“Edition 7.4 of the Australian Dangerous Goods Code (ADG 7.4) has been implemented in all jurisdictions in Australia. “ All jurisdictions - So that must include Federal? It is firstly important to read all the information on the Infrastructure website to understand what the ADG Code does (and doesn’t) cover. Immediately below the previous quote is (bold added): “The purpose of ADG 7.4 is to provide consistent technical requirements for the land transport of dangerous goods across Australia. The Code should be read in conjunction with relevant state or territory law. ADG 7.4 adopts the structure, format, definitions and concepts of the United Nations Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Model Regulations while retaining some Australian specific provisions. It also incorporates additional provisions for the transport of infectious substances.” So the ADG Code is for land transport only Each State or Territory government implements it by way of their legislation It is based on the UN Model Regulations though – so are the international transport codes for air and sea Why can’t they be harmonised? Harmonisation of dangerous goods transport Codes
There are quite a few codes all based on the UN
Model Regulations and they are ‘all different’ ADR (European road), RID (European rail), ICAO Technical Instructions (international air), IMDG Code (international sea), ADG Code (Australian road/rail). The differences are due to the mode as well as the jurisdictional area each Code is applied They are harmonised where the UN Model Regulations provisions suit the mode and the jurisdiction What suits air transport will not necessarily suit other modes – aircraft and their operations being very different to trucks and trains The same is true for sea transport – ships and their operations are also very different to trucks and trains (and different again to air) So all codes are harmonised as much as each mode and jurisdiction is able to accept and apply That leads to a harmonisation challenge for jurisdictions like Australia, where a large amount of dangerous goods are transported by land to reach a port and are then loaded onto a ship IMDG Code – how is it applied
In Australia the sea transport of dangerous
goods is covered by Federal legislation – for the loading of Regulated Australian Vessels (RAV) and foreign flagged vessels that is the Navigation Act 2012 and associated Marine Orders Marine Order 41 (Carriage of dangerous goods) 2009 is the Order that covers the carriage of dangerous goods by sea It primarily applies the IMDG Code in it’s entirety and adds some requirements for Australia It is important to note it does not amend the IMDG Code provisions in any way Major ‘differences’ IMDG and ADG
These differences are the main cause of issues
noted when dangerous goods change mode from land to sea (and vice-versa) in Australia They are not a lack of harmonisation as explained earlier They are due to the unique inherent risks of each mode and how each jurisdiction mitigates those risks Ships can carry tens, hundreds or thousands of Cargo Transport Units or breakbulk packages containing any Class of dangerous goods The ships themselves are constructed and certified by their Flag State as to what classes of dangerous goods they can carry and where Australian special provisions ADG Code Australian special provisions have been developed and applied to suit the unique operations of land transport in Australia – the vehicles, areas of operation and so on If they are used in the land transport prior to the dangerous goods being loaded onto a ship, the dangerous goods cannot be loaded in compliance with the applicable legislation – Marine Order 41 (the IMDG Code) Classes and Competent Authorities
The ADG Code competent authorities can
vary by jurisdiction and by Class of dangerous good The IMDG Code covers all Classes and AMSA is the single Federal competent authority Under the ADG Code the competent authorities are working to regulate what suits Australia, within each jurisdiction and within Australian sovereign borders Under the IMDG Code the competent authorities (there were 162 nations that have ratified the SOLAS Convention as of March 2016) are working to regulate a single Code applied worldwide by international convention, without any unilateral amendments So whilst it would appear highly desirable in Australia to totally harmonise sea transport regulations with land regulations to permit ‘seamless’ change of modes……… Australia is unable to do that since we have promised internationally to implement and apply the IMDG Code to all dangerous goods leaving Australia and arriving anywhere overseas by sea. Land requirements could be 100% aligned with the IMDG Code requirements – however that would cause unnecessary imposts noting the differences are due to unique risks inherent in the transport mode/vehicle What code should I follow?
To assist the seamless change of modes
Marine Order 41 applies the transport requirements of the IMDG Code to persons and the dangerous goods themselves anywhere in Australia - when the dangerous goods are to be loaded onto a ship under the Navigation Act 2012 If you are carrying out any task to enable the loading of dangerous goods onto a ship at an Australian port, it is essential you are complying with Marine Order 41 The ADG Code permits the land transport phase of the export to be in compliance with the IMDG Code – any minor differences may require minor changes at the change of mode but what is required on land remains under State/Territory jurisdiction Training in the IMDG Code
You will need to be trained as is mandated
in the IMDG Code and Marine Order 41 for every task you carry out under the Order For certain critical tasks the training course must be approved by AMSA. The training providers with such approved courses can be found on our website IMDG Code – how do I comply
Whilst AMSA is the competent authority for the
IMDG Code and the regulator for the Federal legislation, we are unable to provide advice as to how to comply with our legislation Providing advice as to how to comply with the IMDG Code is therefore also something we cannot do We can, and do, provide as much general advice as we can – it is difficult though to ensure we do not provide advice that is going to be relied upon for compliance. If we do provide such advice it is then not possible to enforce our legislation if that advice is subsequently determined to be legally incorrect but it is relied upon Apart from ensuring you are trained in the IMDG Code you will likely need some legal advice – however it is doubtful the legal profession would be able to advise on every action you are contemplating to take. They are essential of course to assist with the application of the legislation to you - again as the legislator and regulator AMSA is unable to provide such legal advice IMDG Code
As noted earlier the IMDG Code is based on the same
UN Model Regulations as the ADG Code The actual Codes though differ widely and this is necessary to address the uniquely different modes of transport and the different jurisdictions If the ADG Code is used to transport dangerous goods by land, to a port for loading onto a ship, it is highly likely the IMDG Code has not been complied with The IMDG Code in mandatory effect since 1 January 2016, is the 2014 edition The 2016 edition will be published around October 2016 and can be used on a voluntary basis from 1 January 2017. It will be mandatory from 1 January 2018 The two year cycle repeats with no ‘pauses’ The 2018 edition will be published late 2018 and will be voluntary from 1 January 2019 and mandatory from 1 January 2020 In years where one edition is mandatory and one is voluntary (next year for example with 2014 edition still mandatory and 2016 edition voluntary), the edition that each person or entity applies or uses is their choice Many entities such as shipping lines will insist the voluntary edition is used as soon as it can be By conditions of carriage (by contract) parties can insist on the edition to be used in those overlap years Our legislation allows either to be used in overlap years – it does not mandate the use of one edition over the other Dangerous goods consultants
Generally, where there is specialist advice
required as to how to do something properly, the source of such advice is consultants The transport of dangerous goods is no exception Whilst AMSA is unable to recommend any service provider or individual, we can certainly recommend that people intending to act under Marine order 41, seek consultative advice as to how to comply with the IMDG Code A simple search using your favourite search engine for ‘australian dangerous goods consultants’ will provide a wide choice You may even notice that the search engine places the Australian Institute of Dangerous Goods Consultants (AIDGC) somewhere near the top of the results As with AMSA’s advice, this doesn’t necessarily mean they and their members are recommended (by your favourite search engine or anybody else) Any Questions?