Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M.Sc. thesis of
Arnout Smit
WL | Delft Hydraulics
I would like to thank my graduation committee for their assistance and comments;
WL|Delft Hydraulics for the opportunity to work on this subject and building the
physical model set-up; ITT Flygt B.V. and A.B Dietzel for lending the submersible
pump; at last I want to thank Nander van der Plicht and Rogier Smit for their help
with the report.
A. Smit
Graduation committee:
Prof.dr.ir. G.S. Stelling
Prof.dr.ir. F.H.L.R. Clemens
Dr.ir. W.S.J. Uijttewaal
Ir. C.L. Lubbers
March 2007
WL | Delft Hydraulics
3
Table of contents
4
3.6 Mesurement program and procedures...................................................................... 39
3.6.1 Measurement program ......................................................................................................... 39
3.6.2 Measurement procedures ..................................................................................................... 40
3.6.3 Imposed parameters ............................................................................................................. 40
3.6.4 Measured parameters ........................................................................................................... 42
Chapter 4: Qualitative observations and discussion.................................................. 44
4.1 Observations on plunging jets and air entrainment ................................................ 44
4.1.1 Jet surface roughness ........................................................................................................... 44
4.1.2 Shape of the plunge point..................................................................................................... 47
4.1.3 Features which influence the jet shape during the fall ......................................................... 47
4.1.4 Plunge point enclosing funnels ............................................................................................ 49
4.1.5 Jet plunge angle.................................................................................................................... 50
4.1.6 Approach flow channel inclination ...................................................................................... 51
4.2 Observations on air bubbles and air bubble plumes ............................................... 51
4.2.1 Transport of air into the reservoir ........................................................................................ 51
4.2.2 Air bubble properties ........................................................................................................... 52
4.2.3 Submerged jet obstruction ................................................................................................... 53
4.2.4 Reservoir circulation ............................................................................................................ 54
4.3 Observations on pump air intake .............................................................................. 55
Chapter 5: Results and analysis ................................................................................. 57
5.1 End depth measurements ........................................................................................... 57
5.2 Horizontal fall distance ............................................................................................... 58
5.3 Circular jet cross section fall height .......................................................................... 60
5.4 Aeration length ............................................................................................................ 61
5.5 Penetration depth ........................................................................................................ 64
5.6 Air entrainment discharge ......................................................................................... 69
5.7 Pump impeller revolution rate ................................................................................... 72
5.8 Pump air discharge ..................................................................................................... 73
Chapter 6: Conclusions .............................................................................................. 78
Chapter 7: Recommendations .................................................................................... 80
References ................................................................................................................... 81
Appendix A: Schematic drawing of model set-up ...................................................... 83
5
List of symbols
Ae cross sectional area of the water stream at tube end (m)
Aj cross sectional area of plunge point (m2)
C constant
da air bubble diameter (m)
dN diameter of the nozzle (m)
dj diameter of the jet in plunge point used in literature (m)
dr reference diameter of the jet
dv volume-equivalent bubble diameter (m)
D diameter of the approach flow tube (m)
DH hydraulic diameter (m)
Ej kinetic energy per second of the jet (Nm/s)
Fr Froude number = VN (-)
gd N
hc critical depth (water depth at critical flow speed) (m)
ĥc dimensionless critical depth (= hc / D) (-)
he end depth (tube end water depth) (m)
ĥe dimensionless end depth (= he / D) (-)
hf funnel depth around the plunge point (m)
hm capillary head of model water (mm)
ht capillary head of tap water (mm)
H fall height is the vertical distance between the lower tube end and reservoir water level (m)
Hcir fall height when the jet cross section is circular shaped at a given discharge (m)
ˆ
H dimensionless circular fall height (= Hcir / D) (-)
cir
He fall height of mass centre of the tube stream (= H + 2/3 * he) (m)
Hp penetration depth (m)
Hu fall height when the jet cross section is U-shaped (m)
Hw water depth in reservoir (m)
lN length of cylindrical section of a nozzle (m)
La aeration zone (= Lb – Ljx) (m)
Lb bubble zone (m)
LB breakup length of the jet (m)
Lj length of the jet (m)
Ljx horizontal fall distance (m)
LR ratio between model and prototype length (-)
LT approach flow tube length (m)
Ltp horizontal distance between tube edge and vertical pump intake axis (m)
qw discharge per meter width of weir (m3/h/m)
Qa air entrainment discharge (l/min)
Qap air intake at the pump (l/min)
Qcir circular discharge is the water discharge when the plunge point is circular shaped at a given
jet fall height (l/s)
Qg gas discharge (m3/s)
Ql liquid discharge (m3/s)
Qw water discharge (= jet discharge = pump discharge) (l/s)
Qˆ w dimensionless discharge = Qw (-)
g D 2.5
Relength Reynolds number of the jet accompanying air boundary layer = Ve L j (-)
νw
S approach channel slope (-)
Sc critical slope (-)
t time (s)
Tj fall time (s)
turbulence intensity = V j (-)
'
Tu
V
j
6
ur bubble rise velocity (m/s)
ve horizontal flow speed at tube end (m/s)
vj horizontal flow speed of the jet at plunge point (m/s)
Va local velocity of boundary layer air of the jet (m/s)
Ve total flow speed at tube end (m/s)
Vj total flow speed of the jet at plunge point (m/s)
V j′ mean squared jet velocity fluctuation (m/s)
Vmin minimum entrainment velocity (m/s)
VR ratio between the model and prototype velocity (-)
we vertical flow speed at tube end (m/s)
we average vertical flow speed at tube end (m/s)
wj vertical flow speed of the jet at plunge point (m/s)
Weber number = VN d j ρ a (-)
2
Wea
σ
Weber number at the nozzle = VN d N ρ w (-)
2
WeN
σ
µw (-)
Z Ohnesorge number =
d N ρ wσ
αc critical jet plunge angle (degrees)
αe angle of the stream axis at the tube end (degrees)
αes angle of the stream surface at the tube end (degrees)
αj jet plunge angle (degrees)
δe angle end (see figure 2.16) (degrees)
θN nozzle contraction angle (degrees)
µw dynamic viscosity of water (Pa*s)
νw kinematic viscosity of water (= µ/ρ) (m2/s)
ρ density (kg/m3)
σ surface tension (N/m)
φ contact angle between jet surface and reservoir water surface
Subscripts
a air
ap air at pump
b bubble
B breakup
c critical flow
cir circular shaped jet cross section
e tube end
F nozzle feed
g gas
j jet
l liquid
M model
min minimum
N nozzle
p penetration
P prototype
r reference or rise
R ratio
s surface
t tap water
T tube
u U-shaped jet cross section
v volume
w water
x horizontal
7
Summary
Many pressurized sewer systems do not reach their design capacity discharge due to
enlarged resistance in the pipe system. An extensive investigation has brought to light
that air pockets in pipe systems are an important cause of high resistance in sewer
system pipe lines. Air intake by pumps in sumps is one of the main reasons of air
pocket formation in sewer systems. But there is still little known about air entrainment
due to plunging jets from circular open channels, and air intake by submersible pumps
near plunging jets, especially at the scale of real sewer sumps.
The research objective is to achieve knowledge and insight into air entrainment
from free overfall water jets from horizontal open channels and air bubble intake with
submersible sewer pumps.
It is found in literature that jet surface disturbances are the main cause of the air
entrainment with plunging jets. These disturbances entrap air at the location between
the jet surface and the reservoir water surface when the surfaces do not fit exactly.
In this experimental research it was found out that the perimeter shape of the
intersection between the falling jet and the reservoir water surface (plunge point) is
also an important factor for the amount of air entrainment. For free overfall jets from
circular channels the horizontal jet cross section shape is at first U-shaped and
becomes along the fall gradually circular. The found dimensionless empirical formula
H Qw
for the circular fall height is: cir = 102.0
D g D 2.5
8
The aeration length appeared to be independent of the plunging jet fall height. The
aeration length is mainly affected by the jet water discharge. The empirical maximum
aeration length with an exceedance frequency of once every eight to ten seconds is:
s
La ,max = 0.5Qw0.5 , with the dimension of constant 0.5 equal to
m
From experiments with pump air intake experiments the following observations
are made. Air bubbles are only taken in by the pump when they are in the direct
neighborhood of the pump inlet. The influence sphere of the pump is for discharges
Qw ≤ 15.0 not more than a radius of 0.10 m around the pump inlet centre.
In this thesis a couple of mostly empirical formulas taken from literature are
compared with the results of the experiments. Almost all formulas proposed in
literature are only representative for small jets produced with nozzles. Only Dey
(1998, 2001) and Aigner (1999) have described some recent findings about free
overfall flows in circular channels. But they give no information about the falling jets
produced with the overfall channel flows, nor the air entrainment with the plunging
jets. The only formula from literature that turned out to be valid for the experiments
done is the dimensionless discharge formula of Rajaratnam & Muralidhar (1964):
11
Qw h 6
= 1.54 e .
g D 2.5 D
The measured results are obtained with a specific model set-up. Other similar
models predict different results, especially with the pump air intake experiments. The
measurements are very sensitive to all kinds of variations. Therefore, the results are
only useful for giving an indication of the in reality occurring orders of magnitudes.
The most robust and effective way to prevent air bubbles coming deep into the
sewer sump near the submersible pump inlet is to break up and bend the vertical
submerged jet in the reservoir. When the submerged jet hits a horizontal object below
the water surface, the high velocity flows in the reservoir are bended horizontal. Air
bubbles cannot be brought deeper into the reservoir and rise up unhindered in the
horizontal flows to the water surface. Because real sewer sumps have varying water
levels, the horizontal object in the reservoir should be below the lowest water level.
9
Chapter 1: Introduction
Many pressurized sewer systems do not reach their design capacity discharge due to
enlarged resistance in the pipe system. Because the design capacity discharge is not
reached, sewer overflows will work more often at heavy rainfall, which is not good
for the environment. As a result, more powerful pumps have to be installed and sewer
system pipes have to be enlarged. Older systems are not always able to withstand the
bigger pressures from these more powerful pumps which results in a higher safety
risk.
An extensive investigation has brought to light that air pockets in pipe systems are
an important cause of high resistance in sewer system pipe lines. How the air gets into
the sewer systems is unclear. Possible sources are rotting gasses, degassing of sewage
as a result of the lower pressures downstream, or air intake at the pump inlet by air
entrainment in sewer sumps.
