Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ᚠᚢÞ ᚫ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛟ ᛞ
f u þ a r k g w h n i j æp z s t b e ml ŋ o d
ᚢ ᚬ ᛅ
ᚠ u/ ᚦ ą, ᚱ ᚴ ᛁ
ᚼ ᚾ i, a, ᛦ ᛋ ᛏt, ᛒ —ᛘ ᛚ ———
f/ w, þ,
o, r
k,
æ,
b,
y, h n ʀ s m l
v o, ð g e d p
æ e
ø
Table 1: Elder Futhark and Younger Futhark (from Wikipedia's Younger Futhark)
ᚹ Θ Z Ψ
uui ω the ae
Table 2 Additional letters of king Chilperic I (c. 539 – 584)
J U W (& ⁊)
A B C D E F G H I K L M N O P Q R S T V X Y Z Ƿ Þ Ð Æ
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Æ Ø Å
Table 4 The Danish-Norse alphabet
Overview of the symbolic links between the Futhark alphabets, Chilperic I's letters,
the Old-English and Danish-Norse alphabets.
Abstract
Title: King Chilperic I's letters (ᚹΘZΨ or ΔΘZΨ) may be found at the beginning (ᚠᚢᚦᚫ,
“Futha”) of the runic alphabet and at the end (WIJZÆ) of the Danish-Norse alphabet.
The Futhark alphabet seems to consist of the first three characters ᚠᚢᚦ (“Futh”) to be followed by a
fourth character ᚨ (“A”), which represents the initial character for the “alphabetical” (“AIΩ”)-
section.
In Germanic languages a number of ligatures U&U → W, I&J → IJ, A&E → Æ, etc. concentrates
in the range of the ᚠᚢᚦᚨ - Header (“Futha”). Some of these special letters (Ƿ Þ Ð Æ), are also found
at the end of the Danish-Norse alphabet and at the end of the Old English Latin alphabet.
On a local scale the word Æ still is being used as a symbol for eternity, law, matrimony and the
personal pronoun of the 1st person singular. Although the ligature Æ has been introduced later the
symbolism may have been represented earlier by a simple character ᚨ (“A”). Eventually the shape
of the ligature Æ may be understood as the concentrated symbolism of the creation legend for Ask
& Embla in a singular letter Æ.
One of the interesting traces of these symbolisms may be found in the four additional letters
(ᚹΘZΨ or ΔΘZΨ), which had been introduced to the Latin alphabet by the Merovingian king
Chilperic I (c. 539 – 584).1
This essay concentrates on the end of some of the Germanic alphabets, which contain dedicated
special letters (such as Ƿ Þ Ð Æ Ø W IJ).
The runes were gradually supplanted in Anglo-Saxon England by the Old English Latin
alphabet introduced by Irish missionaries. Futhorc runes were no longer in common use
by the eleventh century, though manuscripts show that fairly accurate understanding of
them persisted into at least the twelfth century.
U
The Phoenician waw-letter was shaped like a rune ᚠ but was also used as a vowel named u-
psilon. In the course of time the shape transformed from Y to V, which was to be inherited to
the Romans. They did use the letter “V” for vowel sounds /oo/ and /u/ but also as the
consonant /w/4.
V
Initially the Roman phoneme changed from /w/ to /b/ as in the Latin word “taverna”, spoken
as “taberna”. In Norman French the /b/ changed to /v” as in the English word “tavern”5..
Y
Originally the Greek Y and the Roman I and U ruled the letter's adaption. By the fourth
century the Y began to replace the I. Around 1066 the Norman scribes used the Y to replace
the runic letter “yogh”. “Y” almost managed to replace the “I” altogether. Printing re-
established the “i” in many spellings, but the “y” was left in a number of words such as
“Henry”7.
Z
The letter “Z” has been adopted by the Romans and inherited to the Europeans. The letter Z
had been shaped in the suggestions of king Chilperic I.
