Professional Documents
Culture Documents
25 October 2010
Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy
http://centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.wordpress.com/
A program of
- Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania
http://www.bioethics.upenn.edu/
- The Wistar Institute Vaccine Center
http://www.wistar.org/vaccinecenter/default.html
- Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Vaccine Education Center
http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/microsite/microsite.jsp
This weekly summary targets news and events in the global vaccines field gathered
from key governmental, NGO and company announcements, key journals and
events. This summary provides support for ongoing initiatives of the Center for
Vaccine Ethics & Policy, and is not intended to be exhaustive in its coverage.
Vaccines: The Week in Review is now also posted in a blog format at
http://centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.wordpress.com/. Each item is treated as an individual
post on the blog, allowing for more effective retrospective searching. Given email
system conventions and formats, you may find this alternative more effective. This
blog also allows for RSS feeds, etc.
Comments and suggestions should be directed to
David R. Curry, MS
Editor and
Executive Director
Center for Vaccine Ethics & Policy
david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org
Events/Conference Watch
[Editor’s Note]
Vaccines: The Week in Review is now monitoring key events and conferences
and will include summaries of key announcements and other content. Event
Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and
issues the Center is actively tracking. If you would like to suggest events
and conferences for coverage, please write to David Curry at
david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org
Journal Watch
[Editor’s Note]
Vaccines: The Week in Review continues its weekly scanning of key journals
to identify and cite articles, commentary and editorials, books reviews and
other content supporting our focus on vaccine ethics and policy. Journal
Watch is not intended to be exhaustive, but indicative of themes and
issues the Center is actively tracking. We selectively provide full text of
some editorial and comment articles that are specifically relevant to our
work. Successful access to some of the links provided may require
subscription or other access arrangement unique to the publisher. Our initial
scan list includes the journals below. If you would like to suggest other titles,
please write to David Curry at
david.r.curry@centerforvaccineethicsandpolicy.org
Clinical Infectious Diseases
15 November 2010 Volume 51, Number 10
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/toc/cid/current
Major Article
The Infection Attack Rate and Severity of 2009 Pandemic H1N1
Influenza in Hong Kong
Joseph T. Wu, Edward S. K. Ma, Cheuk Kwong Lee, Daniel K. W. Chu, Po-
Lai Ho, Angela L. Shen, Andrew Ho, Ivan F. N. Hung, Steven Riley,
Lai Ming Ho, Che Kit Lin, Thomas Tsang, Su-Vui Lo, Yu-Lung Lau,
Gabriel M. Leung, Benjamin J. Cowling, and J. S. Malik Peiris
[Free full text]
Abstract
Background. Serial cross-sectional data on antibody levels to the 2009
pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus from a population can be used to estimate
the infection attack rates and immunity against future infection in the
community.
Methods. From April through December 2009, we obtained 12,217 serum
specimens from blood donors (aged 16–59 years), 2520 specimens from
hospital outpatients (aged 5–59 years), and 917 specimens from subjects
involved in a community pediatric cohort study (aged 5–14 years). We
estimated infection attack rates by comparing the proportions of specimens
with antibody titers 1:40 by viral microneutralization before and after the
first wave of the pandemic. Estimates were validated using paired serum
samples from 324 individuals that spanned the first wave. Combining these
estimates with epidemiologic surveillance data, we calculated the proportion
of infections that led to hospitalization, admission to the intensive care unit
(ICU), and death.
Results. We found that 3.3% and 14% of persons aged 5–59 years had
antibody titers 1:40 before and after the first wave, respectively. The overall
attack rate was 10.7%, with age stratification as follows: 43.4% in persons
aged 5–14 years, 15.8% in persons aged 15–19 years, 11.8% in persons aged
20–29 years, and 4%–4.6% in persons aged 30–59 years. Case-hospitalization
rates were 0.47%–0.87% among persons aged 5–59 years. Case-ICU rates
were 7.9 cases per 100,000 infections in persons aged 5–14 years and 75
cases per 100,000 infections in persons aged 50–59 years, respectively.
Case-fatality rates were 0.4 cases per 100,000 infections in persons aged 5–
14 years and 26.5 cases per 100,000 infections in persons aged 50–59 years,
respectively.
Conclusions. Almost half of all school-aged children in Hong Kong were
infected during the first wave. Compared with school children aged 5–14
years, older adults aged 50–59 years had 9.5 and 66 times higher risks of ICU
admission and death if infected, respectively.
Review Article
Transfusion-Transmitted Malaria in Countries Where Malaria Is
Endemic: A Review of the Literature from Sub-Saharan Africa
Alex K. Owusu-Ofori, Christopher Parry, and Imelda Bates
Abstract
Although international policies recommend that blood for transfusion should
be screened for transfusion-transmitted infections, malaria screening is not
performed in most malaria-endemic countries in sub‐Saharan Africa. Our
literature review identified 17 relevant studies from the period 1980–2009
and indicated that the median prevalence of malaria among 33,029 blood
donors was 10.2% (range, 0.7% in Kenya to 55.0% in Nigeria). Malaria
screening methods, including microscopy (used in 16 of 17 studies), are
either insensitive or impractical for donor screening in resource-poor
countries. Even if a suitable screening method were available, rejection of
malaria-positive donors would jeopardize the blood supply. Only 1 study
established the prevalence of parasitemia among transfusion recipients. This
review highlights the need for more evidence about the clinical impact of
transfusion-transmitted malaria to justify the policy of screening for blood for
malaria in areas of endemicity and for a critical analysis of the feasibility of
implementing such a policy and its effect on blood supply.
Editorial Commentary: Malaria and Transfusion: A Neglected Subject
Coming Back to the Forefront
Jean-Pierre Allain
Human Vaccines
Volume 6, Issue 10 October 2010
http://www.landesbioscience.com/journals/vaccines/toc/volume/6/issue/10/
[Reviewed earlier]
JAMA
Vol. 304 No. 15, pp. 1639-1736, October 20, 2010
http://jama.ama-assn.org/current.dtl
[No relevant content]
Nature
Volume 467 Number 7318 pp883-934 21 October 2010
http://www.nature.com/nature/current_issue.html
[No relevant content]
Nature Medicine
October 2010, Volume 16 No 10
http://www.nature.com/nm/index.html
[No relevant content]
Pediatrics
October 2010 / VOLUME 126 / ISSUE 4
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/current.shtml
[Reviewed earlier]
PLoS Medicine
(Accessed 25 October 2010)
http://medicine.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=browse&issn=1549-
1676&method=pubdate&search_fulltext=1&order=online_date&row_start=1
&limit=10&document_count=1533&ct=1&SESSID=aac96924d41874935d8e1
c2a2501181c#results
[No relevant content]
Science
22 October 2010 Vol 330, Issue 6003, Pages 413-546
http://www.sciencemag.org/current.dtl
Vaccine
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0264410X