Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Auditor General is responsible for securing the audit of the Scottish
Executive and most other public sector bodies except local authorities
and fire and police boards.
The following bodies fall within the remit of the Auditor General:
Acknowledgements
Audit Scotland is grateful to those who acted as advisors to the study.
The support of trusts, Island Health Boards and the State Hospital in
devoting time and contributing to the study is gratefully acknowledged.
The study team was Angela Cullen and Catherine Vallely, under the
general direction of John Simmons.
Contents
Patient satisfaction
Recommendations
Page 15
Recommendations
Page 20
22 Bye now, pay later follow-up
Main findings
Main findings 3
Nutritional care needs to be given a Only 43% of hospitals are operating Around 40% of hospitals have set a
higher priority by all staff (Part 2) a system that allows patients to daily food allowance but less than
Around 70% of trusts have a validated order their meals no more than two one in five hospitals are using this to
tool that allows them to screen meals in advance. calculate the budget required for the
patients for risk of undernutrition. catering service.
We found that in half of hospitals,
Eighty-six per cent of trusts have 10% or more of patients said that There is a wide variation in costs.
nutritionally analysed menus. they did not receive the meal that The majority of hospitals total net
However, the extent of this analysis they ordered. catering costs range between £3.50
varies with some menus being fully and £7.50 per patient day. The cost
analysed whilst others have only a All hospitals have kitchens at ward of patients’ food and beverages
small number of menu items level where snacks can be prepared ranges from around £1.25 to over
analysed for nutritional content. for patients and three-quarters of £3 per patient day. The variation in
hospitals are able to provide snacks costs may be as a result of the
One in four hospitals do not have outwith meal times from the quantity of ingredients used in
standard recipes. This makes the hospital kitchen. production, poor portion control or
nutritional analysis of menus difficult levels of food waste.
and the measuring of the nutritional Sixty-nine per cent of trusts carry out
intake of patients even more patient satisfaction surveys. Patient We found no relationship between
challenging. satisfaction with the catering service cost and production type or patient
is high ranging from 74% to 100% satisfaction.
The majority of trusts undertake a and averaging around 92%. The
formal menu planning process. But auditors’ survey of patient food Non-patient catering is being
very few trusts fully comply with the supports these findings. subsidised (Part 4)
principles of menu planning set out in Only one-third of hospitals reviewed
published guidance. We found no relationship between were able to split the costs of the
patient satisfaction levels and the catering service between patient and
Our findings show that around three cost of the service or the provider of non-patient activities.
in five catering specifications do not the service.
fully comply with the model Three-quarters of hospitals are
nutritional guidelines for catering Ward wastage needs to be reduced subsidising the catering service
specifications in the public sector (Part 4) provided to staff and visitors. Most
in Scotland. Ward wastage, or meals not actually hospitals are doing this unknowingly.
served to patients, is high in some The total cost of this subsidy is nearly
The quality of the catering service is hospitals ranging from under 1% to £4.2 million per year or an average
satisfactory and patient satisfaction over 40% in the hospitals reviewed. hospital subsidy of around £110,000.
is high (Part 3)
All long stay hospitals have at least a If a target of 10% was set for Conclusion
three week menu cycle in place in wastage from unserved meals, NHSScotland’s hospitals are
line with good practice. around three in five Scottish hospitals providing good quality catering
would have to reduce their ward services, which have high levels of
Ninety-eight per cent of hospitals wastage levels and savings of up to patient satisfaction. In this report we
have at least two main meal choices £1.9 million could be made. have identified a number of
on the menu at each mealtime but weaknesses, and make some
there is limited choice for vegetarians, Fifty-six per cent of hospitals are recommendations that will have cost
patients on therapeutic diets and for monitoring wastage levels regularly, implications. However, we have also
patients with eating or swallowing but only 32% have set targets. identified a number of potential cost
difficulties. savings that may be used to offset
Spending on food and beverages for the cost of implementing our
All hospitals have arrangements in place patients varies significantly (Part 4) recommendations.
to offer meals to minority ethnic A large proportion of catering
patients but not all ward staff are aware departments (42%) are basing the
of these arrangements. This limits the catering service budget on historical
choice available to patients. information.
4
Part 1. Introduction
1. ‘Clinical standards for food, fluid and nutritional care in hospitals’, NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (2003).
2. ‘Hospital food as treatment’, BAPEN (1999).
3. ‘The nutrition of elderly people and nutritional aspects of their care in long-term care settings’, CRAG (2000).
4. Scottish Health Services costs year ended 31 March 2002, Information & Statistics Division (ISD).
5. Workforce Statistics as at 30 September 2002, ISD.
Part 1. Introduction 5
Exhibit 1
The percentage of hospitals using different production methods
Cook-serve 83%
With this meal production system,
meals are generally prepared and
cooked within the hospital kitchen for
distribution to the ward.
