Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3. Process Design & • Define Grade Engineering® “circuit”, equipment design & specifications
Simulation • Quantify process simulation responses across mining value chain
CRC ORE 2
MINE PLANNING STAGES AND INDIVIDUAL TARGETS
Long Term Mine Planning Medium Term Mine Planning Short Term Mine Planning
CRC ORE 3
STRATEGIC LONG TERM MINE PLANNING (LTMP)
The Main Target of LTMP is to achieve the economic and strategic targets of the Company / Shareholders
One of the Main Targets of LTMP is to convert Ore Resources into Ore Reserves
CRC ORE 4
STRATEGIC MINE PLANNING: STRATEGIC
Importance of Strategic Mine Planning? Incorporates and plans at a global level.
1. Model and optimise the Mine Plan accounting current and future metal prices.
2. Calculate the annual cut-off grades for the life of the mine for all processes.
3. Model and find optimum timing and size for secondary processes (leaching).
4. Model and select the optimum time for plant expansions, maintenance and close of mine.
5. Model and Optimise multiple scenarios with different Plant Sizes and Metal prices.
6. Maximises NPV and estimates; optimum time, resource region and quantity/size of new
technology application to a specific project.
STRATEGIC MINE PLANNING COMMON ACTIVITIES
Resource Evaluation and Economic Block Model
3. Resource Evaluation
Final Pit Economic
4. Definition of Reserves and Final Pit Optimisation Sequence
CRC ORE 6
STRATEGIC MINE PLANNING + GE ACTIVITIES
Sensor
P r e fe re Different based
n t ia l Sensor Coarse
i al
g r a de
blasting
based stream gr avity
d e port m bulk s eparat
ent for gr ade sorting
b y s iz e sorting i on
by size
GE Cost Model
GE Resource Evaluation GE Final Pit Optimization Push Back Opt/Dsg GE Production Schedule
Optimization
CRC ORE 8
GRADE ENGINEERING: COST MODELLING
Initial Investment
Variable
Capital Costs (CAPEX) • Hauling ($/t)
Sustaining • Loading ($/t)
• Drill & Blast ($/t)
• Rehandling ($/t)
Mining • Ancillary ($/t)
COST MODEL
MINZONE
PARAMETER UNITS TOTAL
SEC PRI
Mining
Ore to Mill Mining Cost CmineMILL $/t 2.63 2.68 2.65
tonnes mined Ore to LCH Mining Cost CmineLCH $/t 2.87 3.11 2.96
Ore to GE Mining Cost CmineGE $/t 2.82 2.99 2.87
Waste to Dump Mining Cost CmineWST $/t 2.87 3.11 2.96
Ore to Stocks Mining Cost CmineSTK $/t 2.90 2.95 2.92
Ore Rehandling Variable Cost CmineREH $/t 1.80 1.80 1.80
Mining Cost Cmine $/t 2.71 2.85 2.76
Dump Leaching Leaching Cost CromLCH $/t 1.45 0.00 1.45
tonnes leached SXEW Cost CSXEW $/lb 0.25 0.00 0.25
Dump Leaching Cost Clch $/t 2.12 0.00 2.12
Milling Mill Throughput Rate TPHMILL t/href 3,523 2,437 3,026
tonnes milled Mill Availability AvMILL % 93.0% 93.0% 93.0%
Mill Operating Hours HropMILL 496,775 418,992 915,767
Milling Variable Cost CmillVAR $/t 3.50 3.50 3.50
Milling Fixed Cost CmillFIX $/hr 18,330 18,330 18,330
G&A Fixed Cost CgaFIX $/hr 8,000 8,000 8,000
