Professional Documents
Culture Documents
approved in 1990. Last previous edition approved in 2008 as C1161–02c (2008)ε1. evenly to the bearing cylinders on either side.
DOI: 10.1520/C1161-13
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
3
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4,
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http://
the ASTM website. www.dodssp.daps.mil.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
NOTE 1—Configuration:
A: L = 20 mm
B: L = 40 mm
C: L = 80 mm
NOTE 2—Load is applied through a ball which permits the loading member to tilt as necessary to ensure uniform loading
FIG. 2 Schematics of Two Semiarticulating Four-Point Fixtures Suitable for Flat and Parallel Specimens. Bearing Cylinders Are Held in
Place by Low Stiffness Springs, Rubber Bands or Magnets
remove no less than 0.060 mm (0.0025 in.) per face. Remove 7.2.4.7 Materials with low fracture toughness and a greater
approximately equal stock from opposite faces. susceptibility to grinding damage may require finer grinding
7.2.4.5 Wheel speed should not be less than 25 m/sec wheels at very low removal rates.
(~1000 in./sec). Table speeds should not be greater than 0.25 7.2.4.8 The four long edges of each B-sized test specimen
m/sec (45 ft./min.). shall be uniformly chamfered at 45°, a distance of 0.12 6 0.03
7.2.4.6 The procedures in 7.2.4 address diamond grit size mm as shown in Fig. 4. They can alternatively be rounded with
for coarse, intermediate, and finish grinding but leaves the a radius of 0.15 6 0.05 mm. Edge finishing must be compa-
choice of bond system (resin, vitrified), diamond type (natural
rable to that applied to the test specimen surfaces. In particular,
or synthetic, coated or uncoated, friability, shape, etc.) and
the direction of machining shall be parallel to the test
concentration (percent of diamond in the wheel) to the discre-
specimen long axis. If chamfers or rounds are larger than the
tion of the user.
tolerance allows, then corrections shall be made to the stress
NOTE 9—The sound of the grinding wheel during the grinding process calculation in accordance with Annex A2. Smaller chamfer or
may be a useful indicator of whether the grinding wheel condition and
material removal conditions are appropriate. It is beyond the scope of this
rounded edge sizes are recommended for A-sized bars. Larger
standard to specify the auditory responses, however. chamfers or rounded edges may be used with C-test specimens.
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
NOTE 1—Configuration:
A: L = 20 mm
B: L = 40 mm
C: L = 80 mm
NOTE 2—Bearing A is fixed so that it will not pivot about the x axis. The other three bearings are free to pivot about the x axis.
FIG. 3 Schematics of Two Fully Articulating Four-Point Fixtures Suitable Either for Twisted or Uneven Specimens, or for Flat and Paral-
lel Specimens. Bearing Cylinders Are Held in Place by Low Stiffness Springs, Rubber Bands, or Magnets
TABLE 3 Specimen Size introduction of random and severe flaws, such as might occur
Configuration Width (b), mm Depth (d), mm Length (LT), min, if specimens were allowed to impact or scratch each other. If
mm required by the user, inspect some or all of the surfaces as
A 2.0 1.5 25 required for evidence of grinding chatter, scratches, or other
B 4.0 3.0 45
C 8.0 6.0 90 extraneous damage. A 5X-10X hand loupe or a low power
stereo binocular microscope may be used to aid the examina-
tion. Mark the scratched surface with a pencil or permanent
marker if scratches or extraneous damage are detected. If such
Consult Annex A2 for guidance and whether corrections for
damage is detected, then the damaged surface should not be
flexural strength are necessary. No chipping is allowed. Up to
placed in tension, but instead on the compression mode of
50 X magnification may be used to verify this. Alternatively, if
loading when the specimen is inserted into the test fixtures.
a test-specimen can be prepared with an edge that is free of
machining damage, then a chamfer is not required. NOTE 10—Damage or scratches may be introduced by handling or
7.2.4.9 Very deep skip marks or very deep single striations mounting problems. Scratches are sometimes caused by loose abrasive
(which may occur due to a poor quality grinding wheel or due grit.
to a failure to true, dress, or balance a wheel) are not 7.3 Number of Specimens—A minimum of 10 specimens
acceptable. shall be required for the purpose of estimating the mean. A
7.2.5 Handling Precautions and Scratch Inspection— minimum of 30 shall be necessary if estimates regarding the
Exercise care in storing and handling of specimens to avoid the form of the strength distribution are to be reported (for
8. Procedure
8.1 Test specimens on their appropriate fixtures in specific
testing configurations. Test specimens Size A on either the
four-point A fixture or the three-point A fixture. Similarly, test
B specimens on B fixtures, and C specimens on C fixtures. A
fully articulating fixture is required if the specimen parallelism
requirements cannot be met.