Exhibit 2
The percentage of hospitals using different methods of meal delivery service
Plated 37%
Meals are individually plated within the hospital
kitchen. They are then delivered in a trolley to the
wards and served by a member of staff.
The study
1.14 This is a report by Audit
Scotland on behalf of the Auditor
General for Scotland. This is the first
review of hospital catering by Audit
Scotland and is based on 2001/02
data. The findings and
recommendations set out in this
report will be followed up by Audit
Scotland on behalf of the Auditor
General for Scotland in due course.
Trusts have received reports setting
out local findings and
recommendations.
Part 2. Nutrition
How is the nutritional care of patients addressed?
Main findings 2.1 In this chapter we look at the 2.3 In the past decade a number of
6789
The majority of trusts plan their nutritional care of patients in terms of: publications have set out the
menus but very few fully comply principles of menu planning
with the recognised principles of • planning the menu to ensure it specifically for the NHS and older
menu planning. meets patients’ needs people. We found that the majority of
trusts undertake a formal menu
Around one in five of trusts do not • identifying patients’ nutritional planning process. However, trusts’
have a tool to screen patients for needs compliance with the principles
risk of undernutrition. outlined in these documents varies.
• ensuring menus provide sufficient The majority of trusts reported that
86% of hospital menus have been nutrients to satisfy patients’ needs. they generally adopt the recognised
analysed for nutritional content principles whilst a few trusts do not
but the extent of this analysis Menu planning comply at all.
varies considerably. 2.2 Menus should be planned to
ensure that they meet patients’ Identifying patients’ nutritional
Around one in five hospitals do needs and are nutritionally sound. needs
not have standard recipes in A wide range of professionals within 2.4 In recent years published
place. trusts hold the appropriate research has raised concerns about
knowledge and information to do the prevalence of malnutrition among
Three in five catering this properly. Planning the menu hospital patients. Up to 40% of
specifications do not fully comply should, therefore, be carried out by a adults admitted to hospital were at
with the model nutritional group of people who bring their own least mildly undernourished on
guidelines for catering expert knowledge to the process. admission or became malnourished
10
specifications in the public sector The group should include, as a during their stay in hospital .
in Scotland. minimum, a catering manager,
dietitian, nurse and a clinician.
6. ‘The health of the nation – Nutrition guidelines for hospital catering’, Department of Health (1995).
7. ‘Hospital catering: Delivering a quality service’, NHS Executive (1996).
8. ‘Eating well for older people’, The Caroline Walker Trust (1995).
9. ‘Nursing Homes Scotland Core Standards’, Scottish Executive (MEL (1999) 54).
10. ‘Incidence and recognition of malnutrition in hospital’, McWhirter JP, Pennington CR (1994).
8
Case study 1
Good practice example
Ayrshire and Arran Primary Care NHS Trust routinely undertakes nutritional care assessments for older
people.
Ayrshire and Arran PCT has developed a nutritional screening tool to identify elderly patients who were already
undernourished or those at risk of becoming undernourished in hospital. On admission all patients receive nutritional
screening, which is completed by qualified nursing staff. Evaluation within the trust has proven the tool to be reliable
and valid*. To support the tool, the trust has devised a training pack that includes guidelines for completion of the
nutrition screening tool and a suggested care pathway.
*Mackintosh M A and Hankey C R (2001) Reliability of a Nutrition Screening Tool for use in elderly day hospitals.
Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics. 14 129-136.
2.5 Nutritional screening of all some good practice in this area and 2.8 Once a menu has been analysed
patients should be an integral part of Case study 1 provides details of an for nutritional content the preparation
clinical practice. Nutritional screening example. of meals needs to be standardised.
is a simple and rapid process that This ensures that the same
identifies the characteristics Nutritionally analysed menus ingredients are used and cooking
11
associated with malnutrition . If risk 2.7 Menus should be analysed for method applied each time the meal
of undernutrition is detected patients nutritional content to ensure that is prepared. Otherwise the nutritional
should be referred to a dietitian. patients are provided with nutritionally content of the same meal could vary
Patients may also need to be sound meals. This analysis may be from one day to another. Standard
referred to other allied health done in three stages: an analysis of recipes are fundamental to the whole
professionals such as a speech and the nutritional value of each menu process of providing nutritionally
language therapist. Staff trained in item, comparison of these values analysed food to patients. Nearly four
the use of a validated nutritional against the recommended minimum in five hospitals have standard
screening tool should undertake nutritional content, and an analysis of recipes in place. The Department of
screening. the entire menu to ensure that it is Health’s Better Hospital Food
12
nutritionally balanced. Eighty-six per website offers a large range of
2.6 Around 70% of trusts have a cent of trusts have nutritionally standard recipes, all of which have
validated nutritional screening tool in analysed menus, but the extent of this been nutritionally analysed.