The Old English Latin alphabet starts with ABC...Z and ends with a series of special characters
which have been eliminated in the course of time. Four of these fundamental characters may be
compared with the four initial runes ᚠᚢᚦᚫ (“Futha”) in the Futhark alphabet:
ABCDEFGHIKLMNOPQRSTVXYZ &⁊ ǷÞÐÆ
Elder ᚠ ᚢ Þ ᚫ ᚱᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛟ ᛞ
Futhark f u þ a r k g w h n i j æ p z s t b e m l ŋ o d
ᚢ ᚦ ᚴ ᛁ ᛅ ᛏ ᛒ
Younger ᚠ ᚬ ᚱ ᚼ ᚾ ᛦ ᛋ ᛘ ᛚ
u/w, þ, k, — — i, a, — — t, b, — — — —
Futhark f/v ą, o, r h n ʀ s m l
y, o, ø ð g e æ, e d p
æ
Table 6 Elder Futhark and Younger Futhark (from Wikipedia's Younger Futhark)
8 Wynn (Ƿ ƿ) - representing the sound /w/. While the earliest Old English texts represent this phoneme with the
digraph ⟨uu⟩, scribes soon borrowed the rune wynn ᚹ for this purpose.
The Ligature Æ
In this comparison I assume the initial rune ᚠ (the “F” in “Futhark”) represents a universal symbol
digamma (Ϝ, respectively in undercase: ϝ) which represents /w/ and also covers the phonemes /v/,
/f/, /u/, /y/. This may be the first letter of Chilperic's additional letters.
In the archaic religion the first 3 initial runes (“Futh” of “Wuth”), ᚠ (the digamma “ϝ”), “ᚢ”, “ᚦ”
represent a keyword consisting the personal pronoun (“wut” or “wit” = “we two”) and the key for
the word “wutan” (“Wodan”, “to wit”, “witness” → “insight”).
11 Of these letters, 20 were directly adopted from the Latin alphabet, two were modified Latin letters (Æ, Ð), and two
developed from the runic alphabet (Ƿ, Þ). The letters K, Q and Z were not in the spelling of native English words.
12 Æ Pronoun – (dialectal, Fjolde) I (first-person singular pronoun)
13 Aa (waternaam)
14 The Backbones of the Alphabets
15 The Backbones of the Alphabets
In “The Origin of the long IJ-symbol in the Dutch alphabet” I document and discuss the locations of
the letter IJ in the ancient Ugaritic alphabet in the middle of the alphabetic section ...H, I, J, K... of
the Dutch alphabet. I try to understand in how far the correlations indicate the correct location for
the letter-symbols IJ and Y between the H and K, respectively between X and Z.
The role of the trailing letters (WIJZÆ) in modern alphabets
Four fundamental cores may be identified in the runic set of symbols “vitha” (ᚠᚢᚦᚫ) and be joined
to form a set of Latin letters (WIJZÆ).
1. The Wunjō (/w/ for the ego-pronoun “wit” as “we both” and “to wit”) may belong to the
ancient symbols of the era in which the first rune “f” had been defined as a digamma Ϝ
(“/w/”). The phoneme /w/ with the digraph ⟨uu⟩ for the digamma in Wunjō may have
extended the phoneme towards the /v/ and /f/, which resulted in the name “Futhark”.
2. The letter “Thorn” (“th”) may be categorized as the consonant ᚦ, which is documented as
Chilperich's definition “the” and the graphical symbol “Z“ (as “Д ?).
3. The ligature Æ (“æ”) is a combination of A and E, which may be cognate to the Creation
Legend. In the Scandinavian languages “Æ” is still in use.
4. For the Dutch ligature IJ the runic symbol ᚢ (“U”) seems to be suitable partner. In Dutch
language the word “wijten” is related to the “long i”-vowel in “wītan”. In Latin the long
vowel (ꟾ) may be considered as the most important vowel in IU-piter.
These four symbols, which are found at the beginning of each runic alphabet mostly will be found
at the end of the modern alphabets as a set of individual trailing symbols (WIJZÆ).
