SNRHA

Southern Nevada Regional HousingAuthorit_y

Tuesday, May 8, 2019

Post office 5ox 1897
Las Vegas, NV 89125
(702) 922-6800
TTY (702) ;,87-1898 Honorable Mayor John J. Lee
City of North Las Vegas
2250 Las Vegas Boulevard North
North Las Vegas, NV 89030

Subject: Special Report to the Mayor and Councilmembers for the City of North Las Vegas
,5c.ott l)lack
from the Executive Director and Secretary-Treasurer to the Board of Directors of the
Chairperson
Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority concerning City of North Las Vegas
Sa~eSedera appointee Resident Commissioner Ms. Teresa Davis
Vice Chairperson
Mayor Lee,
CedricC,rear
Commissioner This enclosed report details the conclusion of an investigation that began in September
2018 and ended in April 2019 which documents actions and activities ranging from possible
Chc~IDavis abuse of power, fraud, and embezzlement by City of North Las Vegas appointee Resident
Commissioner Commissioner Ms. Teresa Davis.

Sharon Davis
Through her actions and activities Ms. Davis seemingly has participated in the fraud,
Commissioner
waste, mismanagement and abuse of the agency as a Commissioner and HCV Program
Misha Hooks Participant, and appears to have engaged in unethical and illegal performance of the
Commissioner agency's resources.

DanK.Shaw
The staff of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority is not a law enforcement
Commissioner
entity and therefore can't make any legal judgments or decisions on this matter. However,
Theresa Davis we believe the facts and evidence are so clearly disturbing that we are compelled to bring
Commissioner this to your attention.

Lawrence Weck19
Commissioner
At the time of this report's submission we are simultaneously referring this matter for
potential criminal investigation and prosecution by the U.S. Department of Housing and
Chad Williams Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General.
Executive Director

Chad Williams
Executive Director
 Special Report to the Mayor and Councilmembers for the
City of North Las Vegas from the
Executive Director and Secretary-Treasurer to the Board of Directors of the
Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority

Tuesday, May 8, 2019

Submitted by:
Chad Williams, Executive Director and Secretary-Treasurer

Written by:
Theodore C. Tulle, Deputy Executive Director

Contributing Writers:
Ebony Bell, Housing Programs (Section 8) Fraud Investigator
Martha Floyd, Resident Program Coordinator
Paula Tucker, Family Self-Sufficiency Coordinator

Submitted to:
City of North Las Vegas
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Public and Indian Housing
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Las Vegas Field Office
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector General
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report details the conclusion of an investigation that began in September 2018 and ended
in April 2019 which documents actions and activities ranging from possible abuse of power, fraud, and
embezzlement by Commissioner Ms. Teresa Davis (aka Teresa Tippens, Teresa Davis-Tippens, Teresa,
Peebles, and/or Teresa Davis-Peebles). Ms. Davis was appointed to the Board of Commissioners for the
Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority (SNRHA) on January 4, 2016. Her appointed term, from the
City of North Las Vegas, is scheduled to end on January 4, 2020. Ms. Davis has been a program
participant in the Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8) since November 9, 2007.

This investigation was triggered as a result of certain continuous actions being taken by Ms.
Davis for which staff considered to be an abuse of power. After a change in the leadership at the
Chairperson position for the Board of Commissioners of the Southern Nevada Regional Housing
Authority, in September 2018, staff felt comfortable to bringing this to the Executive Director's
attention. As a result, the Executive Director, after speaking with HUD officials, authorized the launching
this investigation.

This report spans the period between March 2016 and April 2019, and reveals in our opinion
absolute a·nd substantiated evidence that Ms. Davis probably has falsified information, created fictitious
fact patterns, and manipulated events and circumstances to place herself in the most advantageous
position with regard to the receiving benefits from the Housing Choice Voucher Program (commonly
called Section 8, or "HCV"). At best, Commissioner Theresa Davis' actions might be classified as
unethical. However, without a doubt, her actions clearly could be seen as fraudulent, and constitute a
waste of taxpayer dollars. In addition there is evidence that points to her possible abuse power and
maybe illegal use of public funds. In furtherance, depending on your view point, Commissioner Davis's
action may even rise to the level of embezzlement of public funds, and obstructing justice by intimidating
staff to stop them from investigating her actions and activities for referral to the HUD Office of the
Inspector General. In fact, Ms. Davis on nurrierous occasions during this investigation has taken direct
and indirect actions to cause unwarranted harm, damage, and embarrassment to staff members with
the intention of unjustly removing staff members from the agency to obstruct justice.

