D.C. Regulations Mumbai - Modification Notifications - Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws

4/18/2019 D.C.
Regulations Mumbai- Modification Notifications – Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws
D.C. Regulations Mumbai- Modi cation

Noti cations
0 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn 0 WhatsApp Print 21

SHARES
D.C. Regulations Mumbai- Modi cation Noti cations
Cotton Textile Mills Noti cation dated 17th March, 2015- Regulation 58(1)(b)(v) of D.C.
Regulation, Mumbai, 1991
———–
Maharashtra Regional & Town planning Act, 1966
Sanction to Modi cation to Regulation 58(1)(b)(v) of Development Control Regulations

for Greater Mumbai,1991 under Section 37(2).
GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA
Urban Development Department,
maharashtrahousingandbuildinglaws.com/d-c-regulations-mumbai-modification-notifications/ 1/15
4/18/2019 D.C. Regulations Mumbai- Modification Notifications – Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws
Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032
Dated:- 17th March, 2015.
NOTIFICATION
No. TPB-4312/CR-7/2012/UD-11:
Whereas the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991 (hereinafter
referred to as “the said Regulations”) have been sanctioned by the Government in the Urban
Development Department, under Section 31(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning
Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “the said Act”) vide Noti cation No. DCR 1090/RDP/UD-11
dated 20th February, 1991 so as to come into force with effect from the 25th March, 1991.
And whereas, Regulation 58 of the said Regulation deals with the development or
redevelopment of lands of Cotton Textile Mills, which has been modi ed (hereinafter referred to
as “the said modi ed Regulation”) vide Urban Development Department’s Noti cation No. TPB-
4320/516/CR-50/2000/Part-II/UD-11 dated 20/3/2001, after following the procedure laid down
under section 37 of the said Act.
And whereas, as per provision of Regulation 58(1)(b)(v), the land earmarked for Recreation
Ground and for Public Housing/Mill Workers Housing, are of such small sizes that they do not
admit of separate speci c uses, the Municipal Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai with the prior approval of Govt., earmark the said lands for the use of Recreation
Ground.
And whereas, the Govt., felt it necessary that such plots of small sizes shall be utilized for
Public Housing/Mill Workers Housing and for that purpose the State Government had issued
directions vide order TPB. 4307/3332/CR-354/07/UD-11, dated 29th July, 2008 under Section
37(1) of the said Act to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as
“the said Corporation) to submit modi cation proposal to the Regulation 58(1)(b)(v) after
following the legal procedure stipulated under Section 37 of the said Act to the State Government
for sanction;
And whereas, after completing the procedure laid down under section 37(1) of the said Act,
the said Corporation has submitted the said modi cation to the Government for nal sanction
under section 37(2) of the said Act, vide letter dated 29/03/2010;
And whereas, after consulting the Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State,
Government nds that the said modi cation submitted by the said Corporation, needs to be
sanctioned under Section 37(2) of the said Act;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of the Section 37 of
the said Act, the Government hereby:-
A) Sanctions the proposed modi cation with some changes, as described more speci cally in the
Schedule mentioned below.
SCHEDULE
Existing provision of Note (v) under Modi ed provision of Note (v) under Regulation
Regulation 58(1)(b) of Development Control 58(1)(b) of Development Control Regulation,
Regulation, 1991 for Greater Mumbai. 1991 for Greater Mumbai.
Where the lands accruing as per Columns (3) Where the lands accruing as per Columns (3) &
& (4) are, in the opinion of the Commissioner, (4) are, in the opinion of the Commissioner, of
of such small sizes that they do not admit of such small sizes that they do not admit of
separate speci c uses provided for in the separate speci c uses provided for in the said
said columns, he may, with the prior approval columns, he may, with the prior approval of the
of Government, earmark the said lands for Government, earmark the said lands for use as
use as provided in Column (3). provided in Column (3); the Commissioner may
allow any other Recreation Ground Lands for
any Mills received as Municipal Corporation of
Greater Mumbai’s share of Mill land as per
Column (3), to be earmarked for MHADA in
exchange of such plots, for using as per Column
(4), with the prior approval of the Government.
B) Fixes the date on which the said modi cation is published in the Of cial Gazette, as the date
on which the said modi cation shall come into force.
C) Directs the said Corporation that in the Schedule of modi cation sanctioning the said
Regulations, after the last entry, the schedule to as (A) above shall be added.
The said modi cation shall be kept open for inspection by the general public during the of ce
hours on all working days in the of ce of the Chief Engineer (Development Plan), Greater Mumbai
Municipal Corporation.
This noti cation shall also be published on the Government website-

