Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OF
LEIPZIGER MENDEBRUNN
ENS
FROM
F.
CONTENT
I. The seven traveling works of Leipzig
II. The charge
III. The defense
IV. Concessions
V. The inscription and the 4 empty signs
The intention of this inscription, written by our well-known and popular narrator
and poet, Paul Heyse, is to state, in the shortest and most concise terms, the
achievements of the water to which the Wellwerk refers, in two main directions, with
an edifying didactic twist; and in this respect has not lacked the applause of a
publisher grateful to the author. Except that, of course, closer, the inscription does not
fit to the fountain and the fountain does not fit the inscription, but rather teach the
opposite of each other; And since, strangely enough, no one seems to notice, my well
seems to me like a psychological miracle. In fact, as previously touched, in the whole
well no water strives "with fresh power to the sky" and even outside the well this is
not natural to the wave; but the water jumps down on all sides in arcs or runs
downright. Just as little is the water of the well "given to the earth, which creates
blessing," but all the water of the well runs back into the water, and the tritons and
hippocampi even try to make it jump out over the land.
Of course, what could the poet do for these contradictions, since at the time of
writing the inscription it was indisputable that only the poetic, but not the real, view
of the well was at his command; but both views tend to contradict each other
otherwise. Rather, one could claim it, the form-faced master, that "teaching with loud
brightness" sounds clumsily pompous, and that the last two lines of verse give the
impression of limping in that the penultimate with a short, the last with a long Raise
syllable. The audience lags patiently in this respect, too.
What seems to me to be an inscription on this inscription is that it is altogether
unfortunate to turn to a form of notability among the poets when composing a
monumental van. It seems self-evident that to perform great things in a field, the
performance of a trifle in it must be but a play; but it has concerns about two
sides. Perhaps we would have a charming novella by Heyse if he had not been
plagued by the inscription on a well that did not interest him, but it is a plague and, as
we know, requires a lot of time to say as much as possible in as few words as
possible. The inscription itself, however, would have succeeded better if the poet had
not just had the plan for a new novel or a new drama in mind. why he could not
exploit an intrigue between the tritons and mermaids. If the little one does not go into
the big, it bothers the big one, and the little one loses his nice step if he is to keep up
with the big one.
In the restless fervor of our time to erect monuments, after the time seems to have
passed for memorials, it is indisputable that in a previous remark there is a useful
practical hint for the ordering of inscriptions; and, in order to give more emphasis to
the hint, I could refer to another noble example of what the same teaches; but as I
would have to go back to it, and I do not want to give again the ungrateful effort to
blacken the radiant one dot, it would only be doubly suspected to me; so it may be in
the case of us alone here to abandon examples.
Of course, if an inscription is once ordered by an outstanding personality, the
monument can no longer save itself from it; it has to be accepted. And, one may ask,
what can an authority or the foundation comité do other than turn to the most well-
respected authority in order to be in any case overstaffed for the sake of success.
I believe that something else could be done; it's just not brought here to do that; but
could not you even risk deviating from being brought here? I mean, with or after the
competition for the monument one would have to open it for the inscription; and as I
enclose the value of a discovery with these proposals, I will go into their advantages
in more detail.
We know that in Germany there is no lack of poets, rather of those who are not. So
first, what is the urge to compete; every poet, with the inscription on the monument,
would have been able to hope for a monument to himself, and, if he had really won
the prize, could count on a publisher for his other poems; because, only the head has
drilled a hole, so goes the longest tail. Indeed, since it is only stated that the greatest
poets offer nothing less than the greatest chance of success, even a mediocre or even
bad poet would in the happiest moment of his life fall for the most prized idea, and
thereby become the pride of his offspring can.
Thereafter, it would be advisable to present the incomplete inscriptions in an album
printed to the public, which would offer new advantages. For, first of all, one would
have, as it were, a box of poetic meat extract for the characterization of the poetic
capacity of time; secondly, then each individual in the audience would have the
opportunity to award the prize in their sole discretion, and to scold the committee, if
it was not right with him, thirdly, there would certainly be much to laugh about in it.
