Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARCHITECTURAL CAPSTONE
DESIGN PROJECT MANUAL
2007 CURRICULUM
1
==================
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
4.1.
Architectural Design Development................................................................................................. 11
4.1.1. Site Planning and Site Programming .................................................................................11
4.1.2. Building Space Program ....................................................................................................11
4.1.3. Design Constraints ............................................................................................................11
4.1.4. Initial Design Translation ...................................................................................................11
4.2. Design Features ............................................................................................................................12
4.2.1. Architectural Character .....................................................................................................12
4.2.2. Innovations .......................................................................................................................12
4.2.3. Highlights 12
4.2.4. Material Concept ...............................................................................................................12
4.3. Project Cost Analysis .....................................................................................................................12
7.8. Defense Schedule ................................................................................................................................................12
7.9. Timetable for Defense Proceedings ..................................................................................................................... 12
7.10. Defense Requirements : 2nd Defense: Architectural Programming Defense....................................................... 12
1. Design Project Book Chapters 1 – 4 ..................................................................................................12
2. Power point Presentation ....................................................................................................................12
3. Architectural Design Development Boards .........................................................................................13
4. Additional Defense Requirements .......................................................................................................13
7.11. Submission Deadline of 2nd Defense Requirements: .........................................................................................13
7.12. Other Provisions: ..................................................................................................................................................13
8. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10 (AR521S4): GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS ....................................14
8.1. Architectural Design 10 Capstone Design Project: FINAL DEFENSE ........................................................... 14
8.2. Schedule of Defense.......................................................................................................................................14
8.2.1. Timetable for Defense Proceedings ........................................................................................... 14
8.3. Architectural Design 10 Defense Requirements .................................................................................................14
8.3.1. Book : Chapters 1 – 4 .................................................................................................................... 14
8.3.2. Power point Presentation ...............................................................................................................14
8.3.3. Boards & Design Portfolio ............................................................................................................. 14
8.3.4. Design Portfolio .............................................................................................................................15
8.3.5. Submission Schedule ................................................................................................................. 15
8.3.6. Design Project Book ......................................................................................................................15
8.4. Course Completion Requirements .........................................................................................................................16
9. CLASS STANDING/GRADING SYSTEMS ............................................................................................................16
9.1. Architectural Design 9: ..............................................................................................................................................17
9.2. Architectural Design 10: ............................................................................................................................................17
9.3. CONDITIONAL PASS / INC / FAILING GRADE .......................................................................................................17
9.3.1. Conditional Pass / Subject for Re-Defense if: ...............................................................................17
9.4. Incomplete (INC) if: ...................................................................................................................................................17
9.5. Failing grade (5.0) if: .................................................................................................................................................18
10. MISCELLANEAOUS AND OTHER PROVISIONS .................................................................................................18
10.1. RULING FOR LATECOMERS ............................................................................................................................ 18
10.2. ATTIRE 18
10.3. DESIGN PROJECT BOOK FORMAT .................................................................................................................. 18
10.3.1 Documentation Format ..............................................................................................................................18
10.3.1.Bibliography Format .................................................................................................................................. 18
10.4. OTHER PROVISIONS ........................................................................................................................................20
11. AWARDS ..............................................................................................................................................................20
12. EFFECTIVITY AND AMMENDMENTS .................................................................................................................21
APPENDICES..................................................................................................................................................................................22
A. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT .......................................................................................................................23
B. Adviser Application Form.............................................................................................................................................. 24
C.1 Envelope Tag for Initial Approval .................................................................................................................................. 25
C.2 Envelope Tag for 1st Defense : Design Project Proposal Defense ..............................................................................26
C.3 Envelope Tag for 2nd Defense : Architectural Programming Defense ........................................................................27
D. Consultation Appointment Form ......................................................................................................................................... 28
E. Consultation Referral Form ..................................................................................................................................................29
F. Degree of Complexity for Different Project Types ........................................................................................................30
G. ENDORSEMENT FORM for 1ST DEFENSE: DESIGN PROJECT PROPOSAL.........................................................31
G-2. ENDORSEMENT FORM for 2nd DEFENSE: ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING.........................................................32
H. ENDORSEMENT FORM for FINAL DEFENSE..................................................................................................................... 33
4
1. GENERAL STATEMENT
This manual has been formulated to instill order in the conduct of all Architectural design 9 & 10 design project preparation
and deliberation of the TIP-Quezon City Architecture Department. Among the parameters considered are:
1.1.CONSENSUS: The guidelines herein stated has been examined, well-understood, approved and accepted by the
TIP-Quezon City Architecture Department;
1.2.UNIFORMITY: The set format for the written output, presentation requirements, oral defense, grading system, and
other pertinent requirements leading to a methodical and effective over-all design project undertaking has been well-
communicated, explained, and clearly exemplified to all concerned who are directly involved in the process,
preparation, reparation and defense of design project works;
1.3.PRUDENCE & EFFICIENCY: The set guidelines have undergone great care, scrutiny, and extensive study to ensure
that the outputs have strictly adhered to the set standards stated herein regarding all aspects stated above;
1.4.INTEGRITY & FAIRNESS: The guidelines herein shall be strictly implemented and monitored to ensure impartial
assessment and reliability of decisions regarding the students’ final output to promote, encourage, develop, and
facilitate quality, efficient and creative thinking and actual output among the students;
1.5.INSTITUTIONALIZATION: This manual shall serve as the OFFICIAL manual for Architecture students enrolled in
Architectural Design 9 and Architectural Design 10.
2. ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS
The section under Admission Requirements shall be strictly implemented starting the 1ST semester of academic year
2017-2018
2.1.Design 9 Pre-Requisites
2.1.1. Only students who are 5th year standing (i.e. those who have successfully completed their 1st to 4th year
courses) are allowed to enroll in Design 9.
2.2.Design 10 Pre-Requisites
2.2.1. Only students who have successfully passed Design 9 and the Architectural Comprehensive Course are
allowed to enroll in Design 10.
3. DEFINITION OF TERMS
Acceptability – satisfactory representation of the interest of a particular group such as the school administration, the
department, faculty, project advisers and students.
Capstone – in architectural terms, it is the coping stone (“keystone”) that forms on top of a wall or the final stone placed in the
center of an arch that will hold an entire, otherwise unstable, construction together.
Capstone Design Project – is a multifaceted culminating academic and intellectual experience for senior architecture
students designed to encourage them to think critically, solve challenging architectural problems, and fully demonstrate the
intended learning/student outcomes of the program.
Capstone Adviser – a full-time faculty member delegated by the capstone committee to provide assistance and general
advice to capstone students based on their areas of expertise and/or interest.
Capstone Committee – a committee composed of one (1) chairman and six (6) faculty members of the current semester
tasked with the formulation, implementation and revision of the capstone design project manual; appointment of Capstone
Advisers; scheduling of Capstone events; and computation of Capstone grades.
Capstone Consultants – faculty member(s) from TIP or other school and industry practitioners or anybody who has relevant
and extensive knowledge, expertise and experiences that can assist and guide students on their capstone design project
proposal.
Capstone Coordinator - a faculty member delegated by the Program Chair that will act as Capstone Committee Chairman to
organize the capstone schedule and other administrative concerns during the capstone year.
Capstone Design Project Deliberation/Defense – the actual presentation of the deliberator’s design project proposal
through oral defense accompanied by the use of visual aids and the required defense materials.
Capstone Design Project Book – a printed copy on a4 size paper of the capstone design project that has been approved by
the capstone adviser and the capstone panel with design translation (Chapter 5) on A3 size paper.
Design Project Manual – the guide for TIP Quezon City Architecture Department in the capstone design project undertaking.
1
Defense Materials – includes the following: presentation, design translations (drawings, etc.) printed/plotted mounted on
hard board and scaled model to be used as visual aids during project deliberations and draft copy of their design project book.
Degree of Complexity – a grading system ranking different project types based on complexity and difficulty. The basis for
the establishment of Degree of Complexity is the Standards of Professional Practice (SPP) Document 202 of the IRR of R.A.
9266.
Draft Proposal – an incomplete design project proposal that is being developed to produce the final design book.
Executive Summary – an letter-size document that discusses the salient points of the design project proposal. It consists of
several pages having a format of: two (2)-columned, single-spaced, using Arial Narrow font and font size of 11.
Executive Summary A – a two (2)-page letter-size document for a single proposed design project topic used by Design 9
students as part of the initial requirement.
Executive Summary B – a five (5)-page letter size document for a single proposed design project topic used by Design 9
student as part of the 1st Defense (Design Project Proposal Defense) requirement.
Feasibility Study – analysis of the proposal taking into consideration the various elements of development but not limited to
the following: market, technical, institutional, environmental and the economic and social viability of the project, e.g. supply
and demand analysis, forecasting and planning standards, technical alternatives, institutional and other legal policy, fund
sourcing, internal rate of return (ROI), net present value, benefit-cost analysis, etc.
Guest Juror – an architect from other schools and/or an industry practitioner that will seat as one of the Panel of Jurors during
deliberation/defense.
Panel of Jurors – members are from architecture faculty members of TIP or from other schools and industry practitioners (as
guest juror on case to case basis) tasked with dissecting the design project works of the students by asking questions during
the oral deliberations.