www.urban.maharashtra.gov.in
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Banait)
Under Secretary to Government
******
Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1996.
Sanctioned Modi cation to replace the Explanatory Note (i) to Regulation 35(4) of Development
Control Regulation for Gr. Mumbai, 1991 under Section 37(1AA)(c).
Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.
Dated:- 21st May, 2015
NOTIFICATION
No.TPB.4313/962/CR-44/2014/UD-11:
dated 20th February, 1991 so as to come into force with effect from the 25th March, 1991;
And whereas the Govt. in the Urban Development Department, vide Noti cation No. CMS
4311/452/CR-58/2011/UD-11 Dated 6th January 2012 has incorporated a new Regulation 35(4)
in the said Regulations for Compensatory Floor Space Index. As per the provisions of Regulations
35(4), the Compensatory Floor Space Index is admissible without payment of premium with
speci ed condition for redevelopment under Regulation 33(5), 33(7), 33(9), 33(10);
And whereas, the Explanatory Note (i) to Regulation 35(4) does not have suf cient clarity
regarding the applicability of Regulation 35(4) to a building under construction, which had
received IOD/IOA for a part of the building before the incorporation of Regulation 35(4) in the
said Regulation;
And whereas, the Govt., is satis ed that in the public interest it is desirable to urgently modify
the said Explanatory Note (i) to Regulation 35(4) of the said Regulation 35(4);
And whereas, the Govt., in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1AA) of
Section 37, issued a Notice of even no. dated 9th September, 2014 for inviting
suggestions/objections from the general public with regard to the modi cation proposed in the
Schedule appended to the said Notice (hereinafter referred to as ”the proposed medication”) and
appointed Deputy Director of Town Planning, Greater Mumbai as the Of cer (hereinafter
referred to as “the said Of cer”) to submit a report on the suggestions/objects received in respect
of the proposed modi cation to the Govt. after giving hearing to the concerned persons;
And whereas, the said notice was published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette (Extra
Ordinary Part-I, Konkan Division Supplementary) (hereinafter referred to as “the Of cial
Gazette”) dt. 9th September, 2014 and the said Of cer has submitted his report after completing
all legal procedure vide letter No. 145, dt. 20/02/2015.
And whereas, after considering the report of the said Of cer, the suggestions/objections
received from the general public and after consulting the Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra
State, the Government is of the opinion that the proposed modi cation should be sanctioned with
some changes.
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the
said Act, the Government hereby:-
1. A) Sanctions the proposed modi cation with some changes, as described more speci cally in
the Schedule appended hereto.
2. B) Fixes the date of publication of this Noti cation in the Of cial Gazette as the date of
coming into force of this modi cation.
3. C) Directs the said Corporation that in the schedule of Modi cation sanctioning the said
Regulations after the last entry, the Schedule referred to at (A) above shall be added.
A copy of this Noti cation shall be made available for inspection for a period of one month in
the of ce of the Chief Engineer, (Development Plan) Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.
The Noti cation shall also be available on the Govt. of Maharashtra website:
www.maharashtra.gov.in.
By order and in the name of Governor of Maharashtra.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Banait)
Under Secretary to Government.
SCHEDULE
(Accompaniment to Noti cation No.TPB 4313/962/CR-44/2014/UD-11: Dated:- 21st May, 2015)
The Explanatory Note (i) to Regulation 35(4) of the Development Control Regulation for Greater
Mumbai, 1991, is replaced as follows:
“(i) If an IOD/IOA has already been granted in respect of a building, which is under
construction and not complete on the date of coming into force of this regulation, then at the
option of the owner/developer, the regulation prevailing prior to 6th January, 2012 shall be
applicable to subsequent amendments to the IOD/IOA and to sanctioned plans, to the extent such
amendments provide for additional development in relation to such building, subject to charging
premium at the maximum rate charged for approval to Lift, Lobby, Staircase by the Municipal
Corporation of Greater Mumbai.”
Sd/-
(Sanjay Banait)
*************
The Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966
Noti cation under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the said Act.
Modi cation to the Regulation for Inclusive Housing in the Development Control Regulations of
Greater Mumbai, 1991
Dated:- 27 May, 2015
NOTIFICATION
No.TPB.4312/CR-45/2012/(2)/UD-11:
referred to as “the said Regulations”) have been sanctioned by the Government under Section
31(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “the
said Act”) vide Urban Development Department Noti cation No. DCR/1090/UD-11(RDP) dated
20/2/1991 so as to come into force with effect from the 25/3/1991;
And whereas, in furtherance of the Housing Policy of the State which provides for inclusive
housing for the Low Income Group (LIG) in private layouts, the Govt. in Urban Development
Department, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1AA)(c) of Section 37 of the
said Act, has sanctioned and incorporated a Regulation regarding Inclusive Housing in the said
Regulations of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, vide Noti cation of even No. dated
8th November, 2013;
And whereas, various organizations and individuals have represented and requested the
Government, to amend certain provisions of the Regulation for Inclusive Housing so as to make its
implementation smoother and more effective;
And whereas, after considering the representations of the various organisations and the view
of the Housing Department of the Govt. of Maharashtra and after taking into account the views
expressed by the Govt. in Urban Development Department in W.P.No. 366/2014 before the
Hon’ble High Court, Mumbai, the Government, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-
Section (1AA) of Section 37 of the said Act, had issued Notice of even no. dated 11th Sept, 2014
for inviting suggestions/objections from the general public with regard to the modi cation in
respect of Regulation for Inclusive Housing (hereinafter referred to as “the proposed
modi cation”) proposed in the Schedule appended to the said Notice and appointed the Deputy
Director of Town Planning, Greater Mumbai as the Of cer (hereinafter referred to as “the said
Of cer”) to submit a Report on the suggestions/objections received in respect of the proposed

