Department of Education

Region III
DIVISION OF MABALACAT CITY
Mabalacat City

Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS)- Office Performance Commitment an

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION - REGION III
Name of Employee: MA. IRELYN P. TAMAYO, Ph.D.
Position: OIC- SCHOOLS DIVISION SUPERINTENDENT
Review Period: JANUARY TO DECEMBER 2016
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: MABALACAT CITY
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
CURRICULUM 35%

Basic Education 1.Ensured full implementation January to 15%

Governance of the K to 12 Curriculum by December
producing/designing nine(9) 2016
sets of activity sheets
following the principles of
indigenization, innovation and
integration, within the year.
 2.Provided technical June to 10%
assistance to 80 % of public December
schools in terms of curriculum 2016
implementation and
instructional supervision
during the second semester of
the year.

3. Supervised the operations June to 10%

of 80% of public and private December
schools to ensure their 2016
compliance with quality and
accreditation standards during
the second semester of the
year.

SERVICE
20%
DELIVERY
5. 90% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monito
related to DRRM within the year.
4. 70% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM.within the year.
3. 50% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM.within the year.
2. 30% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and moni
related to DRRM within the year..
1. 10% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM within the year..
1. Engaged 90% of schools in
implementing, coordinating
and monitoring activities
related to Disaster Risk
Reduction Management
(DRRM) within the year.
2. Assessed the SBM level of
practice of all public
elementary and secondary
schools in the division during
the third quarter of the year.
January to 5% 5. 90% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monito
December related to DRRM within the year.
2016 4. 70% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM.within the year.
3. 50% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM.within the year.
2. 30% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and moni
related to DRRM within the year..
1. 10% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monit
related to DRRM within the year..
June to 5%
December
5. 100% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
4. 90% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
3. 80% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
2. 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
1. Less than 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
 3. Achieved 100%
Completion of the learners'
profile of all public and
private schools in the division
by updating the End of the
School Year (EOSY) and
Beginning of the School Year
(BOSY) on or before the
target dates.
4. Approved at least eight (8)
action researches of school
heads/teachers related to
management and curriculum
within the year.
MANAGEMENT
OF RESOURCES
(Human and
Material)
April 30, 2016 5% 5. 100% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
and July 30, updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
2016
4. 90% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
3. 80% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
2. 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division w
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
1. Less than 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the
January to 5% updating
5. At leastEOSY andaction
eight (8) BOSYresearches
on or before the target
of school dates..
heads/ teachers related to manag
December curriculum were approved within the year..
2016 4. At least six (6) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to managem
were approved within the year..
3. At least four (4) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to manage
curriculum were approved within the year..
2. At least two (2) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to manag
curriculum were approved within the year..
1. At least one (1) action research of school heads/ teachers related to manageme
were approved within the year..
45%
1. Attained 100% releases of
salaries, allowances and other
benefits of all teaching and
non-teaching personnel in the
division within the prescribed
period.
2. Approved appointments
and deployments and
evaluated and recommended
personnel actions(promotions,
transfers, reassignments and
dropping from the rolls) on all
personnel of the division
within the prescribed period..
January to 10%
December
2016
January to 5% 5. Approved 100% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recomm
December actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period..
2016 4. Approved 90% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recomme
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
3. Approved 80% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recomm
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
2. Approved 70% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recomm
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
1. Approved less than 70% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and
personnel actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
3. Spearheaded at least ten
(10) division
trainings/seminars for school
heads and teachers on current
educational policies, projects
and programs geared towards
learners' achievement and
holistic development within
the year.
4. Maintained an updated and
accurate inventory of 100% of
school buildings and other
education facilities in the
division within the year.
January to 10% 5. At least ten (10) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on
December policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
2016 4. At least eight (8) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
3. At least six (6) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on c
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
2. At least four (4) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teacherson c
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
1. At least two (2) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on c
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
January to 10% 5. 100% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were in
December updated and accurate inventory within the year.
2016 4. 80% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were in
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
3. 60% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were in
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
2. 40% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were in
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
1. 20% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were in
and accurate inventory within the year.
5. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 90% through regular m
controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
4. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 88% through r
and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
3. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 86%
monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
2. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62%
regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fisca
1. Level of budget utilization was increased fr
through regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of t
 5. Increased the level of
budget utilization from 62%
to 90% through regular
monitoring and controlling of
budgetary accounts at the end
of the Fiscal Year.
Rater:
NICOLAS T. CAPULONG, Ph.D., CESO V
OIC- Asst. Regional Director
January to 10% 5. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 90% through regular m
December controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
2016 4. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 88% through r
and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
3. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 86%
monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
2. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62%
regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fisca
1. Level of budget utilization was increased fr
through regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of t
Overall Rating for Accomplishment
Approving Authority:
MALCOLM S. GARMA, CESO V
Director III, Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Regional Director
 Department of Education
Region III
DIVISION OF MABALACAT CITY
Mabalacat City

nce Management System (RPMS)- Office Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF)

Name of Rater: NICOLAS T. CAPULONG, Ph.D., CESO V

Position: OIC-ASSISTANT REGIONAL DIRECTOR
Date of Review:

