You are on page 1of 68

Marketing and

Training Tools
for
Logging While Fishing
LWF*

GFE paper by Kevin Lirette

March1997 Gulf Coast Division, NAM * Mark of Schlumberger


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to dedicate this paper to Ed Tollefsen. Without his ingenuity and

determination to develop and patent Logging While Fishing, this project would not exist.

Writing this paper has been a great opportunity and pleasure for me.

I would also like to send my thanks out to the following for their direct involvement in my

project …

Marketing/Funding support

Dwight Peters - ES Marketing Manager, NAM

Charles Currie - Marketing Manager/ES Business Development, WTH

Jeff Gorski - Marketing Manager, Gulf Coast Division, NAM

Joe Van Valkenburgh/Sam Edwards/Wayne Finger

- Gulf Coast Special Services (manager, manager, FSM)

Technical and Advice

Bobby Foret - Division Manager, Gulf Coast Division, NAM

Dave Parran, Brady Bauer, Steve Crary, Chuck Deible, Hifzi Artic, Alvin

Rooks, Reggie Burl, Karl Ripple, Kenny Dean, Ricky Danby, John Chaisson,

Mike Bondio, Alfred Gross, Micky Brown, Louis Handy, Troy Frew, Billy Wade, John

Flinner, and those of you who know who you are but not listed.
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

ACKNOWLEDGMENT i

ABSTRACT 1

INTRODUCTION 4

LWF Definition & Description 6

Revenue Profile 9

MARKETING TOOLBOX 10

Contents 11

Costs 11

Distribution 12

Marketing Brochure 12

Interactive Marketing CD-ROM 13

Technical Paper (Operations Guide) 16

Additional Contents 17

ii
PAGE

SCHLUMBERGER ACTION PLANS 18

General 18

Training 19

Equipment 21

Sales/Marketing 22

Review 22

Pricing Issues 25

Current Accounting Codes 26

Job Types 26

“Value Pricing”/Rig Dayrates 27

Proposed “Value Pricing” Example 28

TLC*/Risk Analysis 29

Client Presentations 30

CLIENT SERVICE ALERTS 32

RECOMMENDATIONS 33

REFERENCES 36

ABOUT THE AUTHOR 37

iii
PAGE

TABLES

1 Gulf Coast Division Case Study - Texaco 8

2 1996/1997 YTD Revenue Results 9

3 Toolbox Cost 11

4 Toolbox Distribution 12

4 CD Viewing Time 14

5 Equipment Plan - GCSS, NAM 21

6 LWF Equipment Costs 21

7 LWF Revenue (Code 9250) 24

8 Total LWF Jobs 25

9 LWF & TLC Accounting Codes 26

10 Gulf of Mexico Rig Dayrates 29

11 Horizontal Permits 30

12 Client Presentations 31

13 Client Service Alerts 32

APPENDIX A Microsoft Excel Spreadsheets/Charts

1 1996 LWF Potential/Missed Revenue

2 1996 LWF Potential/Missed Revenue - Gulf Coast Division, NAM

3 by Offshore District

4 by Land District

5 Chart of 1996 LWF Potential/Missed Revenue - Gulf Coast Division, NAM

iv
ABSTRACT

This GFE paper, entitled “Marketing and Training Tools for Logging While

Fishing”, describes the need and development of training and marketing tools to

promote sales and improve service of perhaps one of Schlumberger’s most

profitable oilfield service (in terms of return on investment), - Logging While

Fishing (LWF*). Included in detail are 1997 “Action plans” for sales, training,

equipment, and recognizing and improving Client Service Alerts (This form is

completed any time we fail to meet the client’s expected level of service and

compiled in a database for evaluation and improvements). Also, LWF revenue

results for 1996 and Q1 - 1997 are provided ($227,000, and $83,000) as well as

1996 CSA loss estimate ($320,000) and LWF potential revenue ($2.2 million) if

62 Gulf Coast cut and thread fishing jobs were converted to LWF jobs. To

enhance our ability to achieve the described potential revenue, a marketing

toolbox is needed. The marketing toolbox and its contents can be ordered

through Ross-Martin printing (rmartin1@gramercy.ios.com). Concluding this

paper are my recommendations. *Mark of Schlumberger

Primarily, a sales brochure is needed for both field and sales groups to

introduce LWF to clients. It describes the operational sequence as well as

benefits, applications, and limitations. A “Gulf Coast Case Study” section is

included describing the first three LWF jobs, giving detail to hole conditions,

toolstrings, and a cost saving analysis. For each case, our valued client saved

1
several thousands of dollars ($39,000; $56,500; $97,500) in rig dayrates as a

direct result of the time saved utilizing LWF and completed their logging

objectives during that one drillpipe descent into the borehole.

Secondly, an Interactive Marketing CD-ROM is available to provide an in-depth

description of the LWF service and shows how the client will benefit

financially with an interactive “Cost Savings” worksheet. The compact disk is

formatted for both IBM compatible and Macintosh personal computers and the

viewer can see two units of measurement, feet and meters. The purpose for

developing the LWF CD was to help promote sales and improve service. A

Schlumberger employee can sit with a client to view several topics aimed at

informing the client such as “Overview”, “Benefits”, “Cut and Thread Operation”,

“LWF Operation and Equipment”, and “Examples and Testimonials”. The viewer

has the option to view each section in sequence in automatic mode (similar to a

video), manually select topics to view, or select a “Trade Show Demo Mode” that

only covers the highlights. Viewing the entire CD automatically requires about 21

minutes (tested on IBM P-75 with 600 KBS transfer rate CD-ROM), whereas

“Demo mode” highlights only requires about 6 minutes of your time. The fact

that it is interactive means you have an active role in the viewing and learning

process. Included as a tool to emphasize the benefits of LWF to the client is a

“Cost Savings” worksheet. The rig dayrate, logging interval, and other

well information are entered in the worksheet to calculate time and money saved

utilizing the LWF service as opposed to standard cut and thread fishing. The CD

2
also includes a “Testimonial” section allowing the viewer to hear three

Schlumberger customers who are very happy with the results LWF has provided

them. Understanding that not everyone has access to a computer for training, a

third, more readily medium of information was needed to provide necessary

training.

Third, an internal Technical Paper (operational guide - updated 1994 GFE

paper by Ed Tollefsen) aimed at detailing operational issues was composed to

provide the necessary details needed to successfully and safely complete an

LWF operation. Unlike the CD, this guide focuses solely on the do’s and don’ts

of operations. It steps you through preparing the job, performing the job, and

post-logging procedures. This guide is formatted similar to other technique

sensitive procedures outlined in Wellsite Reference Manuals. Additional

materials included are two Technical Papers, 35mm Slides, Overhead

Transparencies and Presenter’s Notes, which describes the material on

each slide. The material described above is gathered into one source

reference; a Marketing Toolbox (available through Ross-Martin,

rmartin1@gramercy.ios.com).

3
INTRODUCTION

The materials compiled in this GFE paper were written to help both

Schlumberger and our customers meet an achievable goal of a win - win

situation for every case that a wireline toolstring becomes stuck. First, a LWF

Description is given for those of you not familiar with this service. Since its

release in 1994 (Tollefsen, GFE paper), Logging While Fishing service has yet to

reach its full potential in the marketplace mainly due to delays in the sales

promotion and machining of equipment. A Revenue Profile shows 1996 LWF

revenue results as well as 1997 YTD results. A Potential revenue analysis of

1996 Client Service Alerts and cut and thread fishing jobs that could have been

converted to LWF jobs are shown and totaled. To enhance our ability to obtain

potential revenue levels, a Marketing Toolbox is needed. The contents of the

toolbox are described. Its contents include presenter’s notes, sales brochure,

interactive marketing CD-ROM, internal technical paper (operations guide -

updated 1994 GFE paper by Ed Tollefsen), SPE paper (co authored by Shell

Offshore and Flores and Rucks), a World Oil article (co authored by our alliance

partner Texaco) 35 mm slides, and overhead transparencies. Again, this GFE

paper, entitled “Marketing and Training Tools for Logging While Fishing”,

describes the need and development of training and marketing tools to improve

sales and service of perhaps one of Schlumberger’s most profitable oilfield

service (in terms of return on investment), - Logging While Fishing (LWF*).

These issues are addressed in this paper in the way of Action Plans for

training, equipment, sales, and a review of Client Service Alerts. Included in

4
detail are 1997 “Action plans” for training, equipment, and sales. Recognizing

and improving client service is also addressed. Remember that this is a GFE

paper that I researched and wrote; so, please keep an open mind and I hope

you enjoy reading it. I encourage you to also read Ed Tollefsen’s 1994 GFE

paper titled “Logging While Fishing - An Alternate Method to Cut and Thread

Fishing”.

5
LWF DEFINITION AND DESCRIPTION

The traditional method available to clients when a wireline toolstring becomes

stuck was to cut and thread fish on one pipe decent, make a conditioning trip on

a second descent, and risk relogging the well on wireline or with TLC on a third

pipe trip. As you can imagine, this can become very time consuming and costly.

For those of you not familiar with LWF, the definition of LWF is an alternate

procedure to log or take samples over a zone of interest with a stuck wireline tool

utilizing the cut and thread fishing operation.

Benefits realized by the client are it saves rig time and cost, reduces risk by

providing a backup plan if wireline tools get stuck when wireline logging is

chosen over TLC, increases safety at the wellsite by minimizing the time it takes

to produce a log while cut and thread fishing, is appreciated by derrikmen,

roughnecks, and others handling the drillpipe, and ultimately logging objectives

are met efficiently. LWF benefits Schlumberger by generating additional

revenue (less time at the wellsite allows for increased tool turns and dollar per

field hour, also, the premium for the LWF service in addition to the logging

service), by improving client relations (due to the business theory that this

service was developed with the clients needs in focus to reduce exploration and

production cost; appreciation), and by increasing market share (due to improved

client relations and the fact that this service is patented and only offered to SWS

6
clients; of course the patent laws can be broken by certain companies without

morals and sound business ethics).

Limitations of the Logging While Fishing service are that the openhole log

interval is limited to the depth of the casing shoe, the Cable Side Entry Sub and

Double Ended Torpedo must travel in the casing only, and must follow similar

guidelines as Schlumberger’s Tough Logging Conditions System. Please refer

to the materials prepared in the marketing toolbox for details.

Applications of the Logging While Fishing service are for open or cased

wellbores, image or sample logging, straight or deviated wellbores, when TLC

latching difficulties exist (The tool is descended into the hole on wireline until a

predetermined depth in casing, with a tool overshot and special locking grapple,

cut and thread fishing begins for the unstuck tool, overshoot the tool head to

engage the “fish”, then install the Downhole Cable Severing Device and Cable

Side Entry Sub, then log the well as drillpipe and wireline cable are tripped into

and out of the wellbore.), and for most logging tools with the exception of the

Repeat Formation Tester (The 3600 # shearing strength shear bolt must be

locked with a TLC shear collar. If this is done, then it will be impossible to

collapse the tool if it loses power in an open state. A fishing operation will be

guaranteed), and the Checkshot seismic tool (Signal quality is lost due to noise

generated by the drillpipe and the rigid body to geophone design of the tool.),

7
and Sidewall Core Guns (The use of explosive type tools has not yet been

approved by HSE. It is still unsafe to chance the lives of wellsite workers.).

A case study from an offshore Gulf of Mexico well drilled by Texaco Exploration

and Production, Inc. (Table 1). A MDT* Modular Dynamic Reservoir Tester was

run. After the tool was latched with the overshot, 20 additional pressure

measurements and three fluid samples were acquired.

TABLE 1 GULF COAST DIVISION CASE STUDY - TEXACO

Operation Hours Rig Dollars

LWF technique 43 $224,214

Traditional 99 $516,214

Cut and Thread fishing 26

Conditioning trip 42

Drillpipe logging 31

56 $292,000
Total Savings

8
REVENUE PROFILE

Now turning our focus to revenue, we see that $227,000 was generated for 1996

and 1997 YTD results are $83,000 as of 3/18/97 (Table 2).

TABLE 2 1996/1997 YTD REVENUE RESULTS

REVENUE AMOUNT

1996 $227,000

1997 YTD As of 3/18/97 $83,000

These amounts are for LWF revenue only. Potential revenue for 1996 was

estimated at $320,000 from Client Service Alert’s and this also only includes

LWF revenue. I reviewed all 1996 Gulf Coast Division fishing reports and found

that there were 62 applicable cut and thread fishing jobs that could have been

converted to LWF jobs to produce a potential revenue of $2.2 million

dollars as shown in APPENDIX A, and this spreads over the Gulf Coast

districts also shown in APPENDIX A. This dollar amount includes only LWF

revenue as well. Remember, logging service revenue amounts are in addition to

the above amounts. New Iberia Offshore would have made nearly $700,000 and

Opelousas Land about $73,000. My research of the fishing reports are shown in

APPENDIX A.

