You are on page 1of 1

54.

UYTENSU v REPUBLIC filing of the petition up to the time of his admission


GR. No. L-6379 September 29, 1954 to Philippine citizenship.
TOPIC: Domicile and Residence  It should be noted that to become a citizen of the
Philippines by naturalization, one must reside therein
PARTIES INVOLVED: for not less than 10 years, except in some special
PETITIONER: Wilfred Uytengsu cases, in which 5 years of residence is sufficient
RESPONDENTS: Republic of the Philippines (sections 2 and 3, Commonwealth Act No. 473)
 If the residence thus required is the actual or
DOCTRINE: While, generally speaking, domicile and residence constructive permanent home, otherwise known as
mean one and the same thing, residence combined with legal residence or domicile, then the applicant must
intention to remain, constitutes domicile while an established be domiciled in the Philippines on both dates.
abode, fixed permanently for a time for business or other  Where the petitioner left the Philippines immediately
purposes, constitutes a residence, though there may be an after the filing of his petition for naturalization and
intent, existing all the while, to return to the true domicile.. did not return until several months after the first
date set for the hearing thereof, notwithstanding his
FACTS: explicit promise, under oath, that he would reside
 Uytengsu was born, of Chinese parents, in continuously in the Philippines “from the date of the
Dumaguete, Negros Oriental on October 6, 1927, filing of his petition up to the time of his admission to
where he also finished his primary and secondary Philippine citizenship”, he has not complied with the
education. requirements of section 7 of Commonwealth Act No.
 He went to the United States, where, from 1947 to 473, and, consequently, not entitled to a judgment in
1950, he was enrolled in the Leland Stanford Junior his favor.
University, in California.  In short, what naturalization requires is not domicile
 In April of the same year he returned to the but actual residence that should be continuous, since
Philippines for four (4) months vacation. he left during the pendency of his application,
 Then, to be exact, on July 15, 1950, his present Uytengsu failed to comply with this requirement.
application for naturalization was filed.
 Forthwith, he returned to the United States and took GOOD TO KNOW CONCEPTS:
a postgraduate course, in chemical engineering, in  The essential distinction between residence and
another educational institution. domicile is this: the first involves the intent to leave
 He finished this course in July 1951; but did not when the purpose for which he has taken up his
return to the Philippines until October 13, 1951. abode ceases; the other has no such intent, the
 Petitioner contends, and the lower court held, that abiding is animo manendi.
the word “residence”, as used in the aforesaid  Residence is an act. Domicile is an act coupled with
provision of the Naturalization Law, is synonymous an intent.
with domicile, which, once acquired, is not lost by  "Residence" is used to indicate the place of abode,
physical absence, until another domicile is obtained, whether permanent or temporary; "domicile"
and that, from 1946 to 1951, he continued to be denotes a fixed permanent residence to which, when
domiciled in, and hence a resident of the Philippines, absent, one has the intention of returning.
his purpose in staying in the United States, at that
time, being, merely to study therein.

ISSUE:
 WON the application for naturalization may be
granted, notwithstanding the fact that petitioner left
the Philippines immediately after the filing of his
petition and did not return for several months-NO

RATIO:
 While, generally speaking, domicile and residence
mean one and the same thing, residence combined
with intention to remain, constitutes domicile while
an established abode, fixed permanently for a time
for business or other purposes, constitutes a
residence, though there may be an intent, existing all
the while, to return to the true domicile.
 Section 7 of CA 473 requires that “he will reside
continuously in the Philippines from the date of the

You might also like