Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:394461 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company
manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as
providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee
on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive
preservation.
TQM and CS
TQM and customer satisfaction in Malaysia’s
in Malaysia’s service sector service sector
Wen-Yi Sit
Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Malaysia 957
Keng-Boon Ooi
Faculty of Business and Finance, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Received 4 January 2009
Revised 11 April 2009
Kampar, Malaysia Accepted 24 April 2009
Binshan Lin
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationship between total quality
management (TQM) practices and customer satisfaction (CS) as perceived by managers’ perspectives
in Malaysia’s service sector.
Design/methodology/approach – The data are collected from 140 managers of Malaysia’s service
firms. The structural analysis is conducted to test the hypotheses in this paper.
Findings – Results reveal that leadership, customer focus, information and analysis, and human
resource focus are found to have significant and positive association with CS as perceived by
Malaysian service sector’s managers.
Research limitations/implications – There are a few limitations for this paper. First, the time
sequence of the relationships between the variables could not be determined since cross-sectional data
are used. Second, this paper is confined only to service industry. Lastly, the paper is only focused on
managers instead of study employees at different hierarchical levels.
Practical implications – This paper serves as a valuable guideline for top management to review
their TQM programs and conduct assessments on a regular basis in order to facilitate CS within their
organizations.
Originality/value – This paper shows the importance of TQM in contributing to CS within the
service context which is not studied in many past researches. This paper only looks at TQM practices
from the Malaysian service industries. As Malaysia is a developing country which is moving towards
the service sector, this paper will help many organizations that are in other fast growing developing
nations which are moving towards the service industry.
Keywords Total quality management, Managers, Customer satisfaction, Services, Malaysia
Paper type Research paper
consciousness by organizations over the past decade (Lau and Idris, 2001). Such
voluminous TQM literature was mainly sought to examine the relationship between
TQM and organizational performance (Montes and Jover, 2004). However, the
relationship between TQM and customer satisfaction (CS) has been neglected in
general in Malaysia’s services industry in particular. The service sector represent
about 53.4 percent of Malaysia’s gross domestic product and is a very vital component
of its economy (Ministry of International Trade and Industry, 2007). As a consequence,
studying the linkage between TQM and CS is necessary as it provides a theoretical as
well as a practical platform to the service organizations in the efforts to gain
sustainable competitive advantage. Thus, our interest is in finding out the association
between the multidimensionality of TQM and CS in the service industry and more
precisely, the Malaysian services industry.
(MBNQA) and deduced from the model of Black and Porter (1996). It is not surprising
that the elements of strategic quality management (i.e. visible commitment and support
of top management) and corporate quality culture received the biggest coverage and
were ranked as the most important TQM factors in this survey literature. Motwani
(2001) further enumerated that key practices such as top management commitment,
quality measurement and benchmarking, process management (PM), product design,
employee training and empowerment, supplier quality management, and customer
involvement and satisfaction were essential factors and relevant to organizational
performance from a TQM perspective.
Through the review of the TQM literatures, six constructs of TQM practices,
namely leadership (LD), PM, human resource focus (HR), CF, information analysis and
knowledge management, and strategic planning (SP) were selected to represent the
core of TQM practices in this study for the main reason that these practices have been
well-accepted by quality award models (i.e. MBNQA and European Excellence Model
and Quality Award) as well as some renowned scholars such as Badri et al. (1995),
Saraph et al. (1989), Flynn et al. (1994), and Ahire et al. (1996).
Customer focus
CF is referred as the degree to which an organization continuously satisfies customer
requirements and expectations (Zhang, 2000) and it is considered to be one of the basic
building blocks of TQM (Bank, 2000). In the highly competitive business environment,
one of the most vociferous pressures on management in all types of organization is to
focus on customer needs (Piercy, 1995). The key to quality management is maintaining a
close relationship with the customers, so that customers’ needs can be fully understood
and those needs are being met can be received (Zhang, 2000; Li et al., 2006). In the efforts
to pursuit CF, information about customers’ needs and wants, complaints, level of
satisfaction, etc. are gathered and analyzed (Lagrosen, 2001; Zhang, 2000; Phusavat et al.,
2009). According to the review results from Hackman and Wageman (1995), obtaining
information about customer is one of the most frequently used TQM implementation
practices.
In the contemporary global economy and turbulent market environment, it is vital for
organizations to achieve high levels of CS. Only those firms who are able to satisfy
customers’ needs and requirements are able to survive and compete effectively in
the cutthroat business playing field. To be successful, firms should recognize the need to
put customer first in every decision making or perhaps, adopt a customer-focus or
customer-centered culture. Thus, the following hypothesis is formulated:
H3. CF has a significantly positive association with CS.