9
MARKETING TOOLBOX

A Marketing Toolbox is necessary to greatly enhance our ability to meet the

above potential revenue amount and introduce LWF into the marketplace. The

use of one set of reference materials help preserve consistency in the sales and

training process, minimizing interpretations of the procedure and the critical

guidelines required to successfully and safely perform an LWF job. The contents

of the marketing toolbox include presenter’s notes, marketing brochure,

interactive marketing CD-ROM, internal technical paper (operations guide),

35mm slides, overhead transparencies, SPE paper co authored by Shell

Offshore and Flores and Rucks, and a World Oil article co authored by our

alliance partner, Texaco. The brochure will help field and sales groups introduce

LWF to clients both in the office and in the field. The compact disk is directed

towards giving the viewer a detailed overview of the LWF operational sequence

including benefits, applications, and a general sequence of operation.

Complimenting this CD, a technical guide (operations guide - updated 1994 GFE

paper by Ed Tollefsen) is intended for internal use focusing primarily on

Standard Operating Procedures and guidelines. For the person desiring to

present Logging While Fishing to a group can utilize animation provided on the

CD or tailor their presentation by selecting the slides provided.

10
Although the contents of the marketing toolbox were gathered through the work

of this project, the final product will be approved by the wireline coordinator,

Steven Whittaker, at Sugarland, Texas. According to response to monthly

distribution letters, the packages are distributed by Ross-Martin

(rmartin1@gramercy.ios.com). Table 3 shows production costs for the marketing

toolbox components as well as a purposed purchase price. Plans are to

distribute one toolbox to each location listed in Table 4.

CONTENTS

Brochure
Animated marketing CD-ROM
Updated technical paper (operations guide)
Case Study technical papers (SPE paper, World Oil article)
Presenter’s notes, 35mm slides, overhead slides

The quantity of each item will be determined later. I recommend that at least
100 color brochures and 50 Case Study technical papers be included in each
marketing toolbox. Also, each item contained be SMP numbered for ordering.

COSTS

TABLE 3 TOOLBOX COSTS estimates only


Toolbox production cost = $10,000
Brochure = $2300
CD-ROM = $24,000
Toolbox Purchase price = $100

11
LWF MARKETING TOOLBOX DISTRIBUTION

TABLE 3 TOOLBOX DISTRIBUTION


NAM LOCATIONS
Belle Chasse SS NAM Marketing
Belle Chasse ES NAM Technical
Larose Alaska Sales
New Iberia ES Prudhoe Bay District
Houston OS CAD Sales
Houma Land Hibernia
Opelousas Ventura Sales
GCD Marketing Ventura District
N. O. Sales SCA Technical
Lafayette Sales Denver Sales
Houston Sales-W h ite Casper District
Houston Sales-Blue W illiston Depot
Dallas Sales CAD Special Services District
Corpus Sales
NAM Training Center others may be added

WTH LOCATIONS
to be announced

MARKETING BROCHURE

Primarily, the brochure will help field and sales personnel introduce LWF to

clients both in the office and in the field. The brochure is one of the easiest and

economical tools for promoting LWF sales. It is a one page (front and back),

color layout describing the operational sequence along with benefits,

applications, and safety. A “Gulf Coast Case Study” section is included on the

brochure, which was drawn from the October, 1996 LWF Society of Petroleum

Engineers paper (SPE - Tollefsen, 1996). The first three LWF jobs were

discussed giving detail to hole conditions, toolstrings, and a cost savings

12
analysis. For each case the client saved several thousands of dollars in rig time

and completed their logging objectives during that one descent into the borehole.

The art work and editing was arranged through Schlumberger’s Sugarland

Publications (Donna Peterson). It has the same format as other Wireline and

Testing brochures. The brochure can be ordered through E-mail by contacting

rmartin1@gramercy.ios.com

and supplying your location code and requesting SMP-5600. To view the

brochure on the internet, just indicate the internet location with the following

address. www.connect.slb

INTERACTIVE MARKETING CD-ROM

The interactive marketing CD is similar to other Schlumberger CD’s having the

intent to educate people and promote sales. This is done with 3-D animations,

examples, and testimonials. This fully animated interactive marketing CD-ROM

was developed to provide a visually stimulating presentation of the LWF

operation and describe how the client benefits with its use. A sales person can

sit with a client to view several topics aimed at informing the client such as

“Overview”, “Benefits”, “Cut and Thread Operation”, “LWF Operation and

Equipment, and “Gulf Coast Case Studies”. The sales person has the option to

view each section in sequence, manually jump to topics at hand, or select a

“Trade Show Demo mode” that only covers the main points that sell this service.

Viewing the entire CD topic by topic requires about 21 minutes, whereas the

13
Demo overview only requires about 6 minutes of your time. The timing will

depend on the speed of your computer and CD player to access data (Table 4).

Table 4 VIEWING TIME FOR LWF CD-ROM

TITLE MODE TIME (min)


Testimonials Automatic 2:17
Examples Automatic 0:45
Overview Automatic 5:40
Cut & Thread Automatic 2:40
LWF (Total) 7:07
Logging While Fishing Manual 0:20
Operational Sequence Manual 3:17
Equipment Description Manual 3:30
Savings worksheet Manual 2:00
TOTAL TIME 20:29

Demo Automatic 6:30

The fact that it is interactive means you take an active part in the viewing and

learning process. There is a “Cost Savings” worksheet for clients to enter their

rig dayrate and well information that calculates time and money saved utilizing

the LWF service as opposed to conventional cut and thread fishing.

Upon running the CD, the “Testimonial” section automatically plays statements

provided by three satisfied and prominent New Orleans area Schlumberger

clients (including an alliance partner engineer). The sequence of play is Abner

Guillory (Shell Offshore, Petrophysical manager), Bill Flores (Flores & Rucks, VP

14
Operations), and Mark Everett (Texaco, Drilling Engineer). This plays for 2

minutes, 17 seconds and pages back to the main menu. The programming of

the CD forces automatic playing of the success stories in an effort to emphasize

the customer satisfaction. The intent is to give prospective clients of different

disciplines someone other than Schlumberger to relate to. In the event that the

prospective customer is not sure of the benefits, he/she can take the advice of

satisfied customers that will consider using LWF again. The voices are heard as

well as a couple of photos of each speaker. Selecting “Overview” and then

automatic play steps you through Highlights, Benefits, Applications, Limitations,

and Optional Setup. Then by selecting the “Cut & Thread” menu and automatic

play, a narrator describes the animation of a conventional cut and thread fishing

operation. Next, Logging While Fishing animation is selected. An animated

operational sequence is viewed followed by equipment description. The

advantage of the animated view is the ability to see cutaway views of each piece

of equipment and what is actually happening downhole. Other options available

are an interactive savings worksheet and four examples listing actual time and

money saved by four Gulf Coast customers. The savings worksheet allows the

user to input variables such as rig dayrate, stuck tool depth, casing depth, and

logging interval to calculate direct savings utilizing Logging While Fishing as

opposed to cut and thread fishing, making a conditioning trip, and re-logging the

well on drillpipe utilizing TLC*.

*Mark of Schlumberger

15
The compact disk is hybrid formatted for both IBMs and MACs and has

changeable units of measurement for the viewer to work in feet or meters. The

multimedia compact disk was produced by Technomedia (Houston, Texas).

They have produced other marketing/training modules (Platform Express, MDT,

SRFT). The programming language used to write the logic was LINGO and the

animations with Macromedia’s Director 5.0. The sequence of producing this CD

started with an outline of the proposed storyboard. Then a storyboard was

written giving details of sequence, programming notes, and narration. From the

storyboard, programming is done and reviewed. Final approval of the marketing

CD was in March, 1997 by NAM ES Marketing Manager, Dwight Peters and GCD

Marketing Manager, Jeff Gorski.

TECHNICAL PAPER (OPERATIONS GUIDE)

Third, an internal technical paper (operational guide - updated 1994 GFE paper

by Ed Tollefsen) aimed at detailing operational issues was composed to provide

the necessary details needed to successfully and safely complete an LWF

operation. Unlike the CD, this guide focuses solely on the do’s and don’ts of

operations. It steps you through preparing the job, performing the job, and post-

logging procedures. This guide is formatted similar to other technique sensitive

procedures outlined in Wellsite Reference Manuals.

16
ADDITIONAL TOOLBOX CONTENTS

Additional materials included are two technical papers, 35mm slides, overhead

transparencies and presenter’s notes, which describes the material on

each slide. The material described above is gathered into one source

reference; a Marketing Toolbox (available through Ross-Martin,

rmartin1@gramercy.ios.com).

The purpose of the presenter’s notes is to help the presenter focus on presenting

the material and client needs instead of spending all his/her time “re-inventing

the wheel” preparing an LWF talk. Each available slide will be pictured in this

guide along with notes pertaining to that slide. This maximizes consistency

between various presenters. Gulf Coast case studies are profiled in two

technical papers: the Society of Petroleum Engineers technical paper (SPE -

(10/96) co authored by Shell Offshore and Flores and Rucks) and the World Oil

technical paper (co authored by alliance partner Texaco). These two papers

describe the savings LWF brought three customers (Flores & Rucks, Shell, and

Texaco).

17
SCHLUMBERGER ACTION PLANS

GENERAL

Over the past two years revisions to LWF equipment, procedure, and marketing

developed at different rates. The procedure, although patented, has made

significant improvements. Equipment development and manufacturing was very

slow due to delays by Hydrolex manufacturing producing only one LWF Sub set

by December 1996. To make an LWF job, a Downhole Cable Severing Device

Sub(DCSD), Cable Side Entry Sub(CSES), and a modified Double Ended

Torpedo Assembly(DET) with adapter is needed. After changing the

manufacture company, five subs were in use by March, 1997. These DCSC

subs were combined with CSES from TLC pallets in operation to perform LWF

jobs. Budget plans are in place for 1997 to allow for TLC and LWF pallets and

crews to work more independent of one another. Marketing needs were focused

on by the end of Q1, 1996 prompting the purpose of this GFE paper. The

necessary selling and training tools were determined and produced. Action

plans currently in progress are to get employees trained with the marketing

toolbox, On the Job Training, and PEPTEC training program for engineers. Also,

realize equipment budgets for 1997 to allow for five simultaneous LWF jobs, and

aggressively pursue pricing changes as proposed by current Gulf Coast “Value

Pricing” Strategies.

18
TRAINING

Current Gulf Coast Division Training plans are to focus on training personnel

(sales force and field crews) utilizing the Marketing Toolbox, On the Job Training,

District Engineer presentations, Senior Operator TopStar/Advanced training,

proficiency exams through PEPTEC (TLC/LWF section, up to level three), and

the WTH training server. We must work expeditiously and training is imperative

to convey LWF technology to clients with the goal to successfully execute LWF

jobs to make LWF a profitable hit for Schlumberger. We are missing enormous

opportunities to raise LWF revenue into the millions of dollars as I have indicated

in the Sales/Marketing section of this paper.

The technical paper is an operations guide having a similar format to other

procedure sensitive services listed in the Wellsite Reference Manuals. Like any

other service, it is advisable for field personnel to first read and thoroughly

understand the SOP for that service before performing it. Gulf Coast Special

Services located in Belle Chasse, Louisiana had 5 of 11 TLC Specialist trained

by Dec. 1996 and plans for all to be trained by June 1, 1997. This objective will

be achievable by holding technical meetings at the district to review SOP and

share actual LWF job experiences by those already trained. Wireline district

locations are to make LWF the topic for discussion at a technical meeting

reviewing reference materials available and SOP. A TLC/LWF specialist is

recommended to attend the meeting for technical assistance and guidance. It is

planned to have all districts of the Gulf Coast Division equip their field crewboxes

with modified double ended torpedo assemblies by mid 1997. Training

19
schedules will complement the equipment plans for maximum market impact.

Therefore, field crews must be proficient at reestablishing electrical connections

to start the operation while the LWF subs are mobilized to location by either

crewboats, helicopters, or hotshot trucks. Rental and Fishing company

representatives will be invited to their local Schlumberger district to learn Logging

While Fishing. Sales groups will have marketing toolboxes to aid in their training

in addition to presentations given by Special Service representatives.

For the person desiring additional training can find it on the Training server

(Khem Kunsuik Mengrai, Training Manager, WTH Paris). through three levels of

PEPTEC training just contact Adams/Smitson, NAM Training Center (Training

server, a view of a workbench set up for interactive simulation to re-establishing

electrical connection to the logging tool after the wireline is cut. Since correctly

re-establishing the electrical connection before re-powering the tool is very

critical to a successful LWF operation, interactive simulation complements the

training process and practicing this procedure will improve efficiency as well as

minimize doubts leading to failures.

Any technical questions should be directed to your local LWF special services

district.

20
EQUIPMENT

By the end of 1996, GCSS had two sets of LWF equipment. The current action

plan is to machine enough subs to run five simultaneously jobs by the end of

1997 (Table 5). Also by the end of 1997, the double ended torpedoes will be a

standard part of every field crewbox.

TABLE 5 EQUIPMENT PLAN - GULF COAST SPECIAL SERVICES


Pallets 4 1/2" DCSD 3 1/2" DCSD 4 1/2" CSES 3 1/2" CSES Torpedo
1996 2 2 1 2 1 2

1997 2 5 2 5 2 # of crewboxes

The cost to bring up a complete LWF pallet is $41,840.00 (Table 6). That would

include both 4 ½” and 3 ½” subs. The Hydrolex manufactured subs are available

through VPC and the torpedo is available through BCSS.