Millling Cost Cmill $/t 13.51 14.31 13.80
CRC ORE 10
COST MODELLING EXAMPLE: SELLING COSTS
MINZONE
PARAMETER UNITS TOTAL
SEC PRI
Cu Concentrate Concentrate Cu Grade ConCu % 33.4% 33.8% 33.5%
Selling Concentrate As Grade ConAs ppm 1,839 1,261 1,634
Concentrate Ag Grade ConAg g/t 51 50 51
Cu Concentrate Tonnage TconCu dmt 22,515 12,315 34,830
Transport & Port Cost CtrcCu $/wmt 26.0 26.0 26.0
Ocean Freigth Cost CofcCu $/wmt 54.0 54.0 54.0
Insurance Cost CinsCu 0.63 0.64 0.64
Umpire, Surveying, Asseying CusaCu $/dmt 0.35 0.35 0.35
As Penalty PenAs $/dmt 0.00 0.00 0.00
Concentrate Humidity HumCu % 9.0% 9.0% 9.0%
Concentrate Losses LossCu % 0.5% 0.5% 0.5%
Cu Payable Factor PFCu % 96.6% 96.6% 96.6%
Cu Smelter Charge TCCu $/dmt 105.0 105.0 105.0
Cu Refining Charge RCCu $/lb 0.105 0.105 0.105
Sales Cu Price PCu $/lb 2.87 2.87 2.87
Cu Price Particip. Factor PPCu $/lb 0.00 0.00 0.00
Cu Conc. Selling Cost SellConCu $/lb 0.46 0.46 0.46
Cu Cathode Transport & Port Cost CTRP $/lb 0.023 0.000 0.023
Selling Ocean Freigth Cost COFR $/lb 0.027 0.000 0.027
AAA Cathode Quality Premium QPCu $/lb 0.000 0.000 0.000
Sales Cu Price PCu $/lb 2.87 2.87 2.87
CRC ORE 11 Cu Cathode Selling Cost SellCuH $/lb 0.05 0.00 0.05
COST MODELLING EXAMPLE: GE CAPEX & OPEX
Description Unit Unit Cost
Screening – Grade by Size Cost $/t. processed -0.31
Undersize Material Cost $/t. processed 0.03
Oversize Material Cost $/t. processed -0.60
Differential Blasting Cost $/t. processed -0.10
CRC ORE 12
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: ECONOMIC BLOCK MODELLING
GE
E
G
E
G GE GE
E
G
E
GE
0.95
0.80
CU @ 0.5 0.70
0.60
0.35
0.39
20% @ 0.95 + 80% @ 0.39 = 0.5 0.28
0.30
30% @ 0.80 + 70% @ 0.35 = 0.5
CRC ORE 15
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: BLOCK VALUE & DESTINATION
Mine Best Economic Destination
GE Economic Optimum
Combination Process Plant
CU @ 0.5
Leaching Pads
GE Technique
Stock
Pile
HG Stream
Grade
Engineering Plant Waste Dump
LG Stream
CRC ORE 16
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: CUT-OFF GRADE
ℎ
𝑉𝑚 = 𝑃 − 𝑘 𝑥𝑦ḡ − 𝑥ℎ − 𝑚 −
(𝑓+𝐹) 𝑪𝑶𝑮𝒎 =
𝑀 𝑃−𝐾 𝑦
(𝑓 + 𝐹)𝑥 (𝑓 + 𝐹)
𝑉ℎ = 𝑃 − 𝑘 𝑥𝑦ḡ − 𝑥ℎ − 𝑚 − (ℎ + )
𝐻 𝑪𝑶𝑮𝒉 = 𝐻
𝑃−𝑘 𝑦
(𝑓 + 𝐹)𝑥𝑦ḡ
𝑉𝑘 = 𝑃 − 𝑘 𝑥𝑦ḡ − 𝑥ℎ − 𝑚 − ℎ
𝐾 𝑪𝑶𝑮𝒌 =
(𝑓 + 𝐹)
𝑃−𝑘− 𝑦
𝐾
CRC ORE 17
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: VALUE CURVES & COG
VALUE CURVES AND CUT-OFF GRADES FOR GRADE ENGINEERING
15
10
MILL
GE DB
PROFIT [$/T]
GE GS
0
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80
LEACH
-5
-10
CU GRADE [%]
GE GE GE GE
CU 0.7 CU 0.25 CU 0.13 MILL
CU 1.0 CU 0.20 WASTE
CU 0.10
GE GE GE
CU 1.7 CU
LEACH
0.27 MILL
CU 1.3 CU 0.27 WASTE
CU 0.15 LEACH
CU 0.25
CRC ORE 19
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: BEST BLOCK VALUE
CRC ORE 20
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: BEST BLOCK VALUE
CRC ORE 21
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: FINAL PIT OPTIMISATION
?
