Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Q1
Actual
hn-
Tappin distance(mm h (mm Dimensionles
area(m^2) n h1(mm)
g ) ) s Pressure V
(m/s)
0,0005309 0,1811487
195
A (a1) 0 3 195,0 0,00 7
0,0004227 0,2275129
194
B 20 3 194,0 -0,09 5
0,3616982
192
C 30 0,0002659 192,0 -0,26 8
0,0002010 0,4783459
185
D (a2) 48 6 185,0 -0,86 8
0,0002214 0,4343908
188
E 60 1 188,0 -0,60 8
0,0002679 0,3589618
189
F 74 3 189,0 -0,51 6
0,0003192 0,3013013
190
G 92 1 190,0 -0,43 2
0,0003746 0,2567301
192
H 108 2 192,0 -0,26 2
0,0004348 0,2211761
194
J 122 4 194,0 -0,09 2
0,0004991
195
K 138 6 195,0 0,00 0,1926799
0,0005309 0,1811487
196
L 152 3 196,0 0,09 7
Table 2. Results for Flow 1.
Q5
Actual
hn-h1(mm) Dimensionless
Tapping distance(mm) area(m^2) hn(mm)
Pressure V
(m/s)
A (a1) 0 0,00053093 195 0,0 0,00 0,46889198
B 20 0,00042273 192 -3,0 -0,04 0,58890268
C 30 0,0002659 168 -27,0 -0,35 0,9362328
D (a2) 48 0,00020106 128 -67,0 -0,86 1,23816787
E 60 0,00022141 135 -60,0 -0,77 1,12439293
F 74 0,00026793 158 -37,0 -0,47 0,92914973
G 92 0,00031921 167 -28,0 -0,36 0,77989914
H 108 0,00037462 174 -21,0 -0,27 0,66452944
J 122 0,00043484 180 -15,0 -0,19 0,5725002
K 138 0,00049916 184 -11,0 -0,14 0,49873955
L 152 0,00053093 185 -10,0 -0,13 0,46889198
Table 3. Results for Flow 5.
0.20
0.00
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
-0.20
hn-h1(mm)
-0.40
-0.60
-0.80
-1.00
Distance (mm)
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 º
Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10
CONCLUSIONS
From the results table for flow 1, was observed that the values of velocity effectively
increase when the área is reduced, this confirmated the inversely proportional among
From the comparisson between all of values of velocity for each one of flows, the
Also, its observate that the values of pressure decreases as the values of the velocity
increases into the Venturi, so the point where the pressure is less is the site where the
The percent of error between the real flow and calculated flow, its in a range of 0.3% to
12.4%, this it due probably to the bad measurement of real Flow durign the
experimental process.
The coefficient of discharge its near to the range of typical coefficient, but some of this
According whit the values, it was observed a mistake in the data, but it may happened