You are on page 1of 10

Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Applied Acoustics
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apacoust

Acoustic absorption of fibro-granular composite with cylindrical grains


Hasina Mamtaz a, Mohammad Hosseini Fouladi a,⇑, Mohd Zaki Nuawi b, Satesh Narayana Namasivayam a,
Masomeh Ghassem c, Mushtak Al-Atabi d
a
School of Engineering, Taylor’s University, Subang Jaya, Selangor 47500, Malaysia
b
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
c
Faculty of Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 43600 UKM Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia
d
Heriot-Watt University, 62200 Putrajaya, Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: This paper reports the influence of cylindrical granular materials on the acoustic absorption performance
Received 25 December 2016 of a natural fiber composite. The acoustic absorption behavior of an innovative fibro-granular composite
Received in revised form 10 May 2017 composed of natural fibers combined with granular materials was investigated. The fibrous part of this
Accepted 11 May 2017
new composite is fabricated using coconut coir fiber and the granular part by cylindrical rice husk grain.
This study was motivated by a desire to improve the acoustical performance of materials made from nat-
ural (coir) fibers. The amount of binder additive added during composite preparation was considered by
Keywords:
reconstructing the equation using fiber diameter as a new parameter. The acoustic properties of the novel
Natural fiber
Natural grain
composite were investigated based on the well-known Johnson-Champoux-Allard model by varying dif-
Acoustic absorption ferent physical parameters. The experimental analysis was performed in impedance tube to validate the
Fibro-granular composite analytical outcome. The developed analytical model employing Johnson-Champoux-Allard model was
Cylindrical grain found to give predictions in good agreement with absorption coefficient data for the composite material
samples with four different thicknesses. The effect of varying the different factors, such as sample thick-
ness, fiber–grain size and fiber-grain ratio, on the acoustic absorption performance and the effect of the
binder additive were also investigated. Results confirmed the potential of the new material as a promis-
ing acoustic absorber in the low-frequency region (less than 1 kHz).
Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction pore walls by means of friction between the air molecules and
the pore walls. This phenomenon causes the sound energy to be
Traditional acoustic materials, which have provided acceptable dissipated as heat [2].
absorption rates for nearly all frequency bands, cannot satisfy all Coir fiber is an important natural waste material because of its
issues in environmental pollution and waste management. Acous- outstanding potential to replace conventional fibers, such as glass
tic materials from natural waste materials have received attention fibers or rock wool, for noise absorption. The fibrous structure of
to address the dominant use of expensive and non-biodegradable an individual fiber cell is hollow, and this hollow cavity decreases
materials. The natural substance has a high potential for sound the bulk density and makes the coir fiber light and delicate to serve
absorption because of its light weight, natural abundance, cost effi- as a reliable acoustic and thermal insulator [3].
ciency, biodegradability, and eco-friendliness. Thus, natural and Rice husk is a great resource as a natural waste material, which
recycled acoustic materials are valid alternatives to conventional comes from a commonly cultivated crop paddy and is abundant
synthetic materials [1]. worldwide. It is highly resistant to moisture, noncombustible,
Recycled and natural granular materials are highly sustainable, and presents antifungal quality. Rice husk waste, together with
non-combustible, and moisture-resistant acoustic absorption polyurethane binder, has been investigated as a potential low-
materials. Most granular absorbents contain air-filled pores, where frequency acoustic absorber [4].
sound absorption takes place due to viscous boundary layer effect. Several researchers have successfully developed sound absor-
The viscous loss occurs in the boundary layer of air adjacent to bers by combining fiber and plastic or rubber-based granular mate-
rials [5,6]. Berardi and Innace [7] reported the effectiveness of a
composite consisting of cork and canes (bark and wood) as poten-
⇑ Corresponding author. tial acoustic absorbers in terms of the Delany-Bazley model. Mean-
E-mail address: mfoolady@gmail.com (M. Hosseini Fouladi).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.05.012
0003-682X/Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67 59

while, Mahzan et al. [8] investigated the effectiveness of the coir where the numerator denotes the velocity of a fluid over the pore
fiber-recycled rubber composite as a potential acoustic absorber. surface area A, and the denominator denotes the velocity inside
In their study, the composite with optimum composition of 40% the pore volume V.
coir fiber and 60% recycled rubber granulates was identified as a Moreover, Johnson et al. [14] described the relation between
promising sound absorption material. the viscous characteristic length and flow resistivity (rÞ as follows:
Koizumi et al. [9] reported that high tortuosity, high surface sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi!
area, high flow resistivity, and low porosity at optimal values are 1 8ga1
K¼ ð2Þ
the key factors for effective sound absorption performance of any c ru
material.
Despite their great availability and biodegradability, fresh natu- where a1 is the tortuosity, u is the porosity, and c is a constant,
ral fibers cannot be extensively applied industrially because of which is close to one.
their moisture content, thick diameter, and low antifungal quality. Johnson et al. [13] proposed the following expression of the
In addition, industrially treated natural fiber with lower moisture effective density qðxÞ of rigid-framed porous materials:
content compared with fresh natural fiber lead to lower acoustic " sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi#
ru 4a2 gq x
absorption performance [10]. The current study reports, that this qðxÞ ¼ a1 qo 1 þ 1þ 1 2 o : ð3Þ
acoustic attribute can be improved by incorporating granular jxqo a1 r 2 K x2
materials in fibers to modify moisture content.
The authors have previously highlighted the limitations of nat- where K is the viscous characteristic length.
ural fibers in achieving the desired acoustic absorption perfor- As long as the material is air-filled, then thermal exchange
mance at the desired frequency range, which is below 1 kHz [11]. between pore-borne sound wave compressions and rarefactions
Hence, the current study named and investigated the acoustic per- and the pore walls is significant as well. This is why, the
formance of a new composite which is fibro-granular composite. Johnson-Champoux-Allard model includes a thermal characteristic
Usually, it consists of natural, rubber, or plastic granulates and nat- length and thermal exchange is responsible for the thermal losses.
ural or synthetic fibrous materials. Hence, according to Allard and Champoux [12], the thermal char-
The purpose of this study is to investigate the acoustic absorp- acteristic length K0 , which characterizes the high-frequency behav-
tion characteristics of a natural fibro-granular composite to over- ior of the bulk modulus KðxÞ; is given as follows:
come the drawbacks of a single natural fiber composite. The Rd
A A
acoustic absorption performance of 30 mm thick composite sam- K0 ¼ 2 R d ¼ 2 ð4Þ
ple was plotted through analytical and experimental methods. V V
Subsequently, the possible effects of sample thickness, fiber-grain
For fibrous materials with porosity close to one, K and K0 can be
size, binder additive and fiber–grain ratio were analytically inves-
stated as Eqs. (5) and (6), respectively [15], as follows:
tigated for the enhancement of acoustic absorption of this newly
developed composite at the low-frequency region (f < 1000 Hz). K ¼ 1=2prl ð5Þ
Coir fiber and rice husk grain are the acoustic materials which
were used in this study. The well-known rigid frame Johnson- K0 ¼ 1=prl ¼ 2K ð6Þ
Champoux-Allard model was employed for analytical analysis.
Impedance tube measurement was performed for experimental The total length of fiber l per unit volume can be expressed as
analysis and the results were compared with analytical results to follows:
validate the findings. This innovative material can be applied in 1
l¼ ð7Þ
the automotive industry, buildings, and indoor and outdoor sound pr2
control.
where r is the cross-sectional radius of the fiber.
Allard and Champoux [12,15], proposed the following expres-
2. Methodology
sion of the bulk modulus KðxÞ of rigid-framed porous materials:
2.1. Theoretical measurement: Johnson-Champoux-Allard model cPo
KðxÞ ¼  qffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi1 ð8Þ
02
p qo x
Various techniques are used to predict the acoustic absorption c  ðc  1Þ 1  j K02 N8gq x 1 þ j K N16k
p o
mechanism in porous media. Almost all these techniques describe
the acoustic parameters, such as characteristic impedance and The characteristic impedance Z c ðxÞ, complex wave number
propagation constants of porous materials. The Johnson- kc ðxÞ, and surface acoustic impedance Z can be estimated as fol-
Champoux-Allard model is a rigid-frame model, in which the solid lows [15,16]:
phase of the frame remains motionless. The model was developed
1 pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
by Allard and Champoux [12], according to the previous work by Z c ð xÞ ¼ qðxÞ  KðxÞ ð9Þ
Johnson et al. [13]. Five non-acoustic parameters, namely, flow
/
resistivity, porosity, tortuosity, viscous characteristic length, and pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
thermal characteristic length, are considered in this model to pre- kc ðxÞ ¼ x qðxÞ=KðxÞ ð10Þ
dict the acoustical parameters. Viscous characteristic length and
thermal characteristic length are the shape factors related to vis- Z ¼ Z c ðxÞ  cothðkc ðxÞÞ ð11Þ
cous and thermal loss, respectively.
With the surface acoustic impedance Z, the absorption coeffi-
Considering the effects of viscosity, Johnson et al. [14] defined
cient a, at a normal incidence of the porous layer while backed
the frame geometry-dependent parameter of viscous characteristic
with a rigid wall can be calculated as follows:
length (K) as follows:
R  
Z  Z0 2
v 2 dA a ¼ 1    ð12Þ
K ¼ 2 R 2fluid : ð1Þ Z þ Z0 
v fluid dV
where Z 0 ¼ q0 c0 is the impedance of air.
60 H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67

The effectiveness of any porous material depends on its sound Thereafter, the composite samples with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm
absorption coefficient which should be close to one over a large thicknesses were prepared using the collected materials and plas-
frequency range. tic molds shown in Fig. 1. Two samples of 28 and 100 mm diame-
The acoustic behavior of a composite structure made from ters were prepared for each thickness to test the acoustic
cylindrical natural fiber and grain was investigated to predict the properties using the impedance tube. The masses of 100 mm diam-
sound absorption coefficient of a fibro-granular composite mate- eter fibro-granular composite samples with 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm
rial. The effect of varying the other parameters on the acoustic thicknesses were measured as 30.15, 46.29, 61.68, and 95.87 g,
absorption performance of these materials was also investigated. respectively. Acoustic absorption was measured within the fre-
MatlabR 7.0 editor was used to plot the sound absorption coeffi- quency range from 0 kHz to 5 kHz.
cients in the frequency range from 0 kHz to 5 kHz.
3. Results and discussion

2.2. Experimental measurement


The basic properties of any material are its bulk density, average
density, length and diameter. These properties are needed to eval-
The acoustic absorption test was performed on a set of two
uate the five geometrical parameters, namely, flow resistivity,
impedance tubes SCS9020B/K, which was manufactured according
porosity, tortuosity, viscous characteristic length, and thermal
to ISO 10534-2 and ASTM E1050-98 standards [17]. The set con-
characteristic length. The sound absorption coefficient of a mate-
sisted of one high- frequency and one low-frequency impedance
rial is determined by these five parameters. The acoustic absorp-
tubes with diameters of 28 and 100 mm, respectively, two channel
tion coefficient of the fibro-granular composite was evaluated in
data acquisition system 01 dB Symphonie, two 1/200 microphone
this study in terms of a well-known analytical approach, for the
types GRAS-40BP in each tube and a random G10 noise generator.
normal incidence of sound waves.
Calibration of the microphones’ sensitivity was performed, by uti-
The flow resistivities of the 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm thick samples
lizing the calibrator type GRAS-42AB at 114 dB level and 1 kHz. The
were measured experimentally using the ASTM C522 airflow resis-
acoustic absorption coefficients were determined independently in
tance test system [18], which is shown in Fig. 2. Following the idea
the low-frequency range (0–1600 Hz) and high-frequency range
of Kino et al. [16], the porosity u, of new fibro-granular material
(1600–5000 Hz), and the results are presented by a combined plot
was implemented for the current study as follows:
in Figs. 4–10. Both frequency ranges were linked by the user-
friendly SCS8100 software to measure the acoustic absorption qbulkðsÞ
u¼1 ð13Þ
coefficient through the overall frequency pattern. qf þ qg
The air flow resistance of each sample was measured using the
ASTM C522 air flow resistance test system [18]. The test system where qf is the average density of the fiber, qg is the average den-
package consisted of a sample holder, data acquisition system with sity of the grain, and qbulkðsÞ is the bulk density of the fibro-granular
vacuum pump and software package C522. composite sample.
The average value of flow resistivity from three repeated tests The tortuosity a1 varies typically in the range of 1–1.06 for
was considered for every sample. The materials and the equipment fibrous materials (e.g., rock wool) and 1.1–1.8 for granular materi-
used are shown in Figs. 1–3. als. An empirical formula for tortuosity of the acoustic material
The fibrous component coir fiber and granular component rice (coir fiber), can be expressed as follows [10,19]:
husk grain for the new composite were collected from the local 1
market. Both components were cleaned by spraying water and a1 ¼ pffiffiffiffi ð14Þ
u
dried in open sunlight for one week. To measure the physical char-
acteristics such as, average diameter, length, volume, and density A noticeable amount of binder is always needed when prepar-
of fiber and grain, 20 samples were randomly chosen from each ing any composite. This binder additive has an undoubted effect
collected material. The measured values of the physical character- on the sound absorption performance of the composite. Swift
istics of both fibrous and granular components are fabricated in et al. [20] showed that the small pores inside a rubber granular
Tables 1 and 2 at the latter part of the study. composite, become filled with binder causing the formation of
The granular and fibrous components were mixed randomly bridges between the grains. This phenomenon resulted in enlarged
and the ratio of the two was fixed at 50:50 to prepare the compos- surface area, reduced overall porosity, and increased tortuosity and
ite samples with different thicknesses. The necessary cohesion flow resistivity of the material.
between the components was facilitated by a spray binder adhe- In the current study, the influence of sample thickness, fiber–
sive purchased from a hardware shop. Plastic molds with four dif- grain ratio, fiber-grain size, and amount of binder per unit volume
ferent thicknesses were prepared to shape the composite samples. of the composite material on the acoustic properties of the new

Fig. 1. (a) Plastic molds, (b) shaping samples in molds, and (c) prepared samples.
H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67 61

Fig. 2. (a) Equipment and experimental set up for flow resistivity measurement. The equipment is composed of data acquisition system including vacuum pump, software
package C522 and sample holder. (b) Fibro-granular composite sample holder.

Fig. 3. Experimental set up of fibro-granular acoustic absorption measurement. The equipment is composed of two tubes, a noise generator and two channel data acquisition
system 01 dB.

Fig. 4. Sound absorption coefficient of fibro-granular composite to validate the analytical outcome through impedance tube measurement.

composite were investigated. The effect of the amount of binder dfiber = diameter of natural fiber,
was compensated by reconstructing the fiber diameter as a new qbulkðbinderÞ ¼ mass of binder additive
volume of the sample
= density of binder additive.
parameter in the following equation:
qbulkðbinderÞ Consequently, the total length of the fiber per unit volume of
dfiberðmixÞ ¼ dfiber þ dfiber ð15Þ
qbulkðsÞ the material was developed into the following equation-
qf
where lmix ¼ ð1=pr 2mix Þ ð16Þ
dfiberðmixÞ = diameter of fiber with binder additive,
qbulkðsÞ
62 H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67

Fig. 5. Analytical results of the acoustic absorption coefficients at different sample thickness.

Fig. 6. Experimental results of the acoustic absorption coefficients at different sample thickness.

where, interaction of air molecules with the material surface, resulting


dfiberðmixÞ in higher sound absorption of the material.
rmix ¼ 2
= radius of fiber with binder additive,
qf The pore size in a fibro-granular composite is controlled by the
qbulkðsÞ = fraction of fiber existing in the composite material.
binder additive, fiber and grain size and amount of the grains.
Some compensation was considered in the Johnson-Champoux-
The viscous characteristic length and thermal characteristic Allard model due to the introduction of rice husk granular material
length are the two shape factors which describe the acoustic and the binder additive in the new composite. It was assumed that
absorption mechanism of porous materials. The former is related binder became the part of the fiber and grain and filled the porosity
to the viscous losses in the smaller pores, while the latter is related between them. Hence, Eq. (5) is amended accordingly, to obtain the
to the thermal losses in the larger pores of the porous materials new viscous characteristic length as below:
[21]. Champoux and Stinson [22] stated that effective density
and bulk modulus are the two most important acoustical parame- K ¼ ð1=2pr mix lmix Þ  u ð17Þ
ters which can be determined by the pores with small and large Allard and Champoux [12] and Allard [15] showed that, at nor-
cross-sectional areas, respectively. The main parameter influencing mal incidence of sound waves, the thermal characteristic length of
the sound absorption of a porous material is the flow resistivity the material with porosity close to one is twice as much as its vis-
which depends on the pore size distribution, porosity, pore shape cous characteristic length. The porosity of the new composite
and tortuosity. The viscous and thermal effects, which are respon- ranges between 70% and 80% for all samples. Hence, the thermal
sible for the dissipation of incident sound wave energy, are con- characteristic length of the new composite can be evaluated by uti-
trolled by pore size. Higher energy dissipation is due to higher lizing Allard’s [15] expression, as stated in Eq. (6).
H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67 63

Fig. 7. The acoustic absorption coefficients at different percentages of binder additive.

Fig. 8. The acoustic absorption coefficients at different fiber sizes.

The rice husk particles are roughly in cylindrical shape with The accurate resonance prediction, including complete absorp-
large aspect ratios [23]. Hence, the coir fiber and the rice husk tion pattern, was estimated using the Johnson-Champoux-Allard
are considered as natural cylindrical acoustic materials. The phys- model. According to Johnson-Champoux-Allard model the peak
ical characteristics of the coir fiber and rice husk are shown in values of the acoustic absorption coefficient were found 0.8730
Tables 1 and 2, respectively. at 777 Hz for the 30 mm thick sample. By contrast, the sound
The calculated values of four non-acoustic geometrical parame- absorption coefficients from the impedance tube measurement
ters namely, porosity u, tortuosity /1 , viscous characteristic were 0.9000 at 741 Hz for the 30 mm thick sample. Therefore, a
length K and thermal characteristic length K0 are listed in Table 3 promising agreement of the acoustic absorption performances
at the specific fiber–grain ratio of 50:50 for all composite samples. was observed between the experimental and analytical outcomes.
The experimental values of flow resistivity are also provided in The effect of sample thickness, binder additive, fiber-grain size
Table 3 to evaluate the sound absorption coefficient of the fibro- and fiber-grain ratio on sound absorption was investigated. For
granular composites with different thicknesses. investigating the effect of sample thickness, fiber–grain composite
The acoustic properties of the coir fiber and rice husk composite sample ratio was maintained at 50:50. Table 4 shows the analytical
were determined in an impedance tube to validate the analytical and experimental results of the acoustic absorption coefficients for
outcome of the Johnson-Champoux-Allard model. MatlabR 7.0 edi- different thicknesses of the fibro-granular composite samples. For
tor was used to plot the sound absorption coefficients in the fre- both analytical and experimental methods, the acoustic absorption
quency range from 0 kHz to 5 kHz. The analytical and performance at the low-frequency region was observed to increase
experimental results are shown in Fig. 4. for the 30 mm thick with a increase in sample thickness. The results are shown in Figs. 5
sample. and 6, by the plot of the sound absorption coefficient.
64 H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67

Fig. 9. The acoustic absorption coefficients at different grain sizes .

Fig. 10. The acoustic absorption coefficients at different ratios of fiber-grain.

Similar to other composites, a direct relationship between sam- ages of binder were prepared for analytical investigation. The
ple thickness and sound absorption coefficient was observed for acoustic absorption coefficients of the fibro-granular composite
the fibro-granular composite at the low-frequency region. The coir samples is fabricated in Table 5, together with flow resistivity data.
fiber–rice husk fibro-granular composite shows improved result at An enhancement at the low frequency region was observed due to
increased thickness compared with single natural coir fiber com- the increase in binder amount, which is shown in Fig. 7, by the plot
posite. Natural coir fiber showed an average absorption of 0.8 for of the sound absorption coefficients using the Johnson-Champox-
frequencies (Hz) of >1360, >940, and >578 at sample thicknesses Allard model.
of 20, 30, and 45 mm, respectively. Unlike natural fiber, industrial A less significant effect of the binder additive on the acoustic
fiber with less moisture contents showed an average absorption performance of fibro-granular composite materials was observed.
0.8 for frequencies (Hz) of >3190 and >1300 at sample thicknesses An optimal increase in the binder amount within the range of
of 20 and 50 mm, respectively [10,24]. However, average absorp- 10%–40% of the total weight of the sample contributes to higher
tion of 0.8 for the fibro-granular composite was found in the cur- flow resistivity and a slightly better absorption performance at
rent study for frequencies (Hz) <1321, <777, <578, and <449 at the low-frequency region. However, over a range of the optimal
thicknesses of 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm, respectively. The variation amount of binder additive, the composite sample becomes stiff,
in the frequency of the absorption coefficient peaks with thickness and the peaks shift toward the higher frequency region because
is the consequence of the change in the quarter wavelength layer of the increase in structural damping as stated by Wassilieff [25].
resonance. Following the previous researchers [9,24], an investigation was
In order to reveal the binder effect on the acoustic absorption performed in order to highlight the influence of the fiber size on
properties of the composite, three samples with different percent- the acoustic absorption of the new composite. Three composite
H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67 65

Table 1
Physical characteristics of the natural coir fiber collected from local market.

Sample no. Diameter of fiber (mm) Weight of fiber (mg) Length of fiber (mm) Volume of fiber (mm3) Density of fiber (kg/m3)
1 0.101 100 0.60 0.801 749
2 0.108 96 0.55 0.879 626
3 0.109 90 0.65 0.839 775
4 0.111 74 0.60 0.716 838
5 0.120 80 0.70 0.904 774
6 0.135 94 0.81 1.345 602
7 0.136 87 0.88 1.263 697
8 0.140 80 0.78 1.231 634
9 0.146 80 0.80 1.339 597
10 0.160 66 0.88 1.326 664
11 0.178 56 0.90 1.393 646
12 0.187 60 0.90 1.647 546
13 0.200 60 0.93 1.884 494
14 0.200 59 1.00 1.853 540
15 0.216 73 1.95 2.674 729
16 0.250 95 3.00 4.661 644
17 0.254 93 3.00 4.710 637
18 0.350 81 3.0 7.789 385
19 0.405 85 5.9 10.945 539
20 0.501 83 8.5 16.354 520

Total average diameter of fiber = 200 mm.


Total average density of fiber = 632 kg/m3.

Table 2
Physical characteristics of natural rice husk grain collected from local market.

Sample no. Diameter of grain (mm) Weight of grain (mg) Length of grain (mm) Volume of grain (mm3) Density of grain (kg/m3)
1 0.20 0.20 10.1 0.317 631
2 0.25 0.35 9.5 0.466 751
3 0.30 0.50 9.6 0.678 737
4 0.40 0.80 10.6 1.331 601
5 0.60 2.00 10.7 3.024 661
6 0.70 2.50 10.0 3.847 650
7 0.73 2.80 10.0 4.183 669
8 0.80 2.80 9.00 4.522 619
9 0.85 3.40 10.0 5.672 599
10 0.90 4.20 11.0 6.994 601
11 0.90 3.50 10.0 6.359 550
12 1.00 4.30 10.5 8.243 522
13 1.00 4.10 10.3 8.086 507
14 1.05 4.00 9.30 8.049 497
15 1.10 4.10 9.00 8.549 480
16 1.15 4.90 10.5 10.901 450
17 1.18 4.80 10.0 10.93 439
18 1.20 5.40 10.0 11.304 478
19 1.20 5.50 10.5 11.869 463
20 1.23 5.80 10.5 12.470 465

Total average length of grain = 10 mm


Total average density of grain = 569 kg/m3

Table 3
Five geometrical parameters of fibro-granular composite.

Thickness Mass of the sample for 100 mm Flow resistivity r Porosity Tortuosity Viscous characteristics length Thermal characteristics length
(mm) diameter (g) (Nsm4) u /1 K (mm) K0 (mm)
20 30.15 2148 0.8402 1.1137 10.626 21.252
30 46.29 4042 0.8364 1.0934 10.672 21.344
40 61.68 6206 0.8356 1.0940 10.989 21.977
50 95.87 7973 0.7967 1.1203 13.292 26.584

Table 4
Measured values of the sound absorption coefficients (aÞ at different thicknesses of the coir fiber-rice husk fibro-granular composite.

Sample thickness (mm) Frequency (Hz) Analytical results of A Frequency (Hz) Experimental results of A
20 1321 0.9135 1493 0.9000
30 777 0.8730 741 0.9000
40 553 0.8535 736 0.8650
50 449 0.8414 501 0.8577
66 H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67

Table 5 Table 7
Measured values of the sound absorption coefficients at different binder percentages Measured values of the sound absorption coefficients at different grain lengths of
of 30 mm coir fiber-rice husk fibro-granular composite sample. 30 mm coir fiber-rice husk fibro-granular composite sample.

Binder additives (% of Flow Frequency Sound Grain length Flow resistivity Frequency Sound absorption
30 mm sample weight) resistivity (Hz) absorption (mm) (Nsm4) (Hz) coefficient
(Nsm4) coefficient
4.5 4411 727 0.8472
12 3616 819 0.8903 7.5 4051 764 0.8604
22 4042 777 0.8730 10 4042 777 0.8730
32 6394 739 0.8553

Table 8
samples of different fiber diameters were prepared for this investi- Measured values of the sound absorption coefficients at different ratios of the coir
gation. The average grain length was fixed at 10 mm for all three fiber–rice husk fibro-granular composite at 30 mm sample thickness.

samples. Table 6 shows the analytical results of the sound absorp- Fiber:grain Flow resistivity Frequency Sound absorption
tion coefficients for 30 mm thick samples with three different fiber (Nsm4) (Hz) coefficient
diameters of 150, 200 and 300 lm. The significant enhancement of 75:25 3272 795 0.8808
the acoustic absorption performance at the low-frequency region 50:50 4042 777 0.8730
was observed with the reduction of fiber size, which is shown in 25:75 5662 752 0.8617
Fig. 8.
The potential role of the grain size on the acoustic absorption
was investigated by Swift et al. [20]. Where the authors reported, at constant sample thickness of 30 mm are plotted in Fig. 10,
the smaller grain size leads better acoustic performance by con- according to the Johnson-Champox-Allard model.
tributing larger surface area in the composite. In order to investi- The fiber–grain ratio is one of the key features for good acoustic
gate the effectiveness of grain size on the sound absorption of absorption performance. Approximately equal amounts of fiber–
the fibro-granular composite, three composite samples of different grain component were needed to achieve high absorption coeffi-
grain sizes were prepared and for all three samples the average cient [5,26]. Khan [5] reported the best value of the sound absorp-
fiber diameter was fixed at 200 lm. Like other investigations on tion coefficient when the fiber–grain ratios were 40:60 and 60:40
the factors such as, sample thickness, binder amount and fiber size, for the composite with combined nylon fiber and PVC carpet grain.
the specific combination of fiber-grain was maintained at 50:50 for In the current study, the best value of the acoustic absorption coef-
this case too. Table 7 shows the analytical results of the sound ficient of fibro-granular composite was obtained at fiber–grain
absorption coefficients for 30 mm thick samples with three differ- ratio of 25:75 at the low-frequency region.
ent grain lengths of 4.5 mm, 7.5 mm and 10 mm. Fig. 9 shows the Thus, the fibro-granular composite is superior to the simple
acoustic absorption response of the fibro-granular composite at fibrous composite for commercial application, especially for low-
three different grain sizes, in terms of rigid frame Johnson- frequency acoustic absorbent material. This results was derived
Champoux-Allard method. The enhancement of the acoustic by increasing the sample thickness, binder amount, changing the
absorption performance at the low-frequency region was observed fiber-grain sizes, fiber-grain ratio in terms of analytical and exper-
with the reduction of grain size. imental methods. The result can be described by the fact that the
In Figs. 9 and 10, the analytical outcomes of the absorption coef- introduction of granular materials in the fibrous composite causes
ficients are plotted for 30 mm thick fibro-granular composite sam- the reduction in porosity and two shape factors by filling the pores
ples with varying fiber and grain sizes respectively. Results show in an optimal way which contributes to higher flow resistivity and
the both agreements enhanced the acoustic absorption of the com- tortuosity and thereby higher acoustic absorption, which exactly
posite at low frequency region. This phenomena can be explained mimicked the simple law of the compression effect described by
by the fact, that a composite with the combination of thinner fiber Castagnede et al. [27], where they pointed out that, in a com-
and smaller grains possessed the higher surface area, more tortu- pressed fibrous material, the fibers are brought nearer to each
ous path and higher airflow resistance. Hence, it leads to higher other without experiencing any deformation in radius. Similarly,
absorption coefficient and shifts the peak towards the low fre- in the current study, the granular component of the fibro-
quency, which follows the previous work as addressed by previous granular composite formed bridges between the fibers by filling
researchers [9,20]. the small pores within the composite without resulting in any
The acoustic absorption properties of the fibro-granular com- deformation in the fiber radius. Furthermore, a larger surface area
posite with varying ratios of fiber–grain combination were also was created within the composite for more interaction among air
evaluated in this study. Three samples with fiber–grain ratios of molecules within the frame. Hence, more sound energy was con-
75:25, 50:50, and 25:75 were prepared to predict the best acoustic verted into heat energy, leading to higher acoustic absorption.
behavior at the low-frequency region. Table 8 demonstrates the
acoustic absorption behavior of these fibro-granular composite
4. Conclusions
samples. The sound absorption coefficients of these composites
The fibro-granular composite from coconut coir fiber and cylin-
drical rice husk grain can be used as an acoustic absorbent mate-
rial. The acoustic absorption of the composite was investigated
Table 6 using the Johnson-Champoux-Allard model. Experimental investi-
Measured values of the sound absorption coefficients at different fiber diameters of gations using impedance tubes were performed to validate the
30 mm coir fiber-rice husk fibro-granular composite sample.
analytical method. The theoretical and experimental data showed
Fiber diameter Flow resistivity Frequency Sound absorption that, at low frequency <780 Hz, the sound absorption coefficient
(lm) (Nsm4) (Hz) coefficient of the 30 mm thick composite was within the range of 80%–90%.
150 5109 722 0.8418 The results provide a reliable guidance for the possible application
200 4042 777 0.8730 of the novel composite as a promising low-frequency sound-
300 3275 978 0.9345
absorbing material.
H. Mamtaz et al. / Applied Acoustics 126 (2017) 58–67 67

The effect of sample thickness, fiber–grain ratio, fiber–grain size [7] Berardi U, Iannace G. Acoustic characterization of natural fibers for sound
absorption applications. Build Environ 2015;94:1–13. http://dx.doi.org/
and binder additive were also investigated. The findings indicated
10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.05.029.
that increased sample thickness, grains, and binder amount [8] Mahzan S, Ahmad Zaidi AM, Arsat N, Hatta MNM, Ghazali MI, Rasool Mohideen
enhanced the acoustic absorption at the low-frequency region. S. Study on sound absorption properties of coconut coir fibre reinforced
Gradual shifting of the peak value of sound absorption coefficient composite with added recycled rubber. IJIE 2010;2(1):29–34.
[9] Koizumi T, Tsujiuchi N, Adachi A. The development of sound absorbing
was observed with increased sample thickness, granular compo- materials using natural bamboo fibers. In: High performance structures and
nent, binder amount and decreased fiber-grain size toward the composites Book. UK: WIT Press; 2002.
low-frequency region. The peak values of the sound absorption [10] Fouladi MH, Ayub M, Jailani MNM. Analysis of coir fiber acoustical
characteristics. Appl Acoust 2011;72(1):35–42.
coefficients were observed at frequencies (Hz) of 1321 (91%), 777 [11] Mamtaz H, Fouladi MH, Al-Atabi M, Namasivayam SN. Acoustic absorption of
(87%), 543 (85%), and 449 (84%) for the 20, 30, 40 and 50 mm thick natural fiber composites. J Eng 2016:1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/
composites, respectively. Optimal peak values of 0.86 at 752 Hz 5836107.
[12] Champoux Y, Allard JF. Dynamic tortuosity and bulk modulus in air-saturated
and 0.85 at 739 Hz were found for the 30 mm thick sample with porous media. J Appl Phys 1991;70(4):1975–9.
fiber–grain ratio of 25:75 and binder amount of 32% of the total [13] Johnson DL, Koplik J, Dashen R. Theory of dynamic permeability and tortuosity
weight, respectively. For both fiber diameter of 150 lm and grain in fluid-saturated porous media. J Fluid Mech 1987;176(3):379–402.
[14] Johnson DL, Koplik J, Schwartz LM. New pore-size parameter characterizing
length 4.5 mm the peak values of the sound absorption coefficients transport in porous media. Phys Rev Lett 1986;57(20):2564–7. http://dx.doi.
were found 0.84 at around 700 Hz. In the first instance, the results org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 57.2564.
were due to the reduced average pore size and increased surface [15] Allard JF. Propagation of sound in Porous media. In: Modelling sound
absorbing materials. New York and London: Elsevier Applied Science; 1993.
area, flow resistivity, and tortuosity.
[16] Kino N, Ueno T, Suzuki Y, Makino H. Investigation of non-acoustical
Finally, the current investigation contributes to the green tech- parameters of compressed melamine foam materials. Appl Acoust 2009;70
nology because of the shift from using conventional fibro-granular (4):595–604.
composites to natural fibro-granular composites for acoustic [17] Kundt tube technical notes; 1998. http://www.scs-controlsys.com/systems/
pdf/SCS-MT-PRO-KIT-ABSORPTION.pdf.
absorption. This study facilitates the use of agricultural waste resi- [18] ASTM C522. Standard test method for airflow resistance of acoustical
dues as acoustic absorbent material with low manufacturing cost. materials; 2003.
However, the influence of the optimal ratio and size of fiber–grain [19] Attenborough K. Models for the acoustical characteristics of air filled granular
materials. Acta Acust 1993;1:213–26.
components should be investigated further to achieve the acoustic [20] Swift MJ, Bris P, Horoshenkov KV. Acoustic absorption in re-cycled rubber
absorption performance at a desired level. granulate. Appl Acoust 1999;57(3):203–12.
[21] Ravindran A. Investigation of inverse acoustical characterization of porous
materials used in aircraft noise control application Master of Science
References Thesis. Wichita State University; 2007.
[22] Champoux Y, Stinson MR. On acoustical models for sound propagation in rigid
[1] Asdrubali F. Survey on the acoustical properties of new sustainable materials frame porous materials and the influence of shape factors. J Acoust Soc Am
for noise control. Euronoise 2006, Finland. 30 May–1 June, 1–10; 2006. 1992;92(2):1120–31.
[2] Cox TJ, Antonio PD. In: Acoustic absorbers and diffusers: Theory, design and [23] Bharadwaj Anshu, Wang Y, Sridhar S, Arunachalam VS. Pyrolysis of rice husk -
application. New York, USA: Taylors & Francis; 2009. Indian Institute of Science Bangalore. Curr Sci 2004;87(7):981–6.
[3] Waifielate AA, Abiola BO. Mechanical property evaluation of coconut fibre [24] Nor MJM, Ayub M, Zulkifli R, Amin N, Fouladi MH. Effect of different factors on
Master of Science Thesis. Karlskrona, Sweden: Blekinge Institute of the acoustic absorption of coir fiber. J Appl Sci 2010;10(22):2887–92.
Technology; 2008. [25] Wassilieff C. Sound absorption of wood-based materials. Appl Acoust 1996;48
[4] Mahzan S, Zaidi A, Mujahid A, Ghazali MI, Yahya MN, Ismail M. Investigation (4):339–56.
on sound absorption of rice-husk reinforced composite. In: Proceedings of [26] Maderuelo-Sanz R, Barrigón Morillas JM, Martín-Castizo M, Gómez Escobar V,
MUCEET 2009, Malaysian technical universities conference on engineering and Rey Gozalo G. Acoustical performance of porous absorber made from recycled
technology, 20–22 June, 19–22, MS Garden, Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia; 2009. rubber and polyurethane resin. LAJSS 2013;10(3):585–600.
[5] Khan A. Vibro-acoustic products from re-cycled raw materials using a cold [27] Castagnede B, Aknine A, Brouard B, Tarnow V. Effects of compression on the
extrusion process: a continuous cold extrusion process PhD Thesis. University sound absorption of fibrous materials. Appl Acoust 2000;61(2):173–82.
of Bradford; 2008.
[6] Benkreira H, Khan A, Horoshenkov KV. Sustainable acoustic and thermal
insulation materials from elastomeric waste residues. Chem Eng Sci 2011;66
(18):4157–71.

You might also like