Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228411509
CITATIONS READS
23 2,246
1 author:
Robert G. Parker
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ…
137 PUBLICATIONS 2,852 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Robert G. Parker
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 09 May 2016
Mechanics and Sliding Friction in
Belt Drives With Pulley Grooves
The steady mechanics of a two-pulley belt drive system are examined where the pulley
Lingyuan Kong grooves, belt extension and wedging in the grooves, and the associated friction are
considered. The belt is modeled as an axially moving string with the tangential and
Robert G. Parker1 normal accelerations incorporated. The pulley grooves generate two-dimensional radial
Professor and tangential friction forces whose undetermined direction depends on the relative
e-mail: parker.242@osu.edu
speed between belt and pulley along the contact arc. Different from single-pulley analy-
ses, the entry and exit points between the belt spans and pulleys must be determined in
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
the analysis due to the belt radial penetration into the pulley grooves and the coupling of
Ohio State University,
the driver and driven pulley solutions. A new computational technique is developed to
650 Ackerman Rd.,
find the steady mechanics of a V-belt drive. This allows system analysis, such as speed/
Columbus, OH 43202
torque loss and maximum tension ratio. The governing boundary value problem (BVP)
with undetermined boundaries is converted to a fixed boundary form solvable by a
general-purpose BVP solver. Compared to flat belt drives or models that neglect radial
friction, significant differences in the steady belt-pulley mechanics arise in terms of belt
radial penetration, free span contact points, tension, friction, and speed
variations. 关DOI: 10.1115/1.2168469兴
494 / Vol. 128, MARCH 2006 Copyright © 2006 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
F − GV
= 2p关sin  cos − cos s cos共 + ␥兲兴 共4兲
where F is the belt tension, p is the normal compressive pressure
between the belt and the pulley groove surfaces, is the inclina-
tion angle between the belt velocity and the velocity of the over-
lapping point on the pulley 共Fig. 2兲, is the Coulomb friction
coefficient, = ds / d is the belt radius of curvature, and is the
natural angular coordinate 共Fig. 2兲.
Fig. 1 Belt sliding in pulley grooves: „a… cross section and The belt radial penetration is governed by 关13兴
acting forces, and „b… velocities
2pz 2p
x = R − r共s兲 = = 共cos  + sin s兲 共5兲
k k
where R is the constant belt pitch radius, r共s兲 is the belt radius
contacts the pulley groove, because the contacting material par- coordinate, k is the radial spring stiffness, and pz is the pressure
ticles and associated relative sliding velocity vector Ṽs exist in load component exerted on the belt along the pulley axial direc-
this sliding plane 共Fig. 1共b兲兲. The friction force is projected into tion 共Fig. 1共a兲兲. k is determined mainly by the belt cross-sectional
the normal plane, which bisects the belt and is perpendicular to geometry and material properties. Gerbert 关7兴 gives an approxi-
the pulley axis, to establish the equations of motion. The angle s mate estimation k = 12共H / B兲Ez tan , where H is the belt height, B
is the angle between Ṽs and the normal plane. ␥ is the sliding is the belt width 共top side of V-belt兲, and Ez is the belt modulus of
angle defining the direction of the belt relative sliding velocity elasticity in the transverse direction.
