Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARING EOT
APPLICATION, ANALYZING
AND CERTIFICATION
- THINGS TO CONSIDER
AR RIDHA RAZAK
ONUS ON CONTRACTOR TO APPLY FOR EOT
There are many common problems that delay the process of EOT
application for the contractor. The most common problems are as
follows:
Thus, the Contractor is to alert the Architect, within the stated time, any
likely delay to the completion of the Works.
WHY NEED NOTICE?
Give the Architect the earliest possible opportunity to discuss with the
Employer, on any measures to be adopted to mitigate, or neutralise, the
delay.
SURVEY RESEARCH
IACSIT International Journal
of Engineering and
Technology, Vol. 4, No. 4,
August 2012
PROCEDURE FOR FINAL CLAIM
Such final claim must be "duly supported with all particulars" to enable
the Architect to assess any extension of time to be granted through the
following procedures:
The need for limiting the submission of "final claim" to stipulated time of
the end of the cause of delay is to enable the Architect to assess the
claim, before the facts surrounding the claim become blurred by the
passage of time.
FAILURE TO SUBMIT
Information in report
a) A description of the cause of delay
b) The contractual provision which is
being relied upon
c) The date when the delay
commenced and the period of delay
(giving details of intermittent effects if
appropriate).
d) The date of notice of delay,
specifying the reference of the
relevant document
e) A summary of records and particulars
relied upon
f) A description of the event and effects
on progress
2. REPORT FORMAT
Information in report
g) A diagrammatic illustration showing
the status of the programme, progress
and current completion date prior to the
commencement of the delay
3. PRIOR NOTICE CLAIM
4. EOT APPLICATION CHECKLIST FOR EACH RELEVANT EVENT
COMMON REASON FOR EOT CLAIM IN MALAYSIA
SURVEY RESEARCH
IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2012
5. COMPILING YOUR EOT EVIDENCE
Compliance with Architect Instruction issued by the Architect for : Notification to claim
1. Discrepancies of contract document Brief report of application (justify reason and clause)
2. Variations Evidence
3. Suspension and postponing work Copy of AI
Photos with dates
Site diaries
Timeline duration chart
Delay on the part of Nominated Sub-Contractors 1. Notification to claim
2. Brief report of application (justify reason and clause)
Evidence
1. Copy of program highlighted on NSC works
2. Photos with dates
3. Site diaries
4. Timeline duration chart
5. COMPILING YOUR EOT EVIDENCE
The opening up for inspection of any work covered up, testing any Notification to claim
Brief report of application (justify reason and clause)
materials, goods or executed work Evidence
Photos with dates
Site diaries
Timeline duration chart
5. COMPILING YOUR EOT EVIDENCE
Compliance with any changes to any law, regulations, by-law or 1. Notification to claim
2. Brief report of application (justify reason and clause)
terms and conditions of any Appropriate Authority and Service
Evidence
Provider; 1. Copy of authority letter
2. Architects/Engineers instruction
3. Photos with dates
4. Site diaries
5. Timeline duration chart
5. COMPILING YOUR EOT EVIDENCE
Delay as a result of the execution of work for which a Provisional Notification to claim
Brief report of application (justify reason and clause)
Quantity is included in the Contract Bills which in the opinion of the
Evidence
Architect is not a reasonably accurate forecast of the quantity of Architects/Engineers instruction
work required; Photos with dates
Site diaries
Timeline duration chart
5. COMPILING YOUR EOT EVIDENCE
PLANNED
IMPACT
COLLAPSE ASBULT METHOD
Delay Analysis Methodology
4 Collapsed as Built Method involves removing the delays of each party from the as-built
(kaedah penolakan kelewatan schedule so that the resulting schedule will give the
dari program dibina = siapa completion date of the project but for the delays of the other
penyebab utama) party
ASBUILT
Identify
delay
event
Removal of
delay event
DELAY ANALYSIS
Delay Analysis Pros Cons
1 As-planned vs. As-built Economical and simple It does not scrutinize delay types
(kaedah Program Rancang to use and this makes it easy for it to be
lwn bina) manipulated and distorted to reflect
either the position of the claimant
or the defendant
2 Impacted as- planned Useful to evaluate the Use fixed as-planned schedule to
method individual impact of analyze delays out of context and
(kaedah analisa impak each delay activity time but the original baseline
kemungkinan lewat lwn during and after the schedule may not be a realistic
rancang= kelewatan) project on the model on which to base the whole
completion date. analysis.
3 As-Planned but for Method It can be performed Owner’s point of view and
( kaedah program rancang quickly because there is contractor’s point of view may yield
dipinda megikut kedua kedua no need to consider different results resulting in disputes
kelewatan kontraktor dan actual progress of the
pemaju =siapa penyebab work.
utama)
4 Collapsed as Built Method Consider the impact of The use of as-built information to
(kaedah penolakan kelewatan delays on the critical prepare the as-built schedule is
dari program dibina = siapa path. subjective and highly amenable to
penyebab utama) manipulation.
ISSUANCE OF EOT
EOT CERTIFICATE SAMPLE
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSION
PREPARING EOT
APPLICATION, ANALYZING
AND CERTIFICATION
- THINGS TO CONSIDER
AR RIDHA RAZAK