place. A further 10% of trusts are analysis varies considerably. For 13
screening patients for risk of example, in some trusts the first two 2.9 The Scottish Diet Action Plan
undernutrition, but are using a stages may be complete but the recommended that catering
screening tool that has not been menu may not have been assessed specifications should comply with the
validated for the patient group. This for nutritional balance. In other trusts model nutritional guidelines for
means that nearly 20% of trusts do the first stage may not yet be catering specifications in the public
not have an effective nutritional complete with only a few menu items sector in Scotland. Our findings show
screening tool at all. We identified analysed for nutritional value. that around three in five catering
11. ‘Nutrition – assessment and referral in the care of adults in hospital’, Best practice statement, Nursing & Midwifery Practice Development Unit (2002).
12. www.betterhospitalfood.com
13. ‘Eating for health – A diet action plan for Scotland’, Scottish Office (1996).
Part 2. Nutrition 9
Main findings Every hospital has ward level stay hospitals, however, this can be a
Patient satisfaction levels are high. kitchens where snacks can be major problem when patients are
prepared for patients. faced with the same menu choices
We found no relationship between on a regular basis, and may increase
patient satisfaction and the cost or Around 70% of trusts undertake their risk of becoming malnourished.
provider of the service. patient satisfaction surveys. The CRAG report recommended that
at least a three week menu cycle
All long stay hospitals have at least 3.1 In this chapter we look at the should be in operation for long stay
a three week menu cycle in line quality of the catering service and elderly patients.
with good practice. patients’ perceptions in terms of:
3.3 All long stay hospitals have at
Most hospitals offer a sufficient • the presentation and delivery of least a three week menu cycle in
choice of meals to patients eating patient meals place in line with good practice.
everyday meals but the choice for Three-quarters of acute hospitals are
vegetarians and special diets is • communication between wards also operating at least a three week
limited. and the catering department menu cycle. The remaining acute
hospitals are operating a two week
All hospitals have arrangements in • patient satisfaction. menu cycle. This is likely to be
place to offer meals to minority sufficient for the majority of acute
ethnic patients but not all staff are Presentation and delivery of meals hospitals. However, those acute
aware of these arrangements. hospitals with long stay wards or
The menu cycle beds should ensure that they are
More than half of patients are 3.2 Menu planning includes setting a operating a three week menu cycle,
ordering their meals more than menu cycle. This involves planning at least for these patients.
two meals in advance. the menu to provide three meals a
day with no item repeated within a Patient choice
In half of hospitals more than 10% specific time period. The length of 3.4 Menus should contain a sufficient
of patients reported that they did menu cycle varies among hospitals. range of meals to meet the dietary
not receive the meal they had A shorter length of menu cycle is needs and preferences of all patient
ordered. sufficient in acute hospitals where groups including patients who:
the average length of stay for
patients is around four days. In long • are children
Part 3. Quality and patient satisfaction 11
Case study 2
Good practice example
Dumfries & Galloway Acute and Maternity Hospitals Unit has developed a hotel list to provide patients with an
alternative to meals on the menu.
If a patient does not find anything on the menu that appeals to them, they can write on the menu card what they
would like to eat. This may be a lighter meal such as scrambled eggs or a more substantial meal such as scampi or
steak. The catering department will try to meet this request wherever possible whilst ensuring that the facility is not
abused. In circumstances where the catering department cannot provide the patient’s preferred meal they will
speak to the patient and discuss alternatives that can be provided. This practice helps maintain patients’ nutritional
intake and increases patient satisfaction.
• are vegetarian or vegan from the menu for these types of 3.9 Nearly all menus provide an
diets, and in some hospitals these accurate description of dishes that
• are from minority ethnic groups meals were not available from the are easily understood by patients and
menu but had to be requested by the majority provide a range of
• require the texture of food to be patients and ward staff. For example, portion sizes. We also identified that
adapted because they have one in ten hospitals do not offer a 83% of menus are coded for special
problems eating or swallowing vegetarian option from the menu dietary needs, allowing patients to
every day. choose a meal that is suitable
• require therapeutic meals due to for them.