8.2 Carefully place each specimen into the test fixture to
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
preclude possible damage and to ensure alignment of the
specimen in the fixture. In particular, there should be an equal
amount of overhang of the specimen beyond the outer bearings
and the specimen should be directly centered below the axis of
the applied load. If one of the wide specimen surfaces has been
marked for the presence of a scratch or extraneous damage,
then place the damaged surface so that it is loaded in
compression. If a side surface is marked as damaged, then the
specimen may be tested, but shall be inspected after the test to
confirm that the scratch or damage did not cause fracture.
8.3 Slowly apply the load at right angles to the fixture. The
FIG. 5 Surface Grinding Parallel to the Specimen Longitudinal maximum permissible stress in the specimen due to initial load
Axis shall not exceed 25 % of the mean strength. Inspect the points
of contact between the bearings and the specimen to ensure
even line loading and that no dirt or contamination is present.
example, a Weibull modulus). The number of specimens If uneven line loading of the specimen occurs, use fully
required by this test method has been established with the articulating fixtures.
intent of determining not only reasonable confidence limits on 8.4 Mark the specimen to identify the points of load
strength distribution parameters, but also to help discern application and also so that the tensile and compression faces
multiple-flaw population distributions. More than 30 speci- can be distinguished. Carefully drawn pencil marks will
mens are recommended if multiple-flaw populations are pres- suffice. These marks assist in post fracture interpretation and
ent. analysis. If there is an excessive tendency for fractures to occur
NOTE 11—Practice C1239 may be consulted for additional guidance directly (within 0.5 mm) underneath a four-point flexure inner
particularly if confidence intervals for estimates of Weibull parameters are bearing, then check the fixture alignment and articulation.
of concern. Specimen shape irregularities may also contribute to excessive
8.6.2 Crosshead speeds for the different testing configura- 8.13 Fractographic analysis of broken specimens is highly
tions are given in Table 4. recommended to characterize the types, locations, and sizes of
8.6.3 Times to failure for typical ceramics will range from 3 fracture origins as well as possible stable crack extension due
to 30 s. It is assumed that the fixtures are relatively rigid and to slow crack growth. Follow the guidelines in Practice C1322.
that most of the testing-machine crosshead travel is imposed as Only some specimen pieces need to be saved. Tiny fragments
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
strain on the test specimen. or shards are often inconsequential since they do not contain
8.6.4 If it is suspected that slow crack growth is active the fracture origin. With some experience, it is usually not
(which may interfere with measurement of the flexural difficult to determine which pieces are important and should be
strength) to a degree that it might cause a rate dependency of retained. It is recommended that the test specimens be retrieved
the measured flexural strength, then faster testing rates should with tweezers after fracture, or the operator may wear gloves in
be used. order to avoid contamination of the fracture surfaces for
possible fractographic analysis. See Fig. X1.1 for guidance. If
NOTE 14—The sensitivity of flexural strength to stressing rate may be there is any doubt, then all pieces should be preserved.
assessed by testing at two or more rates. See Test Method C1368.
8.7 Break Force—Measure the break force with an accuracy 8.14 Inspect the chamfers or edge round if such exist. If they
of 60.5 %. are larger than the sizes allowed in 7.2.4.4 and Fig. 4, then the
flexural strength shall be corrected as specified in Annex A2.
8.8 Specimen Dimension—Determine the thickness and
width of each specimen to within 0.0025 mm (0.0001 in.). In
9. Calculation
order to avoid damage in the critical area, it is recommended
that measurement be made after the specimen has broken at a 9.1 The standard formula for the strength of a beam in
point near the fracture origin. It is highly recommended to four-point–1⁄4 point flexure is as follows:
retain and preserve all primary fracture fragments for fracto- 3 PL
graphic analysis. S5 (1)
4 bd2
8.9 Determine the relative humidity in accordance with Test
where:
Method E337.
P = break force,
L = outer (support) span,
b = specimen width, and
TABLE 4 Crosshead Speeds for Displacement-Controlled Testing d = specimen thickness.
Machine
Configuration Crosshead Speeds, mm/min 9.2 The standard formula for the strength of a beam in
A 0.2 three-point flexure is as follows:
B 0.5
C 1.0 3 PL
S5 (2)
2 bd2
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
10.1.7 Strain rate or crosshead rate. configuration B and less for configuration C in either three or
10.1.8 Report the strength of every specimen in megapas- four-point loadings, as discussed in Ref (1). The chamfer sizes
cals (pounds per square inch) to three significant figures. in this test method have been reduced relative to those allowed
10.1.9 Mean (S̄) and standard deviation (SD) where: in MIL-STD-1942 (MR). Chamfers larger than specified in this
n test method shall require a correction to stress calculations as
(S
1
discussed in Ref (1).