Process management[1]
A process is a systematic approach for converting inputs into outputs; it is the way in
which all the resources of an organization are used in an effective and efficient manner
to achieve its goals (Zairi, 1997). A relatively new area of such improvements is
“business process management (BPM)” (Elzinga et al., 1995, p. 119). Since business
processes are considered to be the horizontal linkages between key activities that TQM and CS
impact the customer (Zairi, 1997), managing these “end-to-end” processes should be a in Malaysia’s
continuing effort if the companies are to meet customers’ specific needs and
requirements. Process capabilities and implementation determine critical aspects of the service sector
customer encounter such as speed, accuracy, courtesy, and, etc. which in due course,
determine CS (Maddern et al., 2007). In an empirical study, Kumar et al. (2008)
systematically investigated the linkages between BPM and CS. The researchers also 961
challenged the dominance of the customer contact perspectives on service processes
and had proposed a more systemic focus on the totality of service design. The results
revealed that the significance of BPM as a critical factor in driving CS.
Pritchard and Armistead (1999) have conducted a survey and case study research to
understand the application of BPM in European companies. The study was drawn on a
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
postal survey conducted with quality directors and business process managers in
organizations which are the members of the European Foundation for Quality
Management and case studies in a number of organizations regarded as being leaders
in the adoption of BPM. It is not surprising that the findings endorsed BPM as a means
to achieving business excellence (i.e. improved relationship with customers, better
cross-functional working, and a change in organizational culture). Eventually, CS is
established as well. The ultimate goal of such business excellences will undoubtedly,
result in CS. Much research has shown that effective PM, especially BPM has a positive
effect on CS. Thus, the following hypothesis was proposed:
H4. PM has a significantly positive association with CS.
Research framework
The relationship between the six practices of TQM and CS is shown in Figure 1. This
research framework was formulated and derived from the hypothesis discussed above.
Referring to the research framework, the six TQM practices are independent variables
and the construct of CS is the dependent variable. This study will focus on the
relationship of each TQM practices to CS.
TQM constructs
H1
Leadership
H2
Human resource focus
H3 Customer
Process management satisfaction
H4
Customer focus
H5
Strategic planning
H6
Information & analysis
Figure 1.
Research framework
Research methodology TQM and CS
In this section, we discuss sample and data collection procedures and operational in Malaysia’s
measures of variables used in the study as well as the statistical tests used to evaluate
the multidimensionality of TQM practices and its relationship with CS. service sector
Sampling procedures
The target population of this study was managers from the service organizations that 963
practice TQM in their operations. These TQM implementation firms were drawn from
the list of Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (FMM) Directory (2007). From this
directory, it was determined which service firms had implemented TQM. FMM is the
largest economic organization in Malaysia, representing over 2000 manufacturing and
industrial service companies of different sizes (FMM Directory, 2007). Given the
stringent rules that govern the full membership of FMM, a total of 47 percent of the 2,135
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
member organizations have been granted ISO certification (i.e. a certification that can
certified the adoption of TQM) (FMM Directory, 2007). Therefore, the selected sample is
considered to be a valid representation of the population because FMM is a
well-established and renowned representative of the manufacturing and service
industries for over 38 years. In this study, the banking and finance companies, higher
learning institutions, insurance companies, consulting service companies, hotels,
private, and public utility service organizations, courier service companies and other
related organizations were purposively targeted.
The unit of analysis for this study was the managers who possessed adequate
knowledge of their organizational practices pertaining to quality management while had
great understanding about the level of CS in their organizations. In fact, a number of
researchers also had selected this sample group (i.e. managers) as their target population
in relation to the empirical study of TQM (Samat et al., 2006; Terziovski, 2006;
Tavana et al., 2003; Vermeulen, 1996). Tavana et al. (2003) postulated that a commitment
to quality management was primarily initiated by the top management, and
departmental managers were usually more familiar with the basic principles and
terminology of quality management as compared to other levels of employees
(i.e. low-level management). Thus, this group of population was chosen as the target for
this study.
The empirical data were collected using a questionnaire survey. A random sample
of 450 managers was selected from the service organizations which have been ISO
9001:2000 certified. Only one site per organization was included in the sample. Of the
450 questionnaires originally distributed, 150 were returned with answers. This
constituted an overall response rate of 33.33 percent. Nevertheless, ten of the returned
questionnaires were not usable. This reduced the sample size by < 2 percent, leaving
an actual total sample size of 140.
Variable measurements
Independent variables: TQM practices
This measure is based on the six dimensions of TQM developed by Zhang (2000), Lau
and Idris (2001). The six dimensions namely LD, CF, SP, information sharing, PM, and
HR. Each of these TQM categories consists of five statements or items. Thus, a total of
30 statements were developed. Sample items include “Top management strongly
encourages employee involvement in quality management and improvement
IMDS activities” (LD), “Our organization has a written statement of strategy covering all
109,7 business operations which is clearly articulated and agreed by our senior manager”
(SP), “Our organization collects extensive complaint information from customers” (CF),
“Employees are encouraged to develop new and innovative ways for better
performance” (PM), and “Availability of key performance figures for analysis and
decision making” (information sharing). Respondents to these items were on a
964 five-point Likert format ranged from 1, strongly disagree to 5, strongly agree was used
to measure all the statements.
