Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Penn State University Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Soundings:
An Interdisciplinary Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
MICHAEL W. KAUFMAN
Mr.Kaufmanhastaughtcoursesin Shakespeare,Renaissancedrama,Eng-
lish drama,and moderndrama at CornellUniversity. In the fall he will
of New York at Albany.He
move to a new post at the State University
has publishedessayson Shaw, Pinter,Ibsen, O'Casey, and Black theatre.
139
morewomenthanmen).Mostofthegildsweresocialorganiza-
tionswhoseprimaryfunction waspreparingforand participat-
ing in the feastdays. In these cases women'sparticipationis
not surprising.But even in the religiousgilds whereaffairs
weremanagedbypriests, womenwereadmittedas laymembers.
Occasionally,as in the case of the Hull gild of the Blessed
Virginand theGildof CorpusChristi,womenhelpedto found
the organization.Mostsignificantly, gildsof
of the eighty-five
craftmostadmittedwomen,allowing them equal opportunities
and applyingto them equal penaltiesthat the by-lawspre-
scribed:theyelected officersand participatedin feastdays,
and couldbe suedfordebtsand punishedformisdeeds.Several
of thosecraftgildsthatdid notoriginally acceptwomenmade
exceptionsforwidowswhosehusbandshad been gild-brothers.
In othergildsthereseemsto havebeen legitimate reasonswhy
womenwere excluded,usuallyconnectedwiththe natureof
theoccupation.The Young Scholars,forexample,wereprob-
ablystudying forthepriesthood;theshipmen,smiths, and cord-
wainersengagedin verystrenuousphysicalwork.
The important positionthatwomenheld in SouthernEuro-
pean societiesof the eleventhcenturyhas been describedby
Herliby.13EileenPowerhas thisto sayofthefreedomafforded
womentradersand thefemmasole,and describesthe degree
of independencelower-class womenexperienced:
A glanceat any manorial"extent"willshow womenvilleinsand
cotterslivingupon theirlittleholdingsand renderingthe same
servicesfor themas men; some of theseare widows,but many
of themare obviouslyunmarried.. . . Womenperformedalmost
everykindof agriculturallabour,withtheexceptionof the heavy
businessof ploughing.They oftenacted as thatcher'sassistants,
and on manymanorstheydid thegreaterpartof sheep-shearing,
whilethe care of the dairyand of the smallpoultrywas always
in theirhands.14
In the towns women also possessed a degree of economic
independence and were crucial to the growingclothindustries:
Of the fivehundredcraftsscheduledin EtienneBoileau'sLivre
des Métiersin medievalParis,at least fivewere theirmonopoly,
and in a large numberof otherswomenwere employedas well
as men. ... In all the greatcloth-working Florence,the
districts,
Netherlands,England, women are to be found carryingout the
preliminary processes of the manufacture. Spinningwas,indeed,
theregularoccupationof all womenand the "spinster's" habitual
IV
The forcesthatgave riseto the Renaissanceradicallytrans-
formedmostaspectsof Englisheconomicand sociallife.The
changefroman agrariancommunity to an urbanmarketplace
helped to accelerate and extend woman's subjugation.The
enclosuremovement, forexample,whichallowedrichlandlords
V
EnglishRenaissanceliterature is incrediblyrichand diverse,
perhapsthe greatestefflorescence of the human imagination
in Westerncivilization.Despite its rich however,its
diversity,
underlying and consistentconception of woman is not much
different fromthatof the Middle Ages: she is stillan object,
eitherofspiritualcontemplation or ofsexualsubservience. The
dramaticpolaritiesof theseattitudesare clearlyexpressedin
twoof thedominatingmodesof Elizabethanlove poetry.The
firstis the Petrarchanlyric,wherethe Neoplatonizedcult of
love parallels the medieval courtly romancers' spiritual
apotheosisof woman. The second is Ovidian eroticpoetry,
"borderedwithbulls and swans,"followingthe Latin poet in
deployingOlympianmyths,givinga sortof divineembellish-
menttothedeliciousjoysofsexualunion,all thewhileextolling
the libertinecredo thatwomenweremade formen'spleasure
and describingthesureand easysuccessof a manwitha maid.
ChristopherMarlowe's"Hero and Leander,"one of the best
poems in thistradition,providesan ironicperspectiveon the
coy,chastemistress of thesonnetsas wellas an unusualinsight
intothe natureof pastoralpleasures:
Andthenhe wooedwithkisses, and at last
As shepherds do,heron thegroundhe laid,
Andtumbling intothegrass,he oftenstrayed
Beyondtheboundsofshame,inbeingbold
To eyethosepartswhichno eyeshouldbehold.