vector projected in the normal plane. Figure 1共b兲 shows that the Z r and are polar coordinates with origin at the pulley center
共Fig. 2兲. Substitution of the geometric relations ds = rd / cos , r
component of the belt relative sliding velocity vector Ṽs is = R − x, = ds / d, and = − 共d = d − d兲 into 共3兲 and 共4兲
Vs sin s. On the other hand, this velocity component can also be
leads to the polar coordinate equations
written as Vs cos s cos ␥ tan . Equivalence of these two expres-
sions leads to the relationship between these angles 关13兴 R−x
T⬘ = 共F − GV兲⬘ = 2p关− sin  sin + cos s sin共 + ␥兲兴
tan s = tan  cos ␥ 共1兲 cos
where −共 / 2兲 艋 s 艋 / 2. 共6兲
Figure 2 shows the free body diagram of a segment of an ex-
tensible belt in the pulley grooves. The belt is modeled as an 2p R−x
⬘ = 1 − 关sin  cos − cos s cos共 + ␥兲兴 共7兲
axially moving string. An Eulerian formulation is adopted for the T cos
control volume. The model is based on that in 关13兴 except that belt where T = F − GV is the belt tractive tension and 共 兲⬘ is the deriva-
inertia through longitudinal and centripetal accelerations is con-
tive with respect to the angular coordinate . Because tan
sidered here while neglected in 关13兴. Note that Figs. 1 and 2 are
= dr / 共rd兲 = r⬘ / r 共Fig. 2兲, substitution of x = R − r yields
similar to those in 关13兴 but with additional vectors 共GV兲 due to the
consideration of belt inertia. For steady motions, conservation of x⬘ = − 共R − x兲tan 共8兲
mass requires that
To complete the problem, a constitutive law relating belt ten-
G = m共s兲V共s兲 = const 共2兲 sion F and velocity V is needed. Following 关8–10,19兴, the consti-
tutive law is
where G is the mass flow rate, m共s兲 is the belt mass density per
unit length, V共s兲 is the belt speed, and s is the arclength coordinate F = EA共m0V/G − 1兲 Þ T = 共EAm0 − G2兲V/G − EA 共9兲
along the belt. Balance of linear momentum projected along the where EA is the belt longitudinal stiffness and m0共s兲 is the belt
belt tangential and normal directions in the normal plane leads to mass density per unit length in the stress-free state, which can be
d共F − GV兲 measured. The mass flow rate G is not known initially and is
= 2p关− sin  sin + cos s sin共 + ␥兲兴 共3兲 determined in the analysis. Comparison of 共9兲 and Eq. 共4兲 in 关13兴
ds
shows that the constitutive laws are consistent with each other.
Velocity analysis from Fig. 2共b兲 reveals that
V cos = r + Vs sin ␥ V sin = Vs cos ␥ 共10兲
Elimination of the sliding velocity Vs and use of r = R − x and 共9兲
lead to
cos − 共R − x兲共EAm0 − G2兲/关G共T + EA兲兴
tan ␥ = 共11兲
sin
In summary, the motion of the belt sliding in the grooves is
governed by the three differential equations 共6兲–共8兲 and the four
algebraic equations 共1兲, 共5兲, 共9兲, and 共11兲. These equations apply
to the entire belt-pulley contact zone on a pulley.
The governing equations seem complicated at first sight be-
cause they involve coupled differential and algebraic equations
with many variables. The primary variables are T , , and x, whose
behavior is governed by 共6兲–共8兲. All other variables 共such as
V , p , s , ␥, etc.兲 are intermediate variables that can be explicitly
Fig. 2 „a… Free body diagram of a moving curved string includ- expressed in terms of the three basic variables T , , and x based on
ing belt inertia effect and „b… pulley velocity r, belt segment the four algebraic equations 共1兲, 共5兲, 共9兲, and 共11兲. In other words,
velocity V„s…, and relative speed Vs„s… the steady motion of the belt in the belt-pulley contact zone could
g关u共a兲,u共b兲兴 = 0 共12兲
where F, u, and g are n-dimensional vectors and F and g may be
Fig. 3 Two-pulley belt drive with belt penetration into pulley nonlinear.
