Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FOR
BR #231
INDEX
Sl No. Description
1 Subsoil Investigation Report
2 Lateral Soil Spring Stiffness Calculation
3 Stream Force Calculation
4 STAAD.Pro Analysis Report
5 MS Pipe Embedment Depth Calculation
6 Structural Drawing
1-
'
' Construction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam
SASEC Railway Connectivity
/39rfg? o Zl
. Borehoie No
Z'.O/-
3oring Method Used cnui'ug. /s9i*?aVq
eivvuruii.uurtnit - Zj7n1
:
EYIS&;
24 hour) EL
4 -' W7idt6re7,t
'mzd.arq 6rc1 dna-
a .l{ l2o 6 /g
.... - I :
(' /J
/a A5
-4DND
qru d t-Lvl T
Sub Contractor
Representative.
Contractor
ffi,n
{:
' . Constructicn of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam
SASEC Railway Connectivity
Zfin:P'7or4t >t".rt
dctdazt- /a1pt ,
.rj lii ;; T, ; 3;
I
gryf*n;nz
5'P/ J/n*l i
/t
/..
lJ 2zl0 r(J
tc7.c,/ /a la
lo t3
tJ z?
'L3 mzdt"- ,?.7-q/4
ti-
.. -
- J'?ND atrlt nv'Cd
I
I
I
"-1 A
,t'( uffr
I
- |
I
..al
,529'f14f9-.',#,,ri
--i--
I-' ' 3/-9Nu
-
|
i
i
4*'
Sub Contractor
Fepresentative.
IRrt"xwrrTV*
-
.,-- S
6;*;10' --
Representative
'
ffi
r"-
-
. Construction cf Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam
SASEC Railway Connectivity
(/,,+y,
,A)
^4 4<" H5 to /J 3/ 14 PTEa 4re7 /ixa-
-64rvD ,
4'-I
L-1 4( 4t 27 5o
4=e! T.lq\--L[ rr
Sub Contractcr
Representative. Representative, e's. Ma*Affd'm.i,hr*;
Senior lnspectioir & Testing $peciatrst
ALDLP of Bangladesh RailvraY
a\
Construction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into
Dual Gauge betweeni
Akhaura - Laksam
SASEC Railway ConnectivitY
'". /39+5v4'339
*--*:--22=d/-i7 4a'5ry
d; Depth of Borehole
chainaoe /'3-
Boring Method Used :
91Ms_.___ - - --!-Z']-JZ
BH Water Level(RL)
"
. ?'bn
24hour) 't, r51r61hez tzv<-/'
of
'-1il --- *:,t]lT
Blow Count SPT N-Value Change i
cl Sample Type Depth Strata bepm i Description of Soil Strata
(m) 150 150 150 300 Kg-cm
- ,--
No and No.
mm mm mm l:--*jtftaroao-a1ry-
(m)
L I
'V- IJ g,o ,. K 24 23 47
IJ ld.t g', 14 /€:92
$ :
/z'o ', lz ' z/ 23:41
lJ :/it' 9 li
-Ti-;L^Lq \?
4b!uo-ot-t+ Enqr. ffid Abdul MonaYtm-
Sub Contractor Sen ior lnspefi 0{t& shh! S0eciaitst
of Borehole 40 ,rD
water Level(RL) ,' ffi
rr'7d. 33?
r/- 5J
tj , /2'f i{ zr - -rs 3,
tJ ,2r lo lz /L
, tt /3
5J t24'o i
?1!. f i E t/z
4z1a/'
"o7
frfrf>oW
ru"-ot-'tr
Sub Contractor
lO. AnOut MonaYem
Representative.
Construction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam
SASEC Railway Conhectivity
l, , t39+576'
RL ',:
5. i?o4 "3?
Depth of Borehole 4c';rl
Water Level (RL) :
2t 5J 3/5 2- 3
tC ,!2
JJ 360 23 36 /4
/J 3l '5b
+
405 22- 5o
4EPt-'
{-i-or' z'4u1'
.24*ol-lT
Sub Contractor
ffiem
senPffi$fffi
li r
r!! Snetiai ist
Representative. rriil''"' '
ALDTP'of Sangta':e5n
:1" Cormtruction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam'
SASEC Railway Connectivity
I 33 /"5 2 2 2_
,3'O I .2 7 3
tt €'o O ./ -7 L l
(? ,9'o 4 ld /4 26
9 // t/2'o,4 g 70',7?