TABLE 6 LWF EQUIPMENT COSTS


Pallet 4 1/2" DCSD 3 1/2" DCSD 4 1/2" CSES 3 1/2" CSES Torpedo
Cost ($) $1,000.00 $9,093.00 $10,725.00 $8,829.00 $9,093.00 $1,100.00

Spare parts kit for DCSD $2,000.00

Total $41,840.00

To properly (with the greatest potential for success) perform an LWF job, each

logging crew must add ACT-S tools and TDK devices to their standard loadouts.

Also, whole body fishing is recommended requiring the proper size fishing

21
equipment on location. Please refer to the Marketing Toolbox to learn about the

Logging While Fishing service and the equipment used to perform a job.

SALES/MARKETING

To properly develop a Sales/Marketing plan, we must first review where we

currently stand in the big picture. Pricing is then evaluated along with the market

forces that exist. Next, TLC is discussed and the market effects LWF will have.

Finally, the current and proposed client presentations are outlined.

REVIEW

By reviewing, we can develop a sales/marketing plan to increase activity and

revenue; bringing it up to a level of full potential. The purpose here is to see

what can help bring LWF activity to its rightful place in the market. As you will

see, there is a large gap to fill between the actual revenue and potential revenue

for my 1996 analysis. Since its release in 1994, the Logging While Fishing

service has yet to reach its full potential in the marketplace under its current

development rate. The potential savings from the client’s perspective (Tollefsen,

GFE, 1994), LWF could have saved our Gulf Coast Division clients over $5

million in a ten month period. This figure was derived from 108 fishing jobs in

1993. The analysis here was to run LWF on each job to save each client an

average of $50,000 per job. Saving time is also important to our customers.

22
The sooner they can rig Schlumberger down and out of the way, the sooner they

can go back to exploration and production. Also, the rig dayrate trend has

increased tremendously over the past few years, making LWF an attractive

procedure to influence oil companies to choose Schlumberger over our

competitors. The only damper on this theory is oilfield service companies other

than SWS choosing to perform LWF services at a discounted rate and just pay

patent and court fees. The patents department will be kept up to date on

competitor activity on this matter by Gulf Coast Division managers.

The first three LWF jobs were performed offshore in the waters of the Gulf of

Mexico. Amazingly, LWF saved Flores and Rucks $56,500 on one job and Shell

Offshore a total of $136,500 on two jobs. Documented separately was a Texaco

job with documented client savings of $292,000. These amounts shadow Ed

Tollefsen’s estimates to save clients $50,000 per LWF job (Tollefsen, GFE,

1994). The potential savings for Schlumberger are just as beneficial. In addition

to the increased revenue (both the LWF service, possible TLC standby charges,

and the logging service that was efficiently delivered), the sooner we are off

location the sooner we can get back to the district for preventive maintenance

and in the lineup for another job. This gives us a chance to increase revenue

(revenue per field hour) and service, and most importantly minimize safety

hazards by leaving location sooner. As for as safety is concerned, LWF can

reduce retrieval time by as much as 50% allowing for a safer cut and thread

fishing job because there are less monotonous threading procedures for the

23
derrikman and floor hands. We have the chance to increase market share with

more clients utilizing LWF. With the relatively low investment cost of LWF

equipment, we have the potential to gain much more in the long run. Until 1996

most of the development attention had been focused on technical aspects of

LWF. A U.S. patent for this technique was issued and granted in 1995. Also,

equipment and procedure development was focused upon.

The top 10 clients who have fished in this period were:

Texaco, ADTI, Shell Offshore, SWEPI, Flores & Rucks, Vastar Resources,

ORYX, Kerr McGee, LLOG, Amerada Hess.

Table 7 shows LWF revenue to Schlumberger for 1995 and 1996 that was

coded 9250.

TABLE 7 LWF REVENUE(CODE 9250)


DATE REVENUE CLIENT LEASE WELL SO DISTRICT AREA

'95 29-Jul-95 $ 28,819.62 Flores & Rucks, Inc. OCS-G 694 121 648117 3707 GCD - OFFSHORE

'96 4-Aug-96 $ 6,600.00 Chevron OCS-G 1101 D-11 675667 3715 GCD - OFFSHORE
31-May-96 $ 31,280.64 Flores & Rucks, Inc. S/L 15218 1 472429 3707 GCD - OFFSHORE

14-Jul-96 $ 6,000.00 Texaco OCS-G 15161 1 663612 3736 GCD - OFFSHORE


30-Aug-96 $ 24,612.30 Flores & Rucks, Inc. OCS-G 694 201 (ST) 675315 3722 GCD - OFFSHORE
12-Oct-96 $ 2,250.00 Shell Western E & P Jeanerette 126 649120 2104 GCD - LAND
1997 YTD NA $ 85,000.00 NA

24
The total number of LWF jobs as of December, 1996 is nine and 1997 YTD jobs
are three (Table 8).

TABLE 8 TOTAL LWF JOBS


Chevron (1)
Flores & Rucks (3)
Shell (3)
Texaco (2)
Cockrell (2)
OBDC (1)
CANCELED JOBS (8)
Amoco Shell
Chevron SWEPI
Enron Texaco

PRICING ISSUES

Pricing related issues described below are a prime focus of the Gulf Coast

Division. Current accounting procedures are not being followed and job types

are confusing. Also, the proposed Gulf Coast Division “Value Based” pricing

strategy is being looked at by our Marketing and Pricing department heads.

25
CURRENT ACCOUNTING CODES

The current LWF accounting codes are shown in Table 9. TLC codes are also

shown for comparison. Offshore LWF charges are set 75% more than Land

charges.

TABLE 9 LWF & TLC ACCOUNTING CODES


OFFSHORE
9250-151 LWF Day Rate $2000/ 5 day min($10000)
-251 Depth Surcharge $ +80%
-351 Segment Charge $2,600
9233-151 TLC Day Rate $2600/ 5 day min($13000)
-251 Depth Surcharge $ +80%
-351 Latching Charge $3,370
-352 Additional Latches $2,000
9250-451 LWF with TLC $1,000

LAND
9250-151 LWF Day Rate $1500/ 3 day min($4500)
-251 Depth Surcharge $ +50%
-351 Segment Charge $1,000
9233-151 TLC Day Rate $1950/ 3 day min($5850)
-251 Depth Surcharge $ +50%
-351 Latching Charge $1,300
-352 Additional Latches $2,600
9250-451 LWF with TLC $750

JOB TYPES

TLC & LWF, LWF used, TLC not used: Priced in current schedule. LWF
charged as normal job, TLC Equipment canceled charged.

TLC & LWF, TLC used, LWF not used: Priced in current schedule. TLC
charged as normal job, LWF charged at half dayrate.

LWF & Specialist. Priced in current schedule.

LWF Equipment on location & Specialist assigned and sent to location after tool
is stuck. LWF used. Specialist accommodated for all standby time plus service.

26
LWF MONTHLY RENTAL (Not currently in use)
• $1500/week (tie this amount to the type of rig: higher for smaller rig types)
• personnel sitting on standby at shop
• charges set to amount that compensates for equipment tied to one job on
standby

PROPOSED “VALUE PRICING”/RIG DAYRATES

The current LWF price schedule is “TLC based” (Flat equipment, plus surcharge)

as was shown in Table 6. It is proposed that LWF pricing be “value based”. The

proposed of Gulf Coast “Value Pricing” Strategy is based on the worldwide

Schlumberger initiative to set the price of a service according to the customer’s

perceived value. This proposed strategy applies to services such as MDT “low-

shock” sampling, Platform Express reduced logging time and improved data

quality, PEGS Frac-Pak production enhancement procedures, as well as Logging

While Fishing. We can deliver a basic client need (GR, DIT) to the client

according to competitive market price, whereas added value services (LWF,

MDT “low-shock”, Platform Express, PEGS, QUAD-combos) provide additional

data, which is very valuable to the client. Since dayrates are higher for offshore

deep water rigs, the potential for added value is greater to offshore clients than

land clients. A pricing proposal “value pricing” based has been submitted by the

Gulf Coast Division to the oil company, Louisiana Land & Exploration (LL&E), but

have not received a feedback as of March 18, 1997. Plans are to approach

additional companies.

27
PROPOSED “VALUE PRICING” EXAMPLE

An example of how basing LWF according to rig rates affects revenue is shown

here in an actual Gulf Coast Case. Texaco indicated a savings of 56 hours and

$292,000 utilizing LWF. This indicates that $5214/hr and $125,136/day was

saved. On the other hand, Schlumberger’s revenue was from an 80% depth

charge for a MDT to 13,400 feet. This amount totaled $17,000. Whereas, if

pricing were “value based” at a rate of 25% of clients savings, the revenue

would have been $73,000; a 429% increase or better yet $146,000; an 859%

increase at 50% of client’s rig dayrate savings. The client has other expenses in

addition to rig dayrates such as drillpipe/collar/bits rentals, rig crews, catering,

transportation, missed well completion deadlines, other service related providers,

etc. The pricing for an LWF job should still include LWF Dayrates. In addition, if

the service is run, add the Value Pricing rate (25% or 50% of clients savings) in

addition to the logging service revenue.

28
As U.S. Gulf average rig dayrate trend increases and logging costs are

minimized to the lowest possible (increased discounts), we must take a different

approach at finding ways to increase Schlumberger revenue and appearance to

potential stock market investors (Table 10). Value based pricing is that

approach.

TABLE 10 GULF OF MEXICO


Average Day Rate
Jackups - Jan 95 ($18,000); Aug 96 ($26,000)
Semis - Jan 95 ($36,000); Aug 96 ($89,000)

As of July 1996 GOM offshore rig utilization was 89.40%


Jackups (91.4%) Semis (86.7%) Barges (93%)

TLC

Traditionally, when planning a well logging program, client’s decisions are driven

by risk. Risk analysis determines if logging toolstrings will be run on wireline

(gravity descent) or on the end of drillpipe (TLC). If the wireline descent would

require maybe 50% of the time it takes to run TLC, then the program would be

made to run on wireline(I’m sure there are other influences, but for simplicity’s

sake, there are none.). If the toolstring becomes stuck, then the time savings

are thrown out the window and cut and thread fishing with drillpipe is done. After

fishing, the wellbore is reconditioned with another pipe descent and the zone of

interest is re-logged by wireline gravity descent or with drillpipe assisted logging.

29
As you can imagine this procedure can become very time consuming and costly.

Now with the availability of this revolutionary new alternate method to the

traditional method called Logging While Fishing, Schlumberger client’s risk

analysis will be improved and their logging company of choice will more than

likely be Schlumberger. So if wireline logging is chosen over drillpipe assisted

logging and the toolstring does unfortunately become stuck, risk is greatly

reduced and the wellbore will still be logged, objectives will still be met efficiently

and safer, and most of all the client will be very grateful (hopefully) to the oilfield

service company with the ultimate goals set with our clients in mind and that

company is Schlumberger.

TLC will be affected slightly by the increase of LWF jobs, but Table 11 shows

U.S. horizontal permits show a strong market.

TABLE 11 HORIZONTAL PERMITS *


Horizontal Permits
1994 1,264
1995 1,386
1996 881 to June
% Increase
June 95 to June 96 12.4
June 94 to June 96 28

*Data provided by Salomon Brothers (Aug. 23, 1996)

30
CLIENT PRESENTATIONS

By mid 1996, Gulf Coast Special Services started giving formal technical

presentations to several drilling groups in the Gulf Coast Division (Table 12).

TABLE 12 CLIENT PRESENTATIONS


1996
Amoco Kerr McGee
BP Seneca
Chevron Shell
Conoco SWEPI
Exxon Texaco
Flores and Rucks Vastar
1997
Amerada Hess
LL&E
Mobil Oil
others to be announced

31
CLIENT SERVICE ALERTS

As seen in Table 13, two major areas of deficiency within our control show up;

equipment availability and lack of training.

TABLE 13 CLIENT SERVICE ALERTS


Estimated Lost
Revenue
Date Client CSA Alert Type CSA Description Recommendations (Schlumberger)
2. Requested
2/29/96 Vastar Services Provided NO LWF available 5th TLC pallet needed. $20,000
2. Requested 4 LWF pallets due in by late
5/24/96 Texaco Services Provided No LWF available June $20,000
No LWF available,
subsequent
2. Requested operations
8/1/96 Shell Services Provided cancelled Need 4 LWF pallets $25,000

Client displeased
crews' LWF More complete LWF training
8/2/96 Chevron 13. Other knowledge needed for unfamiliar personnel $0
2. Requested No LWF or MDT need more LWF equipment (due
8/15/96 Texaco Services Provided available in Sept.) $30,000

2. Requested No LWF available Still waiting on DCSD's from


9/23/96 Texaco Services Provided after MDT got stuck Hydrolex $0

Client misinformed
that LWF doesn't
work in deviated
holes & that it Need to educate clients and
damages SWS personnel on the benefits
10/31/96 Marathon 10. Communications equipment and uses of LWF $27,000
Lost LWF job due
Flores & 2. Requested to fishing job
11/20/96 Rucks Services Provided incident Dropped cable in well $50,000

Cable damged Inheirent drawback to LWF, this


during fishing needs to be communicated to
operations, unable the client during LWF sales as a
to complete LWF possible limitation to the
11/22/96 Texaco 13. Other operation. service. $60,000
2. Requested No 3 1/2IF Cutting 3 1/2 IF DCSD arrived on
11/23/96 Pennzoil Services Provided sub for LWF job. 11/27/96. (after this job) $75,000
$387,000

1/1/97 NA NA $80,000

32
RECOMMENDATIONS

Currently most of my recommendations have been addressed and are currently

practiced. All reflect upon Gulf Coast Division’s plans and practices, with the

exception of my viewpoint on Technomedia.