a medical condition such as 3.7 All hospitals have arrangements
diabetes. in place to offer meals to minority 3.10 Where patients may have
ethnic patients. In a few wards communication difficulties it is good
3.5 Ninety-eight per cent of hospitals visited staff were not aware of these practice to have menus available in
have at least two main meal choices arrangements potentially limiting the languages other than English, or
on the menu at each mealtime. choice available to patients. The picture menus. These menus ensure
Many hospitals offer alternatives to review also identified some areas of the meal service is accessible to all
main meals such as salads and good practice where separate ethnic patients and can help patients make
sandwiches, aimed at patients who menus were available at ward level. their choice. Our review also
do not want to eat two large meals Case study 3 highlights one of these highlighted some good practice in
each day. Some other good practice areas of good practice. this area and an example is outlined
was identified in extending the in Case study 3.
choice available to patients. For 3.8 Menus should, wherever
example, some hospitals offer up to possible, give patients enough
six choices for lunch and evening information to choose their own
meal. A specific example of good meal. This may be done through
practice is outlined at Case study 2. providing a description of dishes on
the menu and offering different
3.6 But there is a limited choice for portion sizes. Menus should also be
vegetarians, patients on therapeutic coded to show which meals are
diets and for patients with eating or suitable for vegetarians, therapeutic
swallowing difficulties. In some diets and patients with swallowing or
cases, only one choice was available eating difficulties.
12
Case study 3
Good practice examples
Lanarkshire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust and Lanarkshire Primary Care NHS Trust have special menus for minority
ethnic groups and patients with communication difficulties.
Wishaw General Hospital has a multicultural menu for patients. The menu, devised by Serco, is available in Hindi, Arabic,
Cantonese, Urdu, and Punjabi. Requests for religious or minority ethnic meals from this menu are made to the Patient
Meals Service Coordinator in the catering department. All of the menu choices are numbered to allow patients to indicate to
the coordinator which option they would like. This practice enables non-English speaking patients to select meals that are
suitable for their religious beliefs or traditions.
The trust has taken significant action to improve the quality of service for patients with sensory impairment. All catering
managers are currently completing a sign language course to enable them to communicate better with hearing impaired
patients. In addition, pictorial menus have been piloted. For patients with visual impairments, menus on audiotape will be
introduced. All of these measures will allow patients with sensory impairments to have more control over their menu
choice, and enable them to communicate their preferences or comments on the catering service more effectively.
Ordering and delivery of patient are ordered one week in advance. out of hours catering and an example
meals is detailed at Case study 4 overleaf.
3.11 Patients should choose their 3.13 As part of a patient satisfaction
meal as close to the actual meal time survey we asked patients if they had Communication between wards and
as possible. This can raise patient received the meal that they ordered. the catering department
satisfaction and avoid unnecessary We found that in half of hospitals 3.16 Good communication between
wastage as a result of patients surveyed, 10% or more of patients wards and the catering department is
having been discharged, transferred said they did not receive the meal vital to the provision of a quality
or receiving treatment during meal that they ordered (Exhibit 4). patient meal service. It is essential
times. The Patients’ Charter that all staff involved in the catering
recommends that patients should Out of hours services service (from production, through
order their meals no more than two 3.14 Most hospitals operate fixed delivery, to helping patients to eat)
meals in advance of the mealtime. meal times. Meals and refreshments work together as a team. They
In any normal day this would mean should be available to patients should communicate with each other
patients ordering their lunch and outwith these fixed meal times. This to ensure that patients receive the
evening meal at breakfast time. may be necessary for patients who best quality of service possible. Good
have missed a meal or because the communication between wards and
3.12 We found that only 43% of time between the evening meal and the catering department can result in:
hospitals are operating a system that breakfast can be long. The standards
allows patients to order their meals on food, fluid and nutritional care • higher patient satisfaction levels
no more than two meals in advance. state that a substantial snack should
Exhibit 3 shows the timescales for be provided where the time between • patients actually receiving the
ordering patient meals in 2001/02. evening meal and breakfast is meal they ordered
From Exhibit 3 it can be seen that fourteen hours or more.
17% of hospitals indicated that they • fewer meals being ordered and
were operating an ‘other’ system of 3.15 All hospitals have kitchens at wasted
meal ordering. In some of these ward level where snacks can be
hospitals when the meal is ordered prepared for patients and three- • problems being dealt with efficiently
depends on the patient group. For quarters of hospitals are able to
example, acute patients order their provide snacks outwith meal times • potential problems being
meals forty eight hours in advance from hospital kitchens. Our review identified early and addressed.
whilst care of the elderly patient meals identified good practice in providing
Part 3. Quality and patient satisfaction 13
Exhibit 3
Advance ordering of patient meals
1 meal in advance
2 meals in advance
24 hours in advance
48 hours in advance
1 week in advance
other
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Percentage
Exhibit 4
Percentage of patients who said they received the meal they ordered
100
90
80
70
60
Percentage
50
40
30
20
10
Hospitals
Case study 4
Good practice example
Highland Primary Care NHS Trust has developed its out of hours catering by introducing a late admissions tray at
Caithness General Hospital.
