that is has been made. Thus, it cannot be a defense
means of harassing judges whose decisions unfavorable to in a charge of indirect contempt.
them.
i. Lawyers facing direct contempt may not be allowed to retire
A. Forms of Disrespect to the Court: from practice of law bec. it would negate the power to punish
him for contempt.
1. Disregard from the court orders is disrespect to the court; Differences of Direct and Indirect Contempt:
examples:
Indirect or constructive contempt:
a. Failure to file a reply as ordered by the SC is sanctionable. a. The contemnor may be punished only “after the charge in
writing has been filed, and an opportunity has been given to the
b. Disobeying a TRO issued by the CA. accused to be heard by himself or counsel.”
- Court orders however erroneous they may be, must be
respected especially by lawyers who are by themselves officers b. It is appealable.
of the courts because of the respect and consideration that
should be extended to the judicial branch of the gov’t. Direct contempt:
a. The respondent may be summarily adjudged in contempt.
2. Harassment of judges is also disrespect to the Court. b. Only judgments of contempt by MTCs, MCTCs and MeTCs are
The filing of baseless and frivolous administrative appealable.
complaints against judges is a clear harassment to exact
vengeance for rendering adverse judgments. A counsel can also Using contemptuous language in pleadings directed against a
be held to account for assisting a client in filing an utterly particular judge but presented in another court or proceeding
unmeritorious administrative complaint against a judge because constitutes indirect contempt. But if said pleading is submitted before
it is a form of harassment and an attempt to unduly influence the same judge, it would be direct contempt.
the course of the appeal.
Rules on Contempt under Rule 71 of the Rules of
3. Unexplained failure to appear at scheduled hearing is Court:
disrespect and an indirect contempt:
A lawyer without any explanation or justification A. Any person may be punished for Direct contempt if the
shows disrespect and degrading the administration of justice. person is guilty of misbehavior in the presence of or so near a
The lawyer must apologize for his non- appearance in court. court as to obstruct or interrupt in the proceedings before the
Even if the petition become moot and academic, the counsel same, including:
must still appear at the hearing. It is indirect contempt bec. of
disobedience or resistance to a lawful write, order, judgment or - disrespect toward the court,
command by the court. - offensive personalities toward others,
B. Remedies in case of a biased and prejudiced judge: - or refusal to be sworn or to answer as a witness,
The bias and prejudice of a trial judge is a valid reason - or to subscribe an affidavit or deposition when
for voluntary inhibition of the judge under Rule 137, Sec. 1 lawfully required to do so.
(par2). Mere suspicion that a
PENALTY:
judge is partial is not enough, there must be clear and convincing
evidence to prove the charge. Contempt committed against:
C. Power of Contempt by the Court: RTC/CA/SC: Fine not exceeding 2,000 pesos or imprisonment
not exceeding 10 days or both.
a. The power of contempt should be exercised on the preservative
to uphold respect due to it and not on the vindictive principle. Lower court: fine not exceeding or imprisonment not exceeding
1 day or both.
not an excuse that his tardiness was caused by matters which could
B. Any person may be punished for Indirect Contempt in any of reasonably be foreseen or anticipated such as traffic/breakdown of his
the following acts (SEC. 3): vehicle.
a. Misbehavior of an officer of a court in the performance of Rule 11.03 - A lawyer shall abstain from scandalous, offensive or
his duties. menacing language or behavior before the Courts.
b. Disobedience or resistance to a lawful order.
c. Any abuse of or any unlawful interference with the Illustration of violation of the rule both written and oral language:
proceedings of a court.
a. Using the terms “abhorrent nullity”, “legal Monstrosity”, “horrible
d. Any improper conduct which tends directly or indirectly error”
to impede, obstruct, or degrade the administration of b. Stating in his brief that “Judge Maliwanag is not wearing his brief
justice. while in his chamber during office hours.”
e. Assuming to be an attorney or an officer of a court and If the disagreement between the counsel and the judge has
acting as such without authority. degenerated into a personal clash, the use of the contempt power may
no longer be in the preservative but already in the vindictive sense. If
f. Failure to obey a subpoena duly served. this happens, the contempt citation would be improper or that
punishment should be revised.
g. The rescue or attempted rescue of a person or property in
custody of an officer by virtue of an order of the court Rule 11.04 - A lawyer shall not attribute to a Judge motives not
held by him. supported by the record or have no materiality to the case.
NOTE: Nothing in the section shall be construed as to prevent Duty not to attribute unfounded ill-motives to a judge:
the court from issuing process to bring the respondent into
court, or from holding him in custody pending such It is the right of the lawyer also as a citizen to criticize
proceedings. in properly respectful terms and through legitimate channels the
acts if courts and judges.