modi cation to the Govt., after giving hearing to the concerned persons and the Municipal
Corporation of Greater Mumbai:
And whereas, the said Notice dated 11th Sept, 2014 was published in the Maharashtra
Government Gazette (Extra-Ordinary Gazette) dated 11th Sept, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as
“the Of cial Gazette”) and said Of cer has submitted his Report vide letter dt. 18.3.2015 through
the Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, after completing the legal procedure stipulated
under Section 37(1AA) of the said Act;
And whereas, after considering the Report of the said Of cer and after consulting the
Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra State, the Government is of the opinion that the
proposed modi cation is required to be sanctioned with some changes;
Now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the
1. A) Sanctions the proposed modi cation as described more speci cally in the Schedule
appended hereto.
3. C) Directs the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai that in the Schedule of Modi cation
sanctioning the said Regulations, after the last entry, the Schedule appended hereunder shall
be added.
This Noti cation shall also be available on the Govt. of Maharashtra

website:www.maharashtra.gov.in
Sd/-
(Sanjay Banait)
SCHEDULE
(Accompaniment to Noti cation No. TPB 4312/CR-45/2012/(2)/UD-11 Dated 27 May, 2015.)
Sanctioned Modi cation to Regulation for Inclusive Housing
1) The following proviso is added in Clause (1)(b):-
“Provided that in case that Landowner/Developer desires not to utilize such additional FSI in
the same land, fully or partly, then he shall be awarded TDR in lieu of such unutilized additional
FSI. The Utilisation of this TDR shall be subject to the prevailing provisions of DCR and as per the
following formula.
Formula: X = [ Rg/Rr ] x Y
Where X = Utilisation of Development Right (DR) on the receiving plot.
Rg= Land Rate in Rs. per Sq.m. as per the Annual Schedule of Rates (hereinafter referred to as
‘ASR’) of generating plot in the year when project is sanctioned.
Rr = Land Rate in Rs. per Sq.m. as per ASR of the receiving plot of the same year of
generating plot.
Y = Unutilized additional FSI.”
2) The Following two provisos are added in Clause (2)(b):-
“Provided that the equivalent Affordable Housing Plots or 20% plot area can also be provided
at some other location (s) within the same Administrative Ward of the Municipal Corporation.”
“Provided further that the equivalent Affordable Housing tenements can also be provided at
some other location(s) within the same Administrative ward of the Municipal Corporation and
such construction shall be free of FSI upto the limit of 50% of the admissible FSI of such
alternative plot.”
3) In clause 2(c), instead of words- “at the construction rates in the ASR applicable”, the words “at
rates equal to 125% of the construction rates in the ASR applicable” are inserted.
The following two provisos are added in Clause (2)(c):-
“Provided that there shall be no obligation to construct affordable Housing tenements in the
redevelopment project of any Co-operative Housing Society in which the carpet area of all existing
individual residential tenements does not exceed 80 Sq.mtr.
Provided further that in case of individual bungalow Housing Scheme, these provisions shall
not apply in case of redevelopment of individual bungalow. However, if redevelopment for total
plot under layout is proposed, these provisions shall be applicable.”
4) Clause (2)(e) is modi ed as follows:-
“e) There shall be no obligation to construct affordable housing tenements in accordance with
these provisions in any redevelopment project under Regulation 33(5), 33(7), 33(9), 33(10),
33(14), 56(3)(c), 57(4)(c) and also in development of land earmarked to the land owner/developer
as per Column No.5 of the Table, speci ed under Regulation 58(1)(b) as well as any Housing