Dependent variable: CS
Similar to TQM, the measures of CS were derived and adapted from numerous existing
studies (Dimitriades, 2006; Høst and Knie-Andersen, 2004; Levesque and McDougall,
1996). Five statements were developed under this construct. Respondents
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
(i.e. managers) were asked to indicate their opinions about the CS level in their
organizations based on five-point Likert scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3,
neutral; 4, agree; 5, strongly agree). Some of the examples of the statements that
measured CS are as follows: “Customer satisfaction is an everyday priority in my
organization,” “Customers are satisfied with my organization’s products/services,” and
“My organization’s customers feel that we strive to satisfy.”
Statistical analysis
The research framework shown in Figure 1 was analyzed by using structural equation
modeling (SEM), supported by analysis of moment structures 16.0, software. Many
scholars as well as researchers have proposed a two-stage model-building process for
conducting structure equation modeling (Lin and Lee, 2004, 2005; Hair et al., 1998), in
which the confirmatory factor models were tested before testing the structural model.
The confirmatory factor models identify how hypothetical factors are measured in
terms of the observed variables such as LD, SP, IA, CF, PM, and human resource.
Moreover, the structural models identify causal associations among the latent
variables (Lin and Lee, 2004, 2005). Hair et al., (1992, p. 10) as cited by Forza and
Filippini (1998) state that in order to use this method, “an adequate sample is between
100 and 200 observations; however samples with a number of observations between 50
and 400 are also acceptable.” Thus, the sample size of the existing study (n ¼ 140)
meets the minimum requirement that 100 or more observations are desirable to
examine a SEM. This study is engaged to illustrate the causal effects and amount of
unexplained variance (Lin and Lee, 2004).
Number of
Profile respondents Category Count Percentage
After excluding these nine items, the resulting Cronbach’s a values ranged from 0.809
to 0.916, which were above the acceptable threshold 0.70 suggested by Nunnally and
Bernstein (1994) and all factor loadings, are statistically significant at p , 0.001.
However, Fornell and Larcker (1981) assert that the composite reliability is more
apposite indicator, since it takes into consideration the actual factor loadings rather than
assuming that each item is equally weighted in the composite load determining (Lin and
Lee, 2004; Molina et al., 2007). Chau (2001, p. 709) state that the construct reliability can
be computed based on the following formula: “(Square of the summation of the factor
loadings)/{(Square of the summation of the factor loadings) þ (Summation of error
variances)}.” The minimum suggested value is 0.7 (Molina et al., 2007). This analysis
was completed by computing the average variance extracted, whose minimum
recommended value is 0.5 (Molina et al., 2007, p. 691). As Table III shows, in all cases the
scales are within the accepted limits and the composite reliability of all latent constructs
exceeded the benchmark of 0.7 recommended by Nunnally (1978), indicating that the
measurement model is good. Table II shows the results of convergent validity and
internal reliability for constructs.
Moreover, Hair et al. (1998) proposed that the r-value between each pair of
independent variables in the correlation should not exceed 0.90. If there is a case that
the correlation value exceeds 0.90, it may be suspected to exhibit multicollinearity
(Hair et al., 1998). As seen in Table III, the highest value of coefficient is 0.773 (IA and
SP) which is smaller than 0.90. Therefore, it is confirming that multicolinearity is not
significantly exists among the various constructs in the measurement model (Lin and
Lee, 2004; Jun et al., 2006).
The goodness of fit of the measurement model was assessed in terms of eight
common measures: using the ratio of x 2 statistics to the degrees of freedom (df),
comparative fit index (CFI), goodness-of-fit index (GFI), adjusted goodness-of-fit index
(AGFI), normed fit index (NFI), parsimony goodness-of-fit index (PGFI), parsimony
normed fit index (PNFI), and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)
(Segars and Grover, 1998; Kaynak, 2003). According to Jun et al. (2006, p. 803), the ratio
of x 2 to the df should be less than three for an acceptable model fit. Browne and
Cudeck as cited by Jun et al. (2006, p. 803) suggest that an RMSEA value of less than
0.05 implies a “close-fit” and less than 0.08 indicates a “reasonable fit”. The results
indicated that the measurement model fitted the data as listed in Table IV. All the
model-fit (i.e. x 2/df, 1.038; p-value, 0.345; RMSEA, 0.017; NFI, 0.926; GFI, 0.904; AGFI,
TQM and CS
Standardize Average variance Cronbach’s Composite
Construct Indicator loading extrated a reliability in Malaysia’s
LD LD2 0.843 0.627 0.891 0.893
service sector
LD1 0.814
LD3 0.813
LD5 0.777 967
LD4 0.704
SP SP1 0.806 0.610 0.857 0.862
SP4 0.785
SP3 0.779
SP2 0.750
CF CF3 0.825 0.604 0.809 0.821
CF1 0.769
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
CF5 0.737
PM PM3 0.863 0.623 0.817 0.832
PM1 0.752
PM5 0.750
IA IA1 0.815 0.748 0.881 0.882
IA2 0.787
IA4 0.774
IA5 0.770
IA6 0.720
HR HR4 0.849 0.644 0.878 0.875
HR3 0.822
HR2 0.794
HR1 0.748
CS CS3 0.878 0.701 0.916 0.903
CS4 0.848 Table II.