S̄ 5
n
(3) 11.2.3 Configuration A is somewhat more prone to error
which is probably greater than 5 % in four-point loading.
n
Chamfer error due to reduction of cross-section areas is 4.1 %.
!
2
( ~ S 2 S̄ !
1 For this reason, this configuration is not recommended for
SD 5
~n 2 1! design purposes, but only for characterization and materials
development.
10.1.10 Report of any deviations and alterations from the
procedures described in this test method. 11.3 An intralaboratory comparison of strength values of a
high purity (99.9 %) sintered alumina was held (7)5. Three
10.1.11 The following notation may be used to report the
different individuals with three different universal testing
mean strengths:
machines on three different days compared the strength of lots
S(N,L) to denote strengths measured in (N= 4 or 3) -point
flexure, and (L = 20, 40, or 80 mm) fixture outer span
of 30 specimens from a common batch of material. Three
size different fixtures, but of a common design, were used. The
EXAMPLES mean strengths varied by a maximum of 2.4 % and the Weibull
S(4,40) = 537 MPa denotes the mean flexural strength was 537 MPa
when measured in four-point flexure with 40 mm span
moduli by a maximum of 27 % (average of 11.4). Both
fixtures. variations are well within the inherent scatter predicted for
S(3,20) = 610 MPa denotes the mean flexural strength was 610 MPa sample sizes of 30 as shown in Refs (1), (7), and (9).
when measured in three-point flexure with 20 mm
span fixtures.
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
ANNEXES
A1.1 The schematic figures in Fig. A1.1 illustrate semi- that are not parallel or flat. Fully-articulated fixtures may be
articulated and fully-articulated degrees of freedom in the text used for well-machined specimens. Semi-articulating fixtures
fixtures. Fully-articulated fixtures shall be used for specimens shall only be used with flat and parallel specimens.
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
A2.1 Flexural strengths shall be corrected for oversized stage. All four chamfers should be measured and an average
corner chamfers or edge rounds (cmax > 0.15 mm for chamfers value used for the correction. The most accurate results may be
or Rmax > 0.20 mm for edge rounds). Chamfers or rounded obtained by measuring each test specimen, but for many
edges cause an underestimate of the true maximum flexural applications, an approximate average chamfer size based on a
strength, if not considered in the calculations. sample of 5 test specimens may be adequate.
A2.2 The maximum stress in a flexure test specimen is A2.4 The correct flexural strength S may be obtained by
customarily calculated from simple beam theory with the multiplying the apparent flexural strength, S', (calculated on
assumption that the test specimen has a rectangular cross the assumption the cross section is a simple rectangle) by a
section. The test specimen chamfers reduce the second moment correction factor, F.
of inertia, I, of the test specimen cross section about the neutral
axis. For a perfect rectangular cross section, I = (bh3)/12. For S 5 FS' (A2.2)
a rectangular cross section with four chamfered edges of size c,
the adjusted moment of inertia from reference 1 is: A2.5 Correction factors, F, for chamfers or rounded edges
for standard A, B, C sized specimens are listed below. In
bh3 c 2 2 accordance with 9.4 and A2.4, the flexural strength shall be
I5
12
2
9
~ c 1½ ~ 3h 2 2c ! 2 ! (A2.1)
corrected if the chamfers are larger than the sizes highlighted
where the second term on the right hand side shows the by the lines in Table A2.1 and Table A2.2
reduction due to the chamfers. See Tables A2.1 and A2.2.
A2.3 The chamfer size, c, may be measured with a traveling
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Chamfer Geometry
c Correction factor, F Correction factor, F Correction factor, F
(mm) Configuration “A” Configuration “B” Configuration “C”
b = 2 mm, d= 1.5 mm b = 4 mm, d= 3 mm b = 8 mm, d= 6 mm
0.080 1.0121 1.0031 1.0008
0.090 1.0152 1.0039 1.0010
0.100 1.0186 1.0048 1.0012
0.110 1.0224 1.0058 1.0015
0.120 1.0265 1.0069 1.0018
0.130 1.0310 1.0080 1.0021
0.140 1.0358 1.0093 1.0024
0.150 1.0409 1.0106 1.0027
0.160 1.0464 1.0121 1.0031
0.170 1.0521 1.0136 1.0035
0.180 1.0583 1.0152 1.0039
0.190 1.0647 1.0169 1.0043
0.200 1.0715 1.0186 1.0048
0.210 1.0786 1.0205 1.0053
0.220 1.0861 1.0224 1.0058
0.230 1.0939 1.0244 1.0063
0.240 1.1020 1.0265 1.0069
0.250 1.1105 1.0287 1.0074
0.260 1.1194 1.0310 1.0080
0.270 1.1286 1.0333 1.0087
0.280 1.1382 1.0358 1.0093
0.290 1.1481 1.0383 1.0099
0.300 1.1585 1.0409 1.0106
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
APPENDIXES
X1.1 Fig. X1.1 illustrates fracture patterns that are com- more pieces. Fractographic analysis can assist in determining
monly observed in ceramic specimens. Low-strength ceramics, the primary fracture origin. See Practice C1322 for further
which have a low energy level at fracture, typically break into guidance.
