Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BY MICHAEL SOMOGYI
(From the Laboratory of the Jewish Hospital of St. Louis, St. Louis)
Reagents
Starch Paste-We employ U.S.P. corn-starch or pure rice starch.
The starch is washed as follows: 100 gm. of starch are suspended
and frequently agitated for about an hour in 1 liter of approxi-
mately 0.01 N HCl. After sedimentation the acid is poured off
TABLE I
Glucose per 100 Cc. of Solution Corresponding to Titration Vahes When 5 Cc.
of I:10 Solution and 5 Cc. oj High Alkalinity Copper Reagent Are Heated
0 1 0.1 cc. 1 0.2 cc. ( 0.3 cc. ( 0.4 cc. 1 0.5 cc. ( 0.6cc. 1 0.7 cc. 0.8 cc. ( 0.9 CC.
Analytical Procedure
In a test-tube of 14 to 16 mm. diameter 5 cc. of the starch paste
and 2 cc. of the NaCl solution are mixed and immersed in a water
bath of 40”. After a few minutes, when the fluid has assumed
the temperature of the water bath, 1 cc. of plasma (serum, whole
blood) is added, the tube is stoppered and inverted a few times,
and the mixture is incubated for 30 minutes. At this point the
404 Estimation of Diastase
action of the enzyme is terminated in conjunction with the de-
proteinization of the reaction mixture. To this end 1 cc. of the
CuSO4 solution is admixed, than 1 cc. of the tungstate solution is
added, and the mixture is well shaken and centrifuged. Since
copper salts inhibit but do not fully stop diastase action, these
operations must be carried out without undue delay.
The supernatant fluid, which is enzyme-free, is poured through
a small filter paper. The filtrate, a 1: 10 dilution of the plasma,
is opalescent owing to the presence of unaltered starch, and is
proceed at 40” for 30 minutes. At the end of this time the re-
ceptacle is sought out in which no purple or no color at all is
given with iodine, depending on the choice of the end-point.
This procedure is tedious and relatively crude as applied, for ex-
ample, in Wohlgemuth’s (10) method, widely used for the assay
of blood diastase. In this method, when the amount of plasma
is serially diminished by as little as 0.1 cc. in each successive
test-tube, there is a difference of 25 per cent in the enzyme con-
tent of the tubes with 0.4 and 0.5 cc. of plasma, and a gap of 100
Reagents
Starch Solution-This reagent contains 75 mg. of starch and 250
mg. of NaCl per 100 cc. of solution. It is prepared of the same
washed corn-starch as is used in the copper reduction method.
In preparing a past.e as the first step, 15 to 20 gm. of the starch
are rubbed up in a mortar with 100 cc. of water and the suspension
is poured with vigorous agitation into 900 cc. of boiling water.
After this has boiled for about 1 minute under continuous stirring,
10 cc. of 25 per cent NaCl solution are added and the flask is
immersed for 30 minutes in a boiling water bath, the mouth of
the flask being covered with an inverted beaker. After standing
(covered with the beaker to keep the solution sterile) at room
temperature for a day (or longer if necessary), the greater part of
the starch separates out, forming a sediment. The limpid super-
natant fluid is removed by syphoning or, in order to obtain a better
yield, by centrifugation. This dilute starch paste is the stock
M. Somogyi 409
solution which, properly diluted with 0.25 per cent NaCl solution,
furnishes the substrate.
To find the extent of dilution, the starch content (usually 0.4
to 0.6 per cent) of the stock solution is determined as follows:
Into a large test-tube (25 X 200 mm.) 5 cc. of the fluid are intro-
duced, 1 cc. of 3.6 N HCl is added, the tube is closed with a l-hole
rubber stopper that is fitted with a glass tube about 2 feet long,
to serve as a reflux condenser, and the mixture is immersed in a
boiling water bath and heated for 2.5 hours. The hydrolysate
Analytical Procedure
Into a test-tube of 14 to 16 mm. diameter, 4 cc. of the starch
solution (which contains 3.0 mg. of starch) are introduced, and
the tube is immersed in the constant temperature water bath.
A few minutes later, when the reagent has assumed the standard
1. Myers, V. C., and Killian, J. A., J. Biol. Chem., 29, 179 (1917).
2. Sherman, H. C., Kendall, E. C., and Clark, E. D., J. Am. Chem. Sot.,
32, 1073 (1910).
3. Davison, W. C., Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 37, 281 (1925).
4. Elman, R., and McCaughan, J. M., Arch. Int. Med., 40, 58 (1927).
5. Somogyi, M., J. Bio.!. Chem., 124, 179 (1938).