Research objectives
The research objective is to achieve knowledge and insight into air entrainment from
free overfall water jets from horizontal open channels and air bubble intake with
submersible sewer pumps.
Report contents
At first a literature study about plunging jets and free overfall flows from circular
channels is given in Chapter (2). Chapter (3) describes the model set-up and the
measurement program and procedures. The qualitative findings about plunging jets
and bubble plumes are discussed in Chapter (4). The measured results are then
summed up in Chapter (5). The last two chapters contain the conclusions, Chapter (6),
and recommendations, Chapter (7).
10
Chapter 2: Literature study
After the introduction paragraph (2.1) a dimensional analysis is given in paragraph
(2.2). Then, paragraph (2.3) is about air entrainment mechanisms. The basic
hydrodynamic features of liquid jets and air bubbles are described in paragraph (2.4).
The following paragraphs give some entrainment features, like minimum entrainment
jet velocity (2.5), volumetric flow rate of entrained air (2.6) and air/water entrainment
ratio (2.7). The characteristics of bubble dispersion are summed up in paragraph (2.8).
Information about free overfall from circular open channels is available in paragraph
(2.9) and the last paragraph (2.10) gives the conclusions from the literature study.
2.1 Introduction
This chapter describes what is already known about air entrainment. First there is a
dimensional analysis about physical models and scaling in paragraph (2.2). Next there
will be some paragraphs about plunging jets from small nozzles (paragraph (2.3) and
(2.4)). After that the paragraphs (2.5) to (2.7) will tell something about air
entrainment, followed by the characteristics of bubble dispersion in paragraph (2.8)
and a last paragraph (2.9) about free overfall from circular open channels.
In the past, a lot of research has been performed on air entrainment with small
jets, produced by pressurized water supply systems with nozzles. In literature used
nozzle diameters have a range of 1 to 40 mm and the accompanying jet velocity range
is 1 to 37 m/s (Bin, 1993). This research project is different from all the projects
described in literature. De major difference is the use of a free falling jet, from a
horizontal open circular tube, instead of a water supply with a small nozzle.
Furthermore, the sewer pipe as used in practice has a diameter of several decimeters,
instead of the small nozzle diameters described above.
It is clearly that the information that has been written about fast and small liquid
jets in the literature, will give useful information about air entrainment, but most of
the times the empirical data do not apply for the dimensions used in this project.
Besides, some aspects typical for free falling jets from open supply systems are not
considered in literature, for instance the influence of the shape of the jet cross section
profile.
This chapter is mostly based on the review article of Andrzej K.Biń: ‘Gas entrainment
by plunging liquid jets’ (1993).
11
2
V ρV ρVL V V
F ( Fr ; Eu; Re;We; Ma ) = F ; ; ; ; =0
gL ∆P µ σ Eb
ρL ρ
In a geometrical similar model, true dynamic similarity is achieved if and only if each
dimensionless parameter has the same value in both model and prototype. When the
pressure difference ∆P is treated as a dependent parameter and the Sarrau-Mach
number Ma is omitted, because of the very small influence in both model and
prototype, the dynamic similarity in most hydraulic models is governed by:
V ρVL V ∆P
F ; ; = ⇒ F ( Fr ; Re;We ) = Eu
gL µ σ ρV
2
ρL
The use of the same fluid on both the prototype and the model satisfies the Froude,
Reynolds and Weber number scaling criteria, because:
Hereby is the scale multiplier LR and VR the ratio between model and prototype for
l d H V
the length LR = P = P = P respectively velocity VR = P .
lM d M H M VM
In most cases only the dominant mechanism is modeled:
• In fully enclosed flows (pipe flows), the pressure losses are basically related to
the Reynolds number Re, so a Reynolds number scaling is used (ReM = ReP).
• In free-surface flows, gravity effects are always important and a Froude
number modeling is used. Note that the model velocity is less than that in the
prototype for LR > 1 and the time scale equals: t R = LR . A Froude number
modeling is typically used when friction losses are small and the flow is
highly turbulent (ReM > 5000). Where the Reynolds number is defined in
ρVDH
terms of the hydraulic diameter ( Re = ). The model must have the same
µ
relative roughness ((ks)R = LR) as the prototype.
• In case of entrainment of air bubbles in free-surface flows, gravity effects are
predominant, but it is recognized that surface tension scale effects can take
place for LR > 10 (or LR < 0.1) or even less.
12
2.3 Air entrainment mechanisms
Several studies showed that air entrainment with plunging jets from nozzles, takes
place when the jet impact velocity exceeds a characteristic velocity. This velocity is a
function of the inflow conditions (McKeogh & Ervine, 1981). The mechanism of
bubble entrainment depends upon the following:
• Jet velocity at impact
• The physical properties of fluid (mainly viscosity)
• The jet nozzle design
• The length of the free-falling jet
• The jet turbulence (Bin, 1993).
Figure 2.1: Viscous liquid jet plunging through a pool surface: (a) contact angle 0 < αj < 90º; (b)
formation of an air film (αj = 0º) (Biń, 1993)
Induction funnel
Entrainment from an induction funnel is more regular than under extreme conditions,
although still intermittent. A possible explanation for the change from a gas film
formation with low velocity jets to the induction funnel form is the “tearing of the
surface”. The tearing of the surface, which arises from the liquid entrainment in the
reservoir around the plunge point, is significantly assisted by the physical pressure
downwards on the meniscus as the contribution of the air boundary layer becomes
more significant. Near the limits of stability, small changes in the jet velocity can lead
13
to penetration and capture of air. It is evident that any large scale rotations in the
receiving pool will be amplified by the conservation of angular momentum in the
inflowing liquid near the pool surface. This will lead to free vortices at the plunge
point around smooth jets, which will deepen the induction funnel and makes the
contact angle smaller. This enlarges the chance to have a contact angle αj = 0º, and so
the chance to have air entrainment.
The intensity of the circulation leading to the formation of the induction funnel
will be strongly dependent on the geometry of the receiving bath, and in particular on
the presence of baffles or other obstacles that might hinder the development of large
scale rotations.
With larger and generally swifter jets, the more severe conditions lead to the
entrainment of considerable quantities of air. This gas rises immediately around the
plunge point, giving rise to a bubble column effect that is strong enough to produce a
reversal of the flow in the receiving pool; circulation at the surface is now outwards
from the jet towards the walls. Under these conditions it is impossible for the
induction funnel to form.
Figure 2.2: Air entrainment mechanism: (a)-(d) show subsequent phases of the phenomenon as a
disturbance in the jet moves downwards (Biń, 1993)
The horizontal movement on the free surface is not fast enough to follow the
roughness of the jet as it passes by, resulting in the capture of gas bubbles.
In real situations the successive disturbances on the jet produce an irregular gas
entrainment. With longer jets the surface irregularities become bigger, producing
greater entrainment.
14
2.3.3 Other entrainment mechanisms
Disrupted jet
Long jets eventually lose coherence and high velocity jets frequently experience
partial disruption as a result of the air friction forces. Individual droplets impinging on
the liquid surface will entrain air if their velocity is high enough (above about 1 m/s).
Figure 2.3: Schematic representation of a jet from a nozzle (Yamagiwa et al., 1993)
15
According to Nakasone (1987) plunging nappes have a impact velocity of;
V0 = 2 g ( H j + 1.5hc ) , with Hj as the fall height and hc as the critical depth before the
falling edge.
0.9
2ε Lj
= 5.98*10−3
dN dN
16
Lj
This function is valid for a ratio from 6 to 100. Where ε is the surface
dN
disturbance on the jet, see figure 2.4.
Figure 2.4: Surface disturbance on jet surface (McKeoch & Ervine, 1981)
It is evident that the jet geometry will depend on the turbulence level in the jet
itself, which is for its part dependent upon the nozzle design and all other factors
responsible for providing turbulence in the jet.
For the laminar jet region, Bin (1993) suggested a relationship for the break-up
length:
LB 0.85
= 19.5WeN0.425 (1 + 3Z )
dN
Which is valid for WeN (1 + 3Z ) = 3 − 100 with Z as the Ohnesorge number
µw
= , which relates the viscous and surface tension force.
d N ρ wσ
LB
For the turbulent jet region the relationship = CWeNp is most frequently
dN
proposed, with p equal to 0.31-0.32 for jets issuing from nozzles with lN/dN ≥ 5.
McKeogh and Ervine (1981) correlated LB with the discharge rate of water;
LB = CQwx . The power exponent x was found to be dependent on the turbulence level
in the jet and independent of de nozzle diameter.
17
2.4.5 Boundary layer of a surrounding gas
As the liquid jet moves through a gaseous atmosphere, a boundary layer will develop
along the jet, similar to that observed for a moving continuous cylinder with diameter
equal to dj and velocity equal to VN. Several complex approximated models relevant
to this situation are available, see Bin (1993).
Figure 2.5: Impression of the large scatter of the experimental data points between the minimum
entrainment velocity Vmin and the ratio Lj/dN for the continuous jet region (Bin, 1993)
18
The values of Vmin, obtained at different turbulence intensities, are indicated for
comparison. It can be concluded from this figure that a large scatter of the
experimental data points is evident for jets produce from long cylindrical nozzles. The
length of the cylindrical section of the issuing nozzle is responsible for the level of
turbulence produced in the jet. The effect of the liquid viscosity seems to suppress the
turbulence.
0.164
Lj
For large nozzles (dN ≥ 7 mm) an empirical correlation; Vmin = 1.4 can
dN
be recommended, which seems to be applicable for short cylindrical nozzles (lN/dN ≤
3) and within Lj/dN = 1-100. For such nozzles the jets produced from them are of
V′
relatively low turbulence levels j < 3% .
Vj
A bubble trap is a device what collects and measures the amount of air that
withdraws from de reservoir water, after be entrained by an oblique jet, see figure 2.6.
19
Figure 2.6: Schematic representation of a bubble trap (McKeoch & Ervine, 1981)
Each of the measuring techniques has its own shortcomings. In the case of
inclined jets, one usually has to carry out experiments with different angles of
inclination of the jet and extrapolate the data to the vertical position. Both traps and
gas removal arrangements may interfere with the fluid flow in the pool.
Thus a typical S-shaped entrainment rate curve is observed for the whole range of
jet velocities, see also figure 2.7.
20
Figure 2.7: Air volume entrained as a function of jet diameter and velocity (Sande & Smith,
1973)
The rate of gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets of the length near the break-up
length (≥ 0.9 LB), is directly related to the kinetic energy of the jet (Sande & Smith,
1976):
1 π
Qa = function ρ w d 2j V j3
2 4
See figure 2.8. In this case the jet behaves like a train of drops.
