You are on page 1of 6

A Custom Technology March 2014

Adoption Profile
Commissioned By
NTT Communications

Leverage A Third-Party Data


Center To Deliver Increased
Business Value
1

Introduction
Companies are under increasing pressure to meet customer › Companies are leveraging colocation to transform
needs. The convergence of mobility, cloud, social platforms their technology landscape. Companies that have
and customer experience is forcing companies to become already colocated identified factors like disaster recovery
more agile and responsiveness to business changes. and business continuity, network environment, and ability
In February 2014, NTT Communications (NTT Com) to innovate as key drivers. 75% cited improved
commissioned Forrester Consulting to survey enterprises management and optimized IT resources via colocation
about their data center strategies, specifically the benefits, and 72% cited increased ability to innovate by colocating.
opportunities and potential challenges of leveraging › China, India and Indonesia are leading colocation
colocated data center services. The study surveyed 265 IT adoption in Asia Pacific. Between 75% and 80% of
decision-makers from multinational corporations (MNCs) respondents in China, Indonesia, and India have either
based in the US and Europe that have a local footprint in already colocated or plan to. In the survey, we found that
the Asia Pacific region. Malaysia had the lowest adoption rate of colocated data
Forrester’s study yielded four key findings: center. Forty-seven percent of the respondents in
Malaysia have no current plans to colocate versus the
› Retail and manufacturing sectors indicate surging Asia Pacific average of 29%.
demand for colocated data center services in Asia
Pacific. Seventy-one percent of respondents confirmed › Security issues remain a high business concern:
either currently leveraging colocation (using leased third- Australia, Indonesia and Singapore are the top 3
party data centers) or planning to leverage it. Among the countries having security concerns related to data center
three verticals—banking, financial services, and insurance colocation. 97% responded in Australia citied security and
(BFSI), manufacturing, and retail — retail leads the way in privacy concerns about data center colocation versus
colocation adoption. 45% of respondents in retail are 94% in Indonesia and 90% in Singapore. Security
already collocated, versus 41% in manufacturing and 12% concerns for data center colocation differ from sector to
in BFSI. Further, 41% in retail and manufacturing are sector in different countries. For Australia, China, India,
planning to colocate vs 33% in BFSI sector. Philippines, Singapore the BFSI sector has the maximum
security concern among all the verticals. For Hong Kong
and Thailand it is the Manufacturing sector. And for
Indonesia & Malaysia respondents it is Retail sector.

FIGURE 1
Most Respondents Have Already Colocated Or Plan To Leverage A Third-Party Data Center

“Indicate which category your organization would fall into on basis of


location of your data center infrastructure.”
(% of respondents who are currently leveraging or plan to leverage a colocated data center)

80% 78% 75% 73% 71% 70% 70%


65%
53%

China Indonesia India Australia Hong Kong Thailand Philippines Singapore Malaysia

Base: 265 IT budget decision-makers from MNCs headquartered in the US or Europe with local footprint in Asia Pacific region (Australia, China, Hong Kong,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand) with revenue more than US$1billion and with more than 100 employees
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of NTT Com, March 2014
2

Disaster Recovery And Business Continuity, And Improving Network


Infrastructure Are The Primary Drivers Of Colocated Data Centers
In today’s age of the customer, businesses compete 24x7 Instead of incremental changes to DR/BC, companies are
on a global stage and system availability, data sovereignty, seeking to transform their approach when migrating to a
local regulations and application performance are more colocated data center. For example, companies are
critical than ever. Companies are embracing new ways to leveraging virtualization, replication, and flash-based
engage customers, and advanced back-end system storage to automate failovers to significantly improve the
capabilities are a key differentiator. recovery time objective (RTO) without making significant
investments in technology infrastructure.
Global companies are taking steps to colocate their data
centers for four key reasons (see Figure 2): Upgrading the network infrastructure in existing data centers
is extremely cumbersome, especially when you have
1. Disaster recovery and business continuity (DR/BC) legacy, non-virtualized environments and where
2. Network requirements applications need to be available 24x7. Seventy-one
percent of respondents cited “improving the network
3. Physical security and compliance environment” as a critical priority for colocation. Survey
results indicate that companies with revenues of more than
4. Optimize the cost and effort to manage technology US$50 billion in particular are colocating to access data
infrastructure centers that are interconnected through high speed and
Seventy-two percent of respondents cited “improving high capacity networks, which allows them to migrate
DR/BC” as a critical priority to colocate their data centers. workloads more effectively.

FIGURE 2
Improving Disaster Recovery And Business Continuity Is The Top Priority For Decision-Makers

“How strongly do you rate each of the following capabilities/


drivers of data center colocation services?”
(Chart show critical drivers % for rating of 8,9 or 10 on 10 point scale)

Improving disaster recovery and business


72%
continuity capabilities

Improving the network environment (example: have 71%


access to low-latency network, multiple network-route)

Improving the physical security and compliance by 61%


choosing vendors having global accreditations

Improving agility, service levels, reliability 59%


and performance

Increasing capacity to meet busness demands 53%

Base: 265 IT budget decision-makers from MNCs headquartered in the US or Europe with local footprint in Asia Pacific region (Australia, China, Hong Kong,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand) with revenue more than US$1 billion and with more than 100 employees
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of NTT Com, March 2014
3