How to commence proceedings:
Illustration of violation of the rule:
1. May be initiated by the court against which the contempt
was committed by an order or formal charge requiring the a. An allegation by a counsel that the proceedings before the
respondent to show cause why he should not be punished trial court were “irregular” and that the so called
for contempt. irregularities “show the accused control over the court and
court procedure”.
2. Commenced by a verified petition with supporting
particulars and documents to support the petition. b. Stating in pleading: “The Decision of the Court is like a brief
for Ayala” and “The court jeopardized its campaign against
Where to File: where the charge for indirect contempt has been graft and corruption.”
committed against a:
Rule 11.05 - A lawyer shall submit grievances against a Judge to
a. RTC/court of equivalent/higher Court should be charged/filed the proper authorities only.
with such court.
Grievance Mechanism:
b. If in lower court should be filed in RTC
a. All grievances against judges must be presented before the
Hearing: respondent may be released from custody upon filing of the SC as the disciplining authority over all judges.
bond.
b. It must be shown beyond doubt that the judgment is unjust
PENALTY: as it is contrary to law or is not supported by evidence, and
the same was made with conscious and deliberate intent to
Contempt committed against: RTC/CA/SC: fine not exceeding 30,000 do an injustice.
pesos or imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or both. Elements of inexcusable negligence in rendering an unjust
Lower court: fine not exceeding 5,000 pesos or imprisonment not judgment:
exceeding 1 month or both.
Judge failed to observe in his performance of his
Rule 11.01 - A lawyer shall appear in court properly attired. duty, that diligence, prudence, and care which the law is
entitled to exact in the rendering of public service.
Proper attire for:
Male - Barong Tagalog or suit with tie. Jurisdiction of the Ombudsman over Judges:
Female – appropriate business attire. The Ombudsman is duty- bound to have all cases
But generally, the proper attire would be the contemporary business against judges and court personnel filed before it referred to the
suit. SC for determination of whether an administrative aspect is
involved in accordance with Art. VIII Sec. 6 of Constitution. In
- A lawyer not wearing proper attire in court may be held in the meantime that the administrative matter is pending before
contempt of court and ordered to leave the court and return the SC, the Ombudsman must defer action on the criminal
properly attired. complaint against the judge or court personnel.
Rule 11.02 - A lawyer shall punctually appear at court hearings. CANON 12 - A LAWYER SHALL EXERT EVERY EFFORT AND
CONSIDER IT HIS DUTY TO ASSIST IN THE SPEEDY AND
Punctuality is demanded by the respect which a lawyer owes EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
to the court, the opposing counsel and to all the parties to the case. It is
Duty to Assist in the Speedy and Efficient Administration of Justice: Illustration:
Lawyers should not forget that they are, first and foremost, Filing an action for the annulment if the sale and the recovery of
officers of the court, bound to exert every effort to assist in the speedy property allegedly inherited from the deceased will not prosper where
and efficient administration of justice. This duty is not only of the the same property and the same claim are pending adjudication in a
lawyer but also of the judge separate proceeding for the settlement of the estate of the deceased
Rule 12.06 - A lawyer shall not knowingly assist a witness to Duty of non-fraternization with judges:
misrepresent himself or to impersonate another. A lawyer’s treatment of judges must not be with the
end in view of cultivating closeness which can be converted later
Duty not to Present a False Witness on to seek favors from the judge.
Dealing with corrupt witnesses: when the judge is Being a former law school classmate, being a
convinced that the witness makes false statements, he may neighbor/fraternity brother, both lawyer and the judge must be
immediately order that the witness be prosecuted for perjury. aware and conscious as to where such friendship must end.
When it comes to matters pending in the judicial
Rule 12.07 A lawyer shall not abuse, browbeat or harass a witness nor docket, the lawyer and the judge must keep a professional
needlessly inconvenience him. distance and affinity must be kept respectful.
Duty to Respect Witness: Rule 13.02 - A lawyer shall not make public statements in the
Because a witness is not an antagonistic party, so he/she media regarding a pending case tending to arouse public
should be respected and treated with politeness and courtesy opinion for or against a party.
Duty not to resort to the Bar of Public Opinion during the pendency
Rule 12.08 A lawyer shall avoid testifying in behalf of his client, of a case:
except: However, it should be recognized that certain statements
(a) on formal matters, such as the mailing, authentication or custody may be generally permitted, such as a statement on the general nature
of an instrument, and the like; or of a claim or defense in a pending case.