grooves The undefined boundary requires special treatment. The wrap
angles of the belt-pulley contact zones 共Fig. 3兲 for the driver and
driven pulley are ⌽1 and ⌽2, respectively. They are not known at
be cast as a boundary value problem for T , , and x, governed this point. Nevertheless, they are used to define the following
solely by three differential equations. Realization of this point aids nondimensional variables
understanding of the subsequent solution procedure for the full
1 2
two-pulley system. Nevertheless, the formulation 共6兲–共8兲, 共1兲, 共5兲, ˆ 1 = ˆ 2 = 0 ⬍ ˆ 1, ˆ 2 ⬍ 1 共13兲
共9兲, and 共11兲 is retained for clarity of equations and convenience ⌽1 ⌽2
of numerical solution. Correspondingly, the governing differential equations for the belt
Within a contact zone there is no adhesion zone where the belt on the driven pulley 0 ⬍ ˆ 1 ⬍ 1 are
penetration, speed, and tension remain constant, as exists in a
flat-belt model 关8–10兴. Gerbert and Sorge 关13兴 gave a mathemati- dT1
cal proof of the nonexistence of an adhesion zone. An alternative = 2p1关− sin  tan 1 + cos s1共tan 1 cos ␥1 + sin ␥1兲兴
dˆ 1
explanation based on physical insight is given here that clearly
shows that an adhesion zone cannot exist in the grooved pulley ⫻共R − x1兲⌽1 共14兲
再
model. Taking the driven pulley as an example, suppose there is
an adhesion zone BC in the belt-pulley contact zone 共Fig. 3兲.The d1 2p1
only possibility is that it exists in the middle part of the contact = 1− 关sin  − cos s1共cos ␥1 − sin ␥1 tan 1兲兴
dˆ 1 T1
冎
zone because belt penetration varies in the entry and exit zones.
For this assumed adhesion zone BC, the belt penetration and ten-
⫻共R − x1兲 ⌽1 共15兲
sion must be constant and the belt speed 共including that at B兲 must
be the same as the linear velocity of the overlapping point B on
the pulley, i.e., VB = rB1, where rB is the belt radius at B and 1 dx1
is the rotation speed of the driven pulley 共in this paper, the sub- = 关− 共R − x1兲tan 1兴⌽1 共16兲
dˆ 1
scripts 1 and 2 represent the driven and driver pulley, respec-
tively兲. At an arbitrary point A in the entry zone outside BC, the To incorporate the unknown constant ⌽1 in the standard BVP
belt tension is less than that at point B because the driven pulley form 共12兲, it is defined as the unknown function ⌽1共ˆ 1兲 governed
entry zone connects with the slack span. According to the consti- by
tutive law 共9兲, the belt velocity at A is also smaller than that at B,
i.e., VA ⬍ VB. Because the belt velocity component along the cor- d⌽1共ˆ 1兲
= 0, 0 ⬍ ˆ 1 ⬍ 1 共17兲
responding pulley tangential direction is always less than or equal dˆ 1
to its absolute speed, we have VA cos A 艋 VA ⬍ VB. Furthermore, Similarly, the governing equations for the driver pulley on 0
the speed of the overlapping point B on the pulley is less than that ⬍ ˆ 2 ⬍ 1 are
at A, rB1 ⬍ rA1, due to the lesser belt penetration in the entry
zone. Thus we have VA cos A ⬍ rA1, and the belt tangential dT2
speed is less than that of the pulley of the same point. This con- = 2p2关− sin  tan 2 + cos s2共tan 2 cos ␥2 + sin ␥2兲兴
dˆ 2
tradicts the requirement that the tangential friction must be oppo-
site the direction of belt travel on the driven pulley. Consequently, ⫻共R − x2兲⌽2 共18兲
再
the existence of an adhesion zone on the driven pulley is not
possible. There is, however, a single point where the belt moves d2 2p2
purely in the pulley tangential direction = 0 at the transition from = 1− 关sin  − cos s2共cos ␥2 − sin ␥2 tan 2兲兴
dˆ 2 F2
冎
seating to unseating. Similar reasoning applies to the driver pulley
to rule out the existence of an adhesion zone there.
