Professional Documents
Culture Documents
over the wires of a local telephone network. DSL originally stood for digital s
ubscriber loop, although in recent years, the term digital subscriber line has b
een widely adopted as a more marketing-friendly term for ADSL, which is the most
popular version of consumer-ready DSL. DSL can be used at the same time and on
the same telephone line with regular telephone, as it uses high frequency, while
regular telephone uses low frequency.
Typically, the download speed of consumer DSL services ranges from 256 kilobits
per second (kbit/s) to 24,000 kbit/s, depending on DSL technology, line conditio
ns and service level implemented. Typically, upload speed is lower than download
speed for Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line (ADSL) and equal to download speed
for the rarer Symmetric Digital Subscriber Line (SDSL).
Voice and data
DSL (VDSL) typically works by dividing the frequencies used in a single phone li
ne into two primary "bands". The ISP data is carried over the high-frequency ban
d (25 kHz and above) whereas the voice is carried over the lower-frequency band
(4 kHz and below). (See the ADSL article on how the high-frequency band is subdi
vided.) The user typically installs a DSL filter on each phone. This filters out
the high frequencies from the phone line, so that the phone only sends or recei
ves the lower frequencies (the human voice). The DSL modem and the normal teleph
one equipment can be used simultaneously on the line without interference from e
ach other.
Operation
[edit] Regular DSL
The local loop of the public switched telephone network (PSTN) was initially des
igned to carry POTS voice communication and signaling, since the concept of data
communications as we know it today did not exist. For reasons of economy, the p
hone system nominally passes audio between 300 and 3,400 Hz, which is regarded a
s the range required for human speech to be clearly intelligible. This is known
as voiceband or commercial bandwidth.
At the local telephone exchange (United Kingdom) or central office (United State
s) the speech is generally digitized into a 64 kbit/s data stream in the form of
an 8 bit signal using a sampling rate of 8,000 Hz, therefore, according to the
Nyquist theorem, any signal above 4,000 Hz is not passed by the phone network (a
nd has to be blocked by a filter to prevent aliasing effects).
The laws of physics, specifically the Shannon limit, cap the speed of data trans
mission. For a long time, it was believed that a conventional phone line couldn'
t be pushed beyond low speed limits (typically under 9600 bit/s). In the 1950s,
4 MHz television signals were often carried between studios on ordinary twisted
pair telephone cable, suggesting that the Shannon Limit would allow transmitting
many megabits per second. However, these cables had other impairments besides G
aussian noise, preventing such rates from becoming practical in the field. In th
e 1980s techniques were developed for broadband communications that allowed the
limit to be greatly extended.
The local loop connecting the telephone exchange to most subscribers is capable
of carrying frequencies well beyond the 3.4 kHz upper limit of POTS. Depending o
n the length and quality of the loop, the upper limit can be tens of megahertz.
DSL takes advantage of this unused bandwidth of the local loop by creating 4312.
5 Hz wide channels starting between 10 and 100 kHz, depending on how the system
is configured. Allocation of channels continues at higher and higher frequencies
(up to 1.1 MHz for ADSL) until new channels are deemed unusable. Each channel i
s evaluated for usability in much the same way an analog modem would on a POTS c
onnection. More usable channels equates to more available bandwidth, which is wh
y distance and line quality are a factor (the higher frequencies used by DSL tra
vel only short distances). The pool of usable channels is then split into two di
fferent frequency bands for upstream and downstream traffic, based on a preconfi
gured ratio. This segregation reduces interference. Once the channel groups have
been established, the individual channels are bonded into a pair of virtual cir
cuits, one in each direction. Like analog modems, DSL transceivers constantly mo
nitor the quality of each channel and will add or remove them from service depen
ding on whether they are usable.
One of Lechleider's[2] contributions to DSL was his insight that an asymmetric a
rrangement offered more than double the bandwidth capacity of symmetric DSL. Thi
s allowed Internet Service Providers to offer efficient service to consumers, wh
o benefitted greatly from the ability to download large amounts of data but rare
ly needed to upload comparable amounts. ADSL supports two modes of transport: fa
st channel and interleaved channel. Fast channel is preferred for streaming mult
imedia, where an occasional dropped bit is acceptable, but lags are less so. Int
erleaved channel works better for file transfers, where the delivered data must
be error free but latency incurred by the retransmission of errored packets is a
cceptable.