CS6 0.823 Instrument reliability
CS2 0.797 and validity
SEM correlationsa
HR CF LD IA PM SP
HR 1.000
CF 0.527 1.000
LD 0.502 0.385 1.000
IA 0.649 0.564 0.667 1.000
PM 0.652 0.612 0.473 0.672 1.000
SP 0.674 0.574 0.696 0.773 0.673 1.000 Table III.
Latent construct
Notes: n ¼ 140; aall correlations are significant at p , 0.01 correlation
0.8047; CFI, 0.997; PGFI, 0.569; PNFI, 0.634) indices exceed the respective common
acceptance levels indicated by previous research (Kaynak, 2003; Forza and Filippini,
1998; Jun et al., 2006; Lin and Lee, 2004, 2005), indicating that the measurement model
appears to represent a fairly good fit with the data collected.
IMDS
Model-fit index Recommended value Measurement model Structural model
109,7
x 2-test statistics/df #3.00a 1.038 1.169
GFI $0.80a,b 0.904 0.867
AGFI $0.80b 0.847 0.804
NFI $0.80b 0.926 0.900
968 CFI $0.90a 0.997 0.984
RMSEA #0.08a 0.017 0.035
PGFI . 0.5c 0.569 0.586
PNFI . 0.5c 0.634 0.651
Table IV.
Measures of the model fit Sources: aJun et al. (2006, p. 803); bForza and Filippini (1998, p. 14); cKaynak (2003, p. 422)
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
Structural model. The overall results of structural model analysis are shown in
Figure 2. The structural model analysis has a very good fit as determined from the
goodness-of-fit indices (GFI) (x 2/df, 1.169; p-value, 0.024; RMSEA, 0.035; NFI, 0.9900;
GFI, 0.867; AGFI, 0.804; CFI, 0.984; PGFI, 0.586; PNFI, 0.651) as listed in Table IV. All
the model-fit indices exceeded their respective common acceptance levels, suggesting
that the structural model displayed to represent an acceptable model fit to the data
(Kaynak, 2003; Forza and Filippini, 1998; Jun et al., 2006; Lin and Lee, 2004, 2005).
Hypothesis testing. The statistical significance of all the structural parameter values
was examined to ascertain the validity of the hypothesized paths. The analytical results
indicated that HR (path coefficient, 0.085; p , 0.01), LD (path coefficient, 0.786;
p , 0.01), IA (path coefficient, 0.096; p , 0.01), and CF (path coefficient, 0.066; p , 0.01)
were found to have a significant and positive relationship with CS. Therefore, the
hypotheses H1, H2, H4, and H6 were supported. Meanwhile SP (path coefficient, 2 0.013;
r . 0.10) and PM (path coefficient ¼ 2 0.009, r . 0.10) had no significant relationship
with CS. Hence, H3 and H5 were not supported. Table V shows the hypotheses results.
TQM constructs
0.786*
Leadership
0.085*
Human resource focus
– 0.009 Customer
satisfaction
Process management
0.066*
Customer focus – 0.013
Strategic planning
Leadership 969
Optimistically, statistical result revealed that LD is found to be significant to enhance
the level of CS. The result is consistent with the findings of Pannirselvam and Ferguson
(2001) revealed an association between LD and CS. According to González and Guillén
(2002), customers’ needs are not always explicit and the profitability of necessary actions
to satisfy them is not guaranteed. In fact, pleasing the customers involve making the
right management decisions. Thus, fulfilling this principle requires a mutual vision and
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
a strong commitment on the part of all organization members; this is especially true
within the services context. In view of that, this can be achieved through effective LD
that committed to quality program implementation.
Strategic planning
It was discovered that SP is insignificant to CS. This implied that SP in the service
organizations in Malaysia failed to induce CS. The result was found to be two facets. On
one side of the coin, the result was concurred with the findings of González and Guillén
(2002) in which the researchers revealed that there were no direct or indirect effects of
strategic quality planning on CS. In contrast, the findings of Terziovski (2006) were
contradicted with the results of this study. He determined that SP was significantly
associated with CS. Kantabutra and Avery (2007) clarified that those stores without
clear mission and vision statements tend to performed significantly worse in terms of
overall customer and staff satisfaction than those with mutual visions. From the TQM
perspective, a quality policy is usually communicated via a “quality vision statement.”