⫻共R − x2兲 ⌽2 共19兲
冕
⌽i
located at the midpoint of the slack span 共Fig. 3兲, and the as yet
unknown slack span length is ⌬. Both spans are straight for a Mi = 2 pi cos si sin ␥i共R − xi兲2/cos idi i = 1,2
string model of the belt 共no bending stiffness兲. The coordinates of 0
冋 册 冋 册
terms into the standard BVP form, they are a natural product of
⌬ the BVP solution without additional effort. For example, for the
x o1 = + R cos + 1共0兲 , y o1 = R sin + 1共0兲 共25兲
2 2 2 torque on the driven pulley, one defines I1共1兲
The pulley centers have fixed distance L = 兰0 1 2 p1 cos s1sin ␥1共R − x1兲2 / cos 1d␣ and adds the following
ODE and boundary condition to the above BVP formulation
共xo1 − xo2兲2 + 共y o1 − y o2兲2 = L2 共26兲
dI1共1兲 2 p1 cos s1sin ␥1共R − x1兲
2
The coordinates of the two belt-pulley contact points for the tight = ,
d1 cos 1
span are determined geometrically as
冋 册 冋 册
共34兲
⌬ 3 0 艋 1 艋 ⌽1 with I1共0兲 = 0
xC2 = − − R cos − 2共1兲 + R cos − ⌽2 + 2共1兲
2 2 2 I1共⌽1兲 is the desired torque M 1 on the driven pulley and is a direct
共27兲 output of the solution. Although the added ODE and boundary
condition 共34兲 are written in dimensional form over the range
y C2 = R sin 冋
2
册 冋
− 2共1兲 + R sin
3
2
− ⌽2 + 2共1兲 册 共28兲
关0 , ⌽1兴, use of 共13兲 transforms them into the necessary form on
关0 , 1兴. The torque on the driver pulley can be similarly obtained.
x C1 =
⌬
2
+ R cos
2
冋 册 冋
+ 1共0兲 − R cos
3
2
− ⌽1 − 1共0兲 册 4 Results and Discussion
The belt tension F and tractive tension T = F − GV differ by GV,
共29兲 which is nearly constant along the belt 关10兴. In the following
analysis, references to belt tension always mean the tractive ten-
y C1 = R sin 冋
2
册 冋
+ 1共0兲 + R sin
3
2
− ⌽1 − 1共0兲 册 共30兲
sion, T.
Convergence of the numerical BVP solution is not assured be-
cause of its complexity. For such a highly nonlinear problem, an
The tight span goes through point C2, and it is tangent to the initial solution guess by intuition or insight is not reliable. Instead,
belt in the driver pulley groove. Its slope can be calculated from the initial guess is found using a trial and error method. First, the
the three angles 2共0兲, 2共1兲, and ⌽2 on the driver pulley as z2 driver pulley is arbitrarily specified a wrap angle ⌽2 and two
共DR兲 共DR兲
= tan关−共 − 2共1兲兲 − ⌽2 − 2共0兲兴. The line of the tight span can then boundary tensions Tt and Ts ; it is not hard to find its nu-
be written as 共y − y c2兲 = z2共x − xc2兲. Similarly, working from the merical solution from 共6兲–共8兲 plus G⬘ = 0. The equation G⬘ = 0 is
driven pulley, the tight span goes through point C1 and its slope is added because G is an unknown constant; defining it as the field
z1 = tan关⌽1 + 1共0兲 − 1共1兲兴. The tight span line is also 共y − y c1兲 variable G共兲 and enforcing zero derivative enables natural inclu-
= z1共x − xc1兲. These two lines must be the same, which requires sion in the standard form 共12兲. The four boundary conditions are
similar to those in 共23兲 and 2 is specified. Next, for the driven
z1 − z2 = 0 共y 1 − xc1z1兲 − 共y 2 − xc2z2兲 = 0 共31兲 pulley, the wrap angle ⌽1 is arbitrarily specified, and the two
boundary tensions are the same as those for the driver pulley
In the above analysis, the slack span length ⌬, the mass flow
problem. The governing equations and boundary conditions are
rate G, and the driven pulley rotation speed 1 are unknown.