Scheme or residential development project wherein owing to the relevant provisions of the
Development Control Regulations, more than 20% of the basic zonal FSI is required to be utilized
towards construction of residential tenements for the EWS/LIG and also for the
development/redevelopment of any land owned by the Govt., or any Semi-Govt. Organisation,
provided such development/redevelopment is undertaken by the Govt. or such Semi-Govt.
Organisation by itself or through any other agency under BOT or PPP model.
Provided that in case of development of reservation for Public Housing, Housing the
Dishoused, Public Housing/High Density Housing and the EWS/LIG tenements constructed under
the provisions of any other Act, these provisions shall not be applicable.
Sd/-
(Sanjay Banait)
*******
Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.
Sanctioned Modi cation to Regulation 35(4) of DCR for Gr. Mumbai, 1991 under section 37(1AA)
(c).
Dated:- 19th August, 2015
NOTIFICATION
No.TPB.4312/377/CR-139/2014/UD-11:
dated 20th February, 1991 so as to come into force with effect from the 25th March, 1991;
And whereas, the Govt. in the Urban Development Department, vide Noti cation No.CMS
4311/452/CR-58/2011/UD-11 Dated 6th January 2012 has incorporated a new Regulation 35(4)
in the said Regulations for Compensatory Floor Space Index and as per the provisions of
Regulation 35(4), the Compensatory Floor Space Index is admissible without payment of premium
with speci ed conditions for redevelopment under Regulations 33(5), 33(7), 33(9), 33(10), but
there is no speci c provision in Regulation 35(4) to permit Compensatory Floor Space Index (FSI)
without charging premium while granting additional FSI under the said Regulations;
And whereas, the Govt. is satis ed that in the public interest, it is necessary to urgently
incorporate in the said Regulations, speci c provision, as described in the Schedule appended
hereto, regarding the premium to be charged on the compensatory FSI while granting additional
FSI for various purposes under the said Regulations.
And whereas, the Govt. in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section (1AA) of
Section 37, issued a Notice of even no. dated 27th August, 2014 for inviting suggestions/objections
from the general public with regard to the modi cation proposed in the Schedule appended to the
said Notice (hereinafter referred to as “the proposed modi cation”) and appointed Deputy
Director of Town Planning, Brihan Mumbai as the Of cer (hereinafter referred to as “the said
Of cer) to submit a report on the suggestions/objections received in respect of the proposed
modi cation to the Govt. after giving hearing to the concerned persons;
And whereas, the said notice was published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette (Extra
Ordinary Part-I, Konkan Division Supplementary) (hereinafter referred to as “the Of cial
Gazette”) dt. 27th August, 2014 and the said Of cer has submitted his report after completing all
legal procedure to the Government;
And whereas, after considering the report of the said Of cer, the suggestions/objections
received from the general public and after consulting the Director of Town Planning, Maharashtra
State, Pune the Government is of the opinion that the proposed modi cation is required to be
sanctioned with some changes by the Government;
Now therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the
1. A) Sanctions the proposed modi cation to Regulation 35(4) of the said Regulations with some
changes by the Government and as described more speci cally in the Schedule appended
hereto.
3. C) Directs the said Corporation to add the proviso after 5th para in Regulation 35(4), as per
the Schedule referred to at (A) above.
This Noti cation shall also be available on the Govt. Of Maharashtra website
www.maharashtra.gov.in
By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,
Sd/-
(Kishor D.Girolla)
SCHEDULE
(Accompaniment to Noti cation No. TPB 4312/377/CR-139/2014/UD-11, dated 19th