Customer focus
Favorably, the result in this study demonstrated that CF is found to be significant and
contribute to the enhancement of CS within the Malaysian service organizations. This
result provides supporting evidence to the findings of Zhang (2000) where his studies
indicated that becoming CF is very important to induce CS in any organizations. The
finding of this study is also in line with the empirical results of Terziovski (2006)
where the researcher discovered that CF is an important element in companies that are
essential in promoting CS, especially when customer complaints were well rectified via
Process management
970 The dimension of PM was found to be insignificant to CS. This result is inconsistent
with the findings of Kumar et al. (2008) in which they highlighted that BPM is a critical
driving force of CS. In addition, the result of this study is also in contrast with the
findings of Pritchard and Armistead (1999) and Tarı́ (2005) where their studies
stipulated that proper PM executed by organizations is significant towards CS. As
suggested by Maddern et al. (2007), customers perceive companies to be “only as good
as their processes,” thus a far greater understanding of the nature of PM (i.e. BPM) and
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
Research implications
In this study, a contemporary research in the domain of TQM has been rejuvenated
and it has implications in both theoretical and managerial perspectives. These
implications will be discussed as follows.
Theoretical implications
From the theoretical perspectives, this study highlights the importance of TQM in
contributing to CS within the service context. The exploration of the association
between TQM practices and CS in the service industry fills the current disparity and
consequent gap in knowledge. The proposed theoretical model in this study
emphasizes those TQM elements that are particularly important in determining a high TQM and CS
level of CS towards the service providers or the service firms. In addition, there are in Malaysia’s
very limited empirical studies that investigate the multidimensionality of TQM
components which facilitate the level of CS within a service setting. Thus, this service sector
empirical study may obtain the attention from other researchers with its relatively new
concept as it identifies the circumstances that are most conducive to the establishment
of CS, particularly in the domain of TQM. 971
Managerial implications
This study provides some insight into the true worth of TQM implementation in which
it reinforces the widely held belief that LD, CF, IA, and HR are positively associated
with CS. In addition, this research study provides constructive information that helps
the practitioners to precisely identify areas of concerns and take corrective measures.
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
In fact, two elements as identified in this study (i.e. SP and PM) should be revised
prudently by the organizations to enhance their level of CS. A clear vision and mission
statements that asserts the future direction of the organization should be established
and articulated throughout the company. Apart from SP, management may need to
determine whether effective PM exists in their companies. If not, management should
perhaps re-engineer or revitalize its business processes in order to improve its overall
business performance while enhance the CS simultaneously.
This study pinpoints the importance of the impact of various TQM dimensions on
CS. Knowledge in this area will allow managers of the service organizations to direct
their resources adequately in improving the more important contributors of CS. For
instance, management may need to devote more resources in managing their human
resources and analyses of information since these two TQM areas are found to be the
most important predictors of CS.
In addition, the findings of this study also serve as a valuable guideline or yardstick
for top management to review their TQM programs and conduct it on a regular basis in
order to facilitate CS within their organizations. Consequently, management should
always considers customer’s feedback and complaints into quality improvement plans
where CS will be enhanced when these information are well attended. Also, being
customer-oriented should be treated as a continuous managerial activity. Apart from
that, top management should ensure that the information of the organization is widely
communicated and shared among all the employees. Sharing of information among
employees or leaders could form a competitive advantage to the organization. Finally,
it is imperative for organizations to have effective HRM.
972 Conclusion
In conclusion, the main purpose of this research study was to investigate the
relationships between TQM practices and CS as perceived by managers from the TQM
certified service organizations in Malaysia. The findings provided empirical evidence
that TQM have significant and positive association with CS. Finally, the findings
revealed that the dimensions of LD, CF, IA as well as HR were positively associated
with CS. Predominantly, it was found that HR as well as IA were perceived as the
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
dominant TQM practices as they have strong association with CS within the
Malaysia’s service organizations.
Note
1. PM is sometimes called process control and improvement (Zhang, 2000). The two terms are
interchangeable.
References
Adsit, D.J., London, M., Crom, S. and Jones, D. (1996), “Relationship between employee attitudes,
customer satisfaction and departmental performance”, Journal of Management
Development, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 62-75.
Ahire, S.L., Golhar, D.Y. and Waller, M.A. (1996), “Development and validation of TQM
implementation constructs”, Decision Science, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 23-56.
Andaleeb, S.S. (1998), “Determinants of customer satisfaction with hospitals: a managerial
model”, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 181-7.
Badri, M.A., Davis, D. and Davis, D. (1995), “A study of measuring the critical factors of quality
management”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 12 No. 2,
pp. 36-53.
Bank, J. (2000), The Essence of Total Quality Management, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Harlow.
Black, S. and Porter, L. (1996), “Identification of the critical factors of TQM”, Decision Sciences,
Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 1-21.