similar to those of the driver pulley except that G⬘ = 0 is replaced
Analogous to 共17兲, these unknown constants are incorporated into
the standard BVP form 共12兲 by adding three trivial ODEs by ⬘1 = 0. G is specified as that computed from the driver pulley
and, unlike the driver pulley, the rotation speed of the driven
d⌬ dG d1 pulley 1 is not known. Again, the numerical solution can be
=0 =0 = 0, 0 ⬍ ˆ 1 ⬍ 1 共32兲 found for the driven pulley. After computing the solutions for the
dˆ 1 dˆ 1 dˆ 1
driver and driven pulleys, the geometry of the two pulleys and the
The standard BVP form 共12兲 involves only coupled differential belt in their grooves is plotted with the free spans extending from
equations. The algebraic equations 共26兲 and 共31兲 are naturally in- the two pulleys such that the two slack spans align. In general, the
corporated into the form 共12兲 by treating them as boundary con- two tight spans are not geometrically compatible, i.e., they do not
ditions where the unknown constants in 共26兲 and 共31兲 can be overlap with each other 共Fig. 4兲.The parameters, such as the two
written as the values at either boundary 共for example, ⌽2 can be wrap angles, are adjusted until the geometric compatibility condi-
written as either ⌽2共0兲 or ⌽2共1兲兲. The total order of the 11 differ- tion 共i.e., alignment of the two spans兲 is close to being satisfied. At
ential equations 共14兲–共21兲 and 共32兲 that define F in 共12兲 equals the this stage, the numerical solutions of the two individual pulleys,
number of boundary conditions 共22兲, 共23兲, 共26兲, and 共31兲 that together with the wrap angles, can be used as the initial guess for
define g in 共12兲. The algebraic equations 共22兲, 共23兲, 共26兲, and 共31兲 the solution of the full two-pulley BVP with the same specified
are incorporated in the definition of F from the above differential parameters as those in the final step of trial and error. This initial
equations and require no special processing. Although the original guess is typically sufficient for the numerical solution to converge.
problem has unknown boundaries, it is now defined entirely on A continuation procedure avoids repetition of the above process
the interval 关0 , 1兴. This standard BVP form 共12兲 can be solved by as parameters change. After a numerical solution is obtained from
Fig. 4 Search of the initial solution guess by trial and error tween the two pulleys’ entry and exit zones. The two belt free
spans couple the driver and driven pulley solutions and need to be
tangent to the “wedging” belt in the entry and exit zones. Corre-
the above process, the parameters can be changed in small incre- spondingly, the two belt free spans are no longer on the line of
ments where each numerically exact solution obtained in the pre- common tangency of the two pulleys, as in the corresponding
vious step serves as the initial guess for the current step. Even string models of flat belt drives 关8,9兴. Instead, the two free spans
with such a strategy, not all parameter combinations can be are nonparallel and this shows why torque loss exits. Figure
solved. For instance, in the example problem, when the two span 6shows the variations of pulley wrap angles and torques with
tensions are out of the range presented in the following figures, increasing tight span tension. As the tight/slack span tension ratio
the above procedure fails due to the sharp changes of the inclina- increases, the wrap angles for both pulleys increase considerably.
tion and sliding angles in the belt-pulley contact zones. Note, The wrap angle on the driver pulley increases more quickly than
however, the large range of span tensions that can be handled. on the driven pulley. When the tight/slack span tension ratio is
Even for the simpler single pulley case using an alternate numeri- large, the wrap angle on the driver pulley is much larger than that
cal method, finding meaningful solutions involves numerical on the driven pulley, and the two free spans are markedly unpar-
troubles and requires careful selection of the parameters 关13兴. In- allel to each other. When the tight span tension is close to that of
clusion of belt bending stiffness might smooth the sharp changes the slack span, the two wrap angles are close. Even for such a
that can occur in the driver pulley exit zone and improve numeri- case, extrapolation of Fig. 6共a兲 shows that the wrap angles would
cal performance. be around 190 deg, larger than the 180 deg for flat belt drives or
This paper analyzes two-pulley systems. If the belt mechanics when belt wedging is ignored. Only when both span tensions drop
on only a single driver or driven pulley are desired 共as in 关13兴兲, the to zero do the wrap angles become 180 deg. The torques on the
presented BVP-solver method remains a convenient technique. driver and driven pulley differ from each other 共Fig. 6共b兲兲, as
This is because the two free span tensions and the wrap angle, compared to the always equivalent driver and driven pulley
which are the three boundary conditions specified for single-
pulley analysis 关13兴, can be directly specified and readily varied as
desired. This is cumbersome for the shooting method in 关13兴 that
requires trial and error.