Because DSL operates at above the 3.4 kHz voice limit, it cannot be passed throu
gh a load coil. Load coils are, in essence, filters that block out any non-voice
frequency. They are commonly set at regular intervals in lines placed only for
POTS service. A DSL signal cannot pass through a properly installed and working
load coil, while voice service cannot be maintained past a certain distance with
out such coils. Therefore, some areas that are within range for DSL service are
disqualified from eligibility because of load coil placement. Because of this, p
hone companies are endeavoring to remove load coils on copper loops that can ope
rate without them, and conditioning lines to avoid them through the use of fiber
to the neighborhood or node FTTN.
The commercial success of DSL and similar technologies largely reflects the adva
nces made in electronics, that, over the past few decades, have been getting fas
ter and cheaper even while digging trenches in the ground for new cables (copper
or fiber optic) remains expensive. Several factors contributed to the populariz
ation of DSL technology:
Until the late 1990s, the cost of digital signal processors for DSL was prohibit
ive. All types of DSL employ highly complex digital signal processing algorithms
to overcome the inherent limitations of the existing twisted pair wires. Due to
the advancements of VLSI technology, the cost of the equipment associated with
a DSL deployment (a DSLAM at one end and a DSL modem at the other end) lowered s
ignificantly.
A DSL line can be deployed over existing cable. Such deployment, even including
equipment, is much cheaper than installing a new, high-bandwidth fiber-optic cab
le over the same route and distance. This is true both for ADSL and SDSL variati
ons.
In the case of ADSL, competition in Internet access caused subscription fees to
drop significantly over the years, thus making ADSL more economical than dial up
access. Telephone companies were pressured into moving to ADSL largely due to c
ompetition from cable companies, which use DOCSIS cable modem technology to achi
eve similar speeds. Demand for high bandwidth applications, such as video and fi
le sharing, also contributed to popularize ADSL technology.
Most residential and small-office DSL implementations reserve low frequencies fo
r POTS service, so that (with suitable filters and/or splitters) the existing vo
ice service continues to operate independent of the DSL service. Thus POTS-based
communications, including fax machines and analog modems, can share the wires w
ith DSL. Only one DSL "modem" can use the subscriber line at a time. The standar
d way to let multiple computers share a DSL connection is to use a router that e
stablishes a connection between the DSL modem and a local Ethernet, Powerline, o
r Wi-Fi network on the customer's premises.
Once upstream and downstream channels are established, they are used to connect
the subscriber to a service such as an Internet service provider.
Naked DSL
Dry-loop DSL or "naked DSL," which does not require the subscriber to have tradi
tional land-line telephone service, started making a comeback in the US in 2004
when Qwest started offering it, closely followed by Speakeasy. As a result of AT
&T's merger with SBC,[3] and Verizon's merger with MCI,[4] those telephone compa
nies are required to offer naked DSL to consumers.
Even without the regulatory mandate, however, many ILECs offer naked DSL to cons
umers. The number of telephone landlines in the US has dropped from 188 million
in 2000 to 172 million in 2005, while the number of cellular subscribers has gro
wn to 195 million.[5]. This lack of demand for landline service has resulted in
the expansion of naked DSL availability.
[edit] Equipment
The customer end of the connection consists of a Terminal Adaptor or in layman's
terms "DSL modem." This converts data from the digital signals used by computer
s into a voltage signal of a suitable frequency range which is then applied to t
he phone line.
In some DSL variations (for example, HDSL), the terminal adapter is directly con
nected to the computer via a serial interface, using protocols such as RS-232 or
V.35. In other cases (particularly ADSL), it is common for the customer equipme
nt to be integrated with higher level functionality, such as routing, firewallin
g, or other application-specific hardware and software. In this case, the entire
equipment is usually referred to as a DSL router or DSL gateway.
Some kinds of DSL technology require installation of appropriate filters to sepa
rate, or "split", the DSL signal from the low frequency voice signal. The separa
tion can be done either at the demarcation point, or can be done with filters in
stalled at the telephone outlets inside the customer premises. Either way has it
s practical and economical limitations. See ADSL for more information about this
.
At the exchange, a digital subscriber line access multiplexer (DSLAM) terminates
the DSL circuits and aggregates them, where they are handed off onto other netw
orking transports. In the case of ADSL, the voice component is also separated at
this step, either by a filter integrated in the DSLAM or by a specialized filte
ring equipment installed before it. The DSLAM terminates all connections and rec
overs the original digital information.