Patients admitted to Caithness General Hospital after the patient meals have been ordered from the kitchen are supplied
with a ‘late admission tray’. This tray consists of soup, sandwich, and yoghurt. This out of hours service ensures that all
patients receive a nutritionally sound meal.
Case study 5
Good practice example
Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust has improved communication between wards and the catering
department by introducing a twinning system.
The trust has recently introduced a system whereby each cook or assistant cook is twinned with a ward. This provides
ward-based staff with a familiar point of contact within the catering department whom they can approach with any queries
or complaints. This development should also lead to catering staff having an increased sense of responsibility towards their
particular ward. Overall the aims are to help improve communication and the working relationship between ward and
kitchen staff and ensure a better quality service for patients.
Exhibit 5
Percentage of patients scoring the catering service as satisfactory or above
100
90
80
70
60
Percentage
50
40
30
20
10
Hospitals
3.17 We identified some good meal times. Meals were then scored • All menus should be dietary
practice where wards and the against the following seven criteria: coded to help patients make an
catering department were taste, texture, aroma, temperature, informed choice.
communicating effectively. An appearance, the correct item being
example of good practice is received and portion size. Any survey • All catering services should aim to
highlighted at Case study 5. of this type is likely to be subjective, have patients ordering their meals
but the results – ranging from 81% as close to the meal time as
Patient satisfaction to 99% – support the high satisfaction possible and no more than two
3.18 Patients are encouraged to eat scores from the patient survey. meals in advance.
and drink when they are in hospitals Lower scores tended to be because
to aid their recovery and avoid the incorrect item had been received • All catering services should aim to
malnourishment. It is therefore or food temperatures were provide all patients with the meal
essential that trusts seek patients’ inappropriate. they ordered.
views about their needs and whether
these are being met by the hospital 3.22 Trusts should monitor the Communication between wards and
catering service. quality of the catering service on a the catering department
regular basis. Many trusts do their • Trusts should encourage
3.19 All trusts obtain patients’ views own internal monitoring where communication between ward
on the catering service. Sixty-nine per surveys similar to that outlined above staff and the catering department.
cent of trusts carry out patient (para 3.21) are used. All of the private
satisfaction surveys. The frequency contractors undertake their own Patient satisfaction
of surveys varies considerably with regular monitoring of the catering • Trusts should ensure that they
some trusts carrying out monthly service. Around half of trusts use obtain patients’ views on the
surveys whilst others have carried patient groups or the local health catering service through the
out only one survey in two years. For council to obtain the views of introduction of regular (at least
patient satisfaction surveys to be of patients and give an independent quarterly) patient satisfaction
any benefit to catering departments view on the quality of the service. surveys.
and patients they need to be carried
out on a frequent basis. We found 3.23 We found no relationship • Trusts should monitor the quality
that the 31% of trusts which do not between patient satisfaction levels of the catering service through
undertake surveys obtain patients’ and the cost of the service or the internal quality assurance surveys
views through other methods such provider of the service. and/or using patient and user
as comment cards, informing staff or groups to obtain the views
the formal complaints procedure. Recommendations of patients.
These forms of collecting patients’
views place the responsibility for Presentation and delivery of meals
making comments with the patient • Acute trusts with long stay beds
rather than the trust actively asking should ensure that they have a
for their views. We recommend that three week menu cycle, at least
all trusts carry out patient satisfaction for these patients.
surveys at least quarterly.
• Menus should be reviewed to
3.20 The results of our patient ensure they offer sufficient
satisfaction survey are shown in choice to all patient groups.
Exhibit 5. Patient satisfaction levels Where it is considered
are generally high ranging from 74% appropriate, separate menus may
to 100% with an average satisfaction be developed for ethnic meals
level of 92%. and other special diets.
3.21 Auditors also carried out an • Trusts should remind all their staff
independent survey on the quality of of the procedures for offering,
patient meals in each hospital. ordering and delivering meals and
Auditors ordered a sample of meals, in particular meals for patients
across four to six wards over a few who require a special diet.
16
Main findings reasons. Trusts should make every service includes the costs of food
Costs of the catering service vary effort to include a clause in contracts and beverages, staffing, other
significantly with the majority of with private service providers that indirect costs such as cleaning
hospitals net cost per patient day allows the disclosure of sufficient materials and a proportion of trust
ranging between £3.50 and £7.50 financial information for management overheads. Exhibit 6 shows the
and food and beverages cost per decision making. Some of the in- breakdown of total gross costs by
patient day ranging from £1.25 to house catering providers were also these four components. Food and
over £3.00. unable to provide us with suitable beverages and staff account for just
cost information. The exhibits in this over 90% of total gross cost.