This section presents steady solution results for a belt drive
with two identical pulleys. The data are specified in Table 1. Note
that the friction coefficient is adopted from 关13兴. Figure 5 shows
the steady solutions with increasing tight span tension while the
slack span tension remains constant. The belt penetration features
are evident for large tight/slack tension ratio. In particular, note
the distinctly different belt shape and penetration properties be-
Fig. 5 Steady solutions for the system specified in Table 1: „a… Fig. 6 Variation of pulley „a… wrap angles and „b… torques with
Tt = 700 N, „b… Tt = 1200 N, „c… Tt = 3000 N, and „d… Tt = 5000 N tight span tractive tension for the system specified in Table 1
torques for flat belt drives 关8–10兴. The torque difference increases Seating of the belt in the entry zone is determined mainly by the
with the free span tension difference. The two torques are nearly belt entry tensions 共given the pulley/groove geometry, friction co-
equal when the tight/slack tension ratio is comparatively small. efficient, and the belt properties兲. Because the belt entry tension of
Figure 7 shows the tension distributions on the belt-pulley con- the driver pulley is higher than that of the driven pulley, the belt
tact zones for the driver and driven pulley, respectively. Although on the driver pulley is more quickly seated than on the driven
the variation shapes are quite different from each other, they share pulley, resulting in larger amplitude belt inclination angles. This
some common characteristics. In the entry or exit zones, both belt point is most apparent for the driver pulley. For the two extreme
tensions vary slowly. This is because in these zones, the belt radial cases Tt = 700 N and Tt = 5000 N, the belt inclination angles at the
penetrations are small; correspondingly, the friction force is small entry point differ by more than 10 deg 共Fig. 9共a兲兲. While for the
and does not offer significant tangential force to change the belt driven pulley, although the tight span tensions are very different,
tensions. the belt entry tension is the same, i.e., 100 N. Accordingly, the
Figure 8 shows the belt radial penetrations in the belt-pulley belt inclination angles do not change much in the entry zones 共Fig.
contact zones. The penetration patterns on the driver and driven 9共b兲兲.
pulleys are quite different. For both cases, rapid changes of the Unseating of the belt in the exit zone is different from the
penetrations occur in the entry/exit zones. But in the middle zone, seating action in the entry zone. The belt unseating rate in the exit
the belt penetration on the driver pulley varies little, which differs zone depends not only on the belt exit tensions but also on how
from the continuously increasing penetration on the driven pulley deeply the belt is wedged in the pulley grooves in the middle
共also see Fig. 5兲. zone. For pulleys with the same belt penetration in the middle
The belt inclination angles 2 and 1 in the belt-pulley contact zones, the smaller the belt exit tension, the larger the belt inclina-
zones are given in Fig. 9. Negative 共positive兲 belt inclination tion angle required to overcome the belt “wedging” and unseat the
angle means that belt penetration increases 共decreases兲 at the cor- belt. To visualize this, imagine that the belt in the exit zone pulley
responding point while the belt penetration reaches the maximum grooves is pulled out by tugging on the belt in the free spans with
point when the belt inclination angle is zero. In the entry/exit the specified tensions. On the other hand, if the belt exit tensions
zones, the amplitudes of the belt inclination angles are larger than are the same, the deeper the belt penetration in the middle zones,
those in the middle zones because of relatively small pressure the larger the belt inclination angles in the exit zones 共see Fig.