In order to put my suggestion into perspective, I fake that the inscription was not
yet there, but the competition for it only opened. Although I am neither a mediocre
nor a bad poet, but no poet at all, this does not prevent me from taking part in the
competition, since, firstly, I at least share the advantage with my fellow competitors,
the monument on which the inscription should fit to be able to see for
yourself; secondly, an example of how not to do it, of having an excellent poet in
mind, and thirdly, to be quite open, finding nothing else to kill a troublesome
time. But in order to increase my chance as much as possible - as one takes a number
of lots in order to win as surely as possible - I make myself competition with the
following missions:
Variations of the inscription of the Mendebrunen.
(1)
As the waters leap cheerfully,
crowns joyful success
This city in all things.
(2)
Water, ore and stone
do not do it alone;
Glory be to the spirit,
Which did the most,
Who gave rich life
Has given substance.
(3)
The water that came from heaven
drives down its pleasurable play;
The obelisk points to the destination, from
where it originated, so,
whatever the earthly activity,
the highest goal may remain in the eye.
(4)
Only drunk from the earth,
sunk deep into their night,
What seemed lost in it,
Here is born again into the light.
Above it go candles of heaven;
Take the beautiful picture to heart.
(5)
A colorful
fairy- tale seems woven from foreign legends;
But his meaning is simple.
If you want to ask for it;
An element of the world wants to unfold in equal measure
In the narrow space in front of you, its multifarious form.
Of course, what do 5 attempts say when thousands quarrel over the price? Which
among the inscriptions which have come to pass, however, may win them over, it
may not imagine that it will supplant the once existing one, which from the outset has
conquered all possible competitors by having none of them opposite. It will stop, not
because it can appeal to the fact that all recriminations against it fall back only on the
censure of the accusation, but because it once stands; as will the four apocalyptic
dogs of St. Peter's, but not because they are not real dogs, because everyone thinks
they are ugly dogs, or because stylistically they could not be replaced by anything
else; One will not want to give this indictment of architecture; but because they once
stand; and how old Hahnemann will stay in the park because he's sitting. Monumental
works have something conservative about them; and, indeed, what should come of it,
if every new idea should be allowed to make something new out of it; that would be a
story of the monument instead of a monument. So, if a time has made or allowed a
mistake in the construction of a monument, it must also accept that it shares the
durability of the monument, and thus remains characteristic of the time. if any new
idea should be allowed to make something new out of it; that would be a story of the
monument instead of a monument. So, if a time has made or allowed a mistake in the
construction of a monument, it must also accept that it shares the durability of the
monument, and thus remains characteristic of the time. if any new idea should be
allowed to make something new out of it; that would be a story of the monument
instead of a monument. So, if a time has made or allowed a mistake in the
construction of a monument, it must also accept that it shares the durability of the
monument, and thus remains characteristic of the time.
But the more the public will like to accept the inscription as it is, as it does not
inquire anyway about its meaning, enough that the inscription ruthlessly forms an
equally beautiful ornament in gold as the foundation inscription; But the most
beautiful meaning would not be able to beautify the inscription in this respect.
Anyway, the inscription has a meaning, but what does it mean for a sense that the
four red signs or cartouches between the dolphins have no inscription, and what can
they mean without that? In fact, as if wordlessly they yawn at us and seem, as they do
not say themselves what they want to say, to ask us about it; but I do not know for
sure. They can not have a symbolic meaning, a mere ornamental one, but neither,
since the monument is not designed for empty ornamentation at all. and since they are
framed by two dolphins belonging to the figurative stock of the
work; Embellishments but not framed with essential parts of the work. It is still very
doubtful whether they, inserted in the almost black figure stock of the work, do not
contribute much,
Now one can remember that there was a stylistic need to give the simple red
obelisk in the midst of a kind of counterweight on the circumference in distributed
masses of the same color. But supposing that such existed, it could only be fulfilled
by empty signs which do not fulfill the need of self-fulfillment. So all that does not
work out and yet, for nothing the signs can not be there in such a well thought-out
work.
