Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SUMMARY
In developing countries, like Colombia, there are many effects from natural events. They
could affect the Gross National Product (GNP) and the amount of displaced people and
refugees as well. Natural Risk reduction could be a priority responsibility for Colombian
authorities.
The Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Research Group, founded and directed by the
author since 1999, is working in Seismic Microzonation for the following Colombian cities:
Tunja, Barrancabermeja, Villavicencio, Ibagué, Neiva and Pasto. Additionally, the last two
years the group has made a Bogotá Regional Seismic Hazard assessment. In Colombia it is
necessary to improve the Seismic Hazard assessment, in both scales: regional and local.
However, we have two significant limitations: economic and human resources to evaluate
Seismic Hazard accurately and in a realistic way. On the other hand, we could use novel
and inexpensive technologies, like a Geographical Information System Database and
Microtremor Analysis in order to improve Colombian hazard assessment.
INTRODUCTION
It is necessary to reduce the natural hazard risk of Colombian cities. This topic was
successfully developed in highest hazard zones, like San Francisco and Tokyo. In order to
*
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana
Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Research Group
Researcher
†
The members of the Earthquake Engineering and Seismology Research Group are Rene Van
Hissenhoven, MSc, PhD; Alexander Caneva, MSc, PhD; Pilar Monroy, MSc; Alfonso Ramos, MSc;
Diego Garcia, MSc and Andres Alfaro, MSc
succeed we have to asses the seismic hazard accurately, and the vulnerability of buildings
as well.
This part summarize the most dramatic Natural disasters that have being happening in
Colombia in the last twenty years, however, this summary does not include floods and
landslides, because, unfortunately, they happen too many times every year in the whole
country.
Popayán Earthquake, March 31 1983. This earthquake affected Popayán City and
surrounding towns. It resulted in 287 deaths, 7,248 injured people, 13,650 dwelling
destroyed and a huge economic loss. Rebuilding cost approximately US$ 76 million. This
amount does not include National Monuments or Ancient Buildings damaged or destroyed
[8].
Most of Colombian people live in towns and cities, which are located in significant seismic
hazard zones (pga more than 150 gals for 475 years), additionally at least 30 cities have
more than 100,000 inhabitants. Chart 1 summarizes some studies for Seismic Microzoning
in Colombia.
CHART 1
Chart 1 summarizes some of the most important Microzoning studies developed in the last
years in Colombia. This means that Universities like Nacional de Colombia, Los Andes and
Javeriana and Government agencies like Ingeominas, have been done remarkable
contributions to assess the seismic local hazard. Nevertheless, it is necessary to improve
most of these studies and, additionally, to contuct studies for cities like Cucuta (population
462,000 inhabitants), which was destroyed by an earthquake in 1875 [29].
Additionally, cities like Tunja, Neiva, Pasto, Barrancabermeja and Ibagué need to improve
their Local Seismic Hazard Assessment, including geophysical, geological, seismological
and geotechnical surveys, because these studies are in a rudimentary level based on a
compilation and an interpretation of available data. Analysis done included interpretation
of aerial photographs and morphological analysis [1], [21], [5], [2] and [6].
DISCUSSION
In spite of the fact that in the last ten years a remarkable effort has been done in order to
develop Seismic Microzoning studies of the biggest cities in Colombia, like Bogotá [15],
Armenia [12], Medellín [21], Tunja [25], Barrancabermeja [2], Villavicencio [3], Neiva [4],
Pasto [5], Ibagué [2], Bucaramanga [16], Manizales [20], etc. There are more than 10 cities
bigger than 100,000 inhabitants and located in hazardous regions that need Seismic
Microzoning studies (e.g.: Monteria, Cucuta, Palmira, Buenaventura, Tumaco, Quibdo,
etc).
Geological mapping for cities like Tunja, Ibagué, Barrancabermeja, Pasto and Neiva need
to be complemented by cross-sections and one or several block diagrams in order to
provide a three dimensional model of these cities. Also, it is advisable to carry out
geophysical seismic refraction and reflection studies.
On the other hand, in order to refine Microzonation studies it is necessary to evaluate soil
parameters, in the city of Ibagué [6] some of the parameters (Vs, Vp, damping, etc.) were
estimated using empirical correlations [30]. Sometimes, geological and geotechnical
available data is not enough, in these cases, Microtremors could offer valuable and
inexpensive information about several soil materials (Figure 7) [31]. Summarizing, one of
the most significant challenges in Colombia is to improve and to assess Seismic
Microzoning Studies.
Figure 1. Microzonation in Barrancabermeja (Without scale – Original scale 1:25.000) [2]
Figure 2. Soils in Ibagué – Blue dots indicate logs and boreholes location (Without scale
– Original scale 1:25.000) [6]
Figure 3. Microzonation in Neiva (Without scale – Original scale 1:25.000) [22]
Coordenadas EW
975500 m E 976500 m E 977500 m E 978500 m E 979500 m E 980500 m E
628000 m N 628000 m N
627500 m N 627500 m N
627000 m N 627000 m N
626500 m N 626500 m N
626000 m N 626000 m N
Coordenadas NS
Coordenadas NS
625500 m N 625500 m N
625000 m N 625000 m N
624500 m N 624500 m N
624000 m N 624000 m N
623500 m N 623500 m N
623000 m N 623000 m N
Figure 4. City of Pasto . Shear Wave Velocity from Soil Indexes [30] Without scale [5].
