Section 3 – Privacy of Communication and Correspondence

1. Ramirez vs. Court of Appeals

2. Zulueta vs. Court of Appeals

3. Navarro vs. Court of Appeals

4. Ople vs. Torres

5. Disini vs. Secretary of Justice

6. Vivares

Section 4

Freedom of Expression

1. Diocese of Bacolod vs. COMELEC

2. United States vs. Bustos

3. People vs. Alarcon

4. Ayer Productions PTY Ltd. vs. Capulong

5. Borjal vs. Court of Appeals

6. Reyes vs. Bagatsing

7. Pita vs. Court of Appeals

8. Social Weather Stations, Inc. vs. COMELEC

Assembly and Petition

1. Primicias vs. Fugoso

2. Malabanan vs. Ramento

3. De la Cruz vs. Court of Appeals

4. PBM Employees Association vs. Philippine Blooming Mills

5. Bayan vs. Ermita

Batas Pambansa Blg. 880

1
Section 5 – Freedom of Religion

1. Aglipay vs. Ruiz

2. Garces vs. Estenzo

3. American Bible Society vs. City of Manila

4. Iglesia Ni Cristo vs. Court of Appeals

5. Ebralinag vs. Division Superintendent of Cebu

6. Estrada vs. Escritor

7. Imbong vs. Ochoa

Section 6 – Liberty of Abode and of Travel

1. Marcos vs. Manglapus

2. Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals

3. Silverio vs. Court of Appeals

4. Genuino v. De Lima

Section 7 – Right to Information

1. Legaspi vs. Civil Service Commission

2. Valmonte vs. Belmonte, Jr.

3. Province of Cotabato vs. The Gov’t. of the RP Peace Panel

on Ancestral Domain

4. Echagaray vs. Secretary of Justice

5. Chavez vs. Presidential Commission on Good Government

2
 6. “In Re: Production of Court Records and Documents and

the Attendance of Court officials and employees as witnesses

under the subpoenas of February 10, 2012 and the various

letters for the Impeachment Prosecution Panel dated January

19 and 25, 2012, [February 14, 2012]

Section 8 – Right to Form Associations

1. SSS Employees Association vs. Court of Appeals

2. Victoriano vs. Elizalde Rope Workers’ Union

3. In re: IBP membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. Marcial

Edillon

Section 10 – Non-Impairment Clause

1. Rutter vs. Esteban

2. Ortigas & Co. Ltd. Partnership vs. Feati Bank & Trust Co.

3. Lozano vs. Martinez

4. Ganzon vs. Inserto

Section 11 – Free Access to the Courts

In Re: Query of Mr. Roger Prioreschi [A.M. No. 09-6-9-SC, August

19, 2009]

Section 12 – Custodial Investigation

1. Ho Wai Pang v. People of the Philippines

2. Gamboa vs. Cruz

3
 3. People vs. Macam

4. People vs. Judge Ayson

5. People vs. Pinlac

6. People vs. Bolanos

7. People vs. Andan

8. Navallo vs. Sandiganbayan

9. People vs. Dy

10. People vs. Alicando

Republic Act No. 7438

Section 13 – Right to Bail

1. Basco vs. Rapatalo

2. People vs. Judge Donato

3. People vs. Fortes

4. Comendador vs. De Villa

5. Baylon vs. Judge Sison

6. Manotoc vs. Court of Appeals

7. Government of the U.S. vs. Judge Puruganan

8. Government of Hong Kong vs. Hon. Olalia

Rule 114, Revised Rules of Court

4
Section 14

Criminal Due Process

1. Tatad vs. Sandiganbayan

2. Galman vs. Sandiganbayan

3. Alonte vs. Savellano

Presumption of Innocence

1. People vs. Dramayo

2. Dumlao vs. COMELEC

3. Marquez vs. COMELEC

4. Corpus vs. People

5. Feeder International Line vs. CA

Rule 133, Rules of Court

Right to be Heard by Himself and Counsel

1. People vs. Holgado

2. People vs. Agbayani

3. Amion vs. Judge Chiongson

Rule 115, Rules of Court

Right to be Informed of the Nature and Cause of Accusation

1. People vs. Quitlong

2. Pecho vs. People

3. Soriano vs. Sandiganbayan

4. Borja vs. Mendoza

5
Right to Speedy, Impartial and Public Trial

1. People vs. Tee

2. Flores vs. People

3. Conde vs. Rivera

Republic Act No. 8493

4. Mateo, Jr. vs. Villaluz

5. Garcia vs. Domingo

6. People vs. Teehankee, Jr.

7. In re: request for Live Radio and TV Coverage of the Trial in

the Sandiganbayan of the Plunder Cases against Former

President Joseph Estrada

8. Re: Petition For Radio And Television Coverage Of The

Multiple Murder Cases Against Maguindanao Governor

Zaldy Ampatuan, et al.,;

Trial in Absentia

1. People vs. Mapalao

2. People vs. Valeriano

Right of Confrontation

1. United States vs. Javier

2. Talino vs. Sandiganbayan

6
Compulsory Processes

1. Roco vs. Contreras

Section 15 – Suspension of the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas

Corpus

1. Lansang vs. Garcia

2. Jackson vs. Macalino

3. In re: The Issuance of the Writ of Habeas Corpus

for Dr. Aurora Parong, et al. vs. Ponce Enrile,

4. Lagman v. Medialdea

5. Lagman v. Pimentel

6. Padilla v. Congress

Rules on Habeas Data

Rules on Writ of Amparo

Section 16 – Right to a Speedy Disposition of Cases

1. Padua vs. Ericta

2. Flores vs. People

Section 17 – Right Against Self-Incrimination

1. United States vs. Tan Teng

2. Villaflor vs. Summers

7
 3. Beltran vs. Samson

4. Chavez vs. Court of Appeals

5. People vs. Gallarde

6. Pascual vs. Board of Medical Examiners

7. Mapa, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan

Section 18 – Right Against Involuntary Servitude

1. Philippine Refining Company Worker’s Union vs. Philippine

Refining Co.

2. In the Matter of Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus of

Segifredo Aclaracion

Republic Act No. 10364

Section 19 – Prohibited Punishment

1. People vs. Estoista

2. People vs. Esparas

3. Echagaray vs. Secretary of Justice

Section 20 – Non-Imprisonment for Debt

1. Serafin vs. Lindayag

2. Lozano vs. Martinez

8
Section 21 – Double Jeopardy

1. Philippine Savings Bank vs. Bermoy

2. People vs. Obsania

3. Paulin vs. Gimenez

4. Icasiano vs. Sandiganbayan

5. Lejano vs. People of the Philippines

6. People vs. Balisacan

7. People vs. City Court of Silay

8. Esmeña vs. Pogoy

9. People vs. Pineda

10. People vs. Tampal

11. Melo vs. People

12. People vs. Adil

13. People vs. Relova

Section 22 – Ex Post Facto Law and Bill of Attainder

1. United States vs. Conde

2. Concepcion vs. Garcia

3. Nasi-Villar vs. People of the Philippines

4. Salvador vs. Mapa, Jr.

Sec 7, Rule 117, Rules of Court