21
Figure 2.8: Amount of entrained air near the break point with αj = 60º jets (Sande & Smith,
1976)
For jets with lengths less than 90% of the break-up length, Sande & Smith (1976)
suggested an air entrainment rate:
Qa = 0.015 X 0.75
−1.5
With X = d N2 V j3 L0.5
j (sin α j ) and X = 10−4 − 10−2 . The experiments were carried out
with jets produced from nozzles with dN = 2.85 – 10 mm, lN/dN = 50, Vj = 2 – 5 m/s,
Lj < 0.5 m and αj = 20 - 60º.
High velocity jets not only carry air captured within the mean containing
envelope, but also entrain air in the boundary layer that develops outside that
envelope into the pool. Thus the total amount of entrained air is made up of two parts
(Bin, 1993):
Qa = Qa1 + Qa2.
πV
The portion of air captured by the jet roughness is given by: Qa1 = N ( d 2j − d N2 )
4
∞
whereas the boundary layer can be expressed by: Qa 2 = ∫ V 2π rdr , whereby Va is
dj 2
a
the local velocity of the boundary layer air at a given radius measured from the jet
axis.
22
It should be emphasized that the contribution of the boundary layer to the total
amount of entrained air depends upon the situation. Normally, it is between 20 – 70%
of the total and therefore cannot be neglected.
23
Figure 2.9: Specification of jet surface roughness (Burgess et al., 1972)
For vertical jets, Bin (1993) proposed the following empirical expression for all
regions of entrainment:
Qa 0.4
= 0.04 Frj0.28 ( L j / d N ) .
Qw
It corresponds satisfactory with experiments of other authors provided that Lj/dN ≤
0.4
100, lN/dN ≥ 10 and Frj0.28 ( L j / d N ) ≥ 10 .
24
2.7.2 Effect of surface tension and liquid viscosity on entrainment
ratio Qg/Ql
Several authors studied the influence of liquid viscosity and surface tension on the air
entrainment rate. In these studies the liquid phase kinematic viscosity νw was varied
from 8.8*10-7 – 1.5*10-5 m2/s, whereas the surface tension σ varied from 0.024 -
0.076 N/m.
Above about µw = 6.5 mPa s, the shear between the pool liquid and the jet,
controls the entrainment, whilst below this value, the roughness of the jet and the air
boundary layer are the controlling parameters.
Bin (1993) presents the experimental data of Kusabiraki et al. on Qg/Ql with
respect to a term which combines the physical properties of the liquid phase
µl
. Both researchers discovered three regions of such dependence at the same
ρσ
l
values of dN, VN, Lj/dN, and lN/dN, see figure 2.10. The transition values of µl / ρlσ
between the regions were 1.2*10-4 and 1.9*10-4 m1/2.
The Qg/Ql values were correlated by (Kusabiraki, 1990) in the following form
within a 20% error.
B
(L / d N ) ( lN / d N ) Z D ( sin α )
C E
G
Qg / Ql = AFr F (sin α ) j
The empirical constants A – G, which do change according to the range of lN/dN and
VN, are presented in (Yamagiwa et al., 1993)
25
2.8 Characteristics of bubble dispersion
2.8.1 Bubble size distribution
As a result of gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets, bubbles are dispersed below the
pool liquid surface. The dispersed bubbles form two distinctly different regions, see
figure 2.11:
• A characteristic biphasic conical region comprising fine bubbles with
diameters less than 1 mm.
• A region of bigger rising bubbles (secondary bubbles), which surrounds the
former one.
Figure 2.11: Schematic representation of biphasic conical region and the rising bubble region
(McKeoch & Ervine, 1981)
The structure of the biphasic cone and the surrounding bubble column is complex.
In the cone, high turbulence intensities and shear stresses, created by the bubbles,
break the captured gas into fine bubbles. Bubbles escape from the cone at its
boundaries and at the bottom as the buoyancy forces overcome the jet momentum and
the liquid local velocity decreases. Coalescence also takes place in these sections of
the cone. The largest recorded bubbles in the water had diameters of about 7 mm.
There is general agreement that for the air-water system, bubbles formed during
entrainment by vertical or inclined jets in the rising bubbles region (secondary
bubbles) have (Sauter) diameters of about 3-4 mm, practically independent of the
experimental conditions. The bubble size variation distribution is approximately
normal. In the biphasic cone, bubbles are much smaller than the bubbles in the rising
bubble region (< 1.4 mm).
26
2.8.2 Penetration depth of entrained bubbles
Bubbles entrained by a vertical plunging jet penetrate the pool liquid to a maximum
depth. This point is not strictly defined since the lower limit of the bubble swarm
fluctuates continuously, but a time average can be estimated. Several authors
measured the maximum depth of bubble penetration in the vertical or inclined
plunging jet systems. At the maximum depth of bubble penetration, the local liquid
velocity in the submerged jet at that point is assumed to be equal to the bubble free
rise velocity. This led to a direct linear relationship between the maximum penetration
depth and the product of the jet diameter and jet velocity.
Biń (1993) mentions a simple pure empirical relationship for the maximum
penetration depth:
H p = CVNn d Np .
If all available experimental data on Hp are considered, then for VN dN ≥ 0.01 m2/s, n
= p = 0.66 and C = 2.4, whereas for VN dN < 0.01 m2/s, n = p = 1.36 and C = 2.4.
with nozzles of diameter ranging from 3.9 to 12 mm and for Lj < 0.5 m.
Under practical conditions Hp will not be greater than 0.4-1.0 m.
Nakasone (1987) suggest that the penetration depth of entrained air produced with
nappe jets is about: Hp = ⅔Hj. See also figure 2.12.
Figure 2.12: Schematic drawing of the penetration depth of a nappe (Nakasone, 1987).
27
a
H p /d N = ( L j /d N ) ( LN / d N ) 10 f ( Fr ) (sin α )c
b
2
f ( Fr ) = d + e ( log Fr ) + f ( log Fr )
The empirical constants a – f are presented by Yamagiwa (1993).
Figure 2.13: Schematic representation of bubble respectively aeration zone at deep or shallow
reservoirs (Nakasone, 1987)
28
The length of the bubble zone, by means of photographs at many different
experiments with water nappes, the following empirical formula for the length Lb of
the bubble zone was obtained by Nakasone (1987).
0.134
Lb = 0.0629 ( H j + 1.5hc ) qw0.666
Hereby is qw the discharge per meter width of weir in m3/s/m. (In the paper of
Nakasone (1987) on page 74, the dimension of q is written as m3/h/m, but after
verification with values from this experiment and checking his list of symbols, this
should be m3/s/m) This formula is determined with a shallow pool of 0.50 m deep.
For larger reservoir depths whereby bubbles do not reach the bottom, the length of the
bubble zone will probably be shorter.
Figure 2.14: (a) Schematic view of a typical free overfall and the hydraulic aspects; and (b)
streamline pattern of a free overfall (Dey, 2002)
The flow in the vicinity of the channel edge is affected by the vertical acceleration
due to a non-hydrostatic pressure in the water column, see figure 2.14.a. This results
in an end depth being less than the critical depth. In mildly sloping channels, the
approaching flow is sub-critical becoming supercritical just upstream of the channel
end section.
For all overflow geometries, there is a unique relationship between the end depth
and the critical depth and between the critical depth and the water discharge. Only
when the approaching flow is supercritical, the critical section does not exist upstream
of the channel end section. The discharge is than a function of the end depth and the
channel slope.
29
2.9.2 End Depth Ratio he/hc
Dey (1998, 2001 and 2002) presents a simplified approach to determine the end depth
of a free overfall in horizontal or mildly sloping circular channels. Following Dey
h h
(2001) the end depth ratio EDR is between 0.72 < e < 0.74 for c < 0.86 . An often
hc D
used EDR from Rajaratnam & Muralidhar (1964) is equal to 0.725. Aigner uses a
ratio of 0.742.
Figure 2.15: End Depth Ratio for circular channels (Rajaratnam and Muralidhar, 1964)
In this figure can be seen that a little positive inclination has more effect on the
end depth ratio than a little negative inclination. This counts too for the approach flow
velocity.
30
2.9.5 Properties of circular open-channels
This section contains a list of circular open-channel properties, presented by Chanson
(2004). Here D is the tube diameter and δ the angle from pipe centre to the
intersections between water surface and tube wall (can be >180 degrees), see also
figure 2.16.
D δ
• Flow depth: h = 1 − cos
2 2
2h
• Angle: δ = 2 cos −1 1 −
D
δ
• Free-surface width: B = sin
2
• Cross-sectional area:
D2 D2 h
(δ − sin δ ) = arccos 1 − 2 − 2 1 − 2 1 −
h h h
A=
8 4 D D D D
D
• Wetted perimeter: Pw = δ
2
sin δ
• Hydraulic diameter (equivalent pipe diameter): DH = 4 RH = D 1 −
δ
VDH
• Reynolds number for pipe and open channel flows: Re =
ν
31
2.10 Conclusions literature study
The many mechanisms of gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets make it hard to give
a quantitative prediction of the performance of the plunging jet system, at least in
terms of the primary variables (jet diameter, jet velocity and length, as well as the
physical properties of the fluid). Many secondary factors (nozzle design, angle of jet
inclination, presence of vibrations) can have significant influence on jet behavior, but
these are even more difficult to quantify.
Many of the mentioned functions and relations are based on experimental data for
fast and small jets from nozzles. Therefore all except the circular channel formulas are
only applicable for a scale order much smaller than the scales used in real sewer
systems. The objective of this thesis is to see if the relations described in literature
may be used for free overfall jets from circular channels with much bigger
dimensions. If that is not the case, some minor changes may be enough to still use the
functions.
The objective of this report is to find relations between plunging jets, air bubble
entrainment and the air bubble intake with a submerged sewer pump in a small sewer
sump. There is no information available for this subject too, which means there is still
a lot to discover about this subject.
32
Chapter 3: Description of experimental model set-up
and measurement program
The first paragraph (3.1) tells something about the used model reservoir. Then the
horizontal circular approach channel is described in paragraph (3.2). The submersible
sewer pump and the flow regulation follow in paragraphs (3.3) respectively (3.4).
Paragraph (3.5) is about the measurement attributes and the last paragraph (3.6)
describes the measurement program, procedures and parameters.