One of these characters (the “Z”) is identifiable as Chilperic's letter “Z”. The “/W/” is cognate to the
Chilperic's description “uui” and the “Æ” is the ligature “æ” of “A” and “E”. These links seem to
deliver the evidence that Chilperic's additional letters have managed to intrude the Germanic
alphabets as the subset “WIJZÆ” in the Danish-Norse alphabet.
The Dano-Norwegian alphabet is: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Æ Ø
Å, in which the letters c, q, w, x and z will only be found in loanwords. 16
The letter Z
The letter Z may have been introduced as an extra letter by Chilperic I as a gift to the Alemannic
(southern west German and northern Swiss) population, which honored the sky god Týr as Ziu21.
In Germanic mythology, Týr (Old Norse), Tíw (Old English), and Ziu (Old High
German) is a god. Stemming from the Proto-Germanic deity *Tīwaz and ultimately
from the Proto-Indo-European deity *Dyeus, little information about the god survives
beyond Old Norse sources. Due to the etymology of the god's name and the shadowy
presence of the god in the extant Germanic corpus, some scholars propose that Týr may
have once held a more central place among the deities of early Germanic mythology. 22
Unicode ᚨ ᚩ ᚪ ᚫ ᚬ ᚭ
Transliteration a o a æ o
Transcription a o a æ ą, o
Position in row 4 4 25 26 4
Table 8 The split of the Elder Futhark “a”- rune into three independent runes
(from Wikipedia's *Ansuz (rune)
23 Æsir
The Völuspá
As a prophecy of the Völva (Seeress) the Völuspá is the first and best known poem of the
Poetic Edda. It tells the story of the creation of the world and its coming end, related to the
audience by a völva addressing Odin.[1] It is one of the most important primary sources for
the study of Norse mythology.
The poem Völuspá is found in the Codex Regius manuscript (ca. 1270) and in Haukr
Erlendsson's Hauksbók Codex (ca. 1334), and many of its stanzas are quoted or paraphrased
in Snorri Sturluson's Prose Edda (composed ca. 1220, oldest extant manuscript dates from
ca. 1300).
In the creation legend of the Völuspá the Æsir (the gods) establish order in the cosmos by finding
places for the sun, the moon and the stars, thereby starting the cycle of day and night.
In the Wikisource of the Völuspá poem we may identify the joined matrimonial couple Ask and
Emblu which – in analogy to Adam and Eve – also composed the dual core “AE” in the name
“AEsir” for the gods.
Compared to Chilperic's letters (c. 539 – 584) the documentation of the Völuspá (ca. 1270) is
relatively new.
The ligature “Æ” in Æsir may symbolize the matrimonial link between both partners A and E. In
the old-time religion the individuals A and E were considered as halved Man, which may be
understood in reading Plato's Symposium. The ligature “Æ” may be identified as an androgynous
couple named Man.
24 Völuspá
The rune Ψ (M = “Madr”, “Man”) in the Younger Futhark
3 The (Younger) Futhark alphabet in the Runen-Sprach-Schatz (1844) by Udo Waldemar Dieterich
In the Younger Futhark the rune ᛘ represents “M” and is defined as the symbol for “Man” (“Madr”
→ “Man”). The runic shape ᛘ is equivalent to the character Ψ in Chilperic I's proposal for the “æ”
in the extension (ΔΘZΨ or ᚹΘZΨ) of the Latin alphabet.
The most accurate definition of the 4 characters in Chilperic I's proposal is problematic. Therefore I
prefer to copy a primary source of this source in full length (in German):
4: Footnote at page 72 in “Die Runenschrift;(1887)by the author Wimmer, Ludvig Frands Adalbert
• For the uui-representation Chilperic obviously chose a genuine ᚹ (Wynn rune) or a Δ-shape.
• For the æ-representation Chilperic did choose a Greek psi (Ψ) or a runic Ψ-shape.
• For the the-representation Chilperic obviously chose a Greek Zeta (or Latin) Z-shape.
• For the ω-representation Chilperic obviously chose a dotted O- or Θ shape.
Comparison of the Younger to the Elder Futhark
Usage of the Younger Futhark is found in Scandinavia and Viking Age settlements abroad, probably
in use from the 9th century onward, after a "transitional period" during the 7th and 8th centuries.