(b) on substantial matters, in cases where his testimony is essential to Illustration of violation of the rule:
the ends of justice, in which event he must, during his testimony, a. Publication in a newspaper with the title, “Senior prosecutor
entrust the trial of the case to another counsel. lambasts Surigao judge for allowing murder to bail out.”
Duty not to be a Witness and Counsel at the Same Time: Sub- Judice defined:
If a lawyer is both counsel and witness, he becomes more - Refers to matters under or before a judge or court; under judicial
easily impeachable for interest and thus may be a less effective consideration.
witness. The public will be inclined to believe that a lawyer’s - Part of the law relating to contempt to the court.
testimony is altered to serve the client’s interest. He is an ineffective
position or arguing his own credibility. The roles of an advocate and a Basis/purpose of the Sub- Judice rule:
witness are inconsistent.
The courts must be allowed to deal with the legal issues
that are before it free from undue interference and influences by
Rationale of the rule: others making public statements about how these issues should be
1. It’s designed to protect the integrity of the advocate’s dealt with. It also protects the witnesses because public statements
professional role by preserving the distinction between advocacy, may change relevant facts of what he witnessed.
which is based on reason and subject to objective evaluation, and
testimony, which is based on the witness’ moral qualities and is How it is violated?
evaluated in terms of individual credibility. It is violated by public statements that risk prejudging matters or causing
2. It is corollary to the rule that an advocate may not inject prejudice. It includes statements urging the court to reach a particular result
personal belief as to the cause into argument to the judge. in a matter, comments of the strength or weakness of a party’s case or
In other words, it eliminates the opportunity to mix particular issue, or comments on witnesses or evidence in the case.
argument and fact.
Application: letting the media, politics or other concerns sway their decisions,
It applies where court proceedings are ongoing, and through and without fearing penalty in their careers for their decisions.
all stages of appeal until the matter is completed. It also applies where
the court proceedings are merely imminent. CANON 14 – A lawyer shall not refuse his services to the needy.
The rule applies to lawyers, as well as to the public and
public officials including legislators.
Rule 14.01 – A lawyer shall not decline to represent a person solely on
Penalty: account of the latter's race, sex. creed or status of life, or because of his
Making public statements in the media regarding a pending own opinion regarding the guilt of said person.
case which tends to arouse public opinion for or against a party may
also constitute indirect contempt under Sec. 3 (c-d) Rule 71 of the
Rule 14.02 – A lawyer shall not decline, except for serious and
Rules of Court.
sufficient cause, an appointment as counsel de officio or as amicus curiae,
Exception to the rule: fair and accurate reporting is allowed of the or a request from the Integrated Bar of the Philippines or any of its
factual content of ongoing judicial proceedings by the media, as long chapters for rendition of free legal aid.
as the report does not usurp the court’s role by prejudging the case or
its legal issues.
Counsel de Oficio (CDO): A lawyer appointed by the Court to counsel
How does prejudice form in violation of sub-judice rule? If an accused. One can be a CDO if he’s a member of the bar in good
judges and witnesses are exposed to the media materials that are not standing who can competently defend the accused.
part of the evidence presented or argued in the trial, judges and the
witnesses will be hindered from impartiality and objectivity which In localities where no bar member is available: Court may appoint
cause prejudice. Freedom of expression as well as freedom of the media any person, resident of the province and of good repute for ability to
to report should be limited since these freedoms should not take defend the accused.
precedence over the proper administration of justice.
General rule: A lawyer can’t decline being appointed as CDO.
Ex. of violation of sub- judice rule: Exception: a serious and sufficient cause, like the 1) lawyer cannot
a. public discussion of a prior criminal record which is competently handle the case or 2) there’s conflict of interest.
not relevant to the present charge against him;
b. on-screen admissions of guilt by the accused. Court’s duty to appoint a CDO is NOT mandatory when: the accused
has proceeded with the arraignment and the trial with a his chosen
Open- Justice principle: counsel (CDP), but during presentation of evidence, he appears by
Refers to the public right to scrutinize and criticize himself alone because of the inexcusable absence of his counsel.
courts and court proceedings.
Purpose: to prevent idiosyncrasy or judicial arbitrariness and The court can appoint a CDO during (or in the middle of) the
maintain public confidence in the administration of justice. Also, trial: If an accused’s CDP deliberately makes himself
it has been just as fundamental to a democratic society of incompetent, the Court can appoint a CDO to enable the trial to
freedom of speech. proceed until CDP finally appears.
Reason: because otherwise, the pace of the criminal prosecution
Post- litigation criticisms: will be entirely dictated by the accused to the detriment of the
resolution of the case.