Figure 3.1: Schematic drawing of the model set-up (See appendix A for an enlarged version)
33
An approach flow tube in the model, see figure 3.1, represents the mouth of a
(small) sewer system that ends in a sewer sump. In normal dry wetter conditions, the
mouth of the sewer system is always above the water level in the reservoir. This way,
sewer systems have always their maximum buffer capacity in case of a short but
heavily rainfall. Secondly, the low water levels in sewer pipes will wash away
sediments in the sewage and will not be able to settle and block the sewer pipe, as
flow velocities are high at low water levels in the pipe.
The tube and the pump are lined up in the middle of the reservoir to get a
symmetrical reservoir. To keep the model manageable, the set-up must have the
dimensions of a relative small sewer sump, and if possible without any scaling, to
exclude any possible scale effects. More about this subject further on in this
paragraph.
Except for the smallest, all TOP sewer sumps contain two pumps to pump the
sewage to a cleaning station. The reason for that is the possible failure of one of the
pumps in case of blockage with big or tough objects, but the main reason is to
minimize the amount of pump restarts. The amount of restarts per hour is limited, due
to technical reasons. But still the model set-up has only one single pump, for
simplicity reasons.
34
Dimensions of sewer sump model set-up
For experimental researches with air bubbles, it is nearly impossible to obtain real and
valid results with scaled models. The viscosity and the surface tension of the water are
not as easy scalable as model lengths and velocities. For that, it is better to exclude
any scale effects by employ no scaling between prototype and model. For more
information about scaling, see paragraph 2.2 for a dimension analysis.
Without scaling, sewer pipe diameters can be large in practice. But to keep the
model manageable, a small but real sewer pipe diameter of 0.20 meter is chosen as
approach flow channel.
Because the supporting structure of the approach tube is constructed on the rails
of the flume, it is possible to vary the distance between the pump and the tube mouth.
The length of the reservoir itself is also adaptable by moving a non-waterproof
plywood sheet in the flume. The reservoir walls do not have to resist high forces, so
this is the most easily and quickly way to displace it.
35
By knowing this maximum design discharge, ITT Flygt offered a submersible
sewer pump with a capacity of 30 l/s and a water head of 6.0 meters, which is
sufficient for the model set-up.
With this model set-up it is only possible to measure with the same in- and
outgoing discharges, which is almost never the case in practice. In practice the
outgoing pump discharge is much bigger than the incoming flow into the sewer sump
at dry weather. The pump impeller frequency and pipe characteristic are always
constant and designed to handle rain conditions. When the water level reaches the
switch off threshold, the pumps are shut down. This is a difference between the model
set-up and reality.
The volume in the vertical Perspex stand pipe is known by measuring the height
of the air volume in de stand pipe. Along with the measured pressure in the air
volume, is it possible to calculate the volume at atmospheric pressure.
36
Figure 3.3: Vertical stand pipe made of Perspex which takes air bubbles out of the pipeline, see
air bubble at red arrow
In this set-up it was possible to catch all air bubbles with a 5 meter long horizontal
pipe, see figure 3.4, with a diameter D = 0.20 m and a discharges Qw ≤ 12.5 l/s. This
way, the smallest air bubbles needed a rise time of 12.5 s to overcome D = 0.20 m,
which is equal to 1.6*10-2 m/s.
Air bubbles rise quicker when there are no violent turbulent eddies in the
horizontal pipe. This is because these eddies are able to mix especially the smallest
bubbles in the pipe. Therefore a sheet with small holes was placed at the front side of
the horizontal pipe section to suppress big eddies in the turbulent pipe flow.
37
Figure 3.4: Horizontal pipe section to let raise all the air bubbles to the upper side before
collecting the bubbles in the Perspex vertical stand pipe on the right.
The walls of the bubble trap used are 0.15 m below the water surface. So the
maximum pressure below the bubble trap is the pressure of a water column with a
diameter of 0.15 m, which is about 1.5 kPa. Through the narrow passage in the used
air flow meter, the maximum possible air discharge is equal to Qa = 100 l/min.
Unfortunately, this was not the maximum air entrainment that occurred with this
model set-up, so not all entrainment values could be measured.
38
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.5: Schematic representations of possible air entrainment measurement techniques (a):
(McKeogh and Ervine, 1981), (b): (Kusabiraki et al., 1990)
The reservoir depth is decreased to see what the effects are on the air bubble
plume. In these experiments only the bubble zone and the penetration depth are
measured, which was most times to the bottom with the small water depth of 1.0
meter.
Then the air entrainment measurements are done with the bubble trap. So the
effects of the different discharges and falling heights are measured on the total
amount of air entrainment.
The effect of the pump impeller revolution rate alone is measured. It became
apparent that it was certainly important, which was unexpected.
In the last experiments the pump air intake discharges with respect to different water
discharges, fall heights, tube – pump distances and water depths are measured.
39
All experiments are measured only in stationary situations with stationary
parameters, like: water level, water discharge, etc. Real situations like plunging jets
with dropping reservoir water levels, are not taken into account, but are nevertheless
very interesting.
The start up time is different for every measurement, but most times 1 minute is
enough to get an overall stationary situation.
Fixed parameters
The fixed parameters that can not be varied in the used model set-up are:
1. Approach flow tube diameter (D = 0.192 m, inner diameter)
2. Quality of the water (water from the cellar basin below the laboratory hall of
WL|Delft Hydraulics)
o Water temperature (= ±18.5ºC)
o Surface tension of the water (σ = 0.0765 N/m, is relatively high)
3. Reservoir width and depth (b * h = 1.00 m * 1.00 m)
4. ITT Flygt Submersible pump
o Type: NP 3102 MT, 100 mm
o Impeller code: 462
o Best Efficiency Point (BEP): 25 l/s with a 6.5 m water head
o Maximum water head: 12 meter
40
Variable parameters
De variable parameters are adjustable but fixed for every measurement:
1. Water depth Hw (m)
2. Fall height H (m)
3. Tube – pump distance Ltp (m)
4. Water discharge Qw (l/s)
5. Impeller revolutions (for pump air intake experiments only) (l/min)
See figure 3.1 or appendix A for a schematic overview of all parameters.
1) Water depth Hw
The water depth can vary between 0.35 and 0.95 meter. The submersible pump needs
a minimum water level of 0.24 m plus 0.11 m for a concrete pomp base. The height of
the flume walls requires a maximum reservoir water level of 0.95 meter water depth.
Measures are done only with water levels: 0.95, 0.60 and 0.40 m.
2) Fall height H
The fall height is the vertical distance between the inner side of the lower tube edge
and the reservoir water level. It is adjustable to a value of 0.98 m above the maximum
water level. That is about 1.93 m above the reservoir bottom. The minimal distance
between tube edge and the reservoir bottom is 0.40 m.
4) Water discharge Qw
The water discharge can vary between 0 and 25 l/s. This discharge is always equal for
both pump flow and plunging jet flow. For the measurements only discharges
between 0.5 and 15.0 l/s are used. For discharges less than 0.75 l/s the jet used to
follow the tube edge curve, so results like fall distance and horizontal velocities are
affected by this phenomenon and are less useful. Besides that, the discharge gauge has
a resolution of 0.15 l/s, so exact flow measures with these small discharges are almost
impossible.
Overfall jets with discharges above 10 l/s are not stationary and stable with the
used model set-up. The reason for this is not known, but there are some possible
causes; a possibility is a non-stationary water supply from the pump, but it is also
possible that the length of the approach channel is not long enough to eliminate all big
turbulent instabilities in the flow. More about this in paragraph 4.1.
41
In experiments without pump influence on the bubble plume, the revolution rate
of the impeller is of no importance and chosen equal to 1000 rpm to relieve pump
stresses. The maximum impeller revolution rate is 1445 rpm.
For pump air intake experiments, the revolution rate is also chosen equal to 1000 rpm.
For more information, see paragraph 4.3.
42
The aeration zone is the bubble zone minus the horizontal fall distance:
La = Lb − L jx .
43
Chapter 4: Qualitative observations and discussion
Observing the phenomena occurring with a plunging water jet in a sewer sump model
by the naked eye, a lot of things can be said without having measurement results. In
this chapter some observed features of plunging jets (4.1) will be described.
Following that, observations on air bubble plumes are given in paragraph (4.2). The
last paragraph (4.3) describes observed relations between the submersible pump and
bubble plumes.
The jet surface roughness is at first dependent on the turbulent movements in the
approaching flow, so when this flow is more turbulent, the falling jet surface will be
less smooth. A second cause for a rough jet surface is the air friction during the fall of
the water jet. The last possible cause of jet surface ripples is the channel edge shape
and roughness.
For the model experiments with big discharges (> 7.5 l/s), the surface of the jet and
the approach flow were not stable and rough. A possible cause is a non-constant
delivery of water by the pump, but a more acceptable cause for this is an approach
channel which is not long enough to eliminate all big turbulent instabilities in the
approach flow.
In the model set-up, the approach flow channel must be able to lower below the
flume walls. So it was needed to have a vertical connection at the upstream end of the
approach channel, see figure 4.1. But the result of this connection was a highly
turbulent and rough flow at the upstream end of the approach flow. It is plausible that
the channel was not long enough to get a steady and smooth outflow.
44
Figure 4.1: Connection upstream end of the approach flow channel
In literature it is described when the nozzle length is 50 times the diameter; the
flow in the nozzle is completely developed and will not change with longer nozzles.
So the rule ‘50 times the diameter’ is probably also needed for tube channels. In that
case the tube must be LT = 50 * 0.20 = 10 meter. But a 10 meter long tube is hard to
handle, especially when the height of the tube must be changed often. So a length of
25 times the diameter (= 5.0 m) was chosen to get a more manageable model set-up.
When the length of the tube is divided by the hydraulic diameter at critical
Ac
flow DH ,c = 4 instead of the tube diameter D, what is reasonable with
0.5δ c D
channel flows, the dimensionless length of the tube is than Lˆ = L D ≥ 50 for water
T T H
discharges Qw ≤ 2.4 l s , see also figure 4.2. So it can be assumed that discharges less
than 2.4 l/s are completely developed, but discharges to 5 l/s were also visibly stable
and stationary. In future measurements it is recommended that approach channels for
overfalling jets are at least 35 times the hydraulic diameter to get a stationary
situation.
To improve the situation for bigger discharges than 5.0 l/s, some measures are
taken. First a trouser leg is implemented at the upstream part of the approach tube. It
is like a sac around the water flow which enlarges the local roughness, but the effect
was small. So a sharp weir is implemented at the upstream end of the approach tube.