Perceived Barriers Versus Actual Experience With Colocated Data Centers


While data indicates a strong demand for colocated data changing physical infrastructure, wiring and installation was
centers, there remain concerns and barriers to adoption. cited frequently. However, 81% of respondents leveraging
Some concerns are legitimate; others are based on false colocation believe it has actually helped them improve
perceptions (see Figure 3). agility.
Companies with annual revenues of more than US$21 Viability and stability of the colocation vendor were also
billion have a higher percentage of respondents who are commonly cited as concerns. But Forrester believes that
currently not planning to colocate. These companies differ vendors who have built their own data centers and have a
from companies with revenues of less than US$21 billion, global customer base have essentially already addressed
on two evaluation criteria: potential concerns over “financial stability of the colocation
provider and the long term lease of the colocation facility”.
1. They want to partner with vendors that can provide
global data centers interconnected through a high When evaluating colocation services, Technology
speed, high capacity network. professionals should focus on the primary business pain
points and adopt a right sourcing strategy that enables
2. They want to partner with vendors that can help provide increased agility and better responsiveness to business
a private cloud alternative to public cloud for hosting IT demands. Data centers colocation is more suitable for
infrastructure. applications that require consistent performance, reliability
Companies with revenues of less than US$21 billion, on the and security. IT organizations that fail to adapt quickly to
other hand, want to colocate to a data center that supports business needs will lose relevance, forcing business units to
high demands for power and cooling. directly source technology to meet their needs. At the same
time vendors must continue to educate, particularly about
Concerns over a potential loss of agility in colocated data the benefits of improving management and optimization,
centers, particularly for installing, moving, adding or and increasing agility to innovate (see Figure 4).

FIGURE 3
Priorities Of Companies To Improve Technology Infrastructure Are Higher For Companies That Have
Colocated Versus Companies With No Plan

“How strongly do you rate each of the following capabilities/


drivers of data center colocation services?”
Improving Disaster Recovery & Business Continuity capabilities
Improving the network environment (example: have access to low-latency network, multiple network-route)
Improving the physical security & compliance by choosing vendors having global accreditations
Reducing the cost & effort to maintain and/or upgrade data center infrastructure management (such as cooling,
security, power)

Leveraging 3rd party colocated data center services 87% 78% 70% 57%

Plans to leverage to colocated data center services 66% 67% 58% 46%

We are not currently planning to leverage colocated data


center services but will evaluate various options at the time of 62% 66% 53% 39%
next data center refresh

Base: 265 IT budget decision-makers from MNCs headquartered in the US or Europe with local footprint in Asia Pacific region (Australia, China, Hong Kong,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand) with revenue more than US$1 billion and with more than 100 employees
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of NTT Com, March 2014
4

FIGURE 4
Perceived Benefits Versus Actual Experience With A Colocated Data Center

“What benefits do you expect to receive (or have you already received) from
leveraging a 3rd party colocated data center?”
(Chart show colocation benefits % for critical rating i.e. 8, 9 or 10 on 10 point scale)

Already Colocated Planning No Plans

83% 81%
72%
68% 66%
62%
55% 56% 54% 54%
49%
43% 43%
38%
31%

Improve management Improve agility to Provide a private cloud Reduce costs or Enable pay-per-use
and optimization of IT innovate and stay ahead of alternative to public improve total cost of consumption model
resources competitors cloud for hosting IT ownership (TCO) for
infrastructure infrastrastructure-related
spending (over on-
premise data center)

Base: 265 IT budget decision-makers from MNCs headquartered in the US or Europe with local footprint in Asia Pacific region (Australia, China, Hong Kong,
India, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand) with revenue more than US$1 billion and with more than 100 employees
Source: A commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of NTT Com, March 2014

Conclusion
Companies are being forced to make radical changes in the technology adoption to support business growth
way IT infrastructure is provisioned and managed. Smaller initiatives and maintain costs.
companies are unable to spend significant time and effort
designing and maintaining physical infrastructure for data 2. Improving physical security and compliance. IT
centers such as cooling and power; they want to leverage professionals must accurately assess the current risk
vendors that can do it much more efficiently. Larger exposure of existing on-premise data centers. It is likely
companies want to leverage global data centers that are that current risk exposure in the legacy environment is
interconnected using high speed, high capacity, and low far greater than a colocated data center.
latency networks for their critical enterprise applications. 3. Ensuring disaster-resistant facilities with anti-
Survey results indicate that the top benefits and drivers for seismic structures. When evaluating colocation
organizations colocating data centers are: vendors, ensure that the data center has a low risk of
1. Improving management and optimization of IT flood, storm surges, tsunami, and is away from
resources. It is important that companies consolidate hazardous facilities, as well as the vendor has got
and optimize their technology infrastructure at the time strong financial stability and long term lease for their
of colocation. This will help drive innovation and data centers.
5

Methodology
This Technology Adoption Profile was commissioned by NTT Communications. To create this profile, Forrester leveraged its
Forrsights Budgets And Priorities Survey, Q4 2013. Forrester Consulting supplemented this data with custom survey
questions asked of 265 MNCs headquartered in the US or Europe with local footprint in the Asia Pacific region. Survey
respondents included IT decision-makers and IT managers with insights on data centers in their organizations. The auxiliary
custom survey was conducted in March 2014. For more information on Forrester’s data panel and Tech Industry Consulting
services, visit www.forrester.com.

ABOUT FORRESTER CONSULTING


Forrester Consulting provides independent and objective research-based consulting to help leaders succeed in their
organizations. Ranging in scope from a short strategy session to custom projects, Forrester’s Consulting services
connect you directly with research analysts who apply expert insight to your specific business challenges. For more
information, visit forrester.com/consulting.

© 2014, Forrester Research, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Information is based on best available resources.
Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®, Technographics®, Forrester Wave, RoleView, TechRadar, and Total Economic
Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. For additional information, go to
www.forrester.com.1-PVR203

You might also like