As a member of the Board of Commissioners each, individual, Commissioner is held to the

highest ethical standards as they represent the public at-large and provide a voice for the appointing
jurisdiction and residents of our public housing communities and housing choice voucher participants.

The results of the investigation yielded that Commissioner Theresa Davis has repeatedly
manipulated the data, with regard to her household income, and the composition and number of people
in her household, to obtain a rental unit with the optimum number of bedrooms with her paying the
lowest shared portion of the rent while the Federal government, through HUD, represented by SNRHA
pays the highest shared portion of the rent. In fact, most recently, Ms. Davis landlord has reported she
has fraudulently negotiated with the landlord to pay illegal side payments and misrepresented both the
shared portion of the rent SNRHA and herself would pay to this property owner for a housing unit.

Page 2 of 12
 To accomplish her nefarious goals Commissioner Davis manipulated the contents of her
application and financial matters and even sought SNRHA officers and staff persons from all levels of the
agency, from member(s) of the Board of Commissioners, Executive Office, Directors, and program staff,
who appeared to either directly colluded, turned a blind eye, or simply were sympathetic to her cause
despite these actions and activities clearly being unethical.

In January and February 2019, the agency implemented some personnel changes indirectly
related to this matter, and expects to take further personnel decisions as the investigation on this
matter continues and expands.

Being named a Commissioner for a Federally- funded Public Housing Authority (PHA) is a great
opportunity for one to serve his or her community and when appointed these individuals have assumed
significant responsibilities. The Board of Commissioners is the legally and financially responsible
governing body of a PHA and the first line of accountability for the PHA's performance. There are two
important HUD stated responsibilities of this governing body that Ms. Davis has seemingly failed to do
which are:

1} Safeguard the financial integrity of the PHA, preventing fraud, waste, mismanagement, and
abuse;and

2} Ensure ethical, legal, and effective work performance.

Through her actions and activities Ms. Davis seemingly has participated in the fraud, waste,
mismanagement and abuse of the agency as a Commissioner and HCV Program Participant, and appears
to have engaged in unethical and illegal performance of the agency's resources.

The staff of the Southern Nevada Regional Hpusing Authority is not a law enforcement entity and
therefore can't make any legal judgments or decisions on this matter. However, we believe the facts and
evidence are so clearly disturbing that we are compelled to bring this to your attention.

The SNRHA Housing Programs (Section 8) Fraud Investigator and Executive Director at the time of
this report's submission are simultaneously referring this matter for potential criminal investigation and
prosecution by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of the Inspector
General.

Page 3 of 12
 INVESTIGATION RESULTS

Background

On or about September 19, 2018, Mr. Chad Williams, SNRHA's Executive Director, based on
complaints received from SNRHA staff within the Family Self-Sufficiency Services ("FSS") Program,
requested that an informal investigation of activities associated with Resident Commissioner, Theresa
Davis, be undertaken. The staff believed that with new leadership changing in the Board of
Commissioners' Chairperson position the Executive Director would be able to authorize and manage this
investigation through to its conclusion without the fear of retaliation.

The investigation focused on Commissioner Davis' attempts to manipulate SNRHA staff, using
her position on the Board of Commissioners; and, manipulation of data regarding family size and
composition and income to provide her with a most favorable position to obtain housing and housing
assistance payments.

Investigation Results

Non-compliant with Family Self-Sufficiency Program -

The following is a summary of the results of the investigation of the activities surrounding
Commissioner Theresa Davis as it relates to her participation in the FSS Program and as a participant in
the HCV Program. Ms. Davis was originally assigned to FSS Coordinator Ms. Emma Sanders, who,
ultimately, passed away in March 2018. After the death of Ms. Sanders, Ms. Davis' case was re-assigned
to Ms. Paula Tucker. A couple of items should be noted, here:

1. Ms. Theresa Davis, a Resident Commissioner, is currently enrolled in the FSS Program for a
second time. Ms. Davis' initial enrollment in the FSS program failed as she was unsuccessful in
her attempt to complete the program during that first enrollment. At no time during this first
enrollment, or to date, in this, her 2nd (current) enrollment, has Ms. Davis become employed or
reported earned income in her approximate 8 years in the program.