It is the duty of a lawyer to criticize and expose the
shortcomings and indiscretions of courts and judges by
criticizing concluded litigations because then the court’s The need for this appointment arises when an accused is
actuations are thrown open to public consumption and penniless and a lawyer’s services as counsel to the former are
discussion. necessary to secure the ends of justice and to protect the rights of
the party
People who may avail of this legal service: A poor accused
Illustrations of disrespectful post- litigation criticisms:
who’s unable to employ an atty; Only indigents may avail of
a. A lawyer describing a ruling as a “absolutely services of PAO (Note: a CDO is not automatically a PAO lawyer.
erroneous and constituting an outrage to the rights of Remember, CDO may come from private sector)
the petitioner Mickey Celles and a mockery to popular A CDO gets paid but NOT by indigent client; he may get
will.” compensation from the Court subject to availability of funds.
b. A lawyer stating through a local newspaper, (Rules of Court, Sec 32, Rule 138)
“the only remedy to put an end to so much evil, is to A CDO is not exempt from any liability in case he messes.
change the members of the SC.” He’s equally liable as any paid lawyer.
Rule 13.03 - A lawyer shall not brook or invite interference by Distinguish Counsel de oficio (CDO) from Counsel de parte
another branch or agency of the government in the normal (CDP):
CDO is a court appointed lawyer;
course of judicial proceedings.
CDP is the lawyer of the party’s own choice
Judicial Independence defined:
- It is the doctrine that decisions of the judiciary should be The right to secure CDP’s services is not absolute: (It’s actually
impartial and not subject to influence from the other branches of more like a privilege than a right... but whichever, it’s not absolute).
a gov’t or from private or political interests. Reason: The Court should balance the privilege to retain a
counsel of choice against the state and offended party’s equally
Two types of Judicial Independence: important right to speedy and adequate justice (so it’s party’s
privilege vs. State’s right).
1. Institutional independence – means the judicial branch is
independent from the executive and legislative branches.
2. Decisional independence – is the idea that judges should be able The Court can restrict the accused’s option to retain a CDP
to decide cases solely based on the law and the facts without under the ff. circumstances:
- When an accused insists on an atty he can’t afford; - asking the necessary questions regarding the facts and
- When he chooses someone who’s not a member of the bar personalities involved in the case.
When the personally chosen lawyer declines (for a valid reason) ...and
similar others... The right to a CDP is waivable under the ff Rule 15.02 - A lawyer shall be bound by the rule on privilege
conditions: communication in respect of matters disclosed to him by a
- Waiver isn’t contrary to law, public order, public prospective client.
policy, morals, or good customs OR prejudicial to a 3rd person
with a right recognized by law
- Waiver is unequivocally, knowingly, and intelligently made Rule 15.03 - A lawyer shall not represent conflicting interests
except by written consent of all concerned given after a full
disclosure of the facts.
Amicus Curiae: “friend of the court” a person with strong interest on
the subject matter of an action. He can be a private person or someone Rule on conflict of interests:
from the government.
1. Prohibits the lawyer from representing new clients whose
interests oppose those of a former client in any manner,
An amicus curiae becomes a friend of the court when: whether or not they are parties in the same action or in
1. He files a petition with the court for permission to file a brief, totally unrelated cases.
apparently on behalf of a party but actually to suggest a rationale 2. Good faith and honest intention does not negate the
consistent with its own views. His briefs are commonly filed in prohibition.
appeals concerning matters of public interest. 3. To be guilty of representing conflict of interests, a counsel
2. Court invites him to help in the disposition of issues submitted to of record of one party need not also be of counsel of record
it. of the adverse party. He does not have to publicly hold
himself as the counsel of the adverse party, nor make his
Rule 14.03 A lawyer may not refuse to accept representation of an efforts to advance the adverse party’s conflict of interests of
indigent client if: record- although these circumstances are the most obvious
(a) he is not in a position to carry out the work effectively or and satisfactory proof of the charge.
competently; The duration of time that has elapsed is immaterial in
(b) he labors under a conflict of interest between him and the determining conflict of interests. So whether the relationship with
prospective client or between a present client and the prospective the client terminated 8yrs before the creation of new client that
client. has adverse of interest with the first client, there still has conflict
of interest.
5. Termination of previous engagement is not a ground to disregard
Indigent party: one who has no money or property sufficient and
the prohibition on conflict of interest because the client’s
available for food, shelter and basic necessities for himself and his
confidence once reposed cannot be divested by the expiration of
family; the Court designates one as such upon ex parte application and
the professional employment.
hearing (to prove that he really is indigent)
An indigent party is entitled to/exempt from: 6. The absence of any other lawyer in town is not an excuse to
accept cases that has conflict of interest.