Bounds, G., Yorks, L., Adams, M. and Ranney, G. (1994), Total Quality Management: Toward the
Emerging Paradigm, McGraw-Hill, Singapore.
Brah, S.A., Wong, J.L. and Rao, B.M. (2000), “TQM and business performance in the service
sector: a Singapore study”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
Vol. 20 No. 11, pp. 1293-312.
Brookshaw, T. and Terziovski, M. (1997), “The relationship between strategic purchasing and
customer satisfaction within a total quality management environment”, Benchmarking:
An International Journal, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 244-58.
Chang, H.H. (2006), “Development of performance systems in quality management
organizations”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 765-86.
Chau, P.K.Y. (2001), “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model
comparison approach”, Decision Science, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 699-719.
Chen, W.H. (1997), “The human side of total quality management in Taiwan: leadership and TQM and CS
human resource management”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,
Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 24-45. in Malaysia’s
Ching, C.L., Jie, Y. and Li, M.Y. (2001), “The knowledge value of customers and employees in service sector
product quality”, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 20 No. 8, pp. 691-704.
Dayton, N.A. (2003), “The demise of total quality management (TQM)”, The TQM Magazine,
Vol. 15 No. 6, pp. 391-6. 973
de Jong, J.P.J. and den Hartog, D.N. (2007), “How leaders influence employees’ innovative
behavior”, European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 41-64.
Dessler, G. (2000), Human Resource Management, 8th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Dimitriades, A.S. (2006), “Customer satisfaction, loyalty and commitment in service
organizations: some evidence from Greece”, Management Research News, Vol. 29 No. 12,
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
pp. 782-800.
Elzinga, D.J., Horak, T., Lee, C.Y. and Bruner, C. (1995), “Business process management: survey
and methodology”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 24 No. 2,
pp. 119-28.
Fecı́ková, I. (2004), “An index method for measurement of customer satisfaction”, The TQM
Magazine, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 57-66.
Flynn, B.B., Schroeder, R.G. and Sakakibara, S. (1994), “A framework for quality management
research and an associated measurement instrument”, Journal of Operations Management,
Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 339-66.
FMM Directory (2007), Malaysian Industries, 38th ed., Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers,
Kuala Lumpur.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981), “Evaluating structuring equation models with unobservable
variables and measurement error”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Forza, C. and Filippini, R. (1998), “TQM impact on quality conformance and customer
satisfaction: a causal model”, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 55,
pp. 1-20.
Goetsch, D.L. and Davis, S.B. (1997), Introduction to Total Quality: Quality Management for
Production, Processing, and Services, 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
González, T.F. and Guillén, M. (2002), “Leadership ethical dimension: a requirement in TQM
implementation”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 150-64.
Hackman, J.R. and Wageman, R. (1995), “Total quality management: empirical, conceptual, and
practical issues”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, pp. 309-42.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Blank, W.C. (1998), Multivariate Data Analysis,
5th ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Hoang, D.T., Igel, B. and Laosirihongthong, T. (2006), “The impact of total quality management
on innovation: findings from a developing country”, International Journal of Quality &
Reliability Management, Vol. 23 No. 9, pp. 1092-117.
Host, V. and Knie-Andersen, M. (2004), “Modeling customer satisfaction in mortgage credit
companies”, The International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 26-42.
Ju, T.L., Lin, B., Lin, C. and Kuo, H.J. (2006), “TQM critical factors and KM value chain activities”,
Total Quality Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 373-93.
Jun, M., Cai, S. and Shin, H. (2006), “TQM practice in Maquiladora: antecedents of employee
satisfaction and loyalty”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 24, pp. 791-812.
IMDS Kantabutra, S. (2008), “Vision effects in Thai retail stores: practical implications”, International
Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 323-42.
109,7
Kantabutra, S. and Avery, G.C. (2007), “Vision effects in customer and staff satisfaction: an empirical
investigation”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 209-29.
Kaynak, H. (2003), “The relationship between total quality management practices and their
effects on firm performance”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21, pp. 405-35.
974 Kotler, P., Leong, S.M., Ang, S.H. and Tan, C.T. (1996), Marketing Management: An Asian
Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Singapore.
Kumar, V., Smart, P.A., Maddern, H. and Maull, R.S. (2008), “Alternative perspectives on service
quality and customer satisfaction: the role of BPM”, International Journal of Service
Industry Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 176-87.