Two-thirds of hospitals cannot split part of the report only include those
the costs of patient catering from hospitals where cost information was Net costs per patient day
the costs of staff and visitors (non- obtained. 4.7 There is a wide variation in net
14
patient) catering. cost per patient day, with the
Total costs of the catering service average cost being £5.50. The
Over 60% of hospitals waste majority of hospitals range between
more than 10% of food delivered Budget setting £3.50 and £7.50. Some of this
to wards. Reducing ward wastage 4.3 Budgets are set for the catering variation will be due to the level of
to 10% in all hospitals could save service as a whole taking the patient income generated from non-patient
up to £1.9 million for service and meals provided to staff catering services and the hospitals’
NHSScotland. and visitors (non-patient catering) pricing policies. We found no
together. This allows any income relationship between cost and
Three-quarters of hospitals are generated from non-patient catering production type or patient satisfaction.
subsidising non-patient catering to be used to reduce the overall cost
services. Most are doing this of the catering service. Patient catering services
unknowingly as they cannot split
their costs. The annual cost of 4.4 The largest proportion of catering Costs of the patient catering service
subsidising non-patient catering is departments (42%) base their 4.8 Only one-third of hospitals that
around £4.2 million. The average catering service budget on historical we reviewed were able to split the
subsidy per hospital is £110,000. information. Other catering costs of the catering service
departments are basing their budgets between patient and non-patient
We found no relationship on target patient cost per patient activities. This highlights a lack of
between cost and production type week (32%), daily food allowance control over the costs of the catering
or patient satisfaction. (18%) and contract price (8%). service. For example, if a daily food
allowance were set the majority of
4.1 This chapter looks at the cost of 4.5 Using historical information to hospitals would be unable to
the catering service at three levels: budget generally means increasing calculate whether they were meeting
the cost element each year for inflation. this allowance. Around 40% of
• total costs of the catering service Budgeting on this basis simply takes hospitals have set a daily food
account of pay rises and increases in allowance but they do not appear to
• patient catering services the cost of food and beverages. It be using this properly. For example,
does not take account of variation in only around half of hospitals are
• non-patient catering services. the number of meals produced or using this to calculate the budget
other changes such as revisions to required for the catering service.
The figures used in this part of the the menu. Income generation targets
report are those calculated by are likely to be increased each year 4.9 We identified that the cost of
auditors. to offset these increased costs and patients’ food and beverages varies
may be set even higher to reduce significantly ranging from around
4.2 The private contractors providing the overall catering budget. £1.25 to over £3.00 per patient day
catering services to eight of the (Exhibit 7). Variations in food and
hospital sites reviewed did not Total gross cost of the catering beverage costs do not necessarily
supply us with any cost information service mean better or worse ingredients.
for commercial confidentiality 4.6 Expenditure on the catering The vast majority of ingredients are
14. Net costs are the total costs of the catering service (including non-patient catering) less any income generated from catering.
Part 4. Costs of the catering service 17
Exhibit 6
Components of total gross cost
Staffing 50%
The cost of all staff involved in
preparing and cooking meals
(excludes transport and serving
costs).
Exhibit 7
Cost of patients’ food and beverages per patient day
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
£
1.50
1.00
0.50
0.00
Hospitals
purchased through national contracts service tend to have higher wastage We have identified some good
and so costs vary only marginally. levels than those using a plated meal practice, which has resulted in low
The variation in costs may be as a service. Higher wastage levels are an wastage rates, and an example is
result of the quantity of ingredients inherent risk of using a bulk meal outlined at Case study 6.
used in production, poor portion service, as meals are issued to wards
control or food waste. This report in trays of a set size. For example, a Non-patient catering services
highlighted earlier that standard tray may hold twelve portions but 4.18 Most hospitals provide non-
recipes are not in place in every only ten portions are required for patient catering services to staff and
hospital and are not used consistently. patients, leaving two portions (or 17%) visitors in the dining room, vending
unserved. Some catering departments machines and hospitality for meetings
Food wastage have addressed this problem by and events. Some hospitals have
using different sizes of trays. extended this service by operating
Monitoring wastage levels shops and cafes and providing
4.10 The levels of food wastage can 4.15 Plated meal services have the catering for external functions and
affect the cost of a catering service. lowest wastage rates, with an parties, and some provide meals to
Food waste may occur at any or all of average of 10%. The lower quartile non-NHS bodies such as local care
the following stages: production, level for all hospitals is even less at homes and police stations.