Figure 5. Microzonation in Tunja (Without scale – Original scale 1:25.000) [26]
88000 88000
0.00 0.33 0.00
0.40
0.00
0.15
0.15 0.00 0.50
0.45
0.15 0.17
0.83
86000 0.06 0.00
1.43
86000
0.32
0.06
0.10 0.59
0.21 0.90 0.29 0.06 0.33
0.30 1.30
0.43 0.40 0.00
0.17 0.06 0.06 0.21
0.33 0.60
0.43 0.07 0.20 1.73 0.77
0.25 0.91 0.00 1.67 1.810.91
1.43 0.29 1.73 0.67 0.83
0.00 1.00 1.25
1.00 1.71
84000 0.17 0.77 0.90
0.67 1.15
1.43
1.67
1.00 1.88 1.00
1.67
1.71 84000
1.99 1.67
1.43
0.13 0.06 1.54
1.06
0.24
0.30 1.11 0.00 1.25
1.67
1.67 1.25
0.08 0.91 1.250.91 1.11 0.00
0.00
0.16 0.250.22 0.23 1.67 1.67
1.00 1.25
NORTH
NORTH
0.23 0.25 0.26
0.25
0.25 1.00 1.25 1.25 1.111.25
0.13 0.50 1.11
0.14 1.25 0.56
1.11 1.00 1.25
1.00
0.00 1.11 1.25
82000 0.27 0.27
0.33 0.77
1.00
1.25
0.25 1.00 0.67
1.10
1.43 1.54 82000
0.83
0.91 1.11 0.77
0.67 0.00 1.25
1.25
0.91 1.00 0.50 0.06
1.00 0.50 0.67 0.50
0.38
0.28
0.770.50 0.29
0.29
0.50 0.70 0.28
80000 0.48
0.48
0.45
0.63 0.40 0.34 80000
0.91
0.56
0.09
0.83
0.25
0.50
0.530.59 0.50
78000 78000
1.10
0.56
0.50 1.00
0.67
0.56 0.63
0.71 0.71
0.67 0.77 0.83
76000 0.77 0.63 0.91
0.83 76000
0.77
0.77
0.77 0.77
1. Jaramillo, M., G. Pabon, O. Ramirez and J. Guacaneme (2000) Seismic and Geotechnical
Hazard in Tunja. Proc. 8Th Colombian Cong. Geotechnical Eng. Bogotá. (in Spanish)
2. González C. and A. Alfaro. 2001. Seismic Risk for the refugee in Barrancabermeja City
– Colombia. Proc. Second Iberoamerican Cong. Earthq. Eng. Madrid. 714-720. (In Spanish
with English Abstract)
4. Pabón G., M. Jaramillo, C. Calpa and R. Pinto (2000) Geological and Geotechnical for
Neiva. Proc. 8Th Colombian Cong. Geotechnical Eng. Bogotá. (in Spanish)
5. Calpa, C., J. Pantoja, A. Alfaro and R. Van Hissenhoven (2001) Evidencias de Efectos
Locales y Mapa de Susceptibilidad Sísmica en la Ciudad de Pasto. Memorias XI Jornadas
Geotécnicas Ingeniería de Colombia, Bogotá. 253-273.
6. Alfaro, A., A Díaz- Granados, P. Escobar and L. Martínez (2001) Aportes para la
Microzonificación Sísmica de Ibagué. Red Sismológica Regional Eje Cafetero Viejo
Caldas y Tolima Vol. 6 No 1, Manizales. 32-37.
8. Gros, C. (1985) Popayán: deux ans ápres. Autopsie dún désastre. Revue Trimestreill de
Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherche sur l`Ámerique Latine et le Tires Monde, No 23.
Paris
9. D`Ercole, R. (1989) La catástrofe del Nevado del Ruiz: una enseñanza para el Ecuador.
El caso del Cotopaxi. Estudios de Geografía. Riesgos Naturales.
15. Ingeominas and Universidad de Los Andes (1997) Microzonificación Sísmica de Santa
Fe de Bogotá. Bogotá.
17. Meyer, H. (1990) Proyecto Integral para la Mitigación del Riesgo Sísmico de Cali.
Santiago de Cali.
22. Instituto Geofísico Universidad Javeriana and Consultoría Colombiana S.A. (2000).
Microzonificación Sísmica Preliminar de Neiva. Bogotá.
23. Coral, H. (1993) Zonificación geotécnica urbana preliminar para Pasto. Universidad
Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá.
26. Instituto Geofísico Universidad Javeriana and Consultoría Colombiana S.A. (2000).
Microzonificación Sísmica Preliminar de Tunja. Bogotá.
27. Guacaneme J. (2001) Zonificación Morfodinámica de Tunja. Memorias XI Jornadas
Geotécnicas de la Ingeniería Colombiana. Bogotá.
28. Instituto Geofísico Universidad Javeriana and Consultoría Colombiana S.A. (2000).
Microzonificación Sísmica Preliminar de Villavicencio. Bogotá.
29. Ramírez, J. E. (1975) Cúcuta cien años después.18 de mayo de 1874. Instituto
Geofísico de los Andes Colombianos. Bogotá.
30. Ohta, Y. and N. Goto (1978) Empirical Shear Wave Velocity Equations in Terms of
Characteristics Soil Indexes, Earthq. Eng. Struc. Dyn., 6, 167-187.
31. Alfaro, L.G. Pujades, X. Goula, T. Susagna, M. Navarro, J. Sánchez and J.A. Canas.
(2001) Preliminary Map of Soil’s Predominant Periods in Barcelona using Microtremors.
Pure and Applied Geophysics. 158(2001) 2499-2511.