only two pieces. Medium- to high-strength ceramics break into
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
FIG. X2.1
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
X3.1 Test method C1161 has officially replaced standards X3.5 MIL STD 1942(MR) allowed 200 to 500 grit wheels
MIL STD 1942(MR) and MIL STD 1942A that were issued by for final finish grinding. MIL STD 1942A and the 1990, 1994
the United States Army Materials Research Laboratory, and 1996 versions of C1161 specified 320-500 grit wheels for
Watertown, Massachusetts. The former was a U.S. Army finish grinding.
standard adopted in November 1983 and it was replaced by the
X3.6 C1161 and MIL STD 1942A have a requirement (not
tri service MIL STD 1942A on November 8, 1990. MIL STD
found in MIL STD 1942(MR)) that the specimen be centered in
1942A had many revisions to harmonize it with the ASTM the fixtures to within 0.10 mm in the z direction.
C1161-90. MIL STD 1942A was officially cancelled and
replaced by C1161 on 29 May 1998 X3.7 The 1⁄4 inch × 1⁄8 inch × 2 inch specimen on a 1.5 inch
× 0.75 inch test fixture, configuration D, specified in an
X3.2 MIL STD 1942(MR), MIL STD 1942A, and C1161 Appendix in the 1990, 1994 and 1996 versions of C1161 was
have some differences that are listed in the following para- never in the MIL STD’s.
graphs.
X3.8 The MIL STD’s had tighter tolerances than C1161 on
X3.3 The chamfers in MIL STD 1942(MR) were 0.15 mm the specimen cross section dimensions (0.03 mm versus 0.13
for a 45 degree chamfer and 0.20 mm for a rounded edge. The mm).
sizes were reduced to 0.12 mm and 0.15 mm in MIL STD X3.9 The MIL STD’s did not include the “Customary
1942A and C1161. Procedures” specimen preparation option.
X3.4 The parallelism tolerance for test fixture bearing X3.10 The MIL STD’s had no specific limit on the amount
cylinders was reduced from 0.030 mm in MIL STD 1942(MR) of preloading allowed during the fracture test whereas C1161
to 0.015 mm in MIL STD 1942A and C1161. has a limit of 25 % of the mean strength.
REFERENCES
(1) Baratta, F. I., Quinn, G. D., and Matthews, W. T., “Errors Associated (6) Quinn, G. D., “Fractographic Analysis and the Army Flexure Test
With Flexure Testing of Brittle Materials,” U.S. Army MTL TR 87-35, Method,” Fractography of Glass and Ceramics, Vol 22 of Advances
July 1987. in Ceramics, American Ceramic Society, 1988, pp. 314–334.
(2) Quinn, G. D., Baratta, F. I., and Conway, J. A., “Commentary on (7) Quinn, G. D., “Flexure Strength of Advanced Structural Ceramics: A
U.S. Army Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of High Round Robin,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, Vol 73 [8],
Performance Ceramics at Ambient Temperature,” U.S. Army AM- ( 1990), pp. 2374–84.
--```,`,``,`,``,````,,`,,````,,,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
MRC 85-21, August 1985. (8) Davies, D. G. S., “The Statistical Approach to Engineering Design in
(3) Hoagland, R., Marshall, C., and Duckworth, W., “Reduction of Ceramics,” Proceedings of the British Ceramic Society, Vol 22, 1979,
Errors in Ceramic Bend Tests,” Journal of the American Ceramic pp. 429–452.
Society, Vol 59, No. 5–6, May–June, 1976, pp. 189–192. (9) Ritter, J. Jr., Bandyopadhyay, N., and Jakus, K., “Statistical Repro-
(4) Quinn, G.D. and Morrell, “Design Data for Engineering Ceramics: A ducibility of the Dynamic and Static Fatigue Experiments,” Ceramic
Review of the Flexure Test,” Journal of the American Ceramic Bulletin, Vol 60, No. 8, 1981, pp. 798–806.
Society, Vol 74 [9], 1991, pp. 2037–66. (10) Weibull, W., “Statistical Distribution Function of Wide
(5) Quinn, G. D., “Properties Testing and Materials Evaluation,” Ce- Applicability,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol 18, 1951, p. 293.
ramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, Vol 5, May–June 1984, (11) Tennery, V., “International Energy Agency Annex II,” Ceramic
pp. 298–311. Technology Newsletter, Number 23, April–June 1989.
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the ASTM website (www.astm.org/
COPYRIGHT/).