- Docket and other lawful fees (but they create a lien on the
judgment that will be rendered, unless the court provides 7. Conflict of interests is not limited to litigation cases but can also
otherwise) transcripts of stenographic notes. rise from financial dealings.
Rule 14.04: A lawyer who accepts the cause of a person unable to pay A lawyer is forbidden to do either of two things after severing his
relationship with a former client:
his professional fees shall observe the same standard of conduct
governing his relations with paying clients.
1. He may not do anything injuriously affect his former client in
__________________________________________ any matter in which he formerly represented him;
2. Nor he may at any time use against his former client
knowledge/information acquired by virtue of the previous
CANON 15 - A LAWYER SHALL OBSERVE CANDOR, relationship.
FAIRNESS AND LOYALTY IN ALL HIS DEALINGS AND
TRANSACTIONS WITH HIS CLIENTS.
Rationale for the prohibition on conflict of interests:
Duty of candor to his client – a lawyer is not barred from 1. The relations of atty. and client are founded on principles of
commercially dealing with his client but the business public policy, on good taste.
transactions must be characterized with utmost honesty and
2. To avoid treachery and double- dealing so that clients be
good faith.
encouraged to trust their secrets to their attorneys.
General rule on transparency in the identity of the CANON 18 - A LAWYER SHALL SERVE HIS
client: as a matter of public policy, a lawyer may not CLIENT WITH COMPETENCE AND
invoke the communication privilege and refuse to DILIGENCE.
divulge the name or identity of his client because:
- The court has the right to know that the client whose Diligence with that norm of practice expected of
privileged information is sought to be protected is men of good intentions (as the practice of law does
flesh and blood. not require extraordinary diligence)
- The privilege exists only after the atty-client
relationship has been established. Entry and Authority of Appearance:
- Privilege generally pertains to the subject matter of A lawyer is presumed to be properly
the relationship. authorized to represent any cause in which he
- Due process require that the opposing party should appears (and no written power of attorney is
know his adversary. required for this authority)
Formal entry of appearance is no longer
Exceptions to the general rule: Info relating to the required so an appearance may be made by simply
identity of the client may fall within the ambit of the filing a normal motion, plea, or answer.
- a law firm’s main and branch offices comprise
privilege when the client’s name itself has an
a single law firm
independent significance, such as disclosure would then
reveal client’s confidences. - death of handling lawyer does not extinguish
lawyer-client relationship
Purchase of the client’s property by the lawyer under - When relationship is with a law firm, death of
Article 1491 of the Civil Code: the handling lawyer does not terminate lawyer-
client relationship between the client and law firm;
so the lawyers in the firm, to not be held liable for
Under 1491 of the Civil Code, lawyers are
negligence, should either re-assign the case or
prohibited from acquiring either by purchase or
withdraw from it.
assignment the property or rights involved which are
the objects of the litigation in which they intervene by - Accountability of a supervising lawyer for an
virtue of their profession. associate lawyer’s misconduct - well, he’ll just be
asked to explain.
manner that the lawyer is utilizing to defend his
Does the lawyer’s negligence bind his client? interests
General Rule: Yes. XCPN: negligence amounts to
deprivation of due process for the client of results
to serious injustice CANON 19 - A LAWYER SHALL REPRESENT
HIS CLIENT WITH ZEAL WITHIN THE
BOUNDS OF THE LAW.
Rule 18.01: A lawyer shall not undertake a legal service
which he knows or should know that he is not qualified It is the duty of a lawyer to serve only within
to render. However, he may render such service if, with the bounds of law, fair and honest and for lawful
the consent of his client, he can obtain as collaborating objectives.
counsel a lawyer who is competent on the matter.
He must give a candid and honest opinion on
Because the legal practice is an expansive and wide
the merits and probable of the client’s case with
field, it can’t be expected that a lawyer specialize in all
the end in view of promoting respect for the law
and in every field of law. If a lawyer engages in a and for legal processes, and counsel or maintain
practice of law in which he is not familiar, he will be such actions or proceedings which appear to him
rendering an inferior service to the detriment of the as just and such defenses only as he believes to be
client and to this professional embarrassment honestly debatable under the law.