I recommend that LWF continue to be managed by Gulf Coast Special Services. LWF

equipment and TLC equipment is very similar, the Specialist operators overseeing the

jobs are the same, and for efforts to maintain service quality (minimize depth control

errors since the wireline cable is able to move freely through the CSES, three sets of

hands at the wellsite will help). An experienced Specialist at the wellsite in addition to a

LWF proficient field crew will minimize problems with the technique sensitive

procedures, improve Schlumberger’s professional appearance at the wellsite, and

ultimately minimize the chances that Murphy’s Law will cause safety problems and

accidents.

Wireline cables should be manufactured with conductor number one color coded

to maximize efficiency and safety. Again, we should look at ways that minimize

the affects of Murphy’s Law. Also, we would be able to offer Sidewall Core

services to our clients. As a result of my recommendation, color coded 7-V46

and 7-V46XS cables are available at no extra cost.

33
A sustaining request has been submitted to Vector Product Center to develop

smaller LWF Subs to make Flyout Services more efficient and safe.

I have contacted the appropriate persons to include Logging While Fishing with

TLC in the PEPTEC training program and be placed on the worldwide training

server. District Senior Operators should be selected to attend TOPSTAR-

Advanced training to learn more about Logging While Fishing.

Include Modified Double Ended Torpedo Assemblies in district crewboxes. This

will allow field crews to set up LWF at the wellsite while the additional

components of a LWF pallet be mobilized to the wellsite as well as a LWF

Specialist and a Fishing Advisor.

An interface between Multimedia production companies, NAM Technical, and

NAM Marketing is needed. Products would be produced more efficiently if one

person was overseeing the entire process. The Multimedia company I used for

the production of my CD was Technomedia. They are an international company

based in Jakarta, Indonesia and offices in Houston, Texas, and Los Angeles,

California. Of course, I did experience a couple of problems with there service,

but did not outweigh the benefits, loyalty, and devotion I received. Greg Bhin

was my contact in Houston. After working on this project he has improved upon

their process is currently looking at structuring strategies to meet client’s needs

to receive products more efficiently and bug free in addition to state of the art

34
marketing and training package designs that use and reflect tomorrow’s software

design capabilities as well as marketing ideas. Also in their plans is to improve

the communication interface between them and their clients similar to our

alliance coordinators. They have done a great job for me and, now knowing

what you just read, I would consider using them again in the future and

recommend you do the same.

Most important, sales groups should be educationally BLITZED to enhance

abilities to meet and exceed Gulf Coast Division’s 1997 budget plans of

$500,000.

In conclusion, the materials contained in this paper will help us maximize the

opportunity for a win-win relation between us and our clients.

Please contact myself or Sam Edwards (Gulf Coast Special Services District

Manager) for any questions or comments.

Kevin Lirette <lirette@belle-chasse.wireline.slb.com>

Sam Edwards<sedwards@new-orleans.wireline.slb.com>

35
REFERENCES

Tollefsen, E. “LWF General Field Engineer Paper,” Internal Schlumberger


Document, 1994.

“Wellsite Reference Manual Volume 2,” Internal Schlumberger Document,


November 1995.

“United States Patent Number 5,477,921,” Tollefsen, Dec. 26, 1995.

Tollefsen, Crary, Flores, Hashem, Roeterink “Logging While Fishing: An


Alternate Method to Cut and Thread Fishing,” SPE 36487, October 1996

Tollefsen, Everett “Innovative Technique, LWF, Results in Substantial Savings,”


World Oil, November 1996

Gulf Coast Division Pricing Schedule, June 1996

Hydrolex Products, Eastern Oil Tools, Dec. 1996

36
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

KEVIN LIRETTE
GFE, Specialist Engineer
Gulf Coast Special Services, Gulf Coast Division, W&T, NAM

I started with Schlumberger in 1991 after graduating from the University of New

Orleans with a Bachelors of Science degree in Electrical Engineering. My first

assignment was in Houma, Louisiana at the Houma Inland district where I

trained for exploration services. It was also there where I crosstrained to learn

production services. In 1996 I transferred to the Gulf Coast Special Services

district in Belle Chasse, Louisiana as a Borehole Seismic Engineer.

On the personal side, I would like to commend my wife, Richelle, and two sons,

Michael and Nicholas, on their patience while I wrote this paper and prepared for

presentations to the management, technical, marketing and sales staffs of the

Gulf Coast Division and NAM Headquarters.

37
APPENDIX A MICROSOFT EXCEL SPREADSHEETS/CHARTS
1996 LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE - GULF COAST DIVISION, NAM
DATE SO# DISTRICT SERVICE POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR
1/9/96 649327 HMLD - 2104 AIT/LSS/GR $ 21,905.00 Texaco E&P Inc. S/L 1249 #103 Caillou Island Falcon Operators
1/11/96 652205 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR/AMS $ 42,859.00 Amerada Hess Corp. OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
1/15/96 652205 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR/AMS $ 39,218.00 Amerada Hess OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
1/15/96 656191 OPEL - 2102 DIT/LSS/GR $ 16,984.00 Columbia Gas Development Eldredge Heirs No. 1 Esther
1/28/96 600728 NIOS - 2122 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 76,102.00 Pennzoil E & P OCS-G 0778 #9 SMI 23/34 Ensco
2/2/96 648333 HMLD - 2104 AIT/IPL/GR $ 13,676.00 Bass Enterprises BEPCO; COSSE No. 1 Pointe a la Hache Mallard Bay Drlg.
2/8/96 647995 BCWS - 3707 MDT/GR/AMS $ 35,765.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCSG 13647 #1 South Pass 63 Global Marine
2/17/96 675631 LROS - 3715 DIT/LSS/MLT/GR/AMS $ 35,332.00 ADTI/Challenger Minerals OCS-G 12989 #1 Grand Isle 78 Falcon Drilling
2/19/96 649269 HMLD - 2104 LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 15,195.00 Forman Petroleum Corp. W. H. Harrison, Jr., etal #8 Lake Enfermer Falcon Rig 10
2/23/96 654521 BCWS - 3707 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 21,694.00 Flores & Rucks OCSG 0693 #11 SP BLK 27 SW 153
2/23/96 663809 HOOS - 2136 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 29,189.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 1007 B-39 ST South Pass 27
2/23/96 663807 HOOS - 2136 DIT/LSS/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 34,393.00 Enserch Exploration OCS-G 8546 #2 Matagorda Island 566
2/23/96 675632 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR $ 34,105.00 Meridian Oil Offshore OCS-G 15061 #B-4 West Cameron 175 Falcon Drilling / Phoenix I
2/25/96 663736 HOOS - 2136 FMI/IPL/CNL/GR $ 41,446.00 ORYX Energy OCS-G 13808 #3 High Island A-379 Rowan
2/29/96 659036 NIOS - 2122 MEST/GR $ 42,048.00 Texaco E & P Inc. OCS-G 12644 #1 Garden Banks 269 Diamond
3/4/96 653556 BCWS - 3707 MDT/GR/AMS $ 37,219.00 Ensearch exploration, Inc. OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297
3/4/96 658923 NIOS - 2122 CMR/DSI/GR/AMS $ 39,374.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual 86
3/5/96 648355 HMLD - 2104 AIT/GR/AMS $ 11,511.00 Vastar Resources St. Mary Parish Land Company #71 Bayou Sale Nabors Drilling
3/12/96 582596 HOOS - 2136 CIS/AMS $ 19,375.00 Texaco E & P OCS-G 2608 ST 2 Eugene Island 313B
3/18/96 518001 HOOS - 2136 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 49,042.00 Vastar OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual
3/28/96 633595 HOOS - 2136 FMI/GR/AMS $ 30,255.00 Triton USA (turnkey) OCS-G 8151 #3 High Island 207 Noble Drilling
3/29/96 675381 NIOS - 2122 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 52,651.00 Anadarko OCS-G 14427 #1 ST 1 Vermilion 375 Global
3/30/96 674960 NIOS - 2122 MDT/GR/AMS $ 34,930.00 Enserch OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297 Diamond
4/1/96 675685 LROS - 3715 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 41,813.00 CXY Energy Inc. OCS-G 0985 C-28, ST #2 Eugene Island Blk. 259
4/2/96 641344 BCWS - 3707 DIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 47,322.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCS-G 14324 #1 West Cameron Blk 275 Noble Drilling
4/3/96 675654 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR/AMS $ 32,411.00 Kerr McGee Corp. OCS-G 14022 #1 Bypass #1 Green Canyon 82
4/17/96 675687 LROS - 3715 AIT/LSS/LTD/CNL/GR/AMS $ 49,793.00 Kerr McGee Corp OCS-G 1022 #B-5 Ship Shoal 218
5/4/96 675660 LROS - 3715 CIS/AMS $ 24,533.00 Zilkha Energy Company SL 798 #1 Grand Isle 10 Grand Isle 18
5/10/96 675595 LROS - 3715 LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 45,052.00 ADTI/ Newfield Exploration OCS-G 15312 #1 Ship Shoal Blk 354 Diamond
5/11/96 656263 OPEL - 2102 HLDT/CNL/GR $ 22,696.00 Amoco Production Co Bomer Blanks Lumber #1 STK Judge Digby H & P 79
5/15/96 675527 LROS - 3715 CIS/AMS $ 23,775.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 14437 #1 South Marsh Island 24
5/15/96 674991 NIOS - 2122 SRFT/GR/AMS $ 35,073.00 Samedan OCS-G 13980 #1 Viosca Knoll 207 Falcon
5/17/96 675329 NIOS - 2122 PEX/AMS $ 48,572.00 Flores & Rucks, Inc. S/L 1012 No. 28 Sdtk. #1 South Pass Blk. 27 Southwestern

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 1 Schlumberger, GCD


1996 LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE - GULF COAST DIVISION, NAM

DATE SO# DISTRICT SERVICE POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