2. Ms. Davis has a pattern of disregarding the requirements of the FSS program as she consistently
misses her FSS and HCV recertification appointments. Her usual pattern is that she misses the
appointment, then calls after the appointment time and reports that she was never made aware
of the appointment; or, that she had not received the confirmatory appointment letter sent by
SNRHA staff; or, the Councilmember will provide a convenient excuse for missing the
appointment. The table below lists some of Ms. Davis' missed appointments, and note that on
two occasions, SNRHA sent letters of Non-compliance to Ms. Davis indicating that she would be
dropped from the FSS and the HCV Programs unless she appeared for her appointment(s) .

Page4 of 12
 Missed Scheduled Appointments:
July 26, 2016
March 23, 2017
April 18, 2018 **
April 25, 2018
May 2, 2018
July 2, 2018
July 10, 2018 **
January 29, 2019 **
February 11, 2019 **
** Warning Letter Sent

This Section further illustrates Ms. Davis' desire to disregard the rules and policies of SNRHA and her
attempts to exploit the system that's in place to ensure fair and equal treatment of all Housing
Assistance recipients who the Housing Authority serves. This chronology timeline summarizes the initial
meeting between Ms. Davis and her FSS Coordinator.

FSS Appointment - May 2, 2018:

• On May 2, 2018, during Ms. Davis' first appointment with Ms. Paula Tucker, her FSS
Coordinator, had a lengthy discussion to review Ms. Davis' original assessment, her FSS training
plan, and her progress to date. Ms. Davis' stated goals were to seek full-time employment and
that she wanted to obtain an Associate's degree.

In this interview, Ms. Davis also stated that one of her goals was to pursue homeownership. In
their conversation, Ms. Tucker recommended to Ms. Davis that perhaps she should further
discuss her goals with her spouse and decide their mutual goals. Ms. Tucker explained to Ms.
Davis that self-sufficiency includes being able to live within the constraints of a budget; improve
her credit, save money and provide for her family without the assistance of others which
includes housing assistance from the housing authority.

• Ms. Tucker explained to Ms. Davis that failure to address her credit will result in higher interest
rates, and payments for anything she purchases using credit. To assist her improve her fiscal
management Ms. Davis was asked to complete two budget worksheets, one with all of her
household income since Commissioner Davis has a considerable amount of unearned income
from her spouse and social security survivor benefits that will be exhausted in 2020. It should be
noted that Ms. Davis has not submitted either budget worksheet.

Page 5 of 12
 • Part of the FSS Program's financial training includes referrals to legal services to help clients
address credit problems. Ms. Davis (and her spouse) have been referred to Legal Aid of
Southern Nevada on numerous occasions to attend a Bankruptcy class. This class reviews the
pros and cons of filing Bankruptcy and also provides referrals for pro bona or low cost attorneys.
Our record, to date, indicates that Ms. Davis has not completed this action step.

• Also in this meeting Ms. Tucker and Ms. Davis discussed her name change and confirmed she
had not legally changed her last name to Tippens. Ms. Davis stated it was going to take too
much to change it so: "never mind." Further, Ms. Tucker explained to Ms. Davis that she should
not be using the surname Tippens until after she has legally changed her name. Ms. Tucker
guided Ms. Davis through the process of petitioning the court. Ms. Tucker also provided Ms.
Davis with information on how to apply for her birth certificate from Los Angeles County and
asked her to complete the first step. Ms. Tucker recommended that the Ms. Davis take care of
this action immediately, because at some point she will need to prove her last name is Tippens
and that the process is a timely. Our records indicate that the Commissioner has not
completed this action step to date. {It should be noted that Ms. Davis currently uses more
than four different alias for her last name).

Subsequently, Ms. Davis returned for a "Recertification and FSS appointment." What follows are
excerpts taken from Ms. Tucker's program notes.

July 17, 2018 - Recertification and FSS:

• Theresa attended her Annual Recertification & FSS appointment and reported she had
completed real estate school. She submitted a certificate of completion of a real Estate
Licensing 90-hour course. This is not one of her goals, so I asked her why she chose to go to real
estate school and what did she plan to do with it once she passes the test and receives her
license. She stated she hadn't passed the test to date, however she was going to be a part-time
realtor. She also reported on this date she was starting pre-law at Liberty University. She
provided a class schedule for Fall 2018. I requested a copy of her financial aid for this semester
and never received it. She then submitted a letter from Liberty University stating she had not
"matriculated" as of August 31, 2018.