unserved meals at ward level, uneaten 7%. Our results show that three in
food left on patients’ plates and food five hospitals surveyed have ward 4.19 The income from non-patient
wasted in the staff dining room. wastage rates over 10% and only a services is generally used to offset
few operating bulk or hybrid meal the cost of the catering service. Our
4.11 Monitoring wastage enables delivery achieved wastage rates of review found that 84% of catering
catering departments to determine less than 7%. departments have set income
how accurately they are planning generation targets; this allows
production. The best controls over 4.16 It is very difficult to eliminate catering managers to manage their
food waste are when wastage wastage from unserved meals, and it budgets effectively.
levels are regularly monitored, is likely that doing so could adversely
wastage targets are set and wastage affect quality. We recommend that 4.20 Income from non-patient
levels and values measured against hospitals should adopt a target of services should at least cover the
these targets. Fifty-six per cent of 10% wastage from unserved meals. costs of non-patient catering, and
hospitals are monitoring wastage This is equivalent to the average where possible contribute to the cost
levels regularly, but only 32% have wastage rate for plated meals of the patient service. The exception
set targets. services. Hospitals operating a bulk to this would be where a trust has a
meals service can achieve this target clear, written policy on subsidising
Ward wastage by adopting some different practices. staff meals. In such a circumstance,
4.12 As part of the review we carried They can collect information on the a target level of subsidy should be
out a survey of wastage at a sample meals selected by patients, which set and monitored. It is normal to
of wards over a range of meal times. will allow more accurate prediction of have a pricing policy for staff and a
We looked at the number of unserved the uptake of particular dishes. They separate policy for visitors (charging
meals left at each ward after all can also use different size trays higher prices).
patient meals had been served. The when portioning meals for delivery
survey was restricted to unserved to wards. 4.21 All hospitals have pricing policies in
meals due to the practical difficulties place, but in the main, hospitals are
in measuring waste left on plates 4.17 The annual cost to NHSScotland following a pricing policy that was
15
after patients have finished eating. of wastage from unserved meals is originally set in 1978 . This pricing
around £4.2 million. If all hospitals policy states that staff prices should be
4.13 Wastage rates range from 1% reduced their wastage to 10% set at provisions cost plus 50% plus
to 44%, but these vary depending on NHSScotland could save up to VAT. The pricing policy advised in this
the type of meal service (Exhibit 8). £1.9 million. This is equivalent to an circular is unlikely to recover all of the
extra 25 pence on food and costs associated with providing a non-
4.14 Hospitals using a bulk meal beverages for each patient each day. patient catering service.
Exhibit 8
Percentage of unserved meals wasted on wards
45
40
35
30
25
Percentage
20
15
10
0
Bulk Hybrid Plated
Hospitals
Case study 6
Good practice examples
Grampian University Hospitals NHS Trust and Highland Primary Care NHS Trust have developed procedures to
help reduce levels of ward wastage.
Patients in the trust receive menu cards at breakfast time to complete for lunch and evening meal and the following day’s
breakfast. Ward staff collect the menu cards and forward them to the catering department which uses them for planning
production levels. The menu cards are put into pigeonholes within the catering department and prior to each mealtime the
ward reception staff update them. Meals ordered for patients who have since been discharged are removed and orders for
new patients are inserted. This ensures that all patients receive a meal of their choice and food wastage is kept to a
minimum.
Ward and catering staff at Caithness General Hospital operate a straightforward but effective system that keeps catering
staff as up to date as possible with the number of meals required for the day. A white board on each ward details all planned
admissions and discharges for the day. Nursing staff note on the board the actual times of each admission or discharge and
the time at which the kitchen were informed. This aids communication between the wards and catering department and
reduces the amount of unserved meals at ward level.
Exhibit 9
Contribution/subsidy level of non-patient catering services
200,000
100,000
0
£
-100,000
-200,000
-300,000
Hospitals
4.22 The income generated from • Trusts should base their catering
non-patient catering rarely covers the budgets on the most recent,
costs of the service. Around three relevant and accurate information
quarters of hospitals are subsidising available.
their non-patient catering services
and most are doing this unknowingly. • Trusts should consider setting a
Exhibit 9 shows the level of daily food and beverages
contribution or subsidy achieved in allowance for patients.
2001/02 for the hospitals reviewed.
This ranges from an annual • All hospitals should aim to reduce
contribution of £118,000 to a subsidy the level of ward wastage
of £266,000. (unserved meals) to 10%.
4.23 The average hospital subsidy is • Trusts should set pricing policies
around £110,000 per annum. The and income generation targets
cost of this level of subsidy for that aim to at least break-even on
NHSScotland is approximately non-patient catering activities or
£4.2 million per year. have a clear, written policy on the
level and costs of subsidisation.