Grade Engineering
• GE Parameters
• Pre-C Independent
Processing Destination
Base Case • Pre-C $/t
• Pre-C Recoveries
• Ranking Responses
CRC ORE 22
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: FINAL PIT OPTIMISATION
BASE CASE - CONSTRAINED GRADE BY SIZE - CONSTRAINED DIFFERENTIAL BLASTING CONSTRAINED
73% Value, 340% Material Movement 2% Value, 3% Material Movements 4.5% Value, 6% Material Movements
Compared to BC Constrained. Compared to BC Unconstrained. Compared to BC Unconstrained.
CRC ORE 23
GE RESOURCE EVALUATION: PUSHBACK SEQUENCING & DESIGN
?
Push Backs - Base Case Push Backs – Grade Engineering
CRC ORE 24
PUSHBACK SEQUENCING & DESIGN: EXAMPLE
GRADE BY SIZE - CONSTRAINED DIFFERENTIAL BLASTING CONSTRAINED
CRC ORE 25
PRODUCTION SCHEDULE AND NPV OPTIMISATION
ND Natural Deportment
DB Differential Blasting
SBS Sensor Based Sorting
160 1.5
140
140 1.3
120
120 1.1
100
100
Tonnes 0.9 Cu %
000 8080
0.7
6060 G G G
G
G G
G E G G G E G G E G 0.5
4040 G G E E G G E
E E E E E G E E
G E E E E E 0.3
2020 E
00 0.1
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033
CRC ORE 26
GE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE OPTIMISATION – EXAMPLE MINE PLAN
GE Mine Plan
180 3.5
160
3.0
140
Direct Feed to Waste Waste to Dump
2.5
120 Ore to Stock
Ore to Leach from Stocks
Strip Ratio
100 2.0
Ore to Leach from Mine
Direct Feed to Dump Leach Ore to GE from Stocks
80 1.5
Ore to GE from Mine
60 Material to Grade Engineering Plant 1.0 Ore to Mill from Stocks
40 Ore to Mill from Mine
0 0.0
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
Results:
20% of Total Material Movement goes to GE Plant.
14% of Mill Feed comes from Grade Engineering Plant.
CRC ORE 28
GE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE OPTIMISATION: EXAMPLE MILL
Feed to Mill
70 1.0
60
Ore to Mill from Stocks 0.9
0.8
50
Material from Grade Engineering Plant
0.7
0.6
0.5
30
0.4
20 0.3
0 0.0
#N/A
#N/A
#N/A
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
Ore to Mill from Mine Ore to Mill from GE Ore to Mill from Stocks CuT Grade
Results:
0.9
35
0.8
30
0.7
0.61 Cu%
MIllion Tonnes
25
0.6
0.37 Cu%
0.4
15
5
GE TO MILL 0.1
0.19 Cu%
0
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Upgraded Material to Mill
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037
0
Total Ore to Mill from GE Total Ore to Dump Leach from GE Total Wast to Waste Dump from GE
Ore to Mill from GE CuT Grade (%) Ore to Mill from GE CuT Grade (%) Waste to Waste Dump from GE CuT Grade (%)
18,000
Mass Pull 50% 0.80
16,000
0.70
14,000
Mass Pull 40% 0.60
12,000
0.50
10,000 Mass Pull 30%
0.40
8,000
0.30
6,000
2,000 0.10
- 0.00
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038
Comments:
Grade by Size Only
GS 20% Mass Pull is the Main Mass Pull Across the LOM
CRC ORE 31 Mass Pull Increases throughout the LOM
Grade Engineering SS- Mass Pull Schedule
35,000 0.90
0.80
30,000
0.70
25,000 Mass Pull 50%
0.60
20,000 0.50
0.30
10,000
0.20
5,000
Mass Pull 30%
0.10
- 0.00
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038
Comments:
Sensor Based Sorting Only
GS 30% Mass Pull is the Main Mass Pull Across the LOM
CRC ORE 32 Mass Pull Increases throughout the LOM
GE PRODUCTION SCHEDULE OPTIMISATION: NPV VS METAL PRICE
CRC ORE 33
STRATEGIC MINE PLANNING: CONCLUSIONS
GE Full Mine Planning Optimisation aids to reach and improve Strategic Goals.
NPV Improvement of 3% to 15% achieved through GE fully optimised mine plans
Head Grade Improvement from 3% to 15%, per year and for LOM.
Improvement in Metal in Cu concentrate
Improvement in Metal in Mo concentrate
Reduction in Metal in Cu cathode
When Cu Prices Drop GE adds resilience to the project.
CRC ORE 34
invent