Lagrosen, S. (2001), “Strengthening the weakest link of TQM – from customer focus to customer
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
Corresponding author
Binshan Lin can be contacted at: binshan.lin@lsus.edu
1. BasuRana Rana Basu Rana Basu is presently working as a Senior Research Fellow at the Indian Institute
of Technology Kharagpur. He holds BTech Degree in Computer Science and Engineering and MTech
Degree in Industrial Engineering and Management. He has published many research papers in national
and international journals as well as in conferences of repute. His research interests include quality
management issues, green supply chain management and information systems. BholaPrabha Prabha
Bhola Dr Prabha Bhola received a PhD Degree from the IIT Kharagpur. Presently she is a Full Time
Faculty at the IIT Kharagpur. Dr Bhola has successfully handled various government projects related
to entrepreneurship and innovation. She is an Economist and has published articles in peer reviewed
national and international journals of repute. Rajendra Mishra School of Engineering Entrepreneurship,
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India . 2016. Impact of quality management practices
on performance stimulating growth. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 33:8,
1179-1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
2. Muhammad Shahnawaz Adil Department of Management Sciences, IQRA University (Gulshan Campus),
Karachi, Pakistan . 2016. Impact of change readiness on commitment to technological change, focal, and
discretionary behaviors. Journal of Organizational Change Management 29:2, 222-241. [Abstract] [Full
Text] [PDF]
3. María de la Cruz Del Río-Rama, José Álvarez-García, Margarida Saraiva, António Ramos-Pires. 2016.
Influence of quality on employee results: the case of rural accommodations in Spain. Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence 1-20. [CrossRef]
4. George D. Tsiotras, Penelope G. Tsiotras, Thomas A. Fotiadis. 2016. Enabling Quality in the Tourism
Industry: An Evaluation of Business Excellence in Greek Hotels. Global Business and Organizational
Excellence 35:3, 44-57. [CrossRef]
5. Keng-Boon Ooi. 2015. TQM practices and knowledge management: a multi-group analysis of constructs
and structural invariance between the manufacturing and service sectors. Total Quality Management &
Business Excellence 26:11-12, 1131-1145. [CrossRef]
6. Manjeet Kharub, Rajiv Kumar Sharma. 2015. Investigating the role of CSF’s for successful implementation
of quality management practices in MSMEs. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and
Management . [CrossRef]
7. Carmen Jaca, Evangelos Psomas. 2015. Total quality management practices and performance outcomes in
Spanish service companies. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 26:9-10, 958-970. [CrossRef]
8. Ramjit Singh. 2015. Empirical Examination of the Impact of Total Quality Services on Hospitality
Industry Business. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism 16:4, 389-413. [CrossRef]
9. Rana Basu, Prabha Bhola. 2015. Exploring Quality Management Practices and Its Pattern Analysis in
Indian Service SMEs. Journal of Enterprising Culture 23:02, 199-235. [CrossRef]
10. Muhammad Shahnawaz Adil. 2015. Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Competitive
Priorities of the Manufacturing Performance in Karachi. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management
16:1, 37-61. [CrossRef]
11. Pratima Mishra, Rajiv Kumar Sharma. 2015. Integration of Six Sigma and ISM to improve Supply Chain
Coordination – A conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering
3:1, 75. [CrossRef]
12. M. Waqas Raja, S. Wei. 2015. Evaluating innovation performance and quality practices relationship: A
review from different industries. Tékhne 13:1, 25-33. [CrossRef]
13. Jia-Jia Sim, Garry Wei-Han Tan, Jessica C.J. Wong, Keng-Boon Ooi, Teck-Soon Hew. 2014.
Understanding and predicting the motivators of mobile music acceptance – A multi-stage MRA-artificial
neural network approach. Telematics and Informatics 31:4, 569-584. [CrossRef]
14. Mohamed Gamal Aboelmaged. 2014. Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological,
organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms.
International Journal of Information Management 34:5, 639-651. [CrossRef]
15. Garry Wei-Han Tan, Keng-Boon Ooi, Lai-Ying Leong, Binshan Lin. 2014. Predicting the drivers of
behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach. Computers in
Human Behavior 36, 198-213. [CrossRef]
16. Rana Basu, Prabha BholaAn approach to prioritize quality dimensions of IT enabled small service firms:
A study of Indian SMEs 1-6. [CrossRef]
17. Shu-Chun Chang Graduate Institute of Bio-industry Management, National Chung Hsing Univeristy,
Taichung, Taiwan Pei-Yu Chou Graduate Institute of Bio-Industry Management, National Chung Hsing
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
University, Taichung, Taiwan Lo Wen-Chien University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia . 2014. Evaluation of satisfaction and repurchase intention in online food group-buying, using
Taiwan as an example. British Food Journal 116:1, 44-61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
18. Serdar UlubeyliDivision of Construction Management, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of
Engineering, Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey. 2013. Drivers of environmental performance
of cement plants. Industrial Management & Data Systems 113:8, 1222-1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Faisal TalibMechanical Engineering Section, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India Zillur
RahmanDepartment of Management Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
M.N. QureshiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, MS University of Baroda, Vadodara, India. 2013.