Recommendations
• Trusts should ensure that they • The Scottish Executive Health
have appropriate financial Department should withdraw
information on the catering circular NHS 1978 (GEN) 6 and
service to allow informed replace it with guidance which
decision making. states that non-patient catering
activities should at least break-even.
• All catering departments should
have systems in place which
allow them to accurately calculate
the costs of providing patient and
non-patient catering.
Part 5. The catering service 21
Some food handling staff are not 5.5 Around 90% of trusts have food
appropriately trained in food safety and health policies although some of
and hygiene. these do not meet all of the
requirements set out in the Diet
5.1 This chapter looks at: Action Plan.
Exhibit 10
Sickness absence rates for 2001/02
18
16
14
12
Percentage
10
8
Average sickness
6 absence = 6.95%
0
city rural urban
Hospitals
Case study 7
Good practice example
Dumfries and Galloway Acute and Maternity Hospitals Unit has introduced an incentive system to reduce sickness
absence in the catering department.
The unit operates a scheme where catering staff are awarded a bonus dependent on the department’s performance
against the prior year’s budget. The bonus is also linked to sickness absence. Each individual’s bonus entitlement is
calculated using a ‘sliding scale’ depending on how many days sickness absence they have had. This system
increases staff motivation and helps reduce the level of sickness absence.
Exhibit 11
Staff vacancy rates for 2001/02
35
30
25
Percentage
20
15
Average vacancy
rate = 12.5%
10
0
city rural urban
Hospitals
5.8 High levels of sickness absence and vacancy rates should continue to Food safety and hygiene
may be due to the nature of the work be monitored. 5.13 The provision of safe and
and the relative low pay of catering nutritious food in hospitals for
staff. We have identified some good Computerised catering systems patients and staff is a major
practice in targeting sickness 5.11 Catering departments should undertaking. This is achieved by
absence and an example is given in plan their workloads and control the having a combination of good
Case study 7. related costs, quality and nutritional management, staff trained in safe
content of meals provided. hygiene practices and catering skills,
5.9 Another factor that may affect Computerised catering systems and appropriate quality controls.
the ability of the catering department provide more accurate production
to meet demand and provide meals planning and control over the Policies and procedures
17
of a consistent quality is a large catering department as a whole. 5.14 The Scottish Infection Manual
turnover of staff or high vacancy rate. sets out the roles and responsibilities
Exhibit 11 shows that vacancy rates 5.12 Over half of hospital catering of NHSScotland bodies in relation to
for the hospitals included in the study departments have computerised infection control. It also includes
varied between 0% and 32% with an catering systems in place. The extent specific guidance relating to the
average vacancy rate of 12.5%. Our to which these systems are used provision of safe food and catering
review identifies that vacancy rates varies considerably. For example, services in hospitals.
are higher in hospitals based in rural some catering departments are
locations. High staff vacancy and simply using these systems to store 5.15 Every hospital reviewed has a
turnover rates may be due to the pay standard recipes. Others are making food safety control system in place.
rates offered by local competitors, better use of their computerised These systems ensure that food is
the nature of the work and the systems by using them to control prepared and served in accordance
location of the hospital. stock levels, order goods, record with recognised food safety
18
sales in the dining room through procedures and legislation .
5.10 The new pay deal for ancillary electronic point of sale, print menu
workers will help to address some of cards and carry out patient 5.16 As part of our survey on food
these problems but staff turnover satisfaction surveys. quality temperature failures were
Part 6. Recommendations
A summary of the recommendations made in this report
Ms Ellen Davidson
Management Accountant, Forth
Valley Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Mr Sean Hunter
Catering Manager, Royal Infirmary of
Edinburgh and Chair,
Hospitals Caterers Association
(East of Scotland)
Mr Brian Main
Support Services Manager, Tayside
University Hospitals NHS Trust
Mr Eddie Monks
Lay representative, Argyll and Clyde
Health Council
Mr Harry Norton
Finance Manager, Grampian
University Hospitals NHS Trust
28
1 ‘Clinical standards for food, fluid 13 ‘Eating for health: A diet action
and nutritional care in hospitals’, plan for Scotland’, The Scottish
NHS Quality Improvement Office (1992)
Scotland (2003)
14 Circular NHS 1978 (GEN) 6
2 ‘Hospital food as treatment’,
British Association for Parenteral 15 NHSScotland Staff Governance
and Enteral Nutrition (1999) Standard (2002)
5 Workforce Statistics as at 30
September 2002, ISD
Audit Scotland
110 George Street
Edinburgh EH2 4LH
Telephone
0131 477 1234
Fax
0131 477 4567