Rule 19.03 - A lawyer shall not allow his client to dictate Written agreement on fees is generally
the procedure in handling the case. binding, but if client is ignorant and uneducated,
such written agreement may not be persuasive
and the compensation should be made on the basis
- Lawyers have the exclusive management of the of quantum merit.
procedural aspect of the litigation including the
enforcement of the rights and remedies of their client. Unless expressly stipulated, payment of
lawyer’s fees is not gratuitous (as it’s based on the
law of contract: I do and you give)
- Even over the objection of the client, a lawyer can
present or refuse to present certain witnesses. A lawyer may require advance payment of his
fees, but he shall return the excess.
- Mistakes of counsel as to the relevancy or A lawyer may accept property in payment such as
irrelevancy of certain evidence or mistakes in the proper ownership interest in an enterprise.
defense, in the introduction of certain evidence, or in
argumentation are, among all mistakes and procedure Is the imposition of interest in the payment of
and they bind the clients. atty’s fees in a contract allowed? Yes, if it’s
reasonable. Otherwise, the court will ignore such
agreement (for the court to ignore the agreement, it
CANON 20 - A LAWYER SHALL CHARGE ONLY must be shown that it’s contrary to morality or
FAIR AND REASONABLE FEES. public policy)
Mere demand for delivery of the litigated property does not Fixed fee basis: Combination arrangement
cause the transfer of ownership, thus, not a prohibited
transaction. Lawyer may ask for “deposits” which would
cover the necessary expenses and costs
CHAMPERTY: “buying into someone else’s lawsuit”, An executor or administrator of an estate may
it’s the arrangement in which a 3rd party (or even the not charge against the estate any professional
litigation lawyer) supports another’s litigation in exchange fee for legal services as such are already paid
for a share of the proceeds, if there are any. If there are none, for in his capacity as executor or administrator
the party litigant would not have to pay the person or
entity which financed the litigation. Any amount General elements to be considered in fixing a
advanced would not have to be returned. reasonable compensation/L
- Importance of the subject matter/controversy
Champerty is prohibited on the ground of public policy,
- Extent of the services rendered
it violates the fiduciary relationship between the lawyer
and his client. It’s also a form of maintenance - Professional standing of the lawyer
(intermeddling of an uninterested party, in short, epal).
Rule 20.02 A lawyer shall, in case of referral, with the
consent of the client, be entitled to a division of fees in
For the party litigant, it’s an issue of litigation financing proportion to the work performed and responsibility
(when he has no financial means to pursue litigation).
assumed.
Lawyer’s contingency fee (payment conditional upon
Duty to Divide Fees in Proportion to Work Done
success) is an exception to this prohibition.
- Applicable in instances where legal work would
have to be shared between two or more lawyers
CHAMPERTOUS CONTRACTS: an agreement
between a third person and a party litigant or a - In this case, fees would have to be shared between
lawyer and his client wherein the third person with these lawyers proportionately (on the basis of the
respect to the party litigant or the lawyer with proportion of services they render or by agreement
between/among the lawyers) with the prior consent
respect to his client, supports the party litigant’s or
of the client
the client’s litigation in exchange for a share of the
proceeds emanating from the litigation, if there are - It doesn’t require disclosure to the client of the
any. lawyer’s share
SYNDICATED LAWSUITS. It’s a form of Lawyer Referral System: the purpose of this is to aid
champerty where the litigant sells his shares in his individuals who are able to pay fees but need assistance
lawsuit to investors. in locating lawyers competent to handle their particular
problems.
Rule 20.01 A lawyer shall not reveal the
confidences or secrets of his client except; Rule 20.03 A lawyer shall not, without the full
(a) When authorized by the client after acquainting knowledge and consent of the client, accept any fee,
him of the consequences of the disclosure; reward, costs, commission, interest, rebate or forwarding
(b) When required by law; allowance or other compensation whatsoever related to
his professional employment from anyone other than the
(c) When necessary to collect his fees or to defend
client.
himself, his employees or associates or by judicial
action.
Such a payment may be allowed provided it is
There are no fixed rules in the setting of with full knowledge and consent of the client and
attorney’s fees, that’s why they’re negotiable. subject to the condition that that lawyer reasonably
There can only be guidelines. believes that the client’s best interest will not be
adversely affected
Judge’s opinion as to the capacity of the lawyer
is not a basis of the right to a lawyer’s fees
Rule 20.04 A lawyer shall avoid controversies with
Manner of fixing the fees: clients concerning his compensation and shall resort to
judicial action only to prevent imposition, injustice or
Hourly fee basis: a lawyer keeps an accurate record
fraud.
of all the time he had spent on the case, indicating
the number of minutes spent in every activity
Duty to Avoid Disputes with Client Over Fees:
relating to the case. It’s usual to mark the time in
tenth-of-an-hour increments, meaning in chunks of
It’s preferable that agreement on fees between -Although there’s formal contract, the fees are
the client and lawyer be in writing (to avoid disputes) unconscionable or unreasonable
- Void contract
ASSUMPSIT: Latin for “he undertook, he promised”, - The counsel, for justifiable cause, was not
It’s a cause of action for unpaid work. Its basis is able to finish the case to its conclusion
common law so it’s not applicable in the Philippines. There is a hearing.