Program Chair – the head of the TIP QC Architecture Department
Proper Uniform – would mean the official uniform for male and female architecture students.
Proponent / Presenter – a student of AR511S4 (Architectural Design 9) and AR521S4 (Architectural Design 10) enrolled in
the current semester with an approved design project.
Proposal – a brief study on the background and rationale of the project or research topic to ascertain its potential to be
developed into a architectural design project.
Scaled Model – a miniature model of the proposed project showing the character, form and volume of the building and
disposition within the site using an appropriate and acceptable scale.
4.2.Course Goals
The capstone design project shall have the following goals:
4.2.1. It shall be original and not a duplication of previously presented or on-going design project in TIP or in any
other school.
4.2.2. It shall potentially contribute to all the facets of development in all levels of government and society in
general and more specifically to the study of architecture.
4.2.3. It shall not undermine the moral and spiritual values of the people and must not advocate a change in the
present order of things by means of violence but by peaceful means.
4.2.4. It shall promote the latest technological innovations and initiatives towards the development and
management of the environment in consideration of the global concerns on climate change, disaster risk
management, and environmental impacts; contemporary project development strategies; and other current
development conditions that can be adapted and employed in the field of architecture.
2
4.3.Student Outcomes Addressed by the Course
By the end of the course, the student must be able to:
4.3.1. Communicate effectively in oral and in written English including visual communication;
4.3.2. Articulate and discuss the latest developments in the field of architecture;
4.3.3. Act in recognition of professional, social, and ethical responsibility;
4.3.4. Work effectively and independently in multidisciplinary and multicultural teams;
4.3.5. Design the built environment in the context of ecological balance and sustainable development and
conservation of cultural and historical heritage;
4.3.6. Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of architectural business and organization;
4.3.7. Provide professional services in the realm of the scope of practice of architecture;
4.3.8. Use the techniques, skills, and modern tools necessary for architectural practice;
4.3.9. Create architectural design solutions within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, cultural,
social, ethical, health and safety, and sustainability in accordance with architectural design standards;
4.3.10. Recognize the need for, and prepare to engage in lifelong learning.
3
5.3. CAPSTONE ADVISER
5.3.8.1. The Capstone Coordinator shall compute the number of advisees to be handled by each full-time
faculty member based on the total population of enrolled AR511S4 students and based on the
faculty member’s field of specialization/expertise (Appendix B).
5.3.8.2. The appointment of Adviser to Capstone Student shall follow the following parameters:
1. All Capstone Students will be grouped initially according to their most preferred adviser.
2. If the number of Capstone Students grouped under one Adviser is less than or equal to the
prescribed number of advisees for that semester, all of said Capstone Students will be
assigned as the faculty member’s advisee.
3. If the number of Capstone Students grouped under one Adviser is more than the prescribed
number of advisees for that semester, said Adviser will be allowed to choose from the pool of
applicants. To help the Adviser decide, he/she will be informed of the intended design project
topics of said students. The unsuccessful applicants will be assigned to either their 2nd or 3rd
preferred advisees following the same principle.
4. The list of Advisers and Advisee match-up will be posted not later than Week 3.
5. The executive summaries submitted will be forwarded to the respective Capstone Advisers to
serve as their initial guide for consultation. The cover page containing the list of preferred
advisers will be retained by the Capstone Coordinator.
Note: During the 2nd Defense (Architectural Programming, the two (2) original members of the panel must be
present during the deliberation. Should any of the two (2) or all members of the panel is/are absent, the
presentation of the proponent will be rescheduled.
4
5.4.3. Duties and Responsibilities of the Capstone Panel
Note: The Official Department Consultation Form (appendix D) must be attached in the Endorsement form which will be
signed by your Capstone Adviser. Non-compliance of the minimum required number of consultation will result to Non-
endorsement of the student on his/her project defense.
6.3. Capstone students are not allowed to consult or set up a consultation appointment with other faculty members and/or with
any Industry Lecturers unless accompanied by a consultation referral form (appendix E) completely filled-out and signed
by their adviser. The discussion during said consultation shall revolve only on the topics stipulated in the referral slip.
i. Other proposal not listed above shall be subject for approval by the Capstone Committee upon the
recommendation of the capstone adviser.
5
ii. The proposal is subject to Degree of Complexity to balance the inequities, perceived or real, of awarding higher
grades to simpler and less complex project.
7.2. Individual/Collaboration Design Project
7.2.1. The students shall prepare and present his proposal individually and/or by collaboration with other students.
Collaborative works consist of two (2) to three (3) students tackling on one (1) Master Development Plan in
which the division of works can cover a separate Capstone Design Project. For example, in projects that
would involve very large mixed-use complex, one student may handle the residential section, another
student for the commercial-retail section, and another for the commercial-office section. Although the
premise would be that these sections would work hand-in-hand once completed, for the purposes of
capstone design project presentation, each section should stand on its own.
