defined as quality over the long run.
Quality is the condition of the product during manufacturing or immediately afterward, whereas reliability is the ability of a product to perform its intended function over a period of time.
A product that "works" for a long period of time is a reliable one.
Because all units of a given product will fail at different times, reliability is the probability that the product will function as intended for a prescribed life and under certain environmental conditions.
The above definition includes four factors associated with reliability: (1) numerical value, (2) intended function, (3) life, and (4)environmental conditions.
The numerical value is the probability that the product will not fail during a particular time.
Thus, a value of 0.
95
represents the probability that 95
of 100 products will continue to function after a specified time and 5
of the products will be expected to fail before the prescribed period of time.
The second factor relates to the intended function of the product.
Products are designed for specified applications and they are expected to perform those applications.
For example, a hydraulic jack is expected to lift a certain design load; it is not expected to lift a load that exceeds the design specification.
The third factor in the reliability definition is the intended life of the product; that is, how long the product is expected to last.
Product life may be specified as a function of usage, time, or both.
The last factor in the definition is concerned with environmental conditions.
A product that is designed to function in a specified ambient condition can not be expected to function in adverse conditions.
Environmental conditions may also include storage and handling.
SY
STEM RELIABILITY
The more complex the product the greater the probability of failure.
The way component parts are arranged affect the reliability of the finished product.
For components which are arranged in a series the final reliability is the product of the respective reliability factors.
Thus the reliability of an assembly of three components in series which have reliabilities of .
90, .
85
and .
96 will have a reliability of .
73.
It can be seen that as components are added to the series, the system reliability decreases.
In a series circuit, the failure of any component causes the failure of the entire system.
This is not the case for components arranged in parallel.
Parallel circuits continue to function as long as other parallel components are functioning.
The formula for the reliability of a parallel circuit is: R(S) = 1 - (1 - R(1))(1 - R(2)) Therefore, two components having a reliability of .
75
and .
85
will have a reliability of .
96 when assembled in parallel.
It becomes evident that the most important aspect of reliability is design.
Products should be as simple as possible.
The greater the number of components the greater the chance of failure.
Another way of achieving reliability is to have a backup or redundant component.
When the primary component fails, another component is activated.
This concept is illustrated by the parallel arrangement of components.
It is frequently cheaper to have inexpensive redundant components to achieve a particular reliability than to have a single expensive component.
Reliability can also be achieved by overdesign.
The use of large factors of safety can increase the reliability of a product.
For example, a 1-inch rope may be substituted for a 1/2- inch rope even though the 1/2-inch rope would have been sufficient.
When the failure of a product can lead to a fatality or substantial financial loss, a fail- safe type of device should be used.
Thus, disabling extremity injuries from power- press operations are minimized by the use of a clutch.
The clutch must be engaged for the ram and die to descend.
If there is a malfunction of the clutch-activation system, the press will fail to operate.
The maintenamce of the system is an important factor in reliability.
Products that are easy to maintain will likely receive better maintenance.
In some situations it may be more practical to eliminate the need for maintenance.
For example, oil-impregnated bearings do not need lubrication for the life of the product.
Environmental conditions such as dust, temperature, moisture, and vibration can be the cause of failure.
The designer must protect the product from these conditions.
Heat shields, rubber vibration mounts, and filters are used to increase the reliability under adverse environmental conditions.
There is a definite relationship between investment in reliability (cost) and reliability.
After a certain point, there is only a slight improvement in reliability for the increase in product cost.
For example, assume that a $5
0 component has a reliability of 0.
75
.
If the cost is increased to $100, the reliability becomes 0.
90; if the cost is increased to $15
0, the reliability becomes 0.
94; and if the cost is increased to $200, the reliability becomes 0.
96.
As can be seen by this hypothetical example, there is a diminishing reliability return for the investment dollar.
The manufacturing process is the second most important aspect of reliability.
Basic quality control techniques that have been described earlier will minimize the risk of product failure.
Emphasis should be placed on those components which are least reliable.
Manufacturing personnel can take action to insure that the equipment used is right for the job and investigate new equipment as it becomes available.
In addition, they can experiment with process conditions to determine which conditions produce the most reliable product.
Another aspect of reliability is the transportation of product to the customer.
No matter how well conceived the design or how carefully manufactured, the actual performance of the product by the customer is the final evaluation.
The reliability of the product at the point of use can be greatly affected by the type of handling the product receives in transit.
Good packaging techniques and shipment evaluation are essential.
While designers try to eliminate the need for customer maintainance, there are many situations where it is not practical or possible.
In such cases, the customer should be given ample warning.
For example, a warning light or buzzer when a component needs lubricant.
Maintenance should be simple and easy to perform.
THE LIFE-HISTORY
CURVE The following figure shows a typical life-history curve of a complexed product for an indefinite number of items.
The curve, sometimes referred to as the "bathtub" curve, is a comparison of the failure rate with time.
It has three distinct phases: debugging phase, chance failure phase, and the wear-out phase.
(INSERT BATH TUB CURVE) The debugging phase, which is also called the burn-in or infant- mortality phase, is characterizes by marginal and short-life parts that cause a rapid decrease in the failure rate.
Since the debugging phase is not necessarily an operational phase, it is rarely studied.
The chance failure phase is shown in the "bathtub" as a horizontal straight line, thereby showing the failure rate as constant.
Failure occurs in a random manner due to the constant failure rate.
The assumption of a constant failure rate is valid for most products; however, some products may have a failure rate that decreases or increases with time.
The third phase is the wear-out phase, which is depicted by a sharp rise in the failure rate.
Again, the "bathtub" depicts the type of failure pattern exhibited by most products; however, there will be some products that deviate from this curve.
It is important to know the type of failure pattern so that known probability distributions can be used for analysis and prediction of product reliability.