5/23/96 649345 HMLD - 2104 HILT-C $ 23,452.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island
5/23/96 649815 HOOS - 2136 DIT/LSS/GR/AMS $ 37,329.00 King Ranch Oil & Gas OCSG 14834 #1 Galveston Nobble Drilling
5/26/96 675386 NIOS - 2122 PEX/CMR $ 53,507.00 Unocal OCSG 1034 #B15 SS261 Global
5/27/96 648701 HMLD - 2104 DSI/LDT/CNL/GR $ 17,984.00 Texaco E & P< Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island Falcon
5/29/96 472429 BCWS - 3707 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 46,819.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #1 South Pass Blk 39
6/7/96 649653 HOOS - 2136 AIT/GR/AMS $ 26,918.00 Apache Corporation OCS-G 15752 #1 S/T Galveston Blk. 331 Rowan
6/16/96 663610 HOOS - 2136 AIT/DSI/GR/AMS $ 43,105.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. S/L 59456 C-12 ST1 High Island Blk 24L
6/17/96 656269 OPEL - 2102 CMR/GR $ 11,310.00 Shell Western E & P Inc. R Theriot #3 Kings Bayou Nabors 7
6/20/96 670435 BCWS - 3707 FMI/GR/AMS $ 26,591.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #2 ST #1 SP 27 Blk 39
7/3/96 NIOS - 2122 AIT/LSS/GR $ 38,051.00 ADTI/ Newfield OCS-G 0767 #J-4 S/T 1 East Cameron 47 Marine
7/12/96 649280 HMLD - 2104 AIT/GR $ 12,272.00 Oryx Energy Company BIN VUA 11-5 Belle Isle Falcon 28-Oryx
7/13/96 649657 HOOS - 2136 FMI/PEX/AMS $ 25,519.00 Oryx Energy OCS-G 13807 #B-18 High Island A- 378
7/18/96 HMLD - 2104 AIT/LSS/CAL/GR $ 16,005.00 Union Pacific resources Co LL & E A-30 Bastian Bay
7/30/96 649106 HMLD - 2104 AIT/LSS/CAL/GR $ 16,228.00 UPRC/Tenneco LL&E #A-30 Bastian Bay Falcon 62
8/6/96 675667 LROS - 3715 LDT/CNL/CMR/GR/AMS $ 62,707.00 Chevron USA OCS-G 1101 #D-11 West Delta 117 ENSCO 87
8/9/96 681804 BCWS - 3707 MDT/GR/AMS $ 76,862.00 Shell Offshore OCSG 11553 #3 ST1 BP Garden Banks Blk 602 Sonat George Richardson
8/31/96 675315 NIOS - 2122 PEX/AMS $ 53,388.00 Flores & Rucks OCS-G 0694 #201 ST South Pass Southwester 153
9/4/96 639350 OPEL - 2102 PEX $ 21,948.00 LLOG Exploration Cutler Oil & Gas #1 Twin Island Flacon
9/16/96 685453 BCWS - 3707 MDT/GR/AMS $ 41,273.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. OCS-G 2937 #A-42 West Delta
9/23/96 681782 BCWS - 3707 AIT/LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 53,135.00 Apllied Drilling Techologies, Inc. OCSG 13035 #2 Main Pass
9/28/96 649674 HOOS - 2136 AIT/LSS/GR/AMS $ 38,915.00 Houston Exploration OCS-G 8975 #A-6 Mustang Island 785
10/15/96 681807 BCWS - 3707 DIT/LSS/GR/AMS $ 35,373.00 Chevron., USA OCSG 10920 #1 Mobile Area Blk. 819 Mobile Diamond Offshore
10/30/96 675674 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR $ 31,620.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 2322 #B-23 Eugene Island 349 Rowan Middletown
11/2/96 663894 HOOS - 2136 AIT/LSS/GR/AMS $ 33,401.00 Houston Exploration Co. OCS-G 6045 #A5 Matagorda Is. 651
11/7/96 652225 LROS - 3715 MDT/GR/AMS $ 35,717.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 12139 #1 Ewing Banks 917 Ocean Lexington
11/24/96 675414 NIOS - 2122 AIT/LSS/LTD/CNL/GR/AMS $ 51,659.00 Pennzoil OCS-G 0518 #D1 ST High Island 140
11/24/96 675127 NIOS - 2122 DSI/GR/AMS $ 32,265.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 14793 #1 Ship Shoal 64 Southwestern Drilling
12/5/96 675490 NIOS - 2122 LDT/CNL/GR/AMS $ 52,056.00 Flextrend Development OCS-G 12631 #2 ST 1 Garden Banks 117 Sedco-Forex
12/16/96 675154 NIOS - 2122 PEX/LSS/AMS $ 68,166.00 Pel-Tex Oil OCS-G 9574 #B-2 Eugene Island 30

1996 LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE

$ 2,228,883.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 2 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY DISTRICT - GULF COAST DIVISION, NAM
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

BCWS - 3707
2/8/96 647995 $ 35,765.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCSG 13647 #1 South Pass 63 Global Marine
2/23/96 654521 $ 21,694.00 Flores & Rucks OCSG 0693 #11 SP BLK 27 SW 153
3/4/96 653556 $ 37,219.00 Ensearch exploration, Inc. OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297
4/2/96 641344 $ 47,322.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCS-G 14324 #1 West Cameron Blk 275 Noble Drilling
5/29/96 472429 $ 46,819.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #1 South Pass Blk 39
6/20/96 670435 $ 26,591.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #2 ST #1 SP 27 Blk 39
8/9/96 681804 $ 76,862.00 Shell Offshore OCSG 11553 #3 ST1 BP Garden Banks Blk 602 Sonat George Richardson
9/16/96 685453 $ 41,273.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. OCS-G 2937 #A-42 West Delta
9/23/96 681782 $ 53,135.00 Apllied Drilling Techologies, Inc. OCSG 13035 #2 Main Pass
10/15/96 681807 $ 35,373.00 Chevron., USA OCSG 10920 #1 Mobile Area Blk. 819 Mobile Diamond Offshore

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 422,053.00

HMLD - 2104
1/9/96 649327 $ 21,905.00 Texaco E&P Inc. S/L 1249 #103 Caillou Island Falcon Operators
2/2/96 648333 $ 13,676.00 Bass Enterprises BEPCO; COSSE No. 1 Pointe a la Hache Mallard Bay Drlg.
2/19/96 649269 $ 15,195.00 Forman Petroleum Corp. W. H. Harrison, Jr., etal #8 Lake Enfermer Falcon Rig 10
3/5/96 648355 $ 11,511.00 Vastar Resources St. Mary Parish Land Company #71 Bayou Sale Nabors Drilling
5/23/96 649345 $ 23,452.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island
5/27/96 648701 $ 17,984.00 Texaco E & P< Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island Falcon
7/12/96 649280 $ 12,272.00 Oryx Energy Company BIN VUA 11-5 Belle Isle Falcon 28-Oryx
7/18/96 $ 16,005.00 Union Pacific resources Co LL & E A-30 Bastian Bay
7/30/96 649106 $ 16,228.00 UPRC/Tenneco LL&E #A-30 Bastian Bay Falcon 62

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 148,228.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 1 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY DISTRICT - GULF COAST DIVISION, NAM
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

HOOS - 2136
2/23/96 663809 $ 29,189.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 1007 B-39 ST South Pass 27
2/23/96 663807 $ 34,393.00 Enserch Exploration OCS-G 8546 #2 Matagorda Island 566
2/25/96 663736 $ 41,446.00 ORYX Energy OCS-G 13808 #3 High Island A-379 Rowan
3/12/96 582596 $ 19,375.00 Texaco E & P OCS-G 2608 ST 2 Eugene Island 313B
3/18/96 518001 $ 49,042.00 Vastar OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual
3/28/96 633595 $ 30,255.00 Triton USA (turnkey) OCS-G 8151 #3 High Island 207 Noble Drilling
5/23/96 649815 $ 37,329.00 King Ranch Oil & Gas OCSG 14834 #1 Galveston Nobble Drilling
6/7/96 649653 $ 26,918.00 Apache Corporation OCS-G 15752 #1 S/T Galveston Blk. 331 Rowan
6/16/96 663610 $ 43,105.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. S/L 59456 C-12 ST1 High Island Blk 24L
7/13/96 649657 $ 25,519.00 Oryx Energy OCS-G 13807 #B-18 High Island A- 378
9/28/96 649674 $ 38,915.00 Houston Exploration OCS-G 8975 #A-6 Mustang Island 785
11/2/96 663894 $ 33,401.00 Houston Exploration Co. OCS-G 6045 #A5 Matagorda Is. 651

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 408,887.00

LROS - 3715
1/11/96 652205 $ 42,859.00 Amerada Hess Corp. OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
1/15/96 652205 $ 39,218.00 Amerada Hess OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
2/17/96 675631 $ 35,332.00 ADTI/Challenger Minerals OCS-G 12989 #1 Grand Isle 78 Falcon Drilling
2/23/96 675632 $ 34,105.00 Meridian Oil Offshore OCS-G 15061 #B-4 West Cameron 175 Falcon Drilling / Phoenix I
4/1/96 675685 $ 41,813.00 CXY Energy Inc. OCS-G 0985 C-28, ST #2 Eugene Island Blk. 259
4/3/96 675654 $ 32,411.00 Kerr McGee Corp. OCS-G 14022 #1 Bypass #1 Green Canyon 82
4/17/96 675687 $ 49,793.00 Kerr McGee Corp OCS-G 1022 #B-5 Ship Shoal 218
5/4/96 675660 $ 24,533.00 Zilkha Energy Company SL 798 #1 Grand Isle 10 Grand Isle 18
5/10/96 675595 $ 45,052.00 ADTI/ Newfield Exploration OCS-G 15312 #1 Ship Shoal Blk 354 Diamond
5/15/96 675527 $ 23,775.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 14437 #1 South Marsh Island 24
8/6/96 675667 $ 62,707.00 Chevron USA OCS-G 1101 #D-11 West Delta 117 ENSCO 87
10/30/96 675674 $ 31,620.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 2322 #B-23 Eugene Island 349 Rowan Middletown
11/7/96 652225 $ 35,717.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 12139 #1 Ewing Banks 917 Ocean Lexington

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 498,935.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 2 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY DISTRICT - GULF COAST DIVISION, NAM
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

NIOS - 2122
1/28/96 600728 $ 76,102.00 Pennzoil E & P OCS-G 0778 #9 SMI 23/34 Ensco
2/29/96 659036 $ 42,048.00 Texaco E & P Inc. OCS-G 12644 #1 Garden Banks 269 Diamond
3/4/96 658923 $ 39,374.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual 86
3/29/96 675381 $ 52,651.00 Anadarko OCS-G 14427 #1 ST 1 Vermilion 375 Global
3/30/96 674960 $ 34,930.00 Enserch OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297 Diamond
5/15/96 674991 $ 35,073.00 Samedan OCS-G 13980 #1 Viosca Knoll 207 Falcon
5/17/96 675329 $ 48,572.00 Flores & Rucks, Inc. S/L 1012 No. 28 Sdtk. #1 South Pass Blk. 27 Southwestern
5/26/96 675386 $ 53,507.00 Unocal OCSG 1034 #B15 SS261 Global
7/3/96 $ 38,051.00 ADTI/ Newfield OCS-G 0767 #J-4 S/T 1 East Cameron 47 Marine
8/31/96 675315 $ 53,388.00 Flores & Rucks OCS-G 0694 #201 ST South Pass Southwester 153
11/24/96 675414 $ 51,659.00 Pennzoil OCS-G 0518 #D1 ST High Island 140
11/24/96 675127 $ 32,265.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 14793 #1 Ship Shoal 64 Southwestern Drilling
12/5/96 675490 $ 52,056.00 Flextrend Development OCS-G 12631 #2 ST 1 Garden Banks 117 Sedco-Forex
12/16/96 675154 $ 68,166.00 Pel-Tex Oil OCS-G 9574 #B-2 Eugene Island 30

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 677,842.00

OPEL - 2102
1/15/96 656191 $ 16,984.00 Columbia Gas Development Eldredge Heirs No. 1 Esther
5/11/96 656263 $ 22,696.00 Amoco Production Co Bomer Blanks Lumber #1 STK Judge Digby H & P 79
6/17/96 656269 $ 11,310.00 Shell Western E & P Inc. R Theriot #3 Kings Bayou Nabors 7
9/4/96 639350 $ 21,948.00 LLOG Exploration Cutler Oil & Gas #1 Twin Island Flacon

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 72,938.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 3 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY GCD OFFSHORE DISTRICT
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

HOOS - 2136
2/23/96 663809 $ 29,189.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 1007 B-39 ST South Pass 27
2/23/96 663807 $ 34,393.00 Enserch Exploration OCS-G 8546 #2 Matagorda Island 566
2/25/96 663736 $ 41,446.00 ORYX Energy OCS-G 13808 #3 High Island A-379 Rowan
3/12/96 582596 $ 19,375.00 Texaco E & P OCS-G 2608 ST 2 Eugene Island 313B
3/18/96 518001 $ 49,042.00 Vastar OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual
3/28/96 633595 $ 30,255.00 Triton USA (turnkey) OCS-G 8151 #3 High Island 207 Noble Drilling
5/23/96 649815 $ 37,329.00 King Ranch Oil & Gas OCSG 14834 #1 Galveston Nobble Drilling
6/7/96 649653 $ 26,918.00 Apache Corporation OCS-G 15752 #1 S/T Galveston Blk. 331 Rowan
6/16/96 663610 $ 43,105.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. S/L 59456 C-12 ST1 High Island Blk 24L
7/13/96 649657 $ 25,519.00 Oryx Energy OCS-G 13807 #B-18 High Island A- 378
9/28/96 649674 $ 38,915.00 Houston Exploration OCS-G 8975 #A-6 Mustang Island 785
11/2/96 663894 $ 33,401.00 Houston Exploration Co. OCS-G 6045 #A5 Matagorda Is. 651

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 408,887.00

LROS - 3715
1/11/96 652205 $ 42,859.00 Amerada Hess Corp. OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
1/15/96 652205 $ 39,218.00 Amerada Hess OCS-G 14224 #2 Garden Banks 216 ODECO Ocean Rover
2/17/96 675631 $ 35,332.00 ADTI/Challenger Minerals OCS-G 12989 #1 Grand Isle 78 Falcon Drilling
2/23/96 675632 $ 34,105.00 Meridian Oil Offshore OCS-G 15061 #B-4 West Cameron 175 Falcon Drilling / Phoenix I
4/1/96 675685 $ 41,813.00 CXY Energy Inc. OCS-G 0985 C-28, ST #2 Eugene Island Blk. 259
4/3/96 675654 $ 32,411.00 Kerr McGee Corp. OCS-G 14022 #1 Bypass #1 Green Canyon 82
4/17/96 675687 $ 49,793.00 Kerr McGee Corp OCS-G 1022 #B-5 Ship Shoal 218
5/4/96 675660 $ 24,533.00 Zilkha Energy Company SL 798 #1 Grand Isle 10 Grand Isle 18
5/10/96 675595 $ 45,052.00 ADTI/ Newfield Exploration OCS-G 15312 #1 Ship Shoal Blk 354 Diamond
5/15/96 675527 $ 23,775.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 14437 #1 South Marsh Island 24
8/6/96 675667 $ 62,707.00 Chevron USA OCS-G 1101 #D-11 West Delta 117 ENSCO 87
10/30/96 675674 $ 31,620.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 2322 #B-23 Eugene Island 349 Rowan Middletown
11/7/96 652225 $ 35,717.00 Marathon Oil Co. OCS-G 12139 #1 Ewing Banks 917 Ocean Lexington