• During this appointment Theresa also submitted a sample "Intake Assessment" she was using
for her non-profit Brand New Horizon and asked me to review it. I don't believe she has the
qualifications to perform the work she says she is "volunteering" to do. She has a business
license, a Facebook page and claims to assist parents with establishing and maintaining IEP's
(Individual Educational Plans) for students at Clark County School District. She reported during
her recertification appointment she generates zero income from her nonprofit and she
"volunteers". She wrote a personal statement that she "writes grants" however she has not

Page 6 of 12
 reported the receipt of any grants. I have counseled Theresa that this activity is not considered
employment, does not meet her goal or the HUD compliance requirements for FSS.

• I reviewed the information provided at this appointment and explained I felt she was going in
three different directions and they were unrelated to one another. Also none of them is
providing income for her to support her family. I recommended she concentrate on one career
path and focus her time on achieving this goal.

• I reviewed the action steps required for Theresa to complete over the next 90 days. She still
must complete the following action steps:

1) Provide verification she has obtained her Real Estate License

2) Complete Monthly Budget Worksheets (one with all household income, one with just
Theresa and spouse's income)
3) Attend a Bankruptcy Course at Legal Aid of Southern Nevada
4) Complete a timeline of steps to complete her name change, and submit a copy of step
one which is to apply for and receive her birth certificate from LA County

• Theresa was also required to attend a Self-Sufficiency Empowerment workshop during the 3rd
quarter since she has not attended one in more than 12 months. The Self-Sufficiency
Empowerment workshop is required for all FSS program participants to attend every six months.

She did attend two workshops (Support Group and Budgeting/Credit) on September 9, 2018.
However, Martha Floyd, Resident Program Coordinator and facilitator of the workshops
reported to me Theresa took on the role of a SNRHA Commissioner at the workshops and
attempted to provide advice to other FSS clients in attendance. She has been coached in the
past that she is a participant just like everyone else and must represent herself this way.

• In the responsibilities of my duties as Theresa's FSS Coordinator which includes completing her
eligibility for recertification, completing income and household changes; resolving issues that
affect her and landlord, I feel she bypasses me and expedites her issues to the Executive Office
(directly to Ms. Pamela Reid-McDuel without the knowledge of the Executive Director, Mr. Chad
Williams). I always answer my phone unless I am with a client. Yesterday Theresa called me
during an assessment, so she had to leave a message. While I was with a new client I was
interrupted by inspections giving me an urgent message regarding Theresa Tippens. I returned
her call as soon as I was finished with my client. She told me she was calling in a special
inspection. I explained I had procedures to follow and I would be the one requesting a special
inspection. I attempted to call her landlord, and then left a message. I completed the request for
a special inspection and walked it to inspections for scheduling. As soon as I returned to my
office, Theresa was calling to ask what time was her inspection going to be today. I told her I

Page 7 of 12
 would call her once it was scheduled. I feel she takes it upon herself to purposely ignore
procedure and policy to allow her priority consideration.

Unethical Behavior, and Possible Fraud and Embezzlement to continue receiving a Housing Choice
Voucher-

In more recent activities characterizing the errant behaviors of Ms. Davis, excerpted notes from
her FSS Coordinator, indicates a pattern of unethical behavior taken to undermine the process of
receiving a Housing Choice Voucher through manipulation of her household size and composition so
that it results in monthly rent payments that are most beneficial to her; and using her influence as a
Commissioner to bully program management staff and the Executive Office staff to give her preferred
treatment so that she may "cherry pick" which FSS Coordinator is used determine her household income
and size calculations. In all, it appears to be an unethical power-play which borders on fraud, abuse of
power, and abuse and waste of tax-payer dollars. In addition, the cherry picking by Ms. Davis of one
particular FSS Coordinator, HCV Supervisor(s), and HCV Director(s) who indeed provided emphatic
support of her actions and activities may rise to the level of collusion which our agency continues to
investigate for possible disciplinary action.

The excerpt, below, illustrates the extent to which Ms. Davis attempts to abuse the system for her own,
personal, gain.

In processing the Annual Recertification, Interim Change, Move and 2nd Interim Change for Ms. Theresa
Davis over the past 8 months, there have been several questionable occurrences reported.

• Theresa and her spouse, Jackie Tippens attended her annual recertification appointment on July
15, 2018, although it was not effective until November 1, 2018. During this appointment,
Theresa reported her spouse, Jackie Tippens was working full time at Logistics & Technology,
Inc. She submitted four consecutive paystubs to confirm his employment and income.

