Professional Documents
Culture Documents
implied
Abstract
This document studies the role of innovation incurred in organizational educations, the
implications of the process for the implementation and its adaptability in new contexts,
the changes that has to be made in order to innovate, the influence of technology and
several new models of learning as the use of ICT and networks of professionals and
development and innovation catalizers for information society members.
Introduction
The aim of the topics analyzed in this text are close related with innovation in
education, this is a wide subject open for a wide discussion due to many definitions
given for many authors as a lot of interpretations made from the conclusion resulting
from case studies.
Therefore, it is necessary to start a point of reference with some of the
definitions that bring to us a start point to continue with the analysis so it can be related
with some important aspects of innovation.
Engestrom (2007), the way in which we conceptualise innovation has important
consequences for the educational systems of the future. The traditional model
assumes that innovation consists of a process where an original insight is followed by
product development, marketing and the dissemination of innovative products. The
need of innovation is translated into a call for increasing levels of educational
achievement and investments in higher education and research. This model
emphasises original ‘act of creation’ and the role of scientific and technical knowledge
as the sources of innovation.
Tuomi (2002) In practice, innovation rarely occurs according to this traditional
model.
The key to innovation is the social adoption of new technological opportunities. The
interpretation of an idea or technology becomes fixed only when it starts to have
practical implications for a specific community of users.
Innovations are systems innovations that add new elements to existing systems or
reconfigure existing systems in novel ways.
Carbonell (2001). Group of interventions decisions and processes with a grade of
intentionality and systematization trying to modify attitudes, ideas, cultures, contents,
models and pedagogical practices and at the same time, a new forms of products
appears when new forms of acquisition of knowledge are part of the process, such as a
renewal line, new projects, and curriculum design, strategies of teaching and learning,
didactical models and other forms of administration and design of curriculum around an
important element as it is the classroom. (Carbonell 2001)
This procedure has allowed the authors to analyze the possible scenarios that the
Institute of Educational Sciences board team might come up against in the future.
The authors affirmed that in any evaluation and decision-making process, outweighs
the cost of the possible consequences of an erroneous decision, and the development
of a methodology of evaluation provide the final decision with information to help
ensure the success of the project.
One of the methodologies ranks the proposals using different techniques, in order to
analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each of them and give further
recommendations to the Institution.
Based on this reasoning, Innovation has to take a renewal line with a constructive
attitude focusing on the new demands and previsibles changes in order to take a step
further that asserts with the answers, all the above, is a new way of thinking, new
ideas, new methods and pedagogical practices, new models and new resources.
As a complement with this argument, innovation is not all the result that emerges from
original thoughts, or progressist and rupture, it is everything that is encourage with not
as original, or progressist ways but are based with reasons that point the success, this
means, the capacity of knowing the possible effects and consequences in advance.
However, it is considered important in the process of the implementation the
relationship between educator and learner, the components has a meaning in open
and distance learning.
If innovation is understood as change in social practices, the implementation can be
embedded in more extended social learning processes.
Additional, there are many factors that affect negatively the development of the new
changes, these factors are exposed to professors, and these resistances are showed
in problems who attempt the organizations in a society that is looking for the creation of
new knowledge in order to set a dynamic. The problems that are derivated from
changes come from the knowledge or lack of technical formation, thus, it can be called
strategic problems that put a big barrier behind those changes.
In order to face the challenge of an innovation in every field of education in which it
take place, we have to ask ourselves, is it important to make a close relation between
teaching and research through innovation? Considering a similar topic, Is it important to
consider an innovation the change of teaching or the evolution in the old practices used
in education, or innovation has to be a completely new style of doing things in this field,
to go further, are there different kinds of innovations that need to be analyzed in order
to be well applied in different contexts? What kind of methodological practices are more
appropriate for the introduction of innovations related with use of technology.
Another important aspect is the changes in the curriculum design in order to adapt
correctly with an incoming innovation.
Many research applied on the use of ICT show that student teachers frequently face
difficulties with learning how to use technology tools due to these skills-related
difficulties, the instructors of the course had to provide training sessions for
demonstrating the different software to student teachers, and often technology itself
turned out to be the point of instruction and not the role that technology can have in
designing technology- enhanced learning environments.
Thus, it could be the case that student teachers felt so caught up in learning how to use
the tools that they lost sight of the bigger picture. Moreover, It could also be the case
that the cognitive load imposed by learning the technology was so high that student
teachers were left with not enough cognitive resources to attend to the process of
designing appropriate technology-supported instruction.
Shulman (1987) calls _pedagogical reasoning._ The term _pedagogical reasoning_
refers to the process of transforming subject matter into forms that are pedagogically
powerful as well as identifying and selecting strategies for representing key ideas in the
lesson (Shulman, 1987). The source of pedagogical reasoning is pedagogical content
knowledge (PCK), which is a special amalgam of different components of teachers_
knowledge, such as subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, knowledge of
students, and understanding of the social, political, cultural, and physical environment
(Shulman, 1986). Shulman (1986, 1987) described PCK as the ways content,
pedagogy, and knowledge of learners are blended into an understanding of how
particular topics to be taught are represented and adapted to learners_ characteristics,
interests, and abilities. Specifically, PCK relates to the transformation of several types
of knowledge, includes an understanding of what makes the learning of specific
concepts easy or difficult, and embodies the aspects of content most germane to its
teachability (Shulman, 1986). Thus, PCK encompasses an understanding of students_
preconceptions and learning difficulties, and includes the most useful forms of
representation, the most powerful analogies, illustrations, examples, explanations,
demonstrations, and other ways of representing and formulating the subject in forms
that are comprehensible to learners.
Kind of innovation. When they are deep and extensive, they affect all the organisation
and fundamental aspects like, values, forms, thoughts, and pedagogical practices.
Formation for innovation. To measure the relation between teaching and research
trough the innovation.