Concepts on attorney’s fees:
Ordinary sense: compensation paid by client RETAINING FEE: preliminary fee paid to ensure and
Extraordinary sense: awarded by the court to be paid by secure a lawyer’s future services, to remunerate him for
the losing party (this must be expressly stated in the being deprived, by being retained by one party, of the
decision) opportunity of rendering services to the other part and
of receiving pay from him.
CONTINGENT FEES: Arrangement where fees are
due only if the lawyer handles a case successfully. In the absence of an agreement to the contrary, the
Fees will come from the recovered amount in the retaining fee is neither made nor received in
case. If the case is unsuccessful, the client is under consideration of the services contemplated; it’s apart
no obligation to pay his lawyer. from what the client has agreed to pay for the
services which he has retained him to perform
Appropriateness of contingent fee arrangement: Absence of the stipulation of additional atty’s fees is
- The only practical means by which a litigant not a bar to the collection of additional atty’s fees
can afford to pay his lawyer.
- A successful prosecution produces a res out of 2 kinds of retainer fees:
which the fee can be paid 1. General retainer: the fee paid to a lawyer to secure
his future services as general counsel for
On Criminal cases: Public policy condemns this any ordinary legal problem that may arise in the
type of arrangement because these cases don’t routinary business of the client and referred to him
produce a res with which to pay the fee for legal action.
Reason for this is that the lawyer is deprived, by being
Reasonableness of contingent fees: It’s validity retained by one party, of the opportunity of rendering
depends on the reasonableness of the amount fixed services to the other part and of receiving pay from him.
as contingent fee under the circumstances of the - This fee is independent and different from the
case. compensation which the lawyer should receive in
payment for his services
Illustration:
- 50% contingency rate was not considered 2. Special retainer: fee for a specific case handled or
exorbitant where it was determined that the special service rendered by the lawyer for a client.
litigation was difficult
- 18% of the P214 million claim which amounts to Expiration of retainer agreement does not mean that
P38.5 million was found excessive as the lawyer lawyer is no longer entitled to attorney’s fees for
was only tasked to file only one memorandum and services rendered
his professional standing was “not such.” the dismissal of a counter-claim (for atty’s fees) does
not amount to res judicata
Retaining lien on client’s funds and documents Rights and obligations arising from the lawyer-client
(and property): Upon receipt of the funds relationship is not transmissible (therefore the
belonging to the client, the lawyer may collect any lawyer may not go against the heirs of his client of
lien which he as over them in connection with his payment of his professional fees). The fees constitute
legal services, provided he gives prompt notice to a charge against the client’s state.
his client. A lawyer is not entitled to unilaterally When a lawyer rendered legal services to the
appropriate his client’s for himself by the mere fact administrator or executor to assist him in the
that the client owes him atty’s fees. execution of his trust, his atty’s fees may be allowed
as administration expense. But the estate is not
QUANTUM MERUIT: “as much as he deserves”; directly liable for his fees, because they rest
the rule implies a promise to pay a reasonable primarily on the executor or administrator.
amount for the labor and materials furnished His remedy is: a) file an action against the
executor in his personal capacity; or b) file a
Fees based on quantum meruit is authorized when: petition in the intestate or testate proceedings
- There is no express contract for the payment
ACCEPTANCE FEE: It’s an absolute fee The nature of the lawyer- client relationship is
arrangement which entitles a lawyer to get paid for premised on the Roman Law concepts of “locatio
his efforts regardless of the outcome of the conductio operarum” (contract of lease of services)
litigation where one person lets his services and another hires
them without reference to the object of which the
services are to be performed, wherein lawyers’ services
CANON 21 - A LAWYER SHALL PRESERVE may be compensated by honorarium or for hire and
THE CONFIDENCE AND SECRETS OF HIS mandato (contarct of agency).
CLIENT EVEN AFTER THE ATTORNEY- In modern day, an attorney possesses special powers
CLIENT RELATION IS TERMINATED. of trust and confidence reposed on him by his client.
A lawyer is independent and his power his entirely
different from and superior to those of an ordinary
Rationale of lawyer- client confidentiality: agent.