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 498,935.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 1 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY GCD OFFSHORE DISTRICT
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

BCWS - 3707
2/8/96 647995 $ 35,765.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCSG 13647 #1 South Pass 63 Global Marine
2/23/96 654521 $ 21,694.00 Flores & Rucks OCSG 0693 #11 SP BLK 27 SW 153
3/4/96 653556 $ 37,219.00 Ensearch exploration, Inc. OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297
4/2/96 641344 $ 47,322.00 Shell Offshore, Inc. OCS-G 14324 #1 West Cameron Blk 275 Noble Drilling
5/29/96 472429 $ 46,819.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #1 South Pass Blk 39
6/20/96 670435 $ 26,591.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 15218 #2 ST #1 SP 27 Blk 39
8/9/96 681804 $ 76,862.00 Shell Offshore OCSG 11553 #3 ST1 BP Garden Banks Blk 602 Sonat George Richardson
9/16/96 685453 $ 41,273.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. OCS-G 2937 #A-42 West Delta
9/23/96 681782 $ 53,135.00 Apllied Drilling Techologies, Inc. OCSG 13035 #2 Main Pass
10/15/96 681807 $ 35,373.00 Chevron., USA OCSG 10920 #1 Mobile Area Blk. 819 Mobile Diamond Offshore

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 422,053.00

NIOS - 2122
1/28/96 600728 $ 76,102.00 Pennzoil E & P OCS-G 0778 #9 SMI 23/34 Ensco
2/29/96 659036 $ 42,048.00 Texaco E & P Inc. OCS-G 12644 #1 Garden Banks 269 Diamond
3/4/96 658923 $ 39,374.00 Vastar Resources, Inc. OCS-G 2819 #3 West Cameron 35 Dual 86
3/29/96 675381 $ 52,651.00 Anadarko OCS-G 14427 #1 ST 1 Vermilion 375 Global
3/30/96 674960 $ 34,930.00 Enserch OCS-G 8876 #1 Green Canyon 297 Diamond
5/15/96 674991 $ 35,073.00 Samedan OCS-G 13980 #1 Viosca Knoll 207 Falcon
5/17/96 675329 $ 48,572.00 Flores & Rucks, Inc. S/L 1012 No. 28 Sdtk. #1 South Pass Blk. 27 Southwestern
5/26/96 675386 $ 53,507.00 Unocal OCSG 1034 #B15 SS261 Global
7/3/96 $ 38,051.00 ADTI/ Newfield OCS-G 0767 #J-4 S/T 1 East Cameron 47 Marine
8/31/96 675315 $ 53,388.00 Flores & Rucks OCS-G 0694 #201 ST South Pass Southwester 153
11/24/96 675414 $ 51,659.00 Pennzoil OCS-G 0518 #D1 ST High Island 140
11/24/96 675127 $ 32,265.00 Flores & Rucks S/L 14793 #1 Ship Shoal 64 Southwestern Drilling
12/5/96 675490 $ 52,056.00 Flextrend Development OCS-G 12631 #2 ST 1 Garden Banks 117 Sedco-Forex
12/16/96 675154 $ 68,166.00 Pel-Tex Oil OCS-G 9574 #B-2 Eugene Island 30

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 677,842.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 2 Schlumberger, GCD


LWF POTENTIAL/MISSED REVENUE BY GCD LAND DISTRICT
DATE SO# POTENTIAL REVENUE CLIENT WELL FIELD CONTRACTOR

HMLD - 2104
1/9/96 649327 $ 21,905.00 Texaco E&P Inc. S/L 1249 #103 Caillou Island Falcon Operators
2/2/96 648333 $ 13,676.00 Bass Enterprises BEPCO; COSSE No. 1 Pointe a la Hache Mallard Bay Drlg.
2/19/96 649269 $ 15,195.00 Forman Petroleum Corp. W. H. Harrison, Jr., etal #8 Lake Enfermer Falcon Rig 10
3/5/96 648355 $ 11,511.00 Vastar Resources St. Mary Parish Land Company #71 Bayou Sale Nabors Drilling
5/23/96 649345 $ 23,452.00 Texaco E & P, Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island
5/27/96 648701 $ 17,984.00 Texaco E & P< Inc. S/L 15110 #1 Caillou Island Falcon
7/12/96 649280 $ 12,272.00 Oryx Energy Company BIN VUA 11-5 Belle Isle Falcon 28-Oryx
7/18/96 $ 16,005.00 Union Pacific resources Co LL & E A-30 Bastian Bay
7/30/96 649106 $ 16,228.00 UPRC/Tenneco LL&E #A-30 Bastian Bay Falcon 62

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 148,228.00

OPEL - 2102
1/15/96 656191 $ 16,984.00 Columbia Gas Development Eldredge Heirs No. 1 Esther
5/11/96 656263 $ 22,696.00 Amoco Production Co Bomer Blanks Lumber #1 STK Judge Digby H & P 79
6/17/96 656269 $ 11,310.00 Shell Western E & P Inc. R Theriot #3 Kings Bayou Nabors 7
9/4/96 639350 $ 21,948.00 LLOG Exploration Cutler Oil & Gas #1 Twin Island Flacon

1996 POTENTIAL LWF REVENUE


$ 72,938.00

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 1 Schlumberger, GCD


NIOS $ 677,842.00
1996 LWF POTENTIAL REVENUE
LROS $ 498,935.00
GCD bY DISTRICT
BCOS $ 422,053.00
$800,000.00
HOOS $ 408,887.00
HMLD
$700,000.00
$ 148,228.00 $2,228,883.00
OPEL $ 72,938.00
$677,842.00
$600,000.00
$498,935.00
$500,000.00
$422,053.00
$408,887.00
$400,000.00
ACTUAL $227,000
$300,000.00 POTENTIAL$ 2,228,883.00

$200,000.00
$148,228.00
$72,938.00
$100,000.00

$-
NIOS LROS BCOS HOOS HMLD OPEL
DISTRICT

1996 LWF REVENUE


GCD
$2,500,000
$2,228,883
$2,000,000

$1,500,000

$1,000,000

$500,000
$227,000
$0
ACTUAL POTENTIAL

GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette 1 Schlumberger, GCD


APPENDIX B LWF* Technical Paper (Operations Guide)
1997 GFE Paper by Kevin Lirette, GCD, NAM

LWF* LOGGING WHILE FISHING


*A MARK OF SCHLUMBERGER, NAM, U.S. PATENT NO: 5,477,921 DOP: Dec. 26, 1995

SERVICE OVERVIEW - LOGGING WHILE FISHING (LWF*)

TRADITIONAL MEATHOD
The traditional method available to clients when a wireline toolstring becomes stuck -
• Cut & Thread fish on - 1st pipe descent,
• Condition the Wellbore on - 2nd pipe descent,
• risk Re-logging on wireline or with TLC* on - 3rd pipe descent.
As you can imagine, this can become very time consuming & costly for our client.

DEFINITION
An alternate procedure to log or take samples over a zone of interest
with a stuck wireline tool utilizing the Cut & Thread operation.

CLIENT BENEFITS
• Logging expectations are met efficiently (under the circumstances).
• Alternative Cost effective Cut & Thread fishing
• Efficient - drillpipe can be tripped up to 2.5 times faster than pipe threading.
• Risk reduction - when gravity wireline logging is chosen over TLC* logging and unfortunately
the toolstring does get stuck, LWF provides a risked reduced alternative contingency.
• Reduced rig time
• Reduced wiper trips
• Increased confidence in tool engagement

SWS BENEFITS
• Generates additional revenue - LWF premiums in addition to logging services revenue. Dollars per
field hour increase due to reduced crew & equip. time at rig. (tool turns increase maintenance FITS
increase)
• Improved client satisfaction/relations - a logging/retrieval service developed to exceed our client’s
needs to minimize cost in an economic period when rig dayrate trends have escalated to enormous
levels.
• A unique Schlumberger service
• Safe operation

FEATURES
• Incorporates standard cut & thread fishing
• Barrel shaped torpedo design is safe
• Adapters between torpedo and fishing tools
allow for quicker rigups
• 3-1/2” & 4-1/2” IF LWF subs available

Operations Guide 1
APPLICATIONS
• Openhole and casedhole tools
• Depth or station logging tools
• Straight or deviated boreholes
• When TLC latching is unsuccessful
• Recommended for CCS, CTS, or DTS types of telemetry tools
• for using modified AMS or ACTS tension/compression tools

LIMITATIONS
• Similar guidelines to follow as with TLC
• Openhole log interval limited to depth of casing shoe
• Both Cable Side Entry Sub(CSES) and Double Ended Torpedo(DET) only travel inside casing
only
• Minimum drillpipe internal diameter of 2.4 inches.

SAFETY

• Pre-rigup
• Conduct safety/information meeting to discuss details of a safe operation
• Equipment
• Double Ended Torpedo
• Snatch block
• finger pinch points

EQUIPMENT
• Standard fishing tools
• LWF Floor box (Double Ended Torpedo, Adapters, Rope sockets, etc.)
• Downhole Cable Severing Device (DCSD)
• Cable Side Entry Sub (CSES)

OTHER REFERENCE

WWW.CONNECT.COM
http://vector01.sugar-land.wireli…i/gen/hv685_tlcs_info.html#CSES-A

INTERACTIVE CD-ROM
available for WINDOWS and MAC

A. CONSIDERATIONS

Operations Guide 2
WIRELINE DISTRICT LOADOUT - When LWF is a possibility

Call the Logging While Fishing special services manager to review crew/equipment availability and
review technical specifics for your particular job.

• Positive tool engagement


ACTS - Tension/Compression adapter - monitors downhole force upon tool engagement
- LEH-QT heads will not show compression of fishing tool grapple onto the stuck tool.

• Single arm caliper tools (ex: LDT, EPT, HILT, CSI, ...)
SAHE - Swivel head adapter
Tool turner
(Note: It is imperative that the tool not be allowed to roll over on itself. This would prevent the
caliper from opening. If no swivel is run, the engineer must pay close attention to the caliper.
Do not rotate the tool over 1/2 turn. This may require more rotations on the drill pipe as the
torque works its way downhole.

• Other
TDK - Tension device (K) - allows torpedo to spool onto drum without T-bar

Fishing kit SFT-157 or 3rd party

M&S to redress cut cable (rope sockets, male/female pins). Make note of cable size/type at rig.
Parts needed:
• LWF tool box(these are the items that Special Services brings to location)
• tape measure, insert (for CSES), packing nuts and rubbers, spring ball and cover bolt, DC III,
• hacksaw, split jig (for rope socket), punches for 0.46” and 0.52” cable, cable pliers, hammer,
• winchesters, string for line 1, torpedo, double female wire (for ground), boots, pins,
• insulators (male and female; teflon and poly), wire strippers, parts for cutting sub

• Electrical connection options(can be done before or after cut and thread)


1. Before - Equipment needed to build rope sockets and adapt to fishing tools must be on location prior to
cut and thread starts. The wireline conductor identification process is done while the fishing equipment
is installed. This process takes approximately one hour.
2. After - Cut cable 15 feet from where the T-bar is placed when the cable is first cut. The fishing
mechanical connections only are made prior to cut and thread. The LWF specialist is sent to location
with the LWF equipment during the cut and thread operation. The wireline conductor identification
process is done when the DCSD and CSES subs are installed. This process takes approximately one
hour. In some cases, the drillpipe will be stopped in open hole for this procedure.

SPECIAL SERVICES LOADOUT


Information needed:
• Casing shoe depth, logging depths
• Casing and hole sizes
• Check with crew on what supplies are needed.
Operations Guide 3
• What cable size and type at location?
• Check on the length of cable cut up from the floor. Instruct we need 15 feet.
• Will the pre-made electrical connections be made prior to fishing or when the CSES/DCSD subs are
installed?
• Transportation for specialist and equipment.

Equipment needed:
• Downhole Cable Severing Device and Cable Side Entry Sub
• LWF tool box
• tape measure, insert (for CSES), packing nuts and rubbers, spring ball and cover bolt, DC III,
• hacksaw, split jig (for rope socket), punches for 0.46” and 0.52” cable, cable pliers, hammer,
• winchesters, string for line 1, torpedo, double female wire (for ground), boots, pins,
• insulators (male and female; teflon and poly), wire strippers, parts for cutting sub
• Radios for logging unit to rig floor communications.

GENERAL

Familiarize yourself with Standard Operating Procedures regarding cut and thread FISHING and TOUGH
LOGGING CONDITIONS techniques as outlined in the Wellsite Reference Manual.