7.2.2. Two (2) or more students are allowed to present a similar type of proposal/design project provided that their
project site, objectives, scope and limitation, design and solutions shall not be exactly the same. Likewise,
two (2) or more students are allowed to choose the same site provided that their design projects would not
be the same.
7.3.1. Use of the Degree of Complexity. The Degree of Complexity shall be applied only during the Deliberation.
It shall take the form of a point with a corresponding multiplier, which are as follows:
Degree of Complexity Multiplier
1. 1.00
2. 1.025
3. 1.050
4. 1.075
5. 1.10
After the deliberation, the assigned Capstone Committee member in the panel is tasked to compute for the
final grade of the candidate. To determine the Deliberation Grade, the average of the grades given by the
three jurors (average grade) is multiplied by the multiplier corresponding to the given Degree of Complexity.
7.3.2. Guidelines for Determining the Degree of Complexity. These guidelines were derived from SPP
Document 202 of the IRR of R.A. 9266. These should not be seen and perceived as absolute and final
provisions but as a representation of the simplest variation of the building type. In the event that the Capstone
Design Project combines two or more types, the higher Degree of Complexity should be used. If the project is
a complex of similar types, then the Degree of Complexity for this type can be taken one step higher.
The Project Title, and the proposed Project Scope of Work and Space Programming should be checked and
evaluated for these are the primary bases in determining the Degree of Complexity of a design project.
7.3.3. List of Project Type and its Degree of Complexity (please refer to Appendix F).The heading Project Type
represents a project of a single type. These may be continued to produce a more complex project.
6
7.4.1. Proposal Content
1. Chapter 1: Introduction
7
2.3. Micro Site Analysis: The Site and its Immediate Environs
Discussion of the characteristics of the actual lot in relation to its immediate environs. Same with
the previous section, discussion should be aimed towards (1) familiarizing the reader with the
actual lot, and (2) justifying the score given based on the rubrics set in the criteria. All discussions
should be aligned with the proposed project, and should be supported by maps and photo-
documentations.
7.5.1.1.1.Adviser Application Form clearly indicating the name of the student, general area of
intended architectural study (refer to 7.1), title of three (3) initial topics ranked in order of
preference, and names of three (3) full-time faculty members whom the student wished to
be his/her adviser, ranked in order of preference. (refer to Appendix B)
Note: Please attached at the back of the brown envelope the envelope tag for Initial Approval ((refer
to Appendix C).
8
7.6. 1ST DEFENSE : Design Project Proposal Defense (Site and Project Justification)
The Proponent must present the three (3) proposals recommended by the Capstone Adviser. The order of the
presentation of the Capstone proposals shall be according to the ranking decided by the Capstone Adviser and the
Proponent, in which the Title with the highest ranking is presented first, followed by the two (2) back-up or reserved
proposals.
Note: The back-up or reserved proposals are considered by the Capstone Panel in instances where (1) the student was not able
to completely justify the feasibility of the first proposal, (2) the capability of the student being able to complete the study within the
one year is questionable, or (3) it will be a duplication of another design project.
Note: Please attached at the back of the brown envelope the envelope tag for 1st Defense : Design
Project Proposal Defense ((refer to Appendix C).
9
7.6.3.5. Other Provisions:
i. The students shall follow a prescribed Architectural Capstone Design Project format. Failure
to follow the prescribe format would mean unacceptability of the proposal and failure of the
design project requirements.
ii. The approved design project is final and no changes or revision shall be done by the student
without the approval of the Capstone panel.
iii. In case of revision or changes on the approved proposal/study, the student must inform and
advise the Capstone adviser within one (1) week after the approval of the topic provided there
is a sufficient reason for the change of proposal/study.
iv. In case the student decided not to pursue the approved proposal/study after the midterm
period, the student will be advised to drop the subject due to lack of time.
v. The approved design project must be carried and continued in Design 10 (AR521S4). In case
the student decided not to pursue the approved design project after passing Design 9
(AR511S4), the student will not be allowed to enroll in Design 10. Instead, the student must
work on the requirements of the new design project in Design 9.
1. Chapter 1: Introduction
NOTE: The proponent shall include the revised Chapters 1 – 2 based on the comments by the Capstone panel
during the 1st defense
10
investigation. Architectural drawings should reflect preliminary understanding of structure, such as
appropriate depth of floor systems shown in section, preliminary structural grid reflected in plans, etc.
11
4.2. