My Legal Process

Simplified yet practical answer to legal questions

Judgment in Default of Appearance in Malaysia

(setting aside)

Judgment in Default of Appearance in Malaysia

(i) A Judgment in Default of Appearance in Malaysia or commonly referred to as Penghakiman Ingkar

Kehadiran in Bahasa Malaysia is a judgment entered against the defendant after it was proved to the satis-
faction of the Court that the Writ of Summons was served on the defendant but the defendant have failed
to appear or file a notice of his appearance in Court within the permitted time.

(ii) Assuming that someone had served you with a Judgment in Default of Appearance, the next step
for you to do now is to set aside the judgment in default of appearance but the question would be how is it
possible for you to do so and what is the laws governing in setting aside judgment in default of appearance
in Malaysia.

The applicable laws to set aside judgment in default of appearance in Malaysia

(iii) Order 42 rule 13 Rules of Court 2012 (ROC 2012) provides the defendant with 30 days after the ser-
vice of the judgment in default of appearance on him to make an application to Court to set it aside and it
reads as follows:-

“save as otherwise provided in these Rules for the setting aside or varying of any order or judgment, a
party intending to set aside or vary such order or judgment shall make an application to the Court and
serve it on the other party who has obtained the order or judgment within thirty days after the receipt of
the order or judgment on him”

(iv) Order 13 rule 8 ROC 2012 provides the Court with the discretionary power to set aside or vary the
Judgment and it reads as follows:

“The Court may, on such terms as it thinks just, set aside or vary any judgment entered in pursuance to
this Order.”
(v) In the Federal Court’s decision in Lai Yoke Ngan & Anor v Chin Teck Kwee & Anor [1997] 3 CLJ
Mohd Azmi FCJ have held as follows:-

“The principle of setting aside a default judgment under O.13 r.8 has been well established and needs no
detailed repetition. What is important to observe is that a default judgment is not a judgment on the mer-
its. Accordingly, when such judgment is obtained irregularly, such irregularity would be sufficient
ground by itself for setting it aside. But where the default judgment has been obtained regularly,
in order to succeed the defendant must file an affidavit of merits, i.e. the defendant must disclose
by affidavit evidence that prima facie he has a defence of merits. Put in another way, the affidavit
must disclose that he has an arguable or triable issue on the merits. (see Evans v. Bartlam [1937] AC
478).”

(vi) The High Court in the case of Tetuan Tan Teng Siah Realty Sdn Bhd v. Island Oil Palm Planta-
tions Sdn Bhd & Anor [1997] 4 CLJ 634 define what defence as merits means as follows:-

“A defence has merits if there is reasonable prospect of success on the grounds stated and evidence
placed before the court.”

(vii) Briefly what the above legislations and cases says is this:

(a) Application to set aside the judgment in default of appearance shall be made within 30 days after the
receipt of the judgment in default of appearance;

(b) the Court has the discretion to set aside the judgment in default;

(c) the Federal Court said a judgment in default if it is irregular it can be set aside as of right but if
the judgment in default is regular a defence of merit will have to be shown to the Court;

(d) a defence has merits if there is a prospect for you to succeed in defending the case base on the de-
fence raised.

Irregular judgment in default of appearance and regular judgment in default of appearance

(viii) To enter a judgment in default of appearance against a defendant will requires the compliance of
certain requirements prescribed by the ROC by the plaintif and if the judgment in default of appearance
was entered without complying with these rules then the judgment in default of appearance is known as an
irregular judgment in default of appearance and an irregular judgment in default of appearance can be set
aside as of right i.e. without the need to show the defence of merits.
(ix) On the contrary a regular judgment in default of appearance is a judgment recorded in compliance
with the ROC and to set aside a regular judgment in default of appearance you will have to show the Court
that you have a defence of merits.

Defence of Merits

(x) A simple illustration of a successful defence of merit is when the defendant raised the allegation
that there is no privity of contract i.e. there is no contractual relations between him and the plaintiff when
the Plaintiff sued him based on a contract. This can be observed in Tan Teck Hua v. Lim Seng Choo [2012] 1
LNS 717 where the High Court have held as follows:

“Without making any judgment on the merits of the plaintiff’s claim, in my opinion, the defendant had at
the very least raised a prima facie defence, i.e. whether there was a privity of contract between him and the
plaintiff.

Conclusion

(xi) It is important to note that time is of the essence when it comes to setting aside judgment in de-
fault of appearance in Malaysia because the ROC only provides the defendant only with 30 days after the
service of the judgment in default of appearance on him to make the application to set it aside.

(xii) Failure make the application to set aside the judgment in default of appearance shall necessitates a
preliminary application to Court for abridgment of time explaining the delay which translates to another
hurdle for the defendant to cross in order to successfully set aside the judgment in default of appearance.

This entry was posted in Civil Litigation Process on April 4, 2014 [http://mylegalprocess.com/judgment-in-
default-of-appearance-in-malaysia/] .