You are on page 1of 7

Tender no. & Ref.

: 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to


PGN/COPI

To : JOB PERTAMINA-TALISMAN JAMBI MERANG


PHE TOWER, 12th Floor
Jl. TB. Simatupang, Kav. 99
Jakarta 12520

Att. : Procurement Committee

Subject: Clarification Request


Tender: Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI
Tender No.: 1000372R1

Dear Sir,
With reference to the above subject and Tender reference, we would like to submit the
clarification / question related this tender process. Detail clarification / question as per
the attached table

Thank you for your attention and cooperation.

Jakarta, ….. February 2017


PT. sarku Enjinering Utama

M. Oskar Indarto
Director
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

Detail Clarification / Question:

Tender Doc. Description of Clarification/ Reason For


Ref. Exception including suggested modification Clarification
to the Draft Contract

Contractor verification work shall include but not limited to:


1. Verification of existing condition:
a. Soil Investigation (3 points as per company spec)
Ref. 1 : Exhibit C Clarification:
– Scope of Work,  Company to advise the soil investigation data (3 points) and provide (if any). Seems soil
Point 02-01, data available is from 2002/2003, which may differ to current condition. This may
Engineering significantly affect the structural design and/or scope of work.
Endorsement
c. Tie Beam Coring Test (4 points of verification)
Ref. 2 :
Bore Pile e. Tie Beam – Bored Pile Connection (Development Length)- 6 Points
Verification using Clarification:
Plaxis 3D -  Company to advise the tie beam coring data (4 points) and tie beam - bored pile
B-84555-MA- connection (6 point), Company to provide the data (if any). Tie beam rebar calculation
SS0-DRT-JY-00- that is available on document "Bore Pile Verification using Plaxis 3D" (B-84555-MA-
0001 SS0-DRT-JY-00-0001) page 164 stated that some of tie beam bars are inadequate.
Hence, strengthening of tie beams may be needed. Therefore, refer to Ref.1 page 49,
this may cover as an additional work.

Ref. 1 : Exhibit C Contractor verification work shall include but not limited to:
– Scope of Work, 2. Verification of DED data:
Point 02-01, a. Final structural frame fender model and calculation
Engineering Clarification:
Endorsement  Frame fender AFC drawing (B-85001-MA-CC0-DDD-JY-00-0001) has been received in
Company Supplied Data (Ref.2). However, the latest STAAD PRO analysis file and
Ref. 2 : Exhibit G calculation is needed for future verification.
- Company
Supplied Data.
b. Connection of cone/rubber fender to frame fender detail design
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

Clarification:
 No detail drawing and calculation found for this specific item. Company to advise.

c. Connection of frame fender to Bored Pile and/or Tie Beam/Concrete Slab


Clarification:
 No detail drawing and calculation found for this item . Company to advise.

d. Corrosion protection specification for frame fender structure (Coating Spec)


Clarification:
 Company to advise Standard Specification Document for coating as a reference.

e. Tie Beam Rebar development length calculation for Fixed Head Type Connection
Clarification:
 Tie beam rebar calculation that is available on document "Bore Pile Verification using
Plaxis 3D" (B-84555-MA-SS0-DRT-JY-00-0001) page 164 stated that some of tie beam
bars are inadequate. Hence, strengthening of tie beams may be needed. Therefore,
refer to Ref.1 page 49, this may cover as an additional work.

f. Software for structure using STAAD PRO


Clarification:
 Company to provide soft file of STAAD PRO analysis for future verification.

g. Software for soil using 3D finite element (Plaxis 3D)


Clarification:
 Company to provide soft file for Plaxis 3D analysis for future verification.
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

Ref. 1 : MOM
Pre-Bid

On Ref.1, states that:


1. Tie rods are severely deteriorated (+ 50% from total 144 nos tie-rods are considered
fail as per Tie-Rods Assessment Report by OEE/AI).
2. Mooring bollards are failed, and currently using temporary bollards.
3. Sheet piles are severely corroded.

Clarification:
 Company may subject to additional work regarding tie-rods, mooring bollards, or sheet
piles that may need to be replaced.
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

Ref. 1 : Exhibit G Clarification: Discrepancy


- Company  Ref.1, Ref.2 and Ref.3 shown different configuration for the frame fender, especially in between drawing
Supplied Data - fender bottom member. Note that the Plaxis 3D and STAAD PRO analysis found are and analysis open
Fender Framing based on model Ref.2 and Ref.3 (similar). Company to advise which one to follow. the possibility of
Plan & View changes in fender
Drawing (B-  Ref.1 size and
85001-MA-CC0- configuration.
DDD-JY-00- Moreover,
0001) discrepancy in
bottom fender
Ref. 2 : Exhibit G elevation may
- Company impact to
Supplied Data - construction time
Bore Pile window to wait for
Verification using the low tide.
Plaxis 3D
(B-84555-MA-
SS0-DRT-JY-00-
0001), Appendix
B and C
 Ref.2
Ref. 3 : Exhibit G
- Company
Supplied Data -
Constructability
Report Matak
Jetty Repair
Project
(B-84555-MA-
YY4-DRT-JY-00-
0001 ), page 24
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

 Ref.3

Ref. 1 :
Constructability
Report Matak
Jetty Repair
Project
(B-84555-MA-
YY4-DRT-JY-00-
0001 ), page 26

Ref. 2 : Exhibit C
– Scope of Work,
page 46

Clarification:
 On Ref.1, looks like no backfill on the sacrificial stagger location. However, Ref.2 stated
that the excavated area may be backfilled and compacted. Company to confirm.
Tender no. & Ref. : 10003726R1 & Piping Installation from Grissik Metering Station to PGN/COPI

 No details found on the arrangement or standard specification for the sacrificial stagger.
Company to confirm.

You might also like