Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mrs. Wold
ERWC, Per. 5
17 March 2019
Considering that the assignment I had chosen to revise was initially a timed write, my
rewrite was obviously much better because I was able to put in more time and forethought. I was
able to expand upon the ideas I had originally written down, and while I could have probably
went even more in-depth I decided to just keep to the gist of what I wanted to say. I definitely
took more liberties with my rewrite and took things from a more philosophical perspective than
what was probably expected, but I am glad to have taken the time to delve deeper into the ideas I
had as a sophomore and to make them even more complex. Even though I removed a lot of the
“examples” that I had in the first version, it was for the best because they were far too general
and flimsy in presentation. My vocabulary was already good then, but I also took the opportunity
this second time to be more formal in diction. The first version had too many filler sentences and
a lot of half-thoughts. There were a lot of sentences that could have been placed anywhere in the
essay and still would have made sense, which just means that it was a poor way of organizing on
my part. I need to focus more on quality instead of quantity. I can write a lot and can easily fill
up a page in a short amount of time, but often only half of it is meaningful or useful to the
overarching idea/thesis of my writing. My grasp of grammar is good and I take advantage of that,
but it means nothing when the content of my writing holds no value. I often tell myself that I
much more adept at creative writing, at telling stories and creating complex character and plots,
but I struggle when forced to write within a school-oriented mindset (i.e. persuasive essays,
analysis papers, etc.). Even research assignments (especially when the topic personally interests
me), are easier for me to write, and so I hope that I can improve this type of writing in the future.