ACTUAL AVERAGE
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) SCORE
RESULTS RATING
E Q T TOTAL

5. Produced/Designed nine (9) sets of activity sheets that are indigenized,innovative and
integrative,within the year.
4.Produced/Designed eight (8) sets of activity sheets that are indigenized,innovative and
integrative,within the year
3. Produced/Designed seven (7) sets of activity sheets that are indigenized,innovative and
integrative,within the year
2. Produced/Designed six (6) sets of activity sheets that are indigenized,innovative and
integrative,within the year
1. Produced/Designed five (5) sets of activity sheets that are indigenized,innovative and
integrative,within the year
 5. 80% of public schools were given technical assistance in curriculum implementation and
instructional supervision during the second semester of the year.
4. 60% of public schools were given technical assistance in curriculum implementation and
instructional supervision during the second semester of the year.
3. 40% of public schools were given technical assistance in curriculum implementation and
instructional supervision during the second semester of the year.
2. 20% of public schools were given technical assistance in curriculum implementation and
instructional supervision during the second semester of the year.
1. 10% of public schools were given technical assistance in curriculum implementation and
instructional supervision during the second semester of the year.

5. 80% of public schools were supervised to ensure their compliance with quality and accreditation
standards during the second semester of the year.
4. 60% of public schools were supervised to ensure their compliance with quality and accreditation
standards during the second semester of the year.
3. 40% of public schools were supervised to ensure their compliance with quality and accreditation
standards during the second semester of the year.
2. 20% of public schools were supervised to ensure their compliance with quality and accreditation
standards during the second semester of the year.
1. 10% of public schools were supervised to ensure their compliance with quality and accreditation
standards during the second semester of the year.

5. 90% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year.
4. 70% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM.within the year.
3. 50% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM.within the year.
2. 30% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year..
1. 10% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year..
5. 90% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year.
4. 70% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM.within the year.
3. 50% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM.within the year.
2. 30% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year..
1. 10% of schools were engaged in the implementation, coordination and monitoring of activities
related to DRRM within the year..

5. 100% of public elementary and secondary schools in the division were assessed in terms of SBM
level of practice during the third quarter of the year.
4. 80% of public elementary and secondary schools in the division were assessed in terms of SBM
level of practice during the third quarter of the year.
3. 60% of public elementary and secondary schools in the division were assessed in terms of SBM
level of practice during the third quarter of the year.
2. 40% of public elementary and secondary schools in the division were assessed in terms of SBM
level of practice during the third quarter of the year.
1. 20% of public elementary and secondary schools in the division were assessed in terms of SBM
level of practice during the third quarter of the year.

5. 100% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..

4. 90% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..

3. 80% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
2. 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
1. Less than 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
5. 100% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..

4. 90% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..

3. 80% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
2. 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were completed by
updating EOSY and BOSY on or before the target dates..
1. Less than 70% of the learner's profile of all public and private schools in the division were by
updating
5. At leastEOSY andaction
eight (8) BOSYresearches
on or before the target
of school dates..
heads/ teachers related to management and
curriculum were approved within the year..
4. At least six (6) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to management and curriculum
were approved within the year..
3. At least four (4) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to management and
curriculum were approved within the year..
2. At least two (2) action researches of school heads/ teachers related to management and
curriculum were approved within the year..
1. At least one (1) action research of school heads/ teachers related to management and curriculum
were approved within the year..
5. 100% of the salaries, allowances and other benefits of all teaching and non-teaching personnel in
the division were released within the prescribed period.
4. 90% of the salaries, allowances and other benefits of all teaching and non-teaching
personnel in the division were released within the prescribed period.
3. 80% of the salaries, allowances and other benefits of all teaching and non-
teaching personnel in the division were released within the prescribed period.
2. 70% of the salaries, allowances and other benefits of all teaching and non-
teaching personnel in the division were released within the prescribed period.
1. Less than 70 % of the salaries, allownces and other benefits of all teaching
and non- teaching personnel in the division were released within the prescribed period.

5. Approved 100% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recommended personnel
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period..
4. Approved 90% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recommended personnel
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
3. Approved 80% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recommended personnel
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
2. Approved 70% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recommended personnel
actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
1. Approved less than 70% of appointments and deployments and evaluated and recommended
personnel actions on all personnel of the division within the prescribed period.
5. At least ten (10) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on current educational
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
4. At least eight (8) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on current educational
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
3. At least six (6) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on current educational
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
2. At least four (4) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teacherson current educational
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.
1. At least two (2) division trainings/seminars for school heads and teachers on current educational
policies, projects and programs were conducted within the year.

5. 100% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were included in an
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
4. 80% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were included in an
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
3. 60% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were included in an
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
2. 40% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were included in an
updated and accurate inventory within the year.
1. 20% of school buildings and other education facilities in the division were included in an updated
and accurate inventory within the year.

5. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 90% through regular monitoring and
controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
4. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 88% through regular monitoring
and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
3. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 86% through regular
monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
2. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 84% through
regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
1. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 82%
through regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
 5. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 90% through regular monitoring and
controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
4. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 88% through regular monitoring
and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
3. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 86% through regular
monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
2. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 84% through
regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.
1. Level of budget utilization was increased from 62% to 82%
through regular monitoring and controlling of budgetary accounts at the end of the Fiscal Year.

Overall Rating for Accomplishment

Ratee:

MA. IRELYN P.TAMAYO, Ph.D.

OIC- Schools Division Superintendent

ing Authority:

MALCOLM S. GARMA, CESO V

Director III, Officer-In-Charge
Office of the Regional Director