Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name of Employee:
Position: Teacher I
School / Division: MATAAS NA PAARALANG NEPTALI A. GONZALES
Review Period: June 2018 - April 2019
TO BE FILLED DURING PLAN
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding
KRA QET
(5)
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7.5% Quality Showed knowledge of content
Education Knowledge Knowledges of and its integration within and
Services and Pedagogy content within and across subject areas as show
(40%) across curriculum in MOV1 with rating of 7
teaching areas.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons
using MOV 1 and supported by
any one of the other given
MOV
Timeliness
Timeliness
Page 1 IPCRF
3. Applied a range of 7.5%
teaching strategies
to develop critical
and creative Weight
thinking, as well as per
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Outstanding
other higher-order KRA QET
thinking skills. (5)
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 lessons as
evidenced by MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 of the other
given MOV
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Page 2 IPCRF
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding
KRA QET
(5)
3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7.5% Quality Planned and implemented
and Planning managed and developmentally sequenced
implemented teaching and learning process
developmentally as shown in MOV 1 with rating
of 7
sequenced teaching
and learning
processes to meet
curriculum Efficiency Submitted at least 4
requirements and developmentally sequenced
varied teaching teaching and learning process
contexts. as evidently shown in MOV 1
of the other given MOV
Timeliness
Timeliness
Timeliness
Page 3 IPCRF
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding
KRA QET
(5)
4. Assessment 10. Designed, 7.5% Quality Designed, selected, organized
and Reporting selected, organized and used diagnostic, formative
aans used and summative assessment
diagnostic, formative strategies consistent with
curriculum requirements as
and summative
shown in MOV with the rating
assessment of 7
strategies consistent
with curriculum
requirements.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 varied
assessment tools as evidently
shown in any 1 of the
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Page 4 IPCRF
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline per Outstanding
KRA QET
(5)
5. Plus Factor 13. Performed 10.0% Quality Consistently performed various
various related related work / activities that
work/activities that contribute to the teaching
contribute to the learning process as shown in
the MOV submitted
teaching-learning
process.
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 different
kinds of acceptable MOV
Timeliness
Conforme:
Reviewed by:
0
Teacher I ADELAIDA R. GULOY
Ratee FILIPINO DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR
Rater
Page 5 IPCRF
ANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
Submitted 3 lessons using Submitted 2 lessons using Submitted any 1 of the given Each part
MOV 1 and supported by any MOV 1 and supported by any 1 MOV had no
one of the other given MOV one of the other given MOV description
of what to
do with
example
Page 6 IPCRF
Actual
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Q
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Submitted 3 lessons as Submitted 2 lessons as Submitted 1 lessons as No
evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and evidenced by MOV 1 and acceptable
supported by any 1 of the supported by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 of the other evidence
other given MOV given MOV given MOV was shown
Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the Submitted at least 4 of the given No
given strategies as observed given strategies as observed in strategies as observed in 1 acceptable
in 3 lessons 2 lessons lessons evidence
was shown
Page 7 IPCRF
Actual
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Q
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Planned and implemented Planned and implemented Planned and implemented No
developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced developmentally sequenced acceptable
teaching and learning process teaching and learning process teaching and learning process as evidence
as shown in MOV 1 with rating as shown in MOV 1 with rating shown in MOV 1 with rating of 4 was shown
of 6 of 5
Developed and used varied Developed and used varied Developed and used varied No
teaching and learning teaching and learning teaching and learning resources, acceptable
resources, including ICT, to resources, including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning evidence
address learning goals as address learning goals as goals as shown in MOV 1 with a was shown
shown in MOV 1 with a rating shown in MOV 1 with a rating of rating of 4
of 6 5
Submitted 3 varried teaching Submitted 2 varried teaching Submitted 1 varried teaching and No
and learning resources, and learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, acceptable
including ICT, as evidently including ICT, as evidently as evidently shown in MOV 1 evidence
shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and supported and supported by any 1 of the was shown
supported by any 1 of the by any 1 of the acceptable acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV MOV
Page 8 IPCRF
Actual
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Q
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized Designed, selected, organized No
and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative and used diagnostic, formative acceptable
and summative assessment and summative assessment and summative assessment evidence
strategies consistent with strategies consistent with strategies consistent with was shown
curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as curriculum requirements as
shown in MOV with the rating shown in MOV with the rating of shown in MOV with the rating of
of 6 5 4
Frequently monitored and Occasionally monitored and Rarely monitored and evaluated No
evaluated learners progress evaluated learners progress learners progress and acceptable
and achievement using learner and achievement using learner achievement using learner evidence
attainment data as shown in attainment data as shown in the attainment data as shown in the was shown
the MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
Page 9 IPCRF
Actual
Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Results
Q
(4) (3) (2) (1)
Frequently performed various Occasionally performed various Rarely performed various No
related work / activities that related work / activities that related work / activities that acceptable
contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching contribute to the teaching evidence
learning process as shown in learning process as shown in learning process as shown in the was shown
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted MOV submitted
FINAL RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Recommending Approval:
Approved:
EFREN S. CONSEMINO ,Ed.D
Principal IV NERISSA L. LOSARI
OIC-Schools Division S
Page 10 IPCRF
acher I-III
AIDA R. GULOY
NO DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR
, 2019
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Page 11 IPCRF
0 0.00
Score
E T Ave.
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Page 12 IPCRF
Score
E T Ave.
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Page 13 IPCRF
Score
E T Ave.
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Page 14 IPCRF
Score
E T Ave.
0 0.00
Approved:
Page 15 IPCRF
Name of Employee: 0 Name of Rater ADELAIDA R. GULOY
Position Teacher I Position: FILIPINO DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR
School / Division: MATAAS NA PAARALANG NEPTALI A. GONZALES Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: June 2018 - April 2019
COMPETENCIES
5 - Role model; 4 - Consistently demonstate; 3 - Most of the time demonstrate; 2 - Sometimes demonstrate; 1 - Rarely demonstrate
OVERALL
COMPETENCY ###
RATINGS
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.
Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended Developmental Intervention)
A. Functional Competencies
Strength and Power Flexibilty and Speed * Demonstrate a flexible and speedy approach to S.Y. 2019-2020 Quadlateral Movement and
work to attain goals and desired outcomes. Advance Stretches
Team Result Focus * Delivers error-free outputs most if the S.Y. 2019-2020 TIP Module 5
Conforme:
0
Teacher I Rater & Reviewed by: Recommending Approval:
Ratee Approved:
ADELAIDA R. GULOY EFREN S. CONSEMINO ,Ed.D
FILIPINO DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR OIC- Assistant Schools Division Superintendent NERISSA L. LOSARIA, CESO VI
OIC-Schools Division Superintendent
POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No. _________ Revision Code: 00
Department of Education
Name Salary Grade 11
Postion Title Teacher I Effectivity Date
Office Unit MATAAS NA PAARALANG NEPTALI A. GONZALES Page/s
Reports to FILIPINO DEPARTMENT COORDINATOR
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY
QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Elementary / Secondary / Early Childhood Education or Bachelor's degree plus 18 units in Education
Experience None required
Eligibility RA 1080
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE / BSEEd / College Graduate with Education units (18-21), at least 18 MA units
Experience
Eligibility PBET / LET Passer
Trainings In-service Trainn
FINAL RATING Descriptive Rating
0 - 1.499 Poor
1.5 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
2.5 - 3.499 Satisfactory
3.5 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
4.5 - 5 Outstanding