This measure allowed the water flow to be sub-critical, but still the instabilities in the
flow are not vanished. Instable flows with big discharges are accepted then.
45
Figure 4.2: Dimensionless length of the tube at critical flow
In the used model set-up the approach tube edge is sharp and has no big
irregularities. But especially at small discharges, a part of the jet flow is branched off
at the channel edge. It is like the flow sticks to the channel edge. Possibly the surface
tension between the water and the PVC tube is the cause of this effect, but maybe also
the Coãnda-effect plays a role in this situation. The Coãnda-effect is the bending of a
flow along a convex surface, see figure 4.3 for an example.
Figure 4.3: Schematic demonstration of the Coandă effect (Pol-O.R. Bear, 2006)
46
4.1.2 Shape of the plunge point
The shape of the jet cross section is an important parameter with air entrainment,
because air will only entrain when a small air pocket in the direct neighborhood of the
plunge point is enclosed by water. The air bubble is then transported into the reservoir
by the submerged jet. No air bubbles are entering into the falling jet itself, the jet will
at most disintegrate in separate water packages and droplets, dependent on the fall
height, the turbulent movements in the falling jet and the viscosity of the water.
When the perimeter length of the plunge point increases, more air has a chance of
getting enclosed by water and more air will entrain the reservoir. So a stretched jet
entrains more air than a massive circular jet of the same discharge, fall height, etc.
It is clear that a falling jet from a horizontal open approach channel has a specific
characteristic shape. This shape is dependent of the rate of filling of the tube and has
for any fall height a different horizontal cross section in the plunge point. The plunge
point shape is in common U-shaped with relatively small fall heights; this becomes
more and more circular with larger fall heights.
4.1.3 Features which influence the jet shape during the fall
When a water jet leaves the approach channel the shape of the jet cross section
changes during the fall. There are four features that influence the jet cross section
shape:
• Acceleration of the water jet by gravitational forces
• Velocity profile of the channel flow at the channel edge
• Turbulent movements in the jet
• Surface tension forces in the water jet
Gravitational acceleration
Because falling water accelerates by gravitational forces, the cross sectional area of
the jet in the plunge point is smaller than the cross sectional area at the channel end.
This is valid only when the net water jet cross section is taken into account, so air
spaces between water particles are omitted.
Eventually when the fall height is high enough, a falling jet will be disrupted
when turbulent movements in the jet are strong enough. In case of a coherent stable
jet, the jet is stretched until water surface tensions become dominant and the jet is torn
up into droplets. The breaking up of the falling jet has a large influence on the air
entrainment process at the plunge point. More air will entrain with a disrupted
plunging jet and also the penetration depth will decrease, see more about this in
paragraph 4.2.3.
47
Figure 4.4: Turbulent velocity profile in circular open channel flow
In an open tube flow, the parts A and C of the flow cross section, see figure 4.4, has a
lower mean velocity than part B. That is the effect of the tube wall friction. So part A
and C will reach a smaller horizontal distance than the middle part of the jet. The
horizontal cross section of the jet becomes U-shaped with the convex part to the front.
See figure 4.5 for a development of the jet cross section shape during the fall.
Figure 4.5: Development of the horizontal jet cross section during the fall.
This U-shaped jet cross section occurs always with fall heights H = Hu < Hcir, with
Hcir and Hu the fall heights by which the jet has a circular respectively U-shaped jet
cross section. A U-shaped plunge point turns out to be very important for air
entrainment, see paragraph 4.1.4.
48
Surface tension of the jet water
The surface tension of the water in the jet will try to minimize the length of the jet
cross section perimeter. So the surface tension force tries to make the shape of the jet
cross section as circular as possible, see also figures 4.5 and 4.6.
No further research is done on the effect of different surface tensions of plunging
water jets.
Figure 4.6: Deformation of jet cross section; the jet is seen from behind
Figure 4.7: Sketch of a funnel around a water jet in the plunging point
49
In some cases the approaching water at the reservoir surface is hampered a bit to
flow to the plunge point, for example when the plunge point is in the neighborhood of
a wall or floating obstacle. This has directly influence on the local funnel depth
because of the reduced approaching reservoir surface water. The funnel depth
increases and thus air can be entrapped easier within this deep funnel, so the amount
of entraining air increases also.
In case of a U-shaped jet, reservoir surface water cannot adjoin the shooting jet in
the concave part of the U-shaped plunge point as easy as at the convex part. So, the
funnel depth at the concave part is deeper and entrains far more air than the convex
part of the plunge point.
Also with air entrainment measurements, the bubble trap wall must not be placed
very close to the plunge point to prevent funnel depth increase and air entrainment
manipulation. Bubble traps which enclose plunging jets with a gap, like in figure 4.8,
are not reliable for entrained air volume measurements. It is better to have a bubble
trap without a gap, also then practically all entrained air bubbles will be captured.
The amount of air entrainment increases with smaller jet plunge angles. The most
probable reason for this is the small angle between both jet and reservoir water
surfaces, so air can be enclosed easier than with vertical jets. This is of course only
valid for the lower side of the plunging jet. As a matter of fact, Sande & Smith (1973)
say it has only significant effect with plunge angles αj < 60°, which is not the case for
the experiments done with the used model set-up.
No further investigations are made on this aspect.
50
4.1.6 Approach flow channel inclination
When the approach flow channel makes a slight down hill (positive) inclination of
1:400, there are already some visible changes of the falling jet. The horizontal
velocity of the flow is higher and the falling jet surface is rougher.
The extra positive acceleration of the flow, at a slight positive channel inclination, is
almost not slowed down by the small wall surface roughness of the PVC approach
tube. So that is probably the reason why the horizontal velocities of the jet are then
visibly higher. The roughness of jet surface is than the result of the higher flow
velocities and velocity gradients in the approaching channel flow.
An unintentional up hill (negative) inclination of the approach flow channel has
the opposite effect. The horizontal velocity of the flow is reduced and the falling
water jet surface was visibly smoother.
Literature confirms the above-mentioned findings for the horizontal end velocity
of the approach flow, discussed in paragraph 2.9.3.
These findings are only observed qualitatively and no extra measurements are
done to explore these results. But it is an advice that the approach flow tube must be
leveled accurately. This may be the cause for some minor unexpected deviation in the
results.
51
4.2.2 Air bubble properties
Bubble size and water surface tension
The size of the air bubbles in an air bubble plume is relatively constant, because this
is mostly dependent on the water surface tension and the intensity of the shear stresses
in the reservoir. The bigger the water surface tension, the stronger the air bubbles are
and thus the better the air bubbles are able to resist the occurring shear stresses. When
an air bubble is relatively large to the prevailing shear stresses, the air bubble breaks
up into smaller ones. But the same turbulent movements also cause collisions between
air bubbles, which can merge together and move on as one. These two effects are the
causes that air bubbles in a bubble plume do have more or less the same size. This is
also visually observed.
The relation between those two effects are combined in the Weber number
V2
We = , which is proportional to the ratio of the inertial force to capillary force
σ ρL
(i.e. surface tension).
The used water in the model has a relatively high surface tension. With a capillary
tube with a radius of r = 0.2 mm, is measured a capillary rise of hm = 78 mm at ±18ºC.
This is pretty high in comparison to the measured capillary rise of tap water: ht = 76
mm also at ±18ºC. So the accompanying water surface tensions are respectively: σm =
0.0765 N/m and σt = 0.0746 N/m, with both ρw = 1000 kg/m3. The high surface
tension in the model reservoir is probably the result of the salty minerals that are
present in the cellar basin of the laboratory hall of WL|Delft Hydraulics. Therefore it
can be assumed that the air bubbles in the used model water are a bit larger than with
clean tap water.
The water in real sewer sumps is strongly polluted with surfactants, so the surface
tension in real sewer sumps will be much lower than in the model set-up. Air bubble
sizes are then (much) smaller and that affects also the air bubbles rise velocities. The
residence time in the reservoir water will be longer which enlarges the chance for air
bubbles to be taken up by the submersible pump, with all negative side effects. So
results of the used model set-up are thus too promisingly for real sewer sumps and
cannot be used as design rules unconditionally. First the effects of other water
properties must be examined carefully.
The angle of the submerged jet is also important for the air bubbles residence
time, because with a oblique jet, the rising force on the air bubbles is not opposite to
the jet momentum but under an angle. So air bubbles can relatively easy escape the jet
upwards. So the penetration depth is much less with oblique jets (αj ≤ 70º).
52
The relative low density of the air bubble plume is positive for the rise velocity of
the individual air bubbles, that is because the plume rises as a whole and causes a
reservoir circulation. So not only the air bubbles rise, but also the water in between.
This means that the denser the air bubble plume is, the faster the air bubbles rise. The
rise velocity of the air bubbles in the used model is about 0.15 to 0.20 m/s. These
values are not measured exactly.
Figure 4.10: Schematic drawing of an air bubble plume with or without an obstacle
In case of a more oblique jet (αj ≤ 75º) the resulting horizontal force of the jet on
the bubble plume makes sure that the entrained air bubbles will flow away sideways.
So the more the plunging jet is vertical the more the entrained air bubbles are able to
block the submerged jet and the less the penetration depth will be.
This phenomenon is the result of the rate between the jet momentum and the
rising force of the entrained air bubble plume along with the jet plunge angle. So it
can be said that a big, fast, circular jet with a smooth surface has almost no chance of
getting obstructed by entrained air bubbles and so the penetration depth will be very
53
big. Most times this is the case for plunging jets with relative small fall heights (0.20 -
0.40 m) and stable but big enough discharges (1.5 - 3.0 l/s. With smaller fall heights
the jet plunge angle is not vertical enough to get a deep penetration. Jets from bigger
fall heights have more momentum but have also rougher surfaces, so more obstructing
air bubbles will be entrained. This is also the case for bigger discharges then 5.0 l/s,
see also paragraph 4.1.1. Smaller discharges do not have a big enough momentum for
a deep penetration.
The biggest jet obstructions with entrained air bubbles are from jets with high fall
heights (≥ 0.60 m) and small discharges (≤ 1.0 l/s). These jets are relatively rough and
therefore entrain a lot of air. With these small discharges the jet has almost no
momentum for breaking up blockages and plunges also near vertically, which is
needed for jet obstruction.
(a) (b)
Figure 4.11: Pictures of two penetration depths with a slight different discharge and fall height
The up going flow in the middle of the reservoir is flowing against the downward
flowing submerged jet. This feature decreases the penetration depth of the bubble
plume, but the reservoir depth was just not deep enough at these discharges to
measure this effect.