August, 2015.)
The following proviso is added after 5th para in Regulation 35(4)
“Provided that in case of development under regulation 33(2) excluding buildings of private
medical institutions under regulation 33(2)(A), the fungible compensatory FSI shall be admissible
on 50% rebate in premium to be charged as per this regulation and the development under
regulation 33(3) shall be admissible without charging premium for fungible FSI.”
Sd/-
(Kishor D.Girolla)
**************
0 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn 0 WhatsApp Print 21

SHARES
©2015 All Rights Reserved MHB Laws.

Statutory Warning | Disclaimer

D.C. Regulations Mumbai - Modification Notifications - Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

D.C. Regulations Mumbai - Modification Notifications - Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

4/18/2019 D.C.

Regulations Mumbai- Modification Notifications – Maharashtra Housing and Building Laws

D.C. Regulations Mumbai- Modi cation

0 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn 0 WhatsApp Print 21

D.C. Regulations Mumbai- Modi cation Noti cations

Maharashtra Regional & Town planning Act, 1966

Sanction to Modi cation to Regulation 58(1)(b)(v) of Development Control Regulations

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032

Dated:- 17th March, 2015.

This noti cation shall also be published on the Government website-

By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.

(Sanjay Banait)

Under Secretary to Government

Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1996.

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

Dated:- 21st May, 2015

By order and in the name of Governor of Maharashtra.

(Sanjay Banait)

Under Secretary to Government.

(Accompaniment to Noti cation No.TPB 4313/962/CR-44/2014/UD-11: Dated:- 21st May, 2015)

(Sanjay Banait)

Under Secretary to Government.

The Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966

Noti cation under Section 37(1AA)(c) of the said Act.

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

Dated:- 27 May, 2015

Of cer”) to submit a Report on the suggestions/objections received in respect of the proposed

This Noti cation shall also be available on the Govt. of Maharashtra

By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.

(Sanjay Banait)

Under Secretary to Government.

(Accompaniment to Noti cation No. TPB 4312/CR-45/2012/(2)/UD-11 Dated 27 May, 2015.)

Sanctioned Modi cation to Regulation for Inclusive Housing

1) The following proviso is added in Clause (1)(b):-

Where X = Utilisation of Development Right (DR) on the receiving plot.

Y = Unutilized additional FSI.”

2) The Following two provisos are added in Clause (2)(b):-

The following two provisos are added in Clause (2)(c):-

4) Clause (2)(e) is modi ed as follows:-

By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra.

(Sanjay Banait)

Under Secretary to Government.

Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act, 1966.

Urban Development Department,

Mantralaya, Mumbai 400 032.

Dated:- 19th August, 2015

By order and in the name of the Governor of Maharashtra,

(Kishor D.Girolla)

Under Secretary to Government.

(Accompaniment to Noti cation No. TPB 4312/377/CR-139/2014/UD-11, dated 19th

The following proviso is added after 5th para in Regulation 35(4)

(Kishor D.Girolla)

Under Secretary to Government.

0 Facebook Twitter LinkedIn 0 WhatsApp Print 21

©2015 All Rights Reserved MHB Laws.

You might also like