No extendedanalysisof the sexual attitudesimplicitin this
kind of poetryis necessary;the RenaissanceOvidian poems
existin the same traditionas the medievalpastourelle, where
theactorswerenotshepherdsand shepherdesses butchevaliers
* Thesecataloguesitemizing intoconven-
thelady'scharmsquicklypetrified
tionalexpression.The graphiewhichstartedat her hair and terminated at
herfeetprovideda topographical mapoftheladyofsurprising detail.Shake-
theonebeginning
speare'ssonnetstothe"darklady,"particularly "Mymistress'
eyes are nothinglike the sun,"depend on thisconventionfortheirironic
effect.
ofauthoritybehindthepossessiveattitudetowardwomenwhich
theyexpress.The removalof womanfromthe home of her
familyand hertransferrai tothehomeofthemanwhosedomes-
ticated servantshe becomes is embodied in the ceremony
anthropologists call "purchaseof theright."Such an economic
transactionand woman'ssubsequentdomesticreification-akin
tothepurchaseofcattle,fromwhichthewordchatteletymologi-
callyderives-is the foundationof the patriarchalfamily,the
fundamental institution upon whichmale supremacyis based.
Whatis so striking aboutTheShrewis Shakespeare'scareful
juxtaposition of two radicallyconflicting attitudestowardcourt-
ship and domestic relations.Petruchio's brutallypracticalsense
of marriageas an economicmergerand an efficient business
throwssharpcontraston thesubplotwherea triadofidealizing
suitorselevateBianca to a romanticpedestal.The different
impulsesbetweenthe courtshipslead withthe sureness of
inevitabilityto the drasticallydifferingresultsof the marital
relationships,stressingwitha puritanicaldidacticismthe con-
stantoppositionbetweenromantic idealizingand conjugalpart-
nership. Romantic love may be an emotionally compellingpas-
sion,butit has littleto do withthepracticalbusinessof getting
on in the world*;indeed, it is bound to distortthe proper
orderof a household.
AlthoughTheShrewis primarily a playthatextolsthemiddle-
of
classmarriage convenience, itis also interestingas a redaction
of two long-held masculine myths about woman: the
Shrewand thePatientGriselda.Whatevertheirpreciseorigin,
probablygoing back to the contrastbetweenPenelope and
Clytemnestra in Greek literature,these femininestereotypes
emergedfromthe medievalsatireson the sex, representing
two aspectsof the querelledesfemmes. The meek,submissive
Griseldaepitomizedthe ideal of propermasculinedominance
and wifelyobedience,whilethe Shrewdidacticallyservedto
presentthe consequencesof "unnatural"domesticrelations.
♦JulietMitchell,"The LongestRevolution,"NewReview(Nov.-Dec, 1966),
pointsoutthatmonogamy
p. 15.Mitchell precedestheidea oflovein Western
culture."The two[notions]have subsequently been officiallyharmonized,
but thetensionbetweenthemhas neverbeen abolished.There is a formal
betweenthevoluntary,
contradiction contractual characterof 'marriage'and
thespontaneous, characterof love'- thepassionthatis celeb-
uncontrollable
ratedpreciselyforitsinvoluntaryforce."This seemsto be theeffectof the
plotjuxtapositionin TheShrew.
VI
WhatI have attemptedto traceis the drasticrestrictionof
woman's once integralpositionin the economic and social
milieu.DuringtheMiddleAges,whenthevillageand thehome
werecentersof important womenwerebusy,impor-
activities,
powerful.Betweenthetwelfth
tant,and relatively and the six-
teenthcenturiesthe majorityof women were systematically
denied the legal and customarylibertiestheyhad formerly
experienced,untilthe spreadof mercantilecapitalismand the
coalescenceofReformation and bourgeoisideologysuccessfully
isolatedherwithinthedomestichousehold.The rolestructures
* I referhere to the
playThe Tamingofa Shrewwhichfora long while
was consideredShakespeare'ssource.In recentyearsspeculationhas arisen
concerningwhetherA Shrewis merelya memorialreconstruction or a bad
quartoof Shakespeare'splay,or whetherit was writtenlaterand based on
TheShrew.The chronologyand the degree of Shakespeare'sindebtedness
are not at issue here. The importantfactis thatShakespeare'sKatherine
argues fromdifferent groundsthan the analogous characterin A Shrew.
* Evenas procreative
agentRenaissancetheorists
allowedwomanno untar-
nishedglory.For if the Churchremindedpeople thatchild bearingwas
woman'spenancefororiginalsin,sixteenth-century anatomists
taughtthat
the childwas carriedby the male'ssperm.Thus whenin the seventeenth
centuryLeeuwenhoekfirstput semenunder the microscopeand saw the
wriggling"animalcules,"he was convincedthathe had'but confirmedthe
long-heldtheoryofthehomonculus, themale'sbabieswhichhe merelypassed
on to thewomanfornurturing.
NOTES