So I make my hypothesis, thinking that the signs were originally intended for
inscriptions, which should give more specific or secondary connotations to the main
inscription expressing the most general meaning of the work, and thus partly for the
amusement of the spectators as they walk around the well to contribute partly to open
stupid eyes for its multi-sided meaning. And would probably have been one and the
other bad? But it did not work, and why not? But a new hypothesis, as well as
hypotheses like to rely on each other. The author of the main inscription might not
expect the additional inscriptions and thought that it would easily find subordinate
forces; but the fountain was getting ready, when such were found and might not wait
for them with its opening; so the signs remained empty. Or, even more likely, such
powers were really found: the inscriptions obtained from it, however, were still less
than the main inscription, so that the signs themselves were reluctant to accept them.
In order not to lose the cause of the signs at least in the idea, I come back to the
fiction that a competition has been opened up to fill them with inscriptions later; and
since I do not betray vanity by entering into it, by counting my powers to the
subordinate, nor by bringing the audience around for a fair novella, but chiefly for the
third of the above reasons, I again enter the competition myself with the following
contributions :
(1)
In many, seek the one.
Otherwise the mistake is yours.
(2)
The water uses too many things;
Here it is once to make fun of.
(3)
The power, the raw, knows neither measure nor goal,
conquered by art gives a beautiful game.
(4)
And if it stirs inside of grim figures.
It is a work of peace that God can give us.
However, it is enough to have entertained myself with it; for the fountain does not
have reason to resist the imposition of four inscriptions to its two main inscriptions,
asserting that it is a plastic work for which so much reading does not happen.
In fact, I remember a pun on Trochu, who, as the military governor of Paris during
his siege in 1870, could not tire of teaching the French people about the state of
affairs and the demands of the times by means of public plots and proclamations. It
was called Trochu trop lu instead of Trochu, and thus it could meet our memorial, if it
wanted to save thinking about its meaning through reading, saying that it was rather a
Les'mal than a memorial.
If inscriptions on the plates should not fit at all, one might think of another
content; except that everyone I know of has one or more buts. For example, to affix
signage on the signs; So about the most beautiful landscapes of Leipzig. But the
sculptural work would defend itself against painting as well as reading, shields would
soon become shabby through the action of air and water, and the most beautiful
landscapes of Leipzig would only prove the lack of beautiful ones. Or the coats of
arms of Saxony, Leipzig, the founder and the artist (Ungerer in Munich) in bas-relief
or inlaid work on the signs to install. But do the family crests also exist? and the coat
of arms of the donator would have to be attached under the inscription of the
foundation;
And why go further, as the fountain will at last assert its monumental right to leave
the signs empty, because they are once empty, how he will leave the inscription,
because it once stands.
After all, it seems to me that the embarrassment of interpreting, motivating or
filling the four empty signs of the monument amounts to an actual embarrassment in
the execution of the monument, which could not be solved, and which one can easily
put up with she is not too intrusive. But other works of art bear witness to such
embarrassments, and I do not deny that the monument of victory, which will
hopefully face our well on the opposite side of the same place, seems to betray one of
which I hate to miss a happy solution.
It concerns the way in which the emperor was represented in the monument. In the
first draft he was, as far as I can remember, only to be seen on a bas-relief
surrounding the monument as the main figure among other figures; but this
undeniably did not seem to do enough for his meaning as head and guardian of the
Reich in matters of war and peace compared with the representation of the four
paladins of the empire in magnificent equestrian statues protruding from the
monument. On the other hand, he seemed to disappear. But where and how
else? Before, between, besides the four equestrian statues as fifth, he was only a fifth
wheel on the car. Above stood the Germania, which could not be replaced or
suppressed by anything. Now we see him in the definitive design as a bust or a seated
figure in a niche of the post of Germania attached. But attaching one main character
to the post of another protagonist seems even less appropriate; but should I say how
to solve the embarrassment at all, I would have to remain guilty of the answer. I
would have preferred to have the first draft; but it may seem different to others.