between the belt and pulley, which leads to rapid seating/ 9共a兲 where the exit tension is the same for all curves兲. Although
unseating of the belt into the pulley grooves. The seating and the belt penetrations of driver and driven pulleys in the middle
unseating rate x⬘ is approximately measured by the belt inclina- zones are comparable 共Fig. 8兲, the exit tension on the driver pulley
tion angle 共see 共8兲兲. is lower than that of the driven pulley. Consequently, the belt
inclination angle in the driver pulley exit zone is higher than its extreme case of ␥ = 0 deg 共or 360 deg兲, the belt moves only radi-
counterpart on the driven pulley 共Figs. 9共a兲 and 9共b兲兲. This results ally relative to the groove surfaces with decreasing penetration. A
in more rapid unseating in the exit zone on the driver pulley than sliding angle of 180 deg corresponds to purely radial belt motion
on the driven pulley 共Figs. 5 and 8兲. with increasing penetration. For both extreme cases, there is no
The above differences in the entry/exit zones on the driver and friction contribution to the pulley torque. When the pulley torque
driven pulleys cause the two spans to be nonparallel. This effect increases 共decreases兲, the sliding angles adjust to make greater
becomes more apparent with significant tight/slack tension ratio. shares of the contact zones close to 共away from兲 90 deg for the
The belt sliding angles ␥2 and ␥1 in the belt-pulley contact driven pulley or 270 deg for the driver pulley, as well as increas-
zones are given in Fig. 10. Belt sliding angles indicate the direc- ing the wrap angles. The abrupt changes of the belt sliding angles
tion of the friction force relative to the pulley radial direction 共Fig. in the exit zones are caused by the sharp decreases in belt
2兲. They are determined by the belt sliding speed in the pulley penetration.
radial direction and the relative speed between belt and pulley This study does not consider belt bending stiffness, which is an
surfaces along the pulley tangential direction. For the driven pul- important factor in belt-pulley drives 关10,11,20兴. Inclusion of
ley, where the belt drives the pulley, the belt speed along the bending stiffness might make the belt penetrations and inclina-
pulley tangential direction is faster than that of the overlapping tions vary more smoothly in the entry/exit zones, resulting in
point on the groove surface, so the belt sliding angle is in the more parallel spans even with large tension differences. Reducing
range 0 – 180 deg. For the situation where the pulley drives the these sharp changes may also improve numerical convergence for
belt on the driver pulley, the belt sliding angle is in the range less accurate initial guesses.
180– 360 deg. For the driven pulley, when the belt reaches an The power efficiency is defined as the ratio between the powers
extremal of belt penetration and the belt inclination angle is zero, of the driven and driver pulleys, = 共M 11兲 / 共M 22兲. Figure 11
the belt speed along the pulley radial direction is zero; corre- shows that increasing the tight/slack tension ratio significantly de-
spondingly the belt sliding angle is 90 deg 共Fig. 10兲. At this point, creases the rotation speed of the driven pulley and the power
the friction force fully contributes to overcoming the driven pulley efficiency . The rotation speed of the driven pulley is always less
torque, like the case of a flat belt. A similar situation exists on the than that of the driver pulley, which is fixed at 1000 rpm. Effi-
driver pulley; at the maximum penetration point, the belt sliding ciency decreases because 1 decreases with tension ratio for fixed
angle is 270 deg and the friction force fully contributes to resist- 2 while the ratio M 1 / M 2 decreases slightly with tension ratio
ing the pulley driving torque. When the belt sliding angles are 共Fig. 6共b兲兲. For drives with appreciable free span tension differ-
away from 90 deg or 270 deg, the belt moves in both the radial ence, the rotation speed of the driven pulley and the power effi-
and tangential directions 共relative to the groove surfaces兲. In the ciency are much less than those for flat belt drives, where the