/s0 /4 /v
br- oL '*tt-
Sub Contractor En g r. IVlQhilS[cilMon aYem
Representative. Sen io r lfr$86f; tf Btd$lFg i', e; ;;"t
ALDLP of Bangtariesh Ratlv'raY
Construction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into
Dual Gauge between
Akhaura - Laksam
/, SASEC Railway Connectivity
<be,
Sub Contractor Contractor
Representative. 'epresentative Enq; MEeAffiTAIiEnaYem
Sen'ilr tffietmB'ffi
trE Sneciaiist
RailvvaY
AL0LF of Banglarle$h
4
f: Construction of Dual Gauge Double Rail line and Conversion of Existing Rail line into Dual Gauge between
L Akhaura - l-aksam
SASEC Railway Connectivity
RL : 5.J'oa4
Depth of Borehole ,., ?2,o r-,)
:tion Date , 3l-rO /'/ 7 Ground Water Level (RL) '
na.tnoJu-r.l--VOz"*7-
9!:rr:__ /P+6/7-4?9
B i vv,;al' * t tii D r-ro r@DZ-xuV*r6r
24hour) flf/ao kwt "
-z
Sample Type Depth
Blow Count SPT N-Value
torque
Changeof i
mm mm nnm mm
(m)
-- 4--Z
3s s/ s , /Z
Z/, { /z_
iSqs /8 3D /f 45
34'a 4 4
's7f 2b ?-g
4 '-::r--_!_-5"Gw-:
;{os 'ze 35 , &rf 5t
ar/
LS 4sv
Depth of Borehole
ainase
lll.:--
igI3l'i !:':i €
'.-/gg473ry"V74
1
fr,o- -+
"5e
BHGilL*W:
ii+l..rrl
' ' :ZgeP
C{nfucq lew/-
',',:
nrt
I SS /,J- 7
19'o L
2 95
u.o 5-6
4 77
iii'j
lz
'f t, - Uanv d''tb e/tY
i2v
lg i/5,,/9,,37
/f.O ' tS /9 /? 3g
fiJstu' ff{r-Lotb-
Consultant
Sub Contractor Eng r. llfidp&bduhfilonayem
Representative.
Senio, lnsoer:tron E Testing Specjalist
No.
of Borehole :::
of Borehole '' JZ O
d Water Level (RL) :
lT1H ,i#L.n*
SL Sample Typa I
Description of Soil Skata
rEn
V No. and No. , (m) 150 IJU
(m)
I
,
mm mm mm
iJ 'u5
l
tt
i
lL t/ :/9 A 7 2_2_1
4 "./?5 -/ 34 v
/r
l
,)
22f 3 i I 7 /Z
u ,21'0'3 3
2J-a I '2 2 ,7 .
/4 Zo
,30'o (0 t3 /7
j) /*'
qru" ^.
firy-"4^1
L0v
Sub Contractor \* Contractor
Engr.
Representative. : Representative.
Senior I
No.
Depth of Borehole
Lever(RL) o
Water
er24 hour) eq
'JhJArf tp:,<t,
Blow Count SPT N-Value
SL $ample Type Depth lorque Description of Soil Strata
skata 6eoth
No. and No. (m) 150 150 150 Kg-cm (m)
i
mm mm mm
2t 5J 3rf o 96
,/
36.0 23
,fvs 21 , 15 :5:
,24
4 Ir
b6 ,bd itq
t, 75 5 so
The initial stiffness, KH, of an individual soil spring located at depth z is given as,
KH = 2.0 * t * Es
where
t = thickness of the soil layer represented by the spring, in
Es = Young’s modulus for soil at depth z, lbf/in²
The soil spring stiffness values are calculated at 1.5 meter interval upto the depth of embedment as per the subsoil
investigation report,
Increase in Young's
Depth from River Bed, Z Young's Modulus for Modulus for Initial Stiffness, KH
Thickness of Layer, t (in)
(ft) Cohesive Soil, Es Cohesionless Soil, AE (kN/m)
(lbf/in²) (lbf/in²/ft)
59 4.92 3920 80948
59 9.84 3920 80948
59 14.76 440 134109.36
59 19.68 440 178812.48
59 24.6 440 223515.6
59 29.52 440 268218.72
59 34.44 660 469382.76
Local Scour
Laursen's Method
Stream Pressure
P avg = K * (V avg ) 2
where
P avg = average steam pressure, in pounds per squre foot
V avg = average velocity of water in feet per second
when
P avg = average steam pressure, in kN per squre meter
V avg = average velocity of water in meter per second
then
P avg = 0.5148 * K * (V avg ) 2
2
P1 = 0.5148 * 1 * 4.2 = 2.18422 kN/m
Job Information
Engineer Checked Approved
Name: UDAYAN
Date: 30-Jul-18
Project ID
Project Name
Section Properties
Prop Section Area Iyy Izz J Material
(in2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 PIPE 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3 STEEL
2 Taper 25.370 309.129 909.354 3.704 STEEL
Supports
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg)
1 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
3 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
7 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
9 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
13 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
15 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
19 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
21 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
25 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 1 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
2
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Supports Cont...
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg)
37 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
39 Fixed Fixed Fixed - - -
128 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
129 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
130 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
131 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
134 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
135 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
136 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
137 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
140 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
141 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
142 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
143 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
146 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
147 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
148 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
149 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
152 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
153 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
154 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
155 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
158 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
159 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
160 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
161 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
164 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
165 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
166 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
167 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
170 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
171 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
172 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
173 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
176 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
177 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
178 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
179 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
182 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
183 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
184 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
185 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
188 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
189 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
190 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 2 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
3
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Supports Cont...
