Professional Documents
Culture Documents
El proceso de comunicación.
Funciones del lenguaje. La lengua
en uso. La negociación del
significado.
Table of contents:
1.The communication process.
1.1. Different communication models
1.1.1. Transmission Model of communication (Shannon & Weaver)
Level of problems in the analysis of communication
Advantages of Shannon and Weaver’s model
Weaknesses of the transmission model of communication.
1.1.2. Roman Jakobson model of communication.
1.1.3. Stuart Hall’s Model of communication.
4. Negotiation of meaning.
Bibliography.
1. The communication process.
Communication, the exchange of meanings between individual through a
common system of symbols, has been of concern to countless scholars
since the time of ancient Greece. The English literary critic I. A. Richards
offered one of the first -and in some ways still the best- definitions of
communication as a discrete aspect of human enterprise:
1.1. Different communication models.
1.1.1. Transmission Model of Communication (Shannon & Weaver)
Here I will outline and critique a particular, very well-known model of
communication developed by Shannon and Weaver (1949), as the
prototypical example of a transmissive model of communication: a model
which reduces communication to a process of “transmitting information”.
Shannon & Weaver’s model is one which is widely accepted as one of the
main seeds out of which Communication Studies has grown. Claude
Shannon and Warren Weaver were not social scientists but engineers
working for Bell Telephone Labs in the United States. Their goal was to
ensure the maximum efficiency of telephone cables and radio waves. They
developed a model of communication which was intended to assist in
developing a mathematical theory of communication.
message message
Channel
Info Transmitter Receiver Destin-
Source ation
Noise
source
C & W’s original model consisted of five elements, plus a dysfunctional factor:
a) An information source, which produces a message.
b) A transmitter, which encodes the message into signals.
c) A channel, to which signals are adapted for transmission.
d) A receiver, which “decodes” the message from the signal.
e) A destination, where the message arrives.
f) A sixth element, noise is a dysfunctional factor: any interference with
the message travelling along the channer (such as “static” on the
telephone or radio) which may lead to the signal received being
different from that sent.
Shannon and Weaver’s transmission model is the best-known example of
the “informational” approach to communication. Although no serious
communication theorist would still accept it, it has also been the most
influential model of communication which has yet been developed, and it
reflects a common sense understanding of what communication is.
‘The addresser sends a message to the addressee. To be operative the message requires a context
referred to (‘referent’ in another, somewhat ambivalent, nomenclature), seizable by the addressee,
and either verbal or capable of being verbalized, a code fully, or at least partially, common to the
addresser and addressee (or in other words, to the encoder and decoder of the message); and finally, a
contact, a physical channel and psychological connection between the addresser and the addressee,
enabling both of them to stay in communication.’
Jakobson proposes that each of these six factors (addresser, message, context,
contact, code, and addressee) determines a different linguistic function. His
model demonstrates that messages and meanings cannot be isolated from
contextual factors.