54
Figure 4.12: Floating air bubbles against the reservoir walls due to reservoir circulation
The most striking finding on the intake of air at the submerged pump was that the
revolution rate of the pump impeller was very important. At some impeller revolution
rates a circulation in front of the pump inlet emerges, this is called a pre-rotation. It is
known that a pre-rotation appears when a pump is not pumping in its Best Efficiency
Point (B.E.P.), so the revolution rate times the impeller pitch is not equal to the
occurring water discharge. When the revolution rate is too high, the water in front of
the inlet spins in the same direction as the impeller, in case of a too low revolution
rate the pre-rotation is in the counter direction. Figure 4.13 shows a pre-rotation
vortex.
It is likely plausible that a pump in its B.E.P. has no influence on the water in
front of the pump inlet because of the lack of pre-rotation. So it was better to have no
pre-rotation at all, but unfortunately it was impossible to pump small water discharges
(0.5 - 5.0 l/s) with the accompanying low revolution rates to keep the pump in its
B.E.P. A compromise is an impeller revolution rate of 1000 rpm, this is the lowest
revolution rate at what the pump can deliver the requested water discharges (0.5 –
15.0 l/s) with the highest fall height (Hmax = 0.98 m).
More on this provided in section 5.7.
55
The pre-rotation of the pump was able to generate an extra reservoir circulation.
When the reservoir dimensions where small, about ≤ 2.0 m3, a vortex was formed
around the plunge point. Because of this vortex the funnel around the plunge point
becomes much deeper and that certainly influences the air entrainment. Unfortunately
the bubble trap was far too large to measure the total air entrainment in such a small
reservoir and so it was not possible to do those extra measurements.
Sometimes when the pump air discharge Qap is high compared to the water
discharge Qw the pump can not pump away the air inside the pump casing. The pump
impeller is then spinning in an air pocket and the pump pumps no more water. This
Qap
phenomenon occurs with ratios ≥ 0.01 , especially with low water discharges.
Qw
The pump impeller revolution rate is of no importance with air bubble plume
measurements without the influence of the pump. The revolution rate is then also
chosen at 1000 rpm to relieve pump stresses.
56
Chapter 5: Results and analysis
In this chapter is described the measured data and conclusions that are visible from
them. In paragraph (5.1) the end depth results are shown and are compared with
empirical formulas suggested in literature. In paragraph (5.2) is depicted the modeling
of the horizontal fall distance of a free overfalling jet. In paragraph (5.3) is described
the modeling of the circular fall height and in paragraph (5.4) is shown an empirical
relation for the aeration length. A comparison with a formula in literature appeared to
be impossible. The penetration depth and the relation with the air entrainment are in
paragraph (5.5). The relation between discharge and the air entrainment discharge are
given in paragraph (5.6). In the last two paragraphs is told something about the pump
impeller revolution rate (5.7) and the pump air discharge (5.8).
The spreading of the end depths is very small for dimensionless discharges
ˆ
Qw ≤ 0.15 (Qw ≤ 7.5 l/s). For larger discharges there is a significant spread in the
results, which is probably due to the unstable approach channel flow, see paragraph
4.1.1.
Measurement 5 was done with a trouser leg as stilling measure at the upstream
end of the approach channel. This has some effect on the stability of the approach
flow so this measurement is assumed to be the best end depth measurement. To
57
11
Qw h 6
compare the results of measurement 5 with the formula = C e written in
g D 2.5 D
literature in paragraph 2.9.4, figure 5.2 is given.
Figure 5.2: Comparison of various empirical formulas and the measured data with error bands
The error bands are given for the measured data (∆x = ±0.003 ≈ 0.15 l/s). The
error for in the y-axis is negligible in the figure when the estimated error is 0.001 m.
The results of the measured data come very close to the formula with constant C =
1.54, which is the formula of Rajaratnam & Muralidhar (1964).
An extra vertical velocity at the channel end we is added, by knowing the flow is
at that location strongly curved. This vertical velocity is calculated by using equation:
1
H e + weT j − gT j2 = 0 . Every fall height He has a different fall distance Lj,x, but the
2
vertical end velocity we remains the same, so the average vertical velocities we are
calculated to determine the theoretical curves. The curves are represented by the
58
1
formula: ( x(t ); y (t ) ) = vet ; H e + wet − gt 2 and they are a good approximation of
2
the measured data see figure 5.3.
Figure 5.3: Horizontal fall distances with various discharges and the accompanying theoretical
trajectories of the jet axes
Figure 5.4 gives an overview of the various average flow velocities at the
beginning of the jet for various discharges. The average vertical flow velocity we at a
discharge of Qw = 0.5 l/s differs much from the we values of other discharges. That is
probably due to the occurrence of the surface tension or the so called Coandă effect,
see also paragraph 4.1.1. Because of this, a part of the horizontal velocity will be
transferred to the vertical velocity, so the horizontal velocity is calculated too big and
thus is the fall time assumed too small. The initial vertical velocity must now be large
enough to reach the vertical fall distance in that short fall time.
In figure 5.3 can be seen the result of this effect on the theoretical curve for a
discharge of Qw = 0.5 l/s. It does not fit the measured data as good as the rest of the
theoretical curves. In fact the inclination of the curve at Ljx = 0 m should be more
horizontal and the rest of the parabolic curve should be more curved.
59
Figure 5.4: The calculated average flow velocities at the channel end for various discharges
Figure 5.5: Dimensionless fall height when the jet cross section is most circular and massive
60
discharge is also smaller. But there are no measurements done with other approach
channel diameters to check the dimensionless relationship.
In spite of the relative big error margins for the fall height and the discharge, a
linear relationship in figure 5.5 between the fall height and the discharge seems in this
range fairly possible. The dimensionless formula of the fitted line is: Hˆ cir = 102.0Qˆ w
( H cir = 0.39Qw ) . From now on red circles in other charts mark this relationship, to see
if the circular and massive jet cross section has any influence on the shown results.
See for example figure 5.6.
Figure 5.6: Aeration length from plunging jets with various water discharges and fall heights
The sometimes parallel deviations in the curves may be the effect of a slight
approach channel inclination at some fall heights. Especially at the fall height values
H = 0.20, 0.30 and 0.40 m, the inclination was measured less accurately.
Figure 5.6 shows that the aeration length is mainly dependent on the water
discharge. When all results of the aeration length are plotted against the water
discharge, the chart in figure 5.7 is obtained.
61
Figure 5.7: Determination of the maximum aeration length versus discharge
The best fitting line though all aeration length results is: La = 0.37Qw0.58 and the
best fitted formula for the maximum aeration length is: La ,max = 0.5Qw0.5 . The constants
s
0.37 and 0.5 are not dimensionless, they have the dimension of . Figure 5.8
m
shows that all measured aeration lengths are between the following relations:
0.3Qw0.5 ≤ La ≤ 0.5Qw0.5 .
La
Figure 5.8: Relation between Qw
and fall height H
62
Comparison of measured data with formula from literature
Because the bubble zone length formula described by Nakasone (1987)
0.134
Lb = 0.0629 ( H j + 1.5hc ) qw0.666 ,
see also paragraph 2.8.3, is only valid for free overfall nappes in stead of free overfall
jets from circular channels, a comparison with the measured data in this experiment is
not without problems. The difficulty is that an overfall nappe is 2D and an overfall jet
is a 3D phenomenon, so not only the plunge but also the flow in the reservoir is
different because of the third dimension.
By just filling in the measured results in the formula of Nakasone (1987), figure 5.9 is
Q
obtained. With this formula is approximated qw = w and is La = Lb – Ljx.
D
Figure 5.9: Comparison of nappe jet aeration length formula of Nakasone (1987) with measured
data
It is visible that the nappe jet formula is not applicable for jets from circular open
channels. The formula of Nakasone gives results that are about five times bigger then
the measured data of aeration lengths. The formula of Nakasone has a small fall
height dependency, which is not found in the measured results.
63
Figure 5.10: Aeration lengths for various water depths, fall heights and discharges
The figure shows a little effect of the water depth on the aeration length. The
aeration length decreases (0 – 40 %) with less deep water depths, especially for water
discharges between 3.0 and 10.0 l/s. But there is no clear relationship visible.
Figure 5.11: Measured data for the penetration depth for various discharges
64
Figure 5.12: Measured data for the penetration depth for small discharges
At first the penetration depth is clearly not constant for any discharge and/or fall
height. So the rule of thumb given in literature that the penetration depth is more or
less equal to 2/3rd of the fall height is not correct at all. In fact, jets with the smallest
fall heights have mostly the biggest penetration depths.
For the minimum discharge measured, 0.5 l/s, the penetration depth is almost
constant for any fall height. But when the discharge increases to 2.0 l/s, the
penetration depth increases surprisingly faster for low fall heights than for jets from
high fall heights, see also figure 5.12 for a zoomed in version of figure 5.11.
The horizontal lines at Hp = ± 0.94 m represents the bottom of the reservoir, so the
reservoir was unfortunately not deep enough to measure the whole range of interest.
At high discharges (Qw > 2.0 l/s) the penetration depth decreases at some
apparently arbitrary fall heights. There is no unambiguous explanation for this
phenomenon. Maybe this is the result of a slight approach flow inclination at some
measurements, but that is uncertain.
In figure 5.12 the red circles indicates the discharge-fall height combination where
the jet is massive and circular at the plunge point. So the plunging jet entrains then
relative small amounts of air into the reservoir. The relation in paragraph 5.3 is used
for determining the combinations between circular discharge and fall height.
On the left side of the red circles on the curves, the jet plunge point is U-shaped
and the right side of the curve, the jets cross section is more or less circular shaped. It
is clear that the penetration depth increases much when the jets cross section is near
massive and circle shaped. This is visible too in figure 5.13, where the discharge Qw is
divided by the circular discharge Qcir for that specific fall height.
65
Qw
Figure 5.13: Relationship between penetration depth and
Q cir
In contrast to the charts in figures 5.11 and 5.12 it is clear that bigger fall heights
penetrate deeper into the reservoir than small fall heights when we look at the ratio
Qw
in stead of Qw. Jets from big fall heights do not need to be as circular in the
Qcir
plunge point as jets from small fall heights to penetrate to the same depth.
At last figure 5.13 makes clear that the penetration depth increases rapidly when
the discharge Qw increases already from ¾th of the circular discharge Qcir.