• On September 19, 2018 Teresa submitted a "Report of Change in Income/Family Composition"

reporting her spouse Jackie Tippen'!; wages had decreased and her daughter Essence Hamilton
was being removed from the household.
st
Per SNRHA/HCV policy, I processed the "Interim" change effective the 1 of the month after the
receipt date (9/19/18). With this change, I removed Essence Hamilton from the household.
Jackie Tippens had new income that was more than the amount calculated at the 2017
recertification, so his wages did not change at this time (Per policy we don't increase earned
income on a file until the annual recertification). I did not reduce the bedroom size of the
voucher due to SNRHA policy which state this is only done at the time of annual recertification. I
mailed Notice of Change letters to the landlord and Theresa showing her rent effective
10/1/2018 would be $614 and her housing assistance payment would be $786.

Page 8 of12
 I then processed the Annual Recertification (effective 11/1/18) using the four current,
consecutive paystubs as submitted/required for Jackie Tippens, and also included the social
security income for Theresa's daughters Haunani and Kaunani Player. Theresa was to submit
the new paystubs showing the hours were reduced, once her spouse received four current
paystubs reflecting the decrease. I also reduced the bedroom size of her voucher from a three
bedroom to a two bedroom, per policy. Upon completing the file I determined Theresa's rent
was $1.400 and her housing assistance pa yment was $0. In addition to the Notice of Change
letters, Theresa was also sent a HAP to Zero letter stating she was paying 100% of her monthly
rent, and her voucher would remain for six months. At the end of the six month time period, if
there were no changes to her income she would no longer have a voucher due to being over
income.

I am also required to complete an FSS Escrow worksheet (which is done on all FSS files each
month there is a paying action) and it showed Theresa's FSS contract that she was defined as
Self-Sufficient and needing no further public housing assistance according to the rules of 24 CFR
984.303(g).

After receiving the two change notices for October 1, 2018 and November 1, 2018, and the HAP
(Housing Assistance Payment) to Zero letter, Theresa submitted a written request for a rent
review for a recalculation of her rent and a re-assignment of her FSS worker. She stated I
notified her she was graduating from FSS and she would no longer receive housing assistance.
In actuality, I notified her of her rent, she was HAP to Zero, and due to the 30% Rule she was
graduating from FSS effective 11/1/2018. I also explained how the HAP to Zero/30 % Rule policy.

Once the file was quality controlled by Robin Diaz-Mendez (HCV Senior Occupancy Specialist)
and then reviewed by my supervisor Martha Floyd, Resident Program Coordinator, Theresa was
notified her file was processed correctly. She then submitted two new paystubs to Martha
Floyd and reported her spouse was now part-time. The new paystubs were still showing full-
time and were actually greater than the ones used previously. Martha waited another 30 days
for new paystubs. I also contacted the employer and received a letter stating Jackie Tippens was
working part-time. The annual recertification was revised to decrease the income using the new
paystubs. Once revised, Theresa new rent amount effective 11/1/2018 was $1292 and her
housing assistance payment was $108. I notified her she no longer fell under the Hap to
Zero/30% Rule policy and she would remain in the FSS Program.

• On November 13, 2018 Theresa submitted a Vacate notice stating she was moving effective
12/1/2018. Once notified we would only pay the rent for one day in December 2018, she
changed the notice to say 12/31/2018. However, once she was notified she was responsible to
pay $1,292 for December, she again changed her vacate date to 11/30/18. She also reported on
11/13/2018 she was adding her daughter Essence Hamilton back in the household. I explained
she would be required to complete a background check per HCV policy. To reinforce my
explanation of policy in a meeting with Mr. Chad Williams, Martha Floyd and Theresa Davis, I

Page 9 of 12
asked if we could invite Brenda Fonseca, HCV Housing programs Director to clarify. Brenda
Fonseca and Geraldine Johnson, Deputy Director of HCV Housing Programs joined the meeting
and reiterated to Theresa the policy was followed correctly and her daughter would have to
complete and pass a background check. Theresa was issued a two-bedroom voucher and "How
to Determine Rent" form to begin looking for a new rental. At this time she would also receive a
revised "How to Determine Rent", increasing the amount she could look for in a new rental. On
December 3, 2018 Theresa submitted a Change Report stating she and her husband were
separated and requested he be removed from the household. She completed a Certification of
Absent Spouse and Reporting and Lease Requirement form notarized. I notified her Jackie
Tippens would be removed from her case moving forward. Theresa's file was then transferred to
Malandria Watson, an FSS Coordinator who was on our HCV contract team. She was assigned to
only complete Theresa's HAP contract move, and then return the file to me. I continued to be
Theresa's FSS Coordinator and work on all FSS functions.