An empirical investigation of relationship between total quality management practices and quality
performance in Indian service companies. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 30:3,
280-318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Norzuwana SumarjanFaculty of Hotel and Tourism Management, MARA University of Technology,
Selangor, Malaysia Susan W. ArendtApparel, Educational Studies, and Hospitality Management, Iowa
State University, Ames, Iowa, USA Mack ShelleyDepartment of Statistics and Statistical Laboratory,
Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA. 2013. Incongruent quality management perceptions between
Malaysian hotel managers and employees. The TQM Journal 25:2, 124-140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
21. Ehsan Sadeh, Veeri Chettiar Arumugam, C. A. Malarvizhi. 2013. Integration of EFQM framework and
quality information systems. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 24:1-2, 188-209. [CrossRef]
22. Keng-Boon Ooi, Voon-Hsien Lee, Alain Yee-Loong Chong, Binshan Lin. 2013. Does TQM improve
employees’ quality of work life? Empirical evidence from Malaysia's manufacturing firms. Production
Planning & Control 24:1, 72-89. [CrossRef]
23. Abdul Talib Bon, Esam M.A. Mustafa. 2013. Impact of Total Quality Management on Innovation
in Service Organizations: Literature Review and New Conceptual Framework. Procedia Engineering 53,
516-529. [CrossRef]
24. Voon-Hsien Lee, Keng-Boon Ooi, Amrik S. Sohal, Alain Yee-Loong Chong. 2012. Structural
relationship between TQM practices and learning organisation in Malaysia's manufacturing industry.
Production Planning & Control 23:10-11, 885-902. [CrossRef]
25. Saman YapaDepartment of Decision Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
2012. Total quality management in Sri Lankan service organizations. The TQM Journal 24:6, 505-517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
26. Nien-Te Kuo, Kuo-Chien Chang, Mu-Chen Chen, Chia-Lin Hsu. 2012. Investigating the Effect of
Service Quality on Customer Post-Purchasing Behaviors in the Hotel Sector: The Moderating Role of
Service Convenience. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism 13:3, 212-234. [CrossRef]
27. Siew‐Yong LamUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia Voon‐Hsien LeeUniversiti Tunku
Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia Keng‐Boon OoiUniversiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar, Malaysia
Kongkiti PhusavatKasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand. 2012. A structural equation model of TQM,
market orientation and service quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 22:3, 281-309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
28. Siew-Yong Lam, Voon-Hsien Lee, Keng-Boon Ooi, Binshan Lin. 2011. The relationship between TQM,
learning orientation and market performance in service organisations: an empirical analysis. Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence 22:12, 1277-1297. [CrossRef]
29. Keng‐Boon OoiFaculty of Business and Finance, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Petaling Jaya,
Malaysia Binshan LinLouisiana State University in Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA Boon‐In
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)
TanFaculty of Business and Finance, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia Alain Yee‐Loong
ChongFaculty of Computing and IT, INTI University College, Putra Nilai, Malaysia. 2011. Are TQM
practices supporting customer satisfaction and service quality?. Journal of Services Marketing 25:6, 410-419.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
30. Peter Nielsen and Palle RasmussenAalborg University, DenmarkChee‐Yang FongFaculty of Business and
Finance, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia Keng‐Boon OoiFaculty of Business and Finance,
Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia Boon‐In TanFaculty of Business and Finance, Universiti
Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia Voon‐Hsien LeeFaculty of Business and Finance, Universiti Tunku
Abdul Rahman, Malaysia Alain Yee‐Loong ChongDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Republic of China. 2011. HRM practices and
knowledge sharing: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower 32:5/6, 704-723. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
31. Cristóbal Sánchez‐RodríguezSchool of Administrative Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada Angel
Rafael Martínez‐LorenteFacultad de Ciencias de la Empresa, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena,
Murcia, Spain. 2011. Effect of IT and quality management on performance. Industrial Management &
Data Systems 111:6, 830-848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
32. Keng-Boon Ooi, Jia-Jia Sim, King-Tak Yew, Binshan Lin. 2011. Exploring factors influencing consumers’
behavioral intention to adopt broadband in Malaysia. Computers in Human Behavior 27:3, 1168-1178.
[CrossRef]
33. Kuo‐Chien ChangDepartment of Sports, Health and Leisure, Chihlee Institute of Technology, Banciao,
Taiwan, Republic of China Mu‐Chen ChenInstitute of Traffic and Transportation, National Chiao Tung
University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China Chia‐Lin HsuDepartment of Business Administration,
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology,Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China Nien‐Te
KuoDepartment of Tourism Management, Ming Chung University, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China.
2010. The effect of service convenience on post‐purchasing behaviours. Industrial Management & Data
Systems 110:9, 1420-1443. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
34. Salman Iqbal, Paul Toulson, David TweedHRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: 167-183.
[CrossRef]
35. Kijpokin KasemsapThe Role of Total Quality Management Practices on Quality Performance 1-31.
[CrossRef]
36. Salman Iqbal, Paul Toulson, David TweedHRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Behaviour: 1507-1523.
[CrossRef]
Downloaded by Universiti Putra Malaysia At 21:34 02 November 2016 (PT)