Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: ERLYN P. FALCIS Name of Rater:

Position: Teacher I Position :
Bureau/Center/Service / Division : BIWANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review :

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION

ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE

Weig
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline ht per Performance Indications
KRA Q E T AVE
(Quality, Effeciency,Timeliness )
Delivery 1.Teaching and  Prepared daily lesson June 40% 5- 5 learning activities conducted
of Basic Learning logs of activities 2016-
Quality Process including appropriate, March 4-4 learning activities conducted
Educati adequate and updated 2017
on instructional materials 3-3 learning activities conducted
 Discussion
 Reporting 2-2 learning activities conducted
 Role Playing
 Recital 1-1 learning activity conducted
 Vocabulary and
communication skills
enhancement
 Games
Presentation
 Debate
 5- ICT integration is 81-100% or
above evident.
 Facilitated learning in
the school through 4- ICT integration is 61%-80%
functional daily lesson evident.
logs and innovative
teaching 3-ICT integration is 41%-60%
Strategies evident.

2-ICT integration is 21%-40%

evident.

1-ICT integration is less than 20%

evident.

 Promoted Deped Core 5-students were 100% guided in

Values by initiating and the observation of classroom rules
imposing positive and guidelines as evidenced by
discipline to the students descriptive rating in the report card
including classroom
rules, guidelines for 4- 81%-99%
group and individual
tasks. 3- 61%-80%

2- 41%-60%

1%-40%
 Monitored 5- Order, cleanliness and
attendance, diversity attendance checking were 91%-
appreciation, safe, 100%.
positive and
motivating 4- Order, cleanliness and
environment, overall attendance were 81%-90%
physical atmosphere, systematically carried out.
cleanliness and
orderliness of 3-Order, cleanliness and
classrooms including attendance were 71%-80%
proper wastes systematically carried out.
disposal.
2-Order, cleanliness and
attendance were 60%-70%
systematically carried out.

1-Order, cleanliness and

attendance were 1%-59%
systematically carried out.
2.Student  Evaluated and June 30% 5- Class record reflected the bases
Outcomes supervised students 2016- of 100% of student’s ratings in all
development and March classes handled. Student’s
progress through 2017 portfolio contained 100% of his
reading program, accomplishments.
remediation,
enrichment and 4- Class record reflected the bases
interview. of 100% of student’s ratings in all
classes handled. Student’s
portfolio contained 80-99% of his
accomplishments.

3- Class record reflected the bases

of 100% of student’s ratings in all
classes handled. Student’s
portfolio contained 60-79% of his
accomplishments.

2- Class record reflected the bases

of 100% of student’s ratings in all
classes handled. Student’s
portfolio contained 40-59% of his
accomplishments.

1- Class record reflected the bases

of 100% of student’s ratings in all
classes handled. Student’s
portfolio contained 1-39% of his
accomplishments.
 Conducted 5-Remediation/ Enrichment
remediation/enrichm Program is offered to 100% or
ent programs to above of students who need it.
improve performance
indicators. 4-Remediation/ Enrichment
Program is offered to 80-99% or
above of students who need it.

3-Remediation/ Enrichment
Program is offered to 60-79% or
above of students who need it.

2-Remediation/ Enrichment
Program is offered to 40-59% or
above of students who need it.

1-Remediation/ Enrichment
Program is offered to 1-39% or
above of students who need it.

 Attained the desired June 5- Attained 90-100% or above of

learning 2015- the required learning
competencies of March competencies.
DepEd. 2016
4- Attained 70-89% or above of the
required learning competencies.

3- Attained 50-69% or above of the

required learning competencies.
 2- Attained 30-49% or above of
the required learning
competencies.

1- Attained 10-29% or above of

the required learning
competencies.

3. Community  Conducted June 5-accomplishment with set

Involvement Homeroom PTA 2016- agreements
meeting/conference March 4-plannned meetings conducted
2017 producing only set agreements
and partial accomplishment
3-planned meetings conducted
producing set of agreements
2-planned meetings conducted
with minimal results
1-planned meetings conducted
with result/agreement
  Participated in 5-participated in all activities
different events/
activities in the 4-selected activities participated
community
3-few activities participated

2- 1 activity participate

1-none of the activities participated

 Visited parents of 5-100% accomplished

students needing 4-90%accomplished
academic monitoring/ 3-80%accomplished
follow-up 2-70%accomplished 1-
below70% accomplished

4. Professional  Helped conducted June 20% 5- 96-100% and above support to

growth and and organized in 2016- activities.
development different school March
programs that 2017 4- 90-95% support to activities
enhances student’s
skills in 3- 85-89% support to activities
communication,
comprehension and 2-81-85% support to activities
fluency.
1-75-80% support to activities
 Participated and 5- attended at least five seminars
attended seminars and workshop
and workshop 4- attended at least five seminars
and workshop
3- attended at least five seminars
and workshop
2- attended at least five seminars
and workshop
1- attended at least five seminars
and workshop
 5-Acquired 20 or more units in
 Acquired units in Masters Degree
Masters Degree
4-Acquires 18 units in Masters
Degree

3-Acquired 15 units in Masters

Degree

2- Acquired 9 units in Masters

Degree

1-Acquired 6 units in Masters

Degree

The score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

FATIMA S. CALI ERLYN P. FALCIS DATUN K. SAMAMA

Rater Ratee Approving Authority