On several instances Theresa ignored my calls, emails and letters requesting to meet with her
for FSS appointments and to discuss her case. Once I sent a Warning letter she requested again
to be re-assigned to a new worker. After informing her she would not be re-assigned she would
only meet with me if Malandria Watson was present. I agreed, and we reviewed her progress in
the FSS program on 2/13/2019. During the completion of the move/recertification for Theresa,
new income was reported for Essence. She received a second revised "How to Determine Rent"
on 1/22/2019.

Once the inspection was completed on Theresa's new rental on 3/26/2019, Malandria Watson
continued to process the file for the move. Theresa contacted her (Malandria Watson) on April
4, 2019 to ask for her new rent amount. Malandria Watson informed her new monthly rent was
$1,024 and her HAP payment was $91. Theresa asked if it was due to Essence's income and was
told this was part of the income, however three household members receive Social Security
(including Theresa), which also contributed to the increase in her portion of rent. After ending
the call, Theresa called back in less than 10 minutes and reported to Ms. Watson Essence
Hamilton would be moving out of the home effective 4/6/19.

On April 15, 2019 I received an email from Theresa requesting financial assistance for fees
associated with applying for her real estate license, and becoming established as a realtor
through GLVAR (Greater Las Vegas Realtors Association) totaling $2,970.66. After discussing this
with my supervisor I responded by email requesting she send another email asking for
assistance with the testing and licensing fees only. These fees total $284. She has not
responded to this email.

Page 10 of 12
 Conclusion
In the information derived from Ms. Davis' case, it is clear for all to see that Ms. Davis is and has
been systematically manipulating the system for her own, personal, gain. · Ms. Davis refuses to comply
with the requirements of the FSS Program, flaunts the rules and complies minimally - and only when
threatened with removal from the Family Self-Sufficiency Services program. Even then, Ms. Davis
manipulates her income and family composition until she receives the optimum allowances (based on
her variable circumstances), of a maximum financial award.

In addition, Ms. Davis' acts to further exploit the system by seeking to "Cherry pick" and
gerrymander the housing allowance system by attempting to engage SNRHA staff sympathetic towards
or by using her influence as a Commissioner to bully staff into colluding with her are equally
reprehensible to the fraudulent acts that she has committed to increase her housing assistance
payments and to manipulate her household composition with the corruptible intent to increase the size
of her housing unit.

Ms. Davis' behavior evokes the question for the City of North Las Vegas of whether she is the
right appointee of your jurisdiction for this position.

Page 11 of 12
 Attachments
1) Report of Change in Income/Household Composition submitted by Theresa Davis dated 9/19/2018 (removing
Essence Hamilton from household)

2) 50058 effective 10/1/2019 (Interim change) completed by Paula Tucker

3) Notice of Change/Payment Letter mailed to Theresa Davis dated 9/24/18, effective 10/1/19

4) Letterfrom Theresa Davis requesting Rent Review and request to be re-assigned to new FSS Coordinator

5) 50058 for 11/1/18 Annual Recertification (shows HAP to Zero and bedroom size reduction) completed by Paula
Tucker

6) Notice of Change/Payment letter mailed to Theresa Davis on 9/28/2018

7) HAP to Zero letters to Theresa and landlord mailed to Theresa Davis

8) FSS Escrow Worksheet calculation showing 30% rule completed by Paula Tucker

9) 24 CFR 984.303 (g) (copy)

10) Letter from Jackie Tippens' employer showing part-time status

11) 50058 effective 11/1/2018 (REVISED, REDUCES INCOME FOR Jackie Tippens) completed by Martha Floyd

12) Notice of Change/payment Letter mailed to Theresa Davis (revised monthly rent dated 11/2/2018 showing
no longer 30% Rule, new rent is $1292)

13) Report of Change in Income/Household Composition submitted by Theresa Davis dated 11/13/2018 (adding
Essence Hamilton back to household)

14) Certification of Absent Spouse & Reporting and Leasing Requirements submitted by Theresa Davis 12/3/2018
(removing Jackie Tippens from household)

15) Report of Change in Income/Household Composition submitted by Theresa Davis dated 4/8/2019 (removing
Essence Hamilton from the household)

Page 12 of 12