Node X Y Z rX rY rZ
(kip/in) (kip/in) (kip/in) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg) (kip-ft/deg)
191 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
194 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
195 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
196 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
197 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
200 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
201 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
202 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
203 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
206 - - 1.02E+3 - - -
207 - - 1.28E+3 - - -
208 - - 1.53E+3 - - -
209 - - 2.68E+3 - - -
Y
X
Z
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 3 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
4
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
1 DEAD LOAD
Selfweight
Direction Factor Assigned Geometry
Y -1.000 ALL
Floor Load
Direction Pressure Member Group
kN/m2
GY -0.007929 STAGING
Floor Load
Direction Pressure Member Group
kN/m2
GY -4.788 STAGING
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 4 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
5
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Reaction Summary
Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment
Node L/C FX FY FZ MX MY MZ
(kN) (kN) (kN) (kN-m) (kN-m) (kN-m)
Max FX 9 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 262.630
0.437 3 0.447 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FX 33 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 262.633
-0.438 3 0.447 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FY 25 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 308.975
0.106 3 0.744 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FY 128 1:DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.000 3.224 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max FZ 128 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 0.000
0.000 59.461 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min FZ 170 3:COMBINATION LOAD CASE 3 0.000
0.000 -25.166 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MX 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MX 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MY 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MY 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Max MZ 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Min MZ 1 1:DEAD LOAD 0.140 33.313 0.103 0.000 0.000 0.000
Utilization Ratio
Beam Analysis Design Actual Allowable Ratio Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix
Property Property Ratio Ratio (Act./Allow.) (in2) (in4) (in4) (in4)
1 Taper Taper 0.606 1.000 0.606 AISC- H1-3 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
3 PIPE PIPE 0.571 1.000 0.571 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
5 PIPE PIPE 0.521 1.000 0.521 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
6 Taper Taper 0.041 1.000 0.041 AISC- H2-1 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
8 PIPE PIPE 0.105 1.000 0.105 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
10 PIPE PIPE 0.038 1.000 0.038 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
11 Taper Taper 0.041 1.000 0.041 AISC- H1-3 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
13 PIPE PIPE 0.105 1.000 0.105 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
15 PIPE PIPE 0.038 1.000 0.038 AISC- H1-3 1 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
16 Taper Taper 0.041 1.000 0.041 AISC- H1-3 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
18 PIPE PIPE 0.106 1.000 0.106 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
20 PIPE PIPE 0.038 1.000 0.038 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
21 Taper Taper 0.041 1.000 0.041 AISC- H1-3 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
23 PIPE PIPE 0.105 1.000 0.105 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
25 PIPE PIPE 0.038 1.000 0.038 AISC- H1-3 1 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
26 Taper Taper 0.041 1.000 0.041 AISC- H2-1 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
28 PIPE PIPE 0.105 1.000 0.105 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
30 PIPE PIPE 0.038 1.000 0.038 AISC- H1-3 3 23.860 1.11E+3 1.11E+3 2.22E+3
31 Taper Taper 0.606 1.000 0.606 AISC- H1-3 3 25.370 909.362 309.131 3.704
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 5 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
6
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 6 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
7
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 7 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
8
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 8 of 9
Job No Sheet No Rev
9
Part
Software licensed to
Job Title DESIGN - ANALYSIS OF TRMPORARY STAGING FOR BR_231 Ref
Print Time/Date: 02/08/2018 10:55 STAAD.Pro V8i (SELECTseries 6) 20.07.11.45 Print Run 9 of 9
ALL-PILE Version 6 CivilTech Software www.civiltech.com Licensed to
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
10.0 50 157.1 157.1 47123.9 199938 1.203
Steel (smooth)
10.5 18.2 35.0 0.0 16.29 29
11 Fine Sand 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
Loads:
Load Factor for Vertical Loads= 1.0
Profile:
Pile Length, L= 10.0 -m
Top Height, H= 0.000 -m
Slope Angle, As= 0
Batter Angle, Ab= 0
Vertical capacity:
Weight above Ground= 0.00 Total Weight= -7.21-kN *Soil Weight is not included
Side Resistance (Down)= 454.622-kN Side Resistance (Up)= 271.230-kN
Tip Resistance (Down)= 112.550-kN Tip Resistance (Up)= 0.000-kN
Total Ultimate Capacity (Down)= 567.172-kN Total Ultimate Capacity (Up)= 264.018-kN
Total Allowable Capacity (Down)= 359.356-kN Total Allowable Capacity (Up)= 128.403-kN
OK! Qallow > Q
Settlement Calculation:
At Q= 350.00-kN Settlement= 0.05860-cm
600
540
480
Compression Load, Qdw -kN
420
360
300
240
180
120
60
0
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 0.34 0.36 0.38 0.40
Settlement, X -cm
Total Side Tip
9000 9000
8100 8100
7200 7200
Compression Capacity, Qdw -kN
6300 6300
4500 4500
3600 3600
2700 2700
1800 1800
900 900
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Foundation Depth, L -m Foundation Depth, L -m