66
Figure 5.14: Dimensionless penetration depth with various fall heights
Qa
The effect of the entrainment ratio on the penetration depth is examined. The
Qw
results are given in figure 5.15.
Qa
Figure 5.15: Relation between penetration depth and entrainment rate
Qw
Figure 5.15 makes clear that a negative relation between the penetration depth and
the entrainment rate exists, except for the horizontal curve parts which represents the
reservoir bottom, all curves have a positive slope and so, the lower the entrainment
67
ratio, the deeper the penetration depth. This relation is also described in paragraph
4.2.3.
In the figure it is indicated by red circles, at which discharges the jet plunge points
are circular. It is recognizable that the penetration depth is maximal and the
entrainment rate is minimal for circular discharges, especially at the fall height curve
of H = 0.60 m
The penetration depth formula of Sande & Smith (1975) which includes the
buoyancy forces of the entrained air bubbles see paragraph 2.8.2, is interesting to look
at. The formula is valid for only vertical jets from nozzles, but still a comparison is
done with free overfall jets. See figure 5.16 for the calculated penetration depths.
Figure 5.16: Calculated penetration depths from the formula of Sande & Smith (1975) for
vertical plunging jets with measured data
After comparing the calculated penetration depth with the measured penetration
depth in figures 5.11 and 5.12, the following things can be remarked: The penetration
depth is bigger for small fall heights than for big fall heights. This is the result of the
air entrainment discharge in the formula and corresponds to the measured data. In
both results, the penetration depth decreases with higher discharges, but the decrease
of the penetration depth is higher for the calculated penetration depths. That is
probably the result of the inclination of the measured plunging jets, which is not taken
into account in the formula, this way air escapes easier sideways underneath the
plunge point and the air bubbles can be brought a little deeper into the reservoir than
at vertical jets.
Figure 5.16 shows that a penetration depth of 3.0 m is possible with these
parameters. With a maximum possible penetration depth of 0.95 m in the model set-
up, this can not be confirmed nor denied. Scientifically it is interesting to perform
more research on this subject.
68
5.6 Air entrainment discharge
De results of the air entrainment discharge measurements with the bubble trap are
given in figures 5.17 and 5.18.
It can be concluded that as well as the fall height as the discharge has a positive
relation with the air entrainment, but a decreasing plunge point perimeter can
counteract these effects. So the shape of the cross section profile of the plunging jet
has a strong influence on the amount of air entrainment. On the right side of the red
circles on the curves the plunge point is U-shaped and on the left side the plunge point
is circular shaped. Figure 5.18 makes even clearer that the water discharge Qw with a
Q
minimal entrainment ratio a is equal to the circular discharge (Qw = Qcir).
Qw
Unfortunately it is impossible to measure more than 100 l/min entrained air with
the used bubble trap and air flow meter. It is fairly possible to entrain more air with
the used model set-up. Besides that, air entrainment discharges in the order of 10-2 –
100 l/min are possible too with this model set-up, but the used air discharge gauge was
not able to measure them.
69
Figure 5.18: Relation between entrainment ratio
Qa and ratio Q w
Qw Qcir
Figure 5.19: Relationship between air entrainment discharge and the total plunge velocity
70
Comparison measured data with literature formula for Qa
The by Sande & Smith (1976) mentioned aeration length formula Qa = 0.015 X 0.75 ,
−1.5
see paragraph 2.6.2, is valid for values for X = d N2 V j3 L0.5
j (sin α j )
between X = 10−4 − 10−2 . Their experiments were carried out with jets produced from
nozzles with dN = 2.85 – 10 mm, lN/dN = 50, Vj = 2 – 5 m/s, Lj < 0.5 m/s and αj = 20 -
60º.
The experiments done in for this thesis have complete other values for X:
X = 10−1 − 102 . Some other parameters in these experiments differ from the
experiments of Sande & Smith too: The imaginary channel end diameter is
4 Ae
approximated as the nozzle diameter: d%e = d N and is between 30 – 120 mm,
π
Lj = 0.2 – 1.2 m and αj = 60 - 82º. When using these parameters in the formula of
Sande & Smith, figure 5.20 appears.
It is clear that the calculated values as well as the shape of the curves are very
different to the experimental results given in figure 5.17. Therefore the formula of
Sande & Smith is useless for predicting entrainment discharges with plunging jets
from circular open channels.
Figure 5.20: Chart to compare air entrainment discharge calculated with formula of Sande &
Smith (1976) and measured data in figure 5.17
Qa
Comparison measured data with literature formula for
Qw
Following Chanson (1994) the dimensionless air entrainment is proportional to
Qa
= C * Fr 2 for Vj < 5 m/s, see paragraph 2.7.1.
Qw
With the following estimations V0 = 0 m/s and d j ≅ d e , figure 5.21 results.
71
Figure 5.21: Relation between entrainment ratio and squared Froude number
The first thing that is noticeable from figure 5.21, there is no such simple
relationship between the entrainment ratio from overfalling jets and the squared
Froude number, mentioned by Chanson (1994) for jets from nozzles. But there are a
couple of things that are worthy to remark: Again the entrainment ratio is minimal
when the plunge point of the jet is close to circular. In case of Qw < Qcir (right side
from the red circles on the curves) and the squared Froude number Fr2 < 26, the
entrainment ratio is about zero. When the squared Froude number Fr2 > 26 (and Qw <
Qcir) a relationship between the entrainment ratio and the squared Froude number can
Q
be approximated by: a = 0.025 ( Fr 2 − 26 ) .
Qw
More research is needed to confirm this relationship.
When Qw > Qcir (left side from the red circles on the curves) the entrainment ratio
increases with decreasing squared Froude number. In these parts of the curves the
plunge point is U-shaped and entrains relatively big amounts of air into the reservoir.
No relation is formulated to predict these entrainment ratios.
72
Figure 5.22: Effect of the impeller revolution rate on the air discharge taken in by the pump
Air is pushed away from the pump inlet when the pump is not pumping in its Best
Efficiency Point (B.E.P.) that is because a vortex is formed just in front of the pump
inlet. The pump impeller is not designed for pumping low discharges 0.5 to 5.0 l/s
with high water heads, so the revolution rate is mostly far away from its B.E.P., see
figure 5.22. If the impeller revolution rate was not more than twice the B.E.P.
revolution rate, the impact on the amount of pump air intake (Qap) was not very high,
but if the revolution rate becomes more than twice the B.E.P., the pre-rotation was
strong enough to push away almost all air bubbles near the pump inlet.
Figure 5.23: Pump air discharge with water depth Hw = 0.40 m and rpm = 1000
73
Figure 5.24: Pump air discharge with water depth Hw = 0.60m and rpm = 1000
Figure 5.25: Pump air discharge with water depth Hw = 0.84m and rpm = 1000
The first thing that can be said about these figures is that the pump air discharge
does not differ much between water depths H = 0.40 m and H = 0.60 m. That is
because the penetration depth is mostly more than 0.60 m and so the bubble density at
the reservoir bottom (the location of the pump inlet) is somewhat the same. Another
reason is the more or less constant aeration length with varying fall heights and water
depths, see respectively figures 5.6 and 5.10, so the shape of the bubble plume is
similar too.
74
The curves in figures 5.23 and 5.24 are very steep. The vertical axis is logarithmic
which makes the curve in the upper part even steeper. The conclusion from this is: air
bubbles stay pretty close to each other and the transition between water with or
without bubbles is relatively sudden, in particular with small bubble plumes. The air
bubbles in the plume have almost constant sizes so the bubbles have almost the same
rise velocity and path.
The curves in figure 5.25 are a bit different from the foregoing two. That is the
result of the increased importance of the water depth. With this water depth (Hw =
0.84 m) the air bubbles at the reservoir bottom are more dispersed and therefore, the
curves in the chart are less steep and the transition between water with or without air
bubbles is less sudden than in reservoirs with smaller water depths.
The points in the most left three (green) curves in figure 5.25 marks the points that
the submerged jet collides with the upper part of the submerged pump, see figure 5.26
for an impression. Because the angle of the jet and the fall distance increase with the
water discharge, the location of the plunge point and the bubble plume is not the same
for different discharges. It is possible that a jet with a small discharge does not collide
with the pump whereas a jet with bigger water discharges does.
In practice it is possible there are problems with air bubbles in pressurized pipe
lines with Qap ≥ 0.1 l/min.
Figure 5.26: Impression of a pump air intake discharge experiment. The bubble plume collides
with the submersible pump
75
When looking at the percentages of the entrained air volumes that are taken in by
the pump, the following figures 5.27, 5.28 and 5.29 appear.
Figure 5.27: Percentage of entrained air taken in by the pump with water depth Hw = 0.40 m
Figure 5.28: Percentage of entrained air taken in by the pump with water depth Hw = 0.60 m
76
Figure 5.29: Percentage of entrained air taken in by the pump with water depth Hw = 0.84 m
The curves are often defined by a small number of data points. The first reason is
the relative small number of air entrainment discharge data points between the
measurable air discharges Qa ≤ 100 l/min and the reliable air discharges Qa ≥ 1 l/min,
see figure 5.17. Another cause is the small discharge range between little and much
pump air intake discharges, see figures 5.23 and 5.24. Only data that are in both
figures (5.17 and 5.22 to 5.24) have a data point respectively in figures 5.27 to 5.29.
In some cases where data points have no exact water discharge match in both air
entrainment discharge and pump air discharge measurements, but have close neighbor
discharge data points, an estimation of the entrained air discharge is made to increase
the number of data points in figures 5.27 to 5.29.
With the used uncertain data of pump air intake discharges, the pump air intake
percentages are even more uncertain. Because of the uncertainty and the sensitivity of
the model set-up for these measurements, no clear statements can be made other than;
it is possible to take in up to 30 % of the entrained air by the pump in this model set-
up. Even higher percentages are possible when a pump is used which is more capable
in pumping a gas-liquid mixture. But that subject will not be dealt with in this thesis.
The values of the pump air discharges and the pump air percentages are
conservative when looking at the impeller revolution rate. When the impeller works
for every discharge in its best efficiency point, the results of the pump air discharge
and pump air percentage will be higher, especially at small water discharges. See
figure 5.22.
77
Chapter 6: Conclusions
After doing the experiments with free overfall jets from circular channels, a lot of
interesting phenomena occur that were not expected beforehand.
Literature describes that jet surface disturbances are the main cause of the air
entrainment with plunging jets. These disturbances entrap air at the location between
the jet surface and the reservoir water surface when the surfaces do not fit exactly.