While the Migration Period Elder Futhark had been an actual "secret" known to only a literate elite,
with only some 350 surviving inscriptions, literacy in the Younger Futhark became widespread in
Scandinavia.
Originally the runic Ψ-shape (in the Younger Futhark representing “M”=”Man”) may have been
related to the ᛉ (z) in the Elder Futhark which later turned into the Stup-madr ᛦ (→ “reversed”
“Man”).
For his additional letters king Chilperic may have chosen two runic symbols and two Greek letters:
• the genuine ᚹ (Wynn rune) for the uui-representation
• the Ψ-shaped rune for the æ-representation. Chilperic may have dedicated the runic Ψ-shape
to the æ-representation as a symbol for “M” (“Man”) in the sense of the creation legend with
Ask and Emblu.
• The Greek Zeta (or Latin) in the Z-form to represent the Thorn ᚦ. This may have influenced
or been influenced by the Alemannic name Ziu (Old High German) for Tyr.
• A Greek ω- or Ω-representation as a dotted O- or Θ-shape to represent the long O: Ω.
Chilperic probably had to be careful to avoid suspicion in the the transfer of runic symbolism into
the Latin alphabet. The Church may have shared the political power for the Merovingian courts and
any pagan influence had to be hidden by careful strategies.
As a rune æ represented the first Man in the sense of the primordial “Adam & Eve”. This could be
transferred to the Latin alphabet.
Elder ᚠ ᚢ ᚦ ᚨ ᚱᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖ ᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛟ ᛞ
Futhark f u þ a r k g w h n i j æ p z s t b e m l ŋ o d
ᚢ
ᚠ u/w ᚦ ᚬ ᚴ ᛁ ᛅ ᛏ ᛒ
Younger ᚱ ᚼ ᚾ ᛦ ᛋ ᛘ ᛚ
f/ , þ, ą, o, k, — — i, a, — — t, b, — — — —
Futhark r h n ʀ s m l
v y, ð æ g e æ, e d p
o, ø
Table 9 Elder Futhark and Younger Futhark (from Wikipedia's Younger Futhark)
Graphical overview of the links between alphabets
The symbolic links between the Futhark alphabets, Chilperic's letters, the Old-English and Danish
alphabets are found in the following set of 4 tables.
The Elder Futhark starts with four symbols ᚠᚢᚦᚫ (“Futha”) and some extra letters for the symbols
w, æ and o, which in the Younger Futhark alphabet are to be compacted inside the first four runes.
These first four symbols may have been considered as fundamental runes for the Merovingian king
Chilperic I, who decided to introduce these symbols to the standard Latin alphabet of his time.
Other variants of the Latin alphabets such as the Old-English and Danish-Norse alphabets may also
reveal traces of these fundamental symbols (such as in English Ƿ Þ Ð Æ and in Danish Æ and Ø ).
ᚠᚢÞ ᚫ ᚱ ᚲ ᚷ ᚹ ᚺ ᚾ ᛁ ᛃ ᛇ ᛈ ᛉ ᛊ ᛏ ᛒ ᛖᛗ ᛚ ᛜ ᛟ ᛞ
f u þ a r k g w h n i j æp z s t b e ml ŋ o d
ᚢ ᚬ ᛅ
ᚠ u/ ᚦ ą, ᚱ ᚴ ᚼ ᚾ ᛁi, a, ᛦ ᛋ ᛏt, ᛒ —ᛘ ᛚ ———
f/ w, þ,
o, r
k,
æ,
b,
y, h n ʀ s m l
v o, ð g e d p
æ e
ø
Table 10: Elder Futhark and Younger Futhark (from Wikipedia's Younger Futhark)
ᚹ Θ Z Ψ
uui ω the ae
Table 11 Additional letters of king Chilperic I (c. 539 – 584)
J U W (& ⁊)
A B C D E F G H I K L M N O P Q R S T V X Y Z Ƿ Þ Ð Æ
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Æ Ø Å
Table 13 The Danish-Norse alphabet