Each LWF situation is unique; however, there are general guidelines to follow in any LWF operation:

1. Do not pull out of weak point when tool becomes stuck. Keeping this electrical/mechanical
connections a key to LWF.
2. After placing the T-bar on the wireline, allow 15 feet from the rig floor to the cut. This makes
preparing the wireline easier and more efficient. This is explained in detail in Section C.
3. As in any drillpipe conveyed logging situation the cable side entry sub(CSES) should not enter
openhole to reduce chance of damaging the cable at the casing shoe.
4. The interval to be logged during LWF operations must be determined; specifically the possible
maximum and minimum logging depths must be defined. Allow for log overlaps and tie-in’s. Many
times LWF will allow the continuation of uplogs from the stuck tool depth. Overlaps would help when
splicing log sections together and help quality check tool response to pre-LWF response.
5. It is preferable to install the cable side entry sub(CSES) and downhole cable severing device(DCSD)
while drillpipe is in the casing to minimize the chance of sticking drillpipe. This is no problem when
the openhole interval is less than the cased hole interval. When the casing shoe is at a shallow depth
and the logging interval is deep, good hole conditions may prompt the client to accept the risk and stop
the drill pipe in open hole long enough to place these subs. The slips must be set. It is a procedure that
has successfully been performed in a straight hole.
6. The amount of cable outside the drillpipe during LWF operations should be minimized.

These guidelines will sometimes conflict with each other, but they can be formulated into a specific
procedure.

Most aspects of LWF operations are similar to standard cut and thread fishing and drillpipe conveyed
operations(TLC). Critical decisions are 1)what depth to install the cable side entry sub and 2)at what time
will the electrical connections be prepared (before or after cut and thread).

• Tools not applicable to LWF

Operations Guide 4
RFT - Repeat Formation Tester - For TLC the RFT must be pre-modified with a locking collar
(H427627) to prevent a premature hydraulic dump of the RFM due to shearing of the shear bolts.
If a shear collar is placed on the tool before a wireline descent (for the purpose of LWF), then it
will be impossible to collapse the tool if it loses power in an open state on the wireline run. A
fishing operation will be guaranteed. A variety of reasons could cause the tool to lose power such
as generator failure, computer crashes, collector/cable problems, modules, etc. Because of these
reasons we don't log RFT tools with LWF.

QSSTB - Quick Shot Seismic Tool - seismic geophone section is rigid to the tool, signal quality is lost
when tool is conveyed on drillpipe.

CST - Cronological Sidewall Coring Tool - It is unsafe for crewmembers to run this service because the
cable lines must be identified by sending current down the cable conductors with a multimeter
possibly igniting the bullets.

Operations Guide 5
DEPTH CONTROL

Depth control will be more difficult than normal since there is no cable clamp on the wireline at the Cable
Side Entry Sub (CSES).

While logging, adjust the tension to maintain a safe pull not to part the weak point.
General Rules: Safe pull = cable weight + 1,000 pounds
Max pull will either be safe pull on the weak point or half the breaking strength of the
cable (whichever is less)
don’t confuse normal weight and cable weight
normal weight is the uphole tension observed as the tool and cable are moving unassisted
by the drill pipe

Remember, cable weight increases as you go into the hole and decreases on the way out.
If this is not done, tension on the weak point would gradually increase while coming out of the hole.

(Depth control tip: make chalk mark on drill pipe near the rig floor and have the driller measure with a tape
measure the exact footage desired to move the tool up or down. (This was done on a MDT job on LWF)

SAFETY
Hold a safety/information meeting with the company man, driller, tool pusher, and other personnel involved
in the operation. Meeting discussion must be passed on when one worker is relieving another; especially
when rig workers change tower.

Safety issues to discuss:


• Clear personnel from the rig floor as the torpedo passes each sheave and onto the winch drum.

• When logging deeper than the stuck tool depth, the torpedo will descend below the rig floor. Note this
depth for when it is time to come back up through the rotary table. The ends of the torpedo may get
caught on flat-lipped surfaces.

• A snatch block may be used to move the cable out of the rig floor workers way. Check its condition
and the line holding the tension.

• Watch for finger pinch points:


Downhole Cable Severing Device
Cable Side Entry Sub
Between the cable spear and overshot
Between each stand of pipe
Snatch block

• Observe all radioactive and explosive Standard Operating Procedures as outlined in the Wellsite
Reference Manual.

• Core guns: It is unsafe for crewmembers to run this service because the cable lines must be identified
by sending current down the cable conductors with a multimeter possibly igniting the bullets.

Operations Guide 6
Single or double CST-G core guns have inserts that are wired such that lines 5 and 7 connect to a
geophone. When the logging cable is cut for LWF, reestablishing electrical connections are done
by identifying these two lines first. Then the others can be labeled.

Triple CST-G core guns have inserts wired such that lines 6 and 7 connect to a geophone.

When using a Simpson multi-meter to identify these lines, clip your black lead to line 7 first. Use
the red lead to probe for either line 5 or 6.

To increase safety and efficiency in identifying conductors, 7-46P and 7-46XS cables are now available
with lines 1 and 7 color coded.

Currently #7 is coded blue in the 7-46 P High Strength cables. Vector could code #7 and #1 blue for 7-
46 P High Strength and color code #1 only for standard 7-46 P cables. In that way, #1 would always be
identified on both 7-46 P cables and 7-46 P High Strength cables could still be identified.

High Temp 7-46 NT cables cannot be color coded because the coloring added to the insulation actually
contaminates the insulating material. The coloring is also very difficult to see in the teflon.

Also small diameter cables (7-42 and 7-39) cannot be color coded as the contamination from the
coloring material has been linked to an increased number of short conductors.

We can color the No 1 conductor on the 746P cable since the insulation is thicker than say a 742 or 739
cable. On 739 cables in the past we found the failure rate to be higher on the colored conductors than
the uncolored ones.

When we convert, all cables will be changed and the price will not change. At this point it would be
possible to build color coded 7-46 P cables on special order.

Operations Guide 7
B. FISHING TECHNIQUE

CUT AND THREAD

Cut and thread fishing is the preferred method of fishing for all wireline tools and is the only method when
the cable is stuck. In this technique, the cable is cut at the surface and the drillpipe is threaded into the hole
one stand at a time. In this way the cable is always inside the drillpipe. The cable guides the overshot over
the tool which is critical in a washed out hole or for a short tool string. Tool recovery is assured when
procedures are followed precisely.

C. STEPS OF OPERATION

PREPARE TO CUT CABLE

Verify that tool power is off. Pull up 1500 to 2000 lbs. over normal tension on winch. Support the weight
of the cable with a cable clamp or T-Bar. (Ensure that the bushing size matches the cable by viewing the
stamped bushing.) Slack off on the cable to allow T-Bar to support weight. Cut the cable to allow as much
slack as possible from the T-Bar(15 feet would be ideal, 8 feet is the minimum and very difficult to work
with). Rig up derrick by determining where sheave wheels will be placed. Follow FISHING SOP
guidelines as outlined in the WRM. Lower the upper sheave wheel to the rig floor and replace the spade
with a Schlumberger approved sling. The upper sheave should be re-hung in the derrick where it will not
get in the way of tripping drillpipe. Place TDK tension device on lower sheave. Remove CMTD tension
device from winch spooling arm. Remember to change device type in SSD Depth/Tension Display.

WIRELINE PREPARATION

Use the barrel/split nut type torpedo to house the electrical connections. This allows you to prepare
electrical connections before fishing starts. This procedure takes approximately one hour. The split nut is
placed on the downhole cable after the rope socket is made. Thread the barrel onto the uphole cable before
placing the rope socket. When placing the rope sockets on the line, cut the armor back 2-1/2 inches on the
uphole side and 2 inches on the downhole side. The uphole side of the cut is dressed with female pins and
the downhole side has the male pins. Identify the downhole lines through tool response and the uphole lines
through conventional means(See Appendix B). Make note of the conductor numbers by sticking numbered
tape labels to each. Reconnect the lines. Verify the connections using the same tool responses inside the
unit. Power up the tool and verify tool response. Power down the tool. Unscrew the split nut from the
torpedo barrel. Disconnect the conductors. Place the downhole rope socket in the adapter that threads to
the fishing spear. Thread the uphole torpedo housing to the fishing swivel and overshot. At this point, the
wireline mechanical connection is used for cut and thread fishing and the electrical connections are stored
for later. Pull test the spear and overshot with the T-Bar intact.

CUT AND THREAD FISHING


Operations Guide 8
Standard cut and thread fishing is performed. Full body fishing is recommended. Direct the drill crew in
assembling the overshot. String the spear through the tool overshot and lower the cable overshot through
the first stand of pipe. Raise the stand immediately above the spear and reconnect the wireline. Pull 1000
pounds above normal tension on the wireline and have the rig crew screw the stand into the tool overshot.
Remove the T-Bar and lower the stand into the hole. Set the slips. Place the C-plate in the slot between the
rope socket housing and the spear. The cable is slacked until supported by the plate. Flag the wireline near
the drum to show latch position. Rig crew now uses tong pliers to release the overshot from the spear.
Raise the overshot to the derrickman for insertion into the next stand of pipe. Again flag the wireline to
indicate thread position. Continue this process until reaching the predetermined depth for placing the
CSES/DCSD and redressing the wireline electrical connection. Set the slips on the pipe now in the hole and
clamp the T-Bar on top of it.

CABLE SIDE ENTRY SUB (CSES) and


DOWNHOLE CABLE SEVERING DEVICE (DCSD)

The purpose of the DCSD is to remotely cut the cable and allow removal of the cable from the well in the
event that the drill pipe becomes stuck after engaging the fish(See Appendix C). The CSES (commonly
used for TLC - Tough Logging Conditions) allows the cable to crossover from inside the drillpipe (below
the CSES) to outside the drillpipe (above the CSES).

Lay these two subs on the rig floor next to the downhole cable.

• ELECTRICAL CONNECTION
With the wireline supported by the T-Bar, remove the wireline spear, overshot, swivel, and weights. Feed
the downhole cable up through the DCSD, up through the CSES and out of the side entry port. Now the
conductors from the uphole cable can be reconnected to the downhole conductors by joining the male and
female pins within the double ended torpedo. Make sure that the inner sleave is used to lock the joining
rope sockets in place. Thread the split nut into the torpedo barrel. Now power up the tool.
The wireline is not clamped to the CSES; it must pass freely through the port.

Thread the CSES/DCSD together and lift vertical with a fastline. Lower the next stand of pipe onto the top
of the CSES. Screw CSES/DCSD sub assembly up into the string.
Attaching the DCSD/CSES to the bottom of a stand of drill pipe creates a larger moment arm that keeps the
DCSD/CSES from “cocking” due to the forces from the wireline.

The winchman will work the cable up and down to insure that the double ended torpedo will hold. Remove
the T-Bar and make up to the pipe set in the slips.

TRIPPING PIPE INTO THE HOLE

With the wireline on the outside of drill pipe it is now possible to just trip pipe into the hole. The double
ended torpedo will remain at the rig floor as each stand of pipe is lowered. This will speed up fishing
operations.

RETRIEVING THE FISH

Operations Guide 9
As the tool overshot approaches the fish, monitor downhole force closely. Work the overshot over the
toolstring with 1,000 to 2,000 pounds uphole tension and do not break the weak point. Also pay close
attention to maximum compression/tension limits as shown in appendix D.

LOGGING TLC STYLE

Now that the tool is free, begin TLC style logging out of the hole. Maintain constant safe pull tension (not
normal tension) on the line, where Safe Pull tension = cable weight + 1000 pounds.
Quality check the tension curve on the log. It should gradually decrease when uplogging. An experienced
winch operator is necessary.
Remember that the torpedo will stay above the rig floor unless a log overlap or logging deeper than the
stuck depth is necessary. Follow TLC guidelines for descending into the hole and observe maximum
tension/compression limits for the toolstring shown in appendix D.

Clear the floor as the double ended torpedo goes over the upper sheave, lower sheave, and cable drum.
This is a precautionary step. The double ended torpedo will easily clear the 30 inch sheaves and have no
problem spooling onto the winch cable drum.

Power down tool when logging is completed.

PULLING OUT OF HOLE

When the LWF assembly reaches the floor, set the slips on the pipe just below. Unscrew the pipe hanging
in the derrick from the top of the CSES. Rack back that stand of pipe. Connect the T-Bar to the wireline
and pull the weak point out of the head using the elevators. Spool the cable back onto the drum.

The cable is left hanging from the upper sheave wheel. The cable is cut near the lower sheave so that the
drum of cable can be packaged to be removed from the skid unit. Tie the two ends of the cable hanging
from the top sheave out of the way until later when the top sheave can be lowered.

The rest of the drill pipe and the logging tool can be removed from the hole.

Operations Guide 10
LWF REPORTING PROCEDURES

• USING CURRENT TWO PAGE FISHING REPORT

On page one:
1. Company Representative (first blank) <Name of LWF special services general operator>
2. Title <Write: LWF SSGO>
3. Contractors Name <Rig name and type>
4. What happened? <Make note that LWF was done>
5. Customer elected <Other>
6. What changes followed? <Logging While Fishing>

On page two:
1. In space provided for procedure:

Make a table as shown or write out in your own words the events and timing of each.

event date/time
tool became stuck
start making rope sockets
fishing equipment in hole
start making electrical connections
CSES/DCSD in hole
tool freed
logging start time
logging stop time
CSES/DCSD out of hole
tools at surface

estimated hours for client to make a conditioning trip


are there more logging trips after LWF trip

Make comments on the following topics. This information can be entered in the 'Explain any recovery
failure or problem experienced' area.

Any safety issues


Log quality checks
Operational delays
Client feedback
Was downhole
tension/compression
tool used? Explain

Operations Guide 11
APPENDIX A

“COMMON PROBLEMS DURING LOGGING WHILE FISHING”

Common accidents occurring during Cut and Thread Fishing operation:


1. Something unscrews. May be caused by not using a cable swivel.
2. The no-go does not allow passage of the Fishing torpedo. This results in tedious process of
cutting the cable every 90 feet on the way out of the hole.
3. A non-Schlumberger rope socket is used to secure the cable spear and overshot to the cable.
In particular the rope socket using a one slip insert to tighten on the cable appears to be most
unreliable. After threading several stands of pipe it is not uncommon for the slip to wear
smooth and allow the rope socket to drop into the hole.
a)If the spear end comes free then the cable will be lost down hole. This may cost the
client the well and most likely will take several days to retrieve the cable from the
well.
b)If the overshot end comes free then the no-go will catch the cable. This requires that
the rig crew trip pipe back out of the hole until the no-go is back at the surface. The
crew then rebuilds the rope socket and fishing starts again.
4. Frequently, the fishing hand will try to twist the tool out of the overshot. In the Gulf Coast
this tool is generally the AMS. The AMS is tapered such that twisting causes wiring and
structural damage near the resistivity cell. A typical rebuild requires replacing:

a)upper body of the tool (or mandrel) $1496


b)resistivity rings $2244
c)assorted wiring, connectors, and insulators $ 300
d)16 man hours $ 400
Grand Total $4440

The preferred method of extraction is to back off the overshot, remove the control, clear
debris from around the grapple using a water hose, and gently strike the tool against the rig floor.
This will generally free the tool and grapple from the overshot. If this does not work you may now
rotate the tool without damaging the tool.

Operations Guide 12
APPENDIX B

“KNOWN TOOL RESPONSES”

TOOL TYPE LINES TO IDENTIFY METHOD


CTS Power lines 1 & 4 look for infinite resistance from
(T5 mode) adjacent lines. This will be either
line 1 or 4. Verify that there is
continuity to the opposing line.
Select one line of this pair to be
line 1.

DTS Power lines 1 & 4 same as CTS


(T5 & T7 mode)

CST-G (single gun) Geophone lines 5 & 7 search for continuity across
with geophone lines 5 & 7.

CST-G (two guns) Geophone lines 5 & 7 same as single gun


with geophone in top gun

CST-G (three guns) Geophone lines 6 & 7 search for continuity across
with geophone in top gun lines 6 & 7.

Identifying downhole CTS or DTS power lines 1 and 4 that are isolated from
telemetry lines 2, 3, 5, 6:

If line A is either
1 or 4 then it will read
infinite resistance to
F lines B and F.
E A
7
D B

C If there is continuity
from line A to line B
or line F then line A
is not 1 or 4

Operations Guide 13
APPENDIX C

“DOWNHOLE CABLE SEVERING DEVICE”

Need
Conventional wireline logging allows the extraction of wireline by pulling the weak point and spooling up
the cable. Tough Logging Conditions (TLC) drill pipe assisted logging requires that a special rope socket
be built. Each TLC job is engineered using a rope socket with many of its inner and outer wires removed.
In the event that drill pipe becomes stuck while using TLC, the weak point will yield when it strikes the side
entry port. Explosive cutters were not a viable alternative since the cable runs along the outside of drill
pipe. Since Logging While Fishing (LWF) is elected after an unsuccessful wireline descent it is not
possible to re-engineer the weak point. Therefore, it was necessary to come up with a method to sever the
logging cable remotely.

LWF Application
The Downhole Cable Severing Device(DCSD) remotely cuts the cable if the drill pipe becomes stuck
during the logging while fishing operation allowing the removal of the wireline.

Operation
If the drill pipe becomes stuck after the DCSD and CSES are in the hole and the decision has been made by
the client to get the wireline cable out of the way, the DCSD is the most reliable and safest tool to use. The
T-Bar must be placed on the wireline cable to first part the weak point in the Logging Equipment Head.
The T-Bar must be pulled up by the draw works to be safe meaning that the drill pipe stuck in the hole will
not be supported by the draw works for this step. Remove the T-Bar and spool up the cable with the winch
unit. Stop the winch when the rope socket bell housing is close to the DCSD. Make a determination if the
weight of cable from the top sheave down to the DCSD is enough to keep the cable from whipping out of
the hole after being cut. It may be safer to use the T-Bar and draw works again at this step. The sequence
of events in the DCSD start with the wireline bell housing being pulled up against a spring-loaded mandrel
in the lower part of the DCSD. The compression of this spring is against a shear bolt with a shearing range
of 3,000 to 4,000 pounds of force. The shearing of this bolt releases a spring-loaded cutting blade. The
bell housing and about 6 inches of cable is forced down as the mandrel springs back into its relaxed
position. The cutting blade also retracts to its relaxed position. The wireline is now free to pass through the
CSES and up the hole. Now the inside of the drill pipe and all subs are clear for backoff tools.

Field test
The DCSD can cut all types of Schlumberger wirelines and has been tested to consistently cut a 7V52P size
cable.

TLC Application
Another application for the DCSD will be for TLC jobs. If it is possible to sever the cable remotely in the
event that drill pipe becomes stuck, then why engineer a rope socket for each job? It is a common practice
to log as much of the well as possible using conventional logging and completing the more deviated portion
using TLC. Rebuilding and testing TLC engineered rope sockets take 1 to 2 additional hours. This switch
over time can be eliminated using the DCSD.

Operations Guide 14
APPENDIX D
"MAXIMUM TENSION/COMPRESSION LIMITS"
Se rv ic e / To o l Te n sio n C o m p re ssio n Data Se rv ic e / To o l Te n sio n C o m p re ssio n Data
So u rc e So u rc e

A C TS HLD T-A / B
A C TS-A 4,500 4,500 MM 15,000 10,000 1, 2
A C TS-B 22,500 22,500 MM 30,000 5,000 4
AH IRT
107 108 50,000 23,000 2,4 IRT-M 7,500 2,000 4
107 108 50,000 50,000 3 LD T
A IT 16,500 2,300 4 D RS 40,000 5,500 3,4
A IT-B 16,500 1,500 1, 2 LEH
A IT-H ? ? LEH-Q 50,000 23,000 4
A IT-S ? ? LEH Q / Q B/ Q C 40,000 23,000 1
A LA T 3,000 2,000 2,4 LEH-Q T 35,000 23,000 1
A LA T-A ? ? LEH-R/ RC 40,000 23,000 1
A LA T-B 3,000 2,000 2 MCD
A M S-A 50,000 23,000 2,4 M C D -D 36,000 9,900 4
50,000 30,000 3 M C D -G 36,000 9,900 4
A PS-BA ? ? MDT 50,000 7,900 1,4
A SI (DSA -B) ? not a p p lic a b le M RPA ? ?
BG IC -A 50,000 23,000 M RPO ? ?
BG T/ BG S 20,000 20,000 2,3,4 M RM S ? ?
BHTV M RPD ? ?
C BTT-A 50,000 23,000 2 M RC F ? ?
CCS 50,000 20,000 2,3 M RFA ? ?
C C C -A 50,000 23,000 4 M EST/ FM S 12,000 8,000 4
C C C -B 50,000 23,000 4 M EST-A / B ? ?
C TS M EST-C 12,000 8,000 4
TC C -A / B 50,000 20,000 2 M ED S 12,000 12,000 3
C ET 50,000 6,000 2 M LT-A A / A B 11,250 4,100 2,4
C EM -B 50,000 6,000 3,4 M SC T 22,900 12,500 1,2,4
C M RT ? ? NGT
CNT N G T-E 50,000 10,000 1234
C N T-A 50,000 2,500 2 NPLT (IPL) 40,000 5,000 4
C N T-G / H 50,000 2,500 2 O BDT-A / A B 12,000 12,000 2,3,4
C SA T ? ? PEX (HILT) 20,000 MM
C ST HG N S-B ? ?
G / U/ V / Z 50,000 23,000 2,4 M RM S-B ? ?
Z 50,000 30,000 3 HRC C -B ? ?
D IT H A LC -B ? ?
D IT-D 5,000 2,500 1 H A LS-B ? ?
D IT-E 5,000 2,500 1 A IT-H ? ?
D IT-X 5,000 2,500 1 HTBC -A ? ?
D IT-D/ E(DIS) 7,500 2,000 4
D LT PEH-A / A B 50,000 23,000 1
D LT-C 3,000 2,000 2 Q SST
D LT-D 3,000 2,000 2 Q SST-A ? ?
D LT-E 3,000 2,000 2 Q SST-B ? ?
D ST-D 3,000 ? RFT 28,600 19,100 2,4
D LS-E 3,000 2,000 3,4 RFT-A ? ?
DPT 10,000 10,000 3,4 RFT-B ? ?
D SST-A / B 29,000 1,550 4 RFT-C H ? ?
5000 1500 2 RFTTN ? ?
SPA C -A / B ? ?
SM D R-A A ? ? RTHU/ C U ? ?
SSIJ-A A ? ? SRFT ? ?
SM D X-A A ? ? SA H
D TS (DTC & D TA ) 50,000 16,700 2,4 SAH-E 7000 5000 2,4
D TPC 50,000 23,000 SAH-F 50000 23000 2,4,M M
ED A C 30,000 4,000 1 SA T-A / B 50,000 15,000 2,3,4
EM S SC TT
EM A 32,500 ? 2 SD T-C 28,000 1,700 4,2
EM C 40,500 ? 2 SLR-VB 28,000 1,700 4,2
EM M 32,500 ? 2 SG T
EM S+ D TC 32,500 4,000 2 SG T-E 50,000 23,000 2,4
EPT-D/ G 50,000 7,600 1,4 SG T-L 50,000 23,000 2,4
EQ C S-34 50,000 23,000 1 M SG T
FBST/ FM I SHDT 6,000 2,000 2,4
12,000 12,000 2 SLT
12,000 8,000 4 SLT-J ? ?
G PIT SLS- W A 29,700 2,870 2,4
G PIT-A / A C 50,000 23,000 SLS-ZA / B 29,700 1,650 2,4
G PIT-C 50,000 23,000 SP
HDT ? ? SPA -A 48,600 23,000 1,2
HDS-F 10,000 10,000 3,4 USIT
USI (USR?) 40,000 4,000 2,4

D a ta so u rc e
1 TLC N e w s - WTH 10 July 1995
2 W TH TLC m e e t in g - A b e rd e e n , Ju n e 9 4
3 TLC -A B M a in t - M a n u a l MH780000
4 G FE Pro je c t

Operations Guide 15
APPENDIX E

DESCRIPTION OF LWF MAJOR COMPONENTS


This information downloaded from vector product center on internet.

CSES-A Cable Side Entry Sub (H427140) I.D.=2.12 in. O.D.=7.0 in.
• 4-1/2 IF Box to 4-1/2 IF Pin Connection
• Max allowable Torque 30,332 ft-lbf
• Max working load 500,000 lbf
• Length 58 in., Weight 390 lbm
• Recommended for use when pumping with sustained high pressure for long periods of time.

CSES-C Cable Side Entry Sub (H542042) I.D.=2.12 in. O.D.=6.62 in.
• 4-1/2 IF Box to 4-1/2 IF Pin Connection
• Max allowable Torque 30,332 ft-lbf
• Max working load 500,000 lbf
• Length 28.5 in., Weight 175 lbm

CSES-D Cable Side Entry Sub (H542043) I.D.=1.88 in. O.D.=5.88 in.
• 3-1/2 IF Box to 3-1/2 IF Pin Connection
• Max allowable Torque 9,054 ft-lbf
• Max working load 350,000 lbf
• Length 31.5 in., Weight 100 lbm

DOWNHOLE CABLE SEVERING DEVICES (DCSD)


aka CABLE CUTTER TOOL SUBS (CCTS) at Vector

CCTS-A Cable Cutter Tool Sub (H352069) I.D. = 1.870” O.D. = 6.605”
• 4-1/2 IF box to 3-1/2 pin connection
• Max allowable torque 36,000 ft-lbs
• Max working load 565,487 lbs
• Length 51 in., Weight 450 lbs
• May be used in place of the special TLC rope socket in the Pump-down Wet Connect Head (PWCH).

CCTS-B Cable Cutter Tool Sub (H352070) I.D. = 1.870” O.D. = 5.50”
• 3-1/2 IF box to 3-1/2 pin connection
• Max allowable torque 11,800 ft-lbs
• Max working load 325,883 lbs
• Length 51 in., Weight 225 lbl
• May be used in place of the special TLC rope socket in the Pump-down Wet Connect Head (PWCH).

Operations Guide 16

You might also like