This experimental research found out that the perimeter shape of the intersection
between the falling jet and the reservoir water surface (plunge point) is also an
important factor for the amount of air entrainment. For free overfall jets from circular
channels the horizontal jet cross section shape is at first U-shaped and becomes along
the fall gradually circular. Therefore the perimeter length decreases with increasing jet
fall heights and so the air entrainment discharge decreases too. But then again the jet
surface disturbances grow with the fall height, which enlarges the air entrainment.
The found dimensionless empirical formula for the circular fall height is:
H cir Qw
= 102.0 , see paragraph 5.3.
D g D 2.5
The next surprising results are about the penetration depth of the entrained air
bubble plume. In advance, a constant or increasing penetration depth was expected
with increasing jet fall heights, but it appeared that the opposite effect was more often
the case. The amount of air that is entrained by the plunging jet determines mostly the
penetration depth along with the jet water discharge. The higher the entrainment ratio
air/water discharge is, the smaller the penetration depth. That is because the entrained
air bubbles break up the submerged jet and so the jet loses its momentum. To
illustrate it; when the entrainment ratio is high, the jet lands on a cushion of rising air
bubbles.
The aeration length appeared to be independent of the plunging jet fall height. The
aeration length is mainly affected by the jet water discharge. The empirical maximum
aeration length with an exceedance frequency of once every eight to ten seconds is:
s
La ,max = 0.5Qw0.5 , with the dimension of constant 0.5 equal to
m
From experiments with pump air intake experiments the following observations
are made. Air bubbles are only taken in by the pump when they are in the direct
neighborhood of the pump inlet. The influence sphere of the pump is for discharges
Qw ≤ 15.0 not more than a radius of 0.10 m around the pump inlet centre.
The last unexpected phenomenon is the effect of a pre-rotation at the pump inlet
on the pump air intake discharge. A pre-rotation is a circulation in front of the pump
inlet as a result of the pump impeller revolution rate that is not working in its Best
Efficiency Point (B.E.P.). The pre-rotation pushes away the air bubbles near the pump
inlet and hinders air from being taking in by the pump. But this effect is only marginal
with impeller revolution rates bigger than twice the B.E.P. and is therefore no
effective and economical way to prevent air bubbles being taking in by the pump.
78
In this thesis a couple of mostly empirical formulas in literature are compared
with the results of the experiments. Almost all formulas proposed in literature are only
representative for small jets produced with nozzles. Only Dey (1998, 2001) and
Aigner (1999) have described some recent findings about free overfall flows in
circular channels. But they give no information about the falling jets produced with
the overfall channel flows, nor the air entrainment with the plunging jets.
The only formula from literature that turned out to be valid for the experiments
done is the dimensionless discharge formula of Rajaratnam & Muralidhar (1964):
11
Qw he 6
= 1.54 . All other formulas are not useful or applicable for this specific
g D 2.5 D
model or the magnitudes of the model dimensions do not correspond to the validity
dimensions of the empirical formulas in literature.
The measured results are obtained with this specific model set-up. Other similar
models can give different results, especially with the pump air intake experiments.
The measurements are very sensitive to all kinds of variations, for example the
turbulence level in the approach flow and the influence of the pump impeller
revolution rate, see figure 5.22.Therefore, the results are only useful for giving an
indication of the in reality occurring orders of magnitudes.
The measured air entrainment discharges Qa differ very much for different falling
jets. The minimum air entrainment is 0.0 l/min and the maximum is at least 300 l/min.
The measured pump air take in discharge is between 0.0 and 10 l/min. With a pump
air discharge more than 10 l/min, the pump stopped working.
The most robust and effective way to prevent air bubbles coming deep into the
sewer sump near the submersible pump inlet is to break up and bend the vertical
submerged jet in the reservoir. When the submerged jet hits a horizontal object below
the water surface, the high velocity flows in the reservoir are bended horizontal. Air
bubbles cannot be brought deeper into the reservoir and rise up unhindered in the
horizontal flows to the water surface. Because real sewer sumps have alternating
water levels, the horizontal object in the reservoir should be below the lowest water
level.
79
Chapter 7: Recommendations
This master thesis is an experimental research about a specific subject which is hardly
described in literature. Because of that, this thesis is mainly a basic description of all
occurring phenomena with the used model set-up. As a result of the numerous
imposed and measured parameters there was insufficient time to examine every
parameter thoroughly. Maybe other research programs can expand the results with
better predicting and more formulas. The experiment program is easily expandable
too. See following list for recommendations for future researches:
• A longer approach flow tube to a minimum of 35 times the hydraulic diameter
of the highest water discharge, to get better and more reliable results.
• An approach flow tube diameter other than D = 0.20 m, to measure the
diameter dependency.
• An inclined approach flow channel, to see the various effects on the air
entrainment.
• Another approach flow channel geometry, to alter the jet cross section shape.
• A deeper reservoir depth, to get more penetration depth results, especially
from jets with small air/water entrainment ratios.
• A wider or bigger reservoir to minimize the reservoir circulation and the
accompanying effect on the air bubble plume.
• A non-axis-symmetrical approach flow suspension compared to the reservoir,
to measure the effects of increased horizontal reservoir circulations, in
particular for pump air intake discharge measurements.
• A disconnected pump water and plunging jet water discharge, to be able to
vary only one parameter. Like real sewer sumps, experiments with non-
stationary reservoir water levels are then possible too.
• Other water properties, like lower water surface tensions and viscosities, to see
the effects on the air entrainment and the air bubble plume.
• A better device or method to measure the plunge point area, to get extra
information and starting-points for an air entrainment formula.
80
References
Aigner, D., Cherubim, C., Overflow in a cylindrical pipe bend. VII-th Conference Problems of Hydro
Engineering . Wroclaw-Szklarska Poreba, Poland, 1999, p.136-141.
Battjes, J.A., Vloeistofmechanica. Lecture notes CT2100 of faculty Civil Engineering and Geosciences
at Delft University of Technogoly, Delft, 2001.
Biń, A.K., ‘Gas entrainment by plunging liquid jets’. Chemical Engineering Science, 48, No.21 (1993),
p.3585-3630.
Burgess, J.M., Molloy, N.A. and McCarthy, M.J., ‘A note on the plunging liquid jet reactor’. Chemical
Engineering Science, 27 (1972), p.442-445.
Chanson, H., Hydraulic design of stepped cascades, channels, weirs and spillways. Oxford: Pergamon,
1994.
Chanson, H., The hydraulics of open channel flow: An introduction. 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier
Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004.
Detch, R.M., Sharma, R.N., ‘The critical angle for gas bubble entrainment by plunging liquid jets’, The
Chemical Engineering Journal, 44 (1990), p.157-166.
Dey, S., ‘End Depth in Circular Channels’. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 124, No.8, (1998),
p.856-863.
Dey, S., ‘EDR in Circular Channels’. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 127, No.2
(2001), p.110-112.
Dey, S., ‘Free overall in open channels: state-of-the-art review’. Flow Measurement and
Instrumentation, 13 (2002), p.247-264.
Flygt, brochure: Top 50, 65, 80, 100, 150, Turnkey pump stations. ITT Industries
Ito, A., Yamagiwa, K., Tajima, K., Yoshida, M. and Ohkawa, A., ‘Maximum penetration depth of air
bubbles entrained by vertical liquid jet’. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 33, No.6
(2000), p.898-900.
Kusabiraki, D., Murota, M., Ohno, S., Yamagiwa, K., Yasuda, M. and Ohkawa, A., ‘Gas entrainment
rate and flow pattern in a plunging liquid jet aeration system using inclined nozzles’. Journal of
Chemical Engineering of Japan, 23 (1990), p.704-710.
Lubbers, C.L and Clemens, F.H.L.R., ‘Air and gas pockets in sewerage pressure mains’, IWA journal
Water Science and Technology, volume 52, issue 3, p37-44, ISSN Print: 0273-1223 (2005).
Lubbers, C.L and Clemens, F.H.L.R., ‘Breakdown of air pockets in downwardly inclined sewerage
pressure mains’, IWA journal Water Science and Technology, volume 54, issue 11-12, p.233-
240, ISSN Print: 0273-1223, (2006).
McKeogh, E.J., Ervine, D.A., ‘Air entrainment rate and diffusion pattern of plunging liquid jets’.
Chemical Engineering Science, 36 (1981), p.1161-1172.
Nakasone, H., ‘Study of Aeration at Weirs and Cascades’. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol.
113, No.1 (1987), p.64-81.
81
Pol-O.R. Bear, Personal Air Conditioning System. November 2006.
http://www.polorbear.net/Coan_eff.html
Sande, E. van der, Smith, J.M., ‘Surface entrainment of air by high velocity water jets’. Chemical
Engineering Science, 28 (1973), p.1161-1168.
Sande, E. van der, Smith, J.M., ‘Mass transfer from plunging water jets’. The Chemical Engineering
Journal, 10 (1975), p.225-233.
Sande, E. van der, Smith, J.M., ‘Jet break-up and air entrainment by low velocity turbulent water jets’.
Chemical Engineering Science, 31 (1976), p.219-224.
Theylaert, A., Rosink, J.G. and Massink, H., Aquatische ecotechnologie, practicum handleiding.
Hogeschool Zeeland, November 2005. Januari 26th 2007.
http://www.hzeeland.nl/~mass0001/bestanden/web_t12_labhandleiding.doc
Yamagiwa, K., Mashima, T., Kadota, S. and Ohkawa, A., ‘Effect of liquid properties on gas
entrainment behavior in a plunging liquid jet aeration system using inclined nozzles’. Journal of
Chemical Engineering of Japan, 26, No.3 (1993), p.333-336
Zhu, Y., Oğuz, H.N. and Prosperetti, A., ‘On the mechanism of air entrainment by liquid jets at a free
surface’. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 404 (2000), p.151-177.
Other references:
Picture of a V-notch:
http://civcal.media.hku.hk/yuenlong/model_design/instruments/_vnotch.htm
82
Appendix A: Schematic drawing of model set-up
83
Definitions:
• Reservoir with B (m)
• Approach tube diameter D (m)
• Aeration zone La (m)
• Bubble zone Lb (m)
• Fall distance Ljx (m)
• Approach tube length Lp (m)
• Tube–pump distance Ltp (m)
• Critical depth hc (m)
• End depth he (m)
• Fall height H (m)
• Real fall height He (= H + 2/3 he) (m)
• Penetration depth Hp (m)
• Water depth Hw (m)
• Total plunge velocity Vj (m/s)
84