Professional Documents
Culture Documents
With the "way of a council" for ending the schism thus foreclosed, just three
ways of ending it remained without one side admitting its error: military action,
binding arbitration, or mutual resignation of both claimaints.
Military action still had its advocates, most of whom now embraced the new
concept of a "kingdom of Adria" ruled by Duke Louis of Anjou which would
incorporate the Adriatic coast of Italy north of the kingdom of Naples, including
most of the papal state, and would adhere to Antipope Robert.9, But Italy had too
many states already; adding one more, even if it could be done, was not likely in
actuality to give anyone preponderance.
The "way of cession"-resignation-was endorsed in strong terms by Jean Gerson,
Chancellor of the University of Paris, in December 1392 '95 but could never prevail
unless both Pope and Antipope could be persuaded to resign, which neither
showed the slightest inclination to do. If mutual resignation and binding arbitration
were rejected, the moral imperative for the serious Catholic became to decide, for
himself and for his country insofar as he was able, who was in truth the rightful
Pope, and adhere to him. The evidence proving that Urban VI had been the rightful
Pope and Boniface IX consequently his rightful successor was not easy for
everyone to obtain, but not really difficult for those in authority. The documents of
the cardinals of 1378 avowing full adherence to the Pope days and weeks after the
alleged duress ended, and the arguments of St. Catherine of Siena, were available
and irrefutable.96 But few now thought the schism could be resolved that way. Both
sides-especially France-had invested too much in their previous commitment to one
or the other papal contender. The supporters of the Antipope gave no sign of
possessing the moral courage to admit that they had simply been wrong.
Christendom was in a trap.
Antipope Robert was more a military man than a churchman, and he
efele-Leclercq, Histoire des Conciles, VI-2, 1111-1112; Valois, France et le grand schisme, II,
115-117.
"I-Iefele-Leclercq, Histoire des Conciles, VI-2, 1112.
91
lbid., VI-2, 1113, 1121-1122; Von Pastor, History of the Popes, I, 137, 164;Valois, France
et le grand schisme, II, 145; Halecki, Jadwiga, p. 184.
9z
Palmer, England, France, and Christendom, p. 193; E. R. Chamberlin, The Count of Yutue;
Giangaleauo V'csconti, Duke of Milan (New York, 1965), p. 151; HefeleLeclercq, Histoire des Conciles,
VI-2,1126-1127.
mith, Great Schism, p. 161; Hefele-Leclercq, Histoire des Conciles, VI-2,1123.
9°
Chamberlin, Count of V'utue, pp. 152-154.
"Howard Kaminsky, Simon de Cramaud and the Great Schism (New Brunswick NJ, 1983), p. 55.
96
In May 1379 Holy Roman Emperor Wenceslas had written to Richard II of
England declaring that he was keeping in his archives "for eternal memory" the
letters of the cardinals written after the election of Pope Urban VI expressing
satisfaction with his election and fealty to him (Ullman, Origins of the Great Schism, p. 94).