Professional Documents
Culture Documents
finance model
It includes a modeling of the plant capacity and heat rate degradation, overhaul
cycle and plant operating hours, gross and net generation, distribution losses and net
sales, gross revenue (direct customers, sales to grid, sales to spot market), fuel
costs, variable and fixed O&M costs, property taxes, property insurance, business
interruption insurance, regulatory costs (permits, fees, licenses, fines), DSRF
expense, depreciation and amortization, loan interest, income before tax, corporate
income tax, income after tax, cash flows (add back depreciation less principal
repayment plus/minus non-tax deductible adjustments), project IRR and payback
(100% equity), equity IRR and payback (e.g. 30% equity, 70% debt), debt service
cover ratio, levelized tariff, generation cost and net profit, and financial ratios
(current ratio, quick ratio, A/R turnover, days sales in receivables, inventory
turnover, liabilities to equity ratio, number of times interest earned, return on assets,
net profit to assets ratio, net profit to sales ratio, return on owner's equity).
The common methods for analyzing the economic feasibility of a project and its
alternatives are enumerated blow:
o Annual cost
o Payback period
o Percent return
Most feasibility studies use a number of the above methods such as the net present
value (NPV) and discounted internal rate of return (DCF IRR) to determine the return
on investment (ROI) and the return on equity (ROE).
The same method will be used by this author in the presentation of income
statement, cash flow statement and DCF IRR calculation for return of investment and
return on equity.
In addition, this author added the calculation of working capital, balance sheet, cash
flow to meet debt service and the free cash for dividend payment. It also calculated
the payback period and debt service cover ratio (DSCR = cash flow for debt service /
debt service).
The financial model may use several currencies such as the Philippine Peso, US
Dollar or Japanese Yen depending on the major source of equipment and soft loan.
No escalation is applied on the income and expense accounts during the 25-year
project life. In this way, feasibility is determined purely from the performance of the
market assumptions and technology parameters, and not on the relative behavior of
escalating income streams and expenses. A divergent assumption such as higher
tariff escalation relative to cost escalation will result in a mis-leading conclusion of
economic feasibility.
List of Assumptions
Capital Structure:
Tenor = 12 years
Fuel (coal) Delivered Cost, PhP/MT = depends on plant site and distance from mine
EPC (power plant, ESP, raw water treatment, waste water treatment, T/L)
10% Contingency
1% Doc Stamps
Forecast Electricity Demand and Energy (Purchases) : forecast demand and energy
Transmission Line Losses = dependent on Plant location (length), plant size (kW
power), voltage (kV), power factor, conductor type
Start-up Time = xx hours from cold start (yy hours from warm start)
Start-up per year = based on 365 days and 95% reliability = 18 starts
Operating & Maintenance Costs (running spares, supplies & materials, lubes,
chemicals, except manpower) = x.xx % of project cost
Manpower Cost & Benefits : see plantilla (table of organization with basic salary and
fringe benefits)
Other Expenses and Regulatory Costs (see Permits & Licenses sheet):
Recurring taxes, permits, fees and licenses = part of annual fixed expenses
Income Tax Holiday (ITH) = 6 years, pay income tax on the 7th year
The reader is advised to visit my website for a snippet of the project finance model:
http://energytechnologyexpert.com/financial-models/how-to-order-your-state-of-
the-art-project-finance-models-for-power-plants-get-50-discount-via-paypay-this-
november-2009/
Please email me your specific needs so I could prepare a customized project finance
model for your feasibility study project.
Marcial T. Ocampo
email: mars_ocampo@yahoo.com
energydataexpert@gmail.com