Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 1546-9239
© Asian Network for Scientific Information, 2004
Abstract: The present work aims at finding an optimized explicit finite difference scheme for the
solution of problems involving pure heat transfer from surfaces of Pangasius Sutchi fish samples
suddenly exposed to a cooling environment. Regular shaped packages in the form of infinite slab were
considered and a generalized mathematical model was written in dimensionless form. An accurate
sample of data set was chosen from the experimental work and was used to seek an optimized scheme
of solutions. A fully explicit finite difference scheme has been thoroughly studied from the viewpoint
of stability, the required time for execution and precision. The characteristic dimension (half
thickness) was divided into a number of divisions; n = 5, 10, 20, 50 and 100 respectively. All the
possible options of dimensionless time (the Fourier number) increments were taken one by one to give
the best convergence and truncation error criteria. The simplest explicit finite difference scheme with
n = (10) and stability factor ( (∆X )2 / ∆τ = 2 ) was found to be reliable and accurate for prediction
purposes.
115
American J. Appl. Sci., 1 (2), 115-120, 2004
U i j +1 − U i j
=
θ
[
. (1 − Y ).U i j−+11 − 2U i j +1 + (1 + Y ).U i j++11 +
(1 − θ ) . (1 − Y ).U j − 2U j + (1 + Y ).U j
] [ ] (5)
∆τ (∆X ) 2
(∆X )2 i −1 i i +1
116
American J. Appl. Sci., 1 (2), 115-120, 2004
perform cooling process, two pairs of insulated hooks Table 1: Data for Precooling of a Slab Shaped Fish
were attached to the inside of the upper and lower Sample
surfaces of the test section. The test container was Parameter Notation Units Numeri-
fastened to the upper and lower hooks with the help of cal value
thin cotton threads to avoid heat conduction. The Specific heat Cp Kj/kg.k 3.75364
characteristic length, x0, of the fish sample was half the capacity
thickness of test container (1.27cm). Five copper- Surface heat H W/m2.k 83.5
constantan thermocouples beads were installed inside transfer
the fish flesh, at the depths x0/5, 2x0/5, 3x0/5, 4x0/5 and Coefficient
x0 from the sample surface. In order to make it possible Thermal K W/m.k 0.5296
to insert the temperature sensors at the desired depths, conductivity
o
five fine holes were drilled at equal distances of 5 mm Dry Tdb c 1
from each other at the middle of one copper sheet cover bulb.temper-
of the test container. The temperatures inside the fish ature
o
flesh, and the dry bulb and wet bulb temperatures of the Initial TI c 25
circulating air were measured with the help of copper- temperature
constantan thermocouples. The lead wires of all the Half slab X0 m 0.0127
thermocouples were connected with data logger to thickness
obtain the temperature measurements at a specified Mass density ρ kg/m3 1052
equal time interval, which was maintained at 1 minute Relative φ % 90%
while time of each experiment was 60 minutes. First the humidity of air
refrigeration system of the chilling duct was run until a
constant temperature of 1 0C was achieved. Then the The experimental results for this slab shaped sample
fish package was suspended in the test section of the air during its air blast cooling considering only heat
duct such that the conducting surfaces were parallel to transfer (such as in canning and tinning) were
the direction of flow of chilled air stream. The data compared for all the possible explicit finite difference
logger was used to collect the transient temperature- schemes. The concept of least mean root square method
time data. of the error has been used which can be represented by
the following model.
Computational Procedure: The system of Equations
(1)-(13) was solved for predicting temperature time
variations during cooling of solids with pure 1 m
(16)
S = (TE − T p ) 2
convection heat transfer from the surface of the solids. m i =1
The co-ordinate system for the fish package is shown in
Fig. 3, and the mesh of time and space intervals during In the above equation, TE is the experimental value of
the finite difference solutions are in Fig. 4. In order to temperature. The constant m represents the number of
establish a finite difference scheme parameters which data points and S is the arithmetic mean of root square
are accurate, reliable and efficient for heat transfer errors.
analyses during precooling of infinite slab shaped
bodies, a sample set of temperature-time data was RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
chosen from the experimental work with relevant
calculated thermo physical properties of Pangasius First, the fully explicit scheme was examined by
Sutchi fish as listed in Table 1. Calculations have been substituting θ = 0 in Eq. (5) [10]. A program has been
done for air-cooling with only heat transfer boundary developed in visual fortran for the system of
condition. equations(1-13,16) to predict the temperature
The scheme was found to be stable when (∆X )2 ≥2 distributions verse time in five locations inside the
∆τ sample to compare the predicted values with the
and yield accurate results for all the space divisions. experimental results as shown in Fig.5. For the
Table 3 shows the variation of n with processing time investigation of stability criterion (∆X )2 . The program
and accuracy at constant stability criterion of (6). The ∆τ
change in n from 5 to 100, only a 0.8 % decrease in was repeated many times to determine the optimum
error was observed whereas the time elapsed for value of that criterion on the bases of stability,
developing the result will be increased by 72 times. processing time and accuracy as shown in the Table 2:
117
American J. Appl. Sci., 1 (2), 115-120, 2004
∆τ
Processing 1 1.52 2 2.57 2.97 13.29 26.36
Time
Error 0.22263 0.22267 0.22329 0.22279 0.22283 0.22401 0.22693
*Processing Time Expressed as Index
30
T0
Temperature(c)
25
T1
20
T2
15 T3
10 T4
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time(min)
Fig. 2: Test Container, (a) Side View,(b) Cross Section Fig. 5: Experimental Values of Temperature
Distribution Throughout the Flash Sample
118
American J. Appl. Sci., 1 (2), 115-120, 2004
30 30
Cioncidence of To Coincidence of T3
Temperature(deg.c)
25 25
Temperature(deg.c)
Experimental
20 20 Experimental
Predicted n=5
Predicted n=100 15 Predicted n=5
15
10 Predicted n=100
10
5
5 0
0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Time(sec)
Time(sec)
Fig. 6: Deviation of the Predicted Fig. 9: Deviation of the Predicted Temperature from
Temperature from the Experimental Values at the Experimental Values at X =3X0/5
X =0
30
30 Coincidence of T4
Coincidence of T1
25
Temperature(deg.c)
Temperature(deg.c)
25
Experimental
20 Experimental 20
Predicted n=5
15 Predicted n=5 15
Predicted n=100
10 Predicted n=100 10
5
5
0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Time(sec)
Time(sec)
0.35
E(0)
30
Coincidence of T2 0.3 E(1)
25 E(2)
Temperature(deg.c)
Experimental E(3)
20 0.25
Predicted n=5 E(average)
S
0 0.1
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 0 20 40 60 80 100
Time(sec)
n
Fig. 8: Deviation of the Predicted Temperature from Fig. 11: The Error Variation with Sensors Locations
the Experimental Values at X =2X0/5 and Average Throughout the Sample
119
American J. Appl. Sci., 1 (2), 115-120, 2004
120