To permit the attorney to reveal to others what is There are rules, ethical conduct and duties that
disclosed, would be not only a gross violation of a breathe life into it, among those, the fiduciary duty to
sacred trust upon his part, but it would utterly his client which is at very delicate, confidential character
destroy and prevent the usefulness and benefits requiring a very high degree pf fidelity and good faith.
derived from professional assistance.
Lawyer- client confidentiality extends as well to his Rules on creation of Lawyer- Client relationship:
employees and neither of them should accept
Written contract is not an essential element in the
employment, which involves or may involve the employment of an attorney, it could be expressed or
disclosure or use of these confidences either for the implied.
advantage of his client, without his knowledge and Personal relationship is irrelevant
consent, and even thought there are other available Payment of fees to the lawyer is irrelevant.
sources of information. Lawyer- client relationship is not terminated by a
trial court’s decisions on the case.
The announced intention of the client to commit
crime or fraud is not included within the (Self- explanatory rules of Canon 21):
confidence which he bound to respect.
Rule 21.02 - A lawyer shall not, to the disadvantage of
Rule 21.01 - A lawyer shall not reveal the
his client, use information acquired in the course of
confidences or secrets of his client except;
employment, nor shall he use the same to his own
advantage or that of a third person, unless the client
(a) When authorized by the client after acquainting with full knowledge of the circumstances consents
him of the consequences of the disclosure;
thereto.
(b) When required by law;
(c) When necessary to collect his fees or to defend Rule 21.03 - A lawyer shall not, without the written
himself, his employees or associates or by judicial consent of his client, give information from his files
action. to an outside agency seeking such information for
auditing, statistical, bookkeeping, accounting, data
processing, or any similar purpose.
Attorney- client privileged defined- in the law of
evidence, it is the client’s privilege to refuse to
disclose and to prevent any person from disclosing Rule 21.04 - A lawyer may disclose the affairs of a
confidential communication between him and his client of the firm to partners or associates thereof
attorney. unless prohibited by the client.
Factors to consider in creation of a Lawyer- Client
relationship: Rule 21.05 - A lawyer shall adopt such measures as
2. Where legal advice of any kind is sought from a may be required to prevent those whose services
professional legal adviser in his capacity as such, are utilized by him, from disclosing or using
3. the communications relating for that purpose, confidences or secrets of the clients.
4. made in confidence
5. by the client, Rule 21.06 - A lawyer shall avoid indiscreet
6. are at his instance permanently protected, conversation about a client's affairs even with
7. from disclosure by himself or by the legal members of his family.
advisor,
8. except the protection be waived. Rule 21.07 - A lawyer shall not reveal that he has
been consulted about a particular case except to
Nature of lawyer- client relationship: avoid possible conflict of interest.
CANON 22 - A LAWYER SHALL WITHDRAW Procedure for the Substitution of Attorneys. There
HIS SERVICES ONLY FOR GOOD CAUSE AND must be filed:
UPON NOTICE APPROPRIATE IN THE - Written application for such substitution
CIRCUMSTANCES. - Written consent of the client
- If the written consent can’t be obtained, there
must be filed with the application proof of
Duty to Withdraw Legal Services Only for Good
service of notice of such motion upon the atty to
Cause and Upon Notice
be substituted in the manner prescribed by the
rules
Rule 22.01 A lawyer may withdraw his services in
any of the following case: - If the foregoing is not complied with,
substitution will not be permitted.
(a) When the client pursues an illegal or immoral
course of conduct in connection with the matter he
is handling; Rule 22.02 A lawyer who withdraws or is discharged
shall, subject to a retainer lien, immediately turn over all
(b) When the client insists that the lawyer pursue
conduct violative of these canons and rules; papers and property to which the client is entitled, and
shall cooperative with his successor in the orderly
(c) When his inability to work with co-counsel will
transfer of the matter, including all information
not promote the best interest of the client;
necessary for the proper handling of the matter.
(d) When the mental or physical condition of the
lawyer renders it difficult for him to carry out the
employment effectively; Duty to Effect an Orderly Turn-Over after
(e) When the client deliberately fails to pay the fees Withdrawal or Discharge
for the services or fails to comply with the retainer
agreement; The discharge does not terminate the lawyer’s
(f) When the lawyer is elected or appointed to duty to protect the client’s interest.
public office; and
(g) Other similar cases. Lawyer’s right to retain papers: This right persists
This is a mandatory rule largely because no substitute procedures have been
These are the grounds where a lawyer may established to provide a lawyer with a prior
withdraw legal services secured claim for his fee.