Professional Documents
Culture Documents
that can catalyze economic development and community empowerment. Minerals are part
of its national patrimony, hence there is a big responsibility to maximize the benefits that
can be derived from their utilization with due regard to the protection of the environment and
Mining in the Philippines has long been prevalent since the mining boom decades ago. The
mineral wealth of our country is the cause of the mining movement that is said to be a big help
for the Philippines. Mining officials say that mining is the answer to the country’s poverty and
unemployment rate. Furthermore, mining operations usually happen in rural areas since mineral
resources are typically found in deep parts of land that are untouched and formed from a long
time ago. Minerals that are being mined are non-renewable resources, once used, it cannot be
used again. Although mining provides jobs, precious resources, and alleviates poverty, it
destroys the environment, affects the livelihood of the food producers, and harms the ecology of
the Philippines.
According to my internet sources, there are about 2 million jobless Filipinos. It really is
impossible to live without mines and it helps to create thousands of jobs here in our country. In
establishing mining businesses it is a fact well documented that there will be more investors who
will invest and this leads to higher employment thus having a positive impact in the Philippines
economic status. However, these things are yet unimaginable due to “monkey businesses”
between the businessmen and government officials leaving the normal people out of the picture.
A brief episode of the show “Failon Ngayon” with Ted Failon many years ago tackles the mining
in Palawan. Some of the people who were interviewed are living in towns where mining
operations are held. According to some of the natives in the area, the people that they know are
employed by the mining companies in their town, but those people are yet to achieve the
economic promise of mining. The jobs that they were given do not pay well enough compared to
what these workers have to go through in their occupation. Mining is present in their town but
Mining harnesses precious resources that are used in our everyday lives. The minerals that are
gathered by the mining operations are used in many materials across many industries that run
our world. It is a lie to say that mining can be done without affecting the surroundings of the
mining site. There are tons of issues that we’ve seen in television regarding mining, one would
be is the effects it contributed to the livelihood of the people living around the area of the mining
site. A farmer interviewed by ABS-CBN in their documentary said that crop production is low
since the arrival of mining operations in their area. Crop production is said to be affected by the
laterites extracted from the mines. Their rice production before the mining companies came
were 110 sacks a hectare, but when mining operations began; rice production alarmingly
decreased to only 50 sacks a hectare. That large depreciation of rice production is very
alarming and can be heavily attributed to mining even without scientific observation. The
shrinking of the rice variety made him feel lazy because for him there is no point in planting
anymore since production is low. In addition, farmers are not the only food producers affected
by the laterites brought by mining operations. Fishermen are also affected by the mining
operations in their area. An interview with a fisherman in the same documentary said that the
prawns caught recently in the lake were significantly smaller than the prawns from the previous
years. Many of them wanted to complain to an official but they do not know where to go or
whom to consult. Moreover, the cost of harnessing minerals, based on the first-hand accounts
of food producers, is greater than the revenue to be received from mining operations. The
destruction of lands and rivers are not worth the minerals extracted from the mines. It is such a
shame to think that the natives of the area who lived there for a long time are not the ones who
are benefiting from the land that they live in. Hence, with the destruction of the land and water, it
Poverty is another problem that mining hopes to solve. Mining companies include the alleviation
of poverty in their mission statements and making it their obligation to solve the economic
problems of our country. With that in mind, the question that should be asked is, “is it feasible?”
Mining companies can do anything they please about how their operations bring development in
our country, but development is still to be felt in the areas where the operations are held. Monsod
(internet source) says that the mining industry is correct in saying that statistics do not establish
causality, but questions still remain whether the claim that mining improves the quality of life in
its communities. Given what Monsod said, the presence of mining in a community does not
assure development and alleviation of poverty. Mining companies do not pay high salaries nor
does it give above standard employee benefits to its miners. Mining is not different from other
blue-collared jobs in the market. It still requires manual labor and back breaking work. Miners
work in hazardous mining sites with the hope of lifting themselves from the poverty line.
Furthermore, some of the farmers and fishermen from the area who were struck by the laterites
expounded by mining switched occupation and went to mining. The destruction of their
farmlands and fishponds compelled them to turn to mining because they think it is the best way
to earn more for themselves and their loved ones. In short, mining companies are just like
Mining in the Philippines undoubtedly helps the country with minerals and jobs but it is
exaggerating to say that it is the way to development. Mining has long been present in our
country but genuine quality of life is yet to be achieved. The provinces where mining is present
are evidence to why mining cannot be called the way to development. Mining is not bad but it is
not good either. Absolute abolishment of mining is not needed but the strict control of mining
should be implemented. The minerals that are being extracted are non-renewable and cannot be
grown again. The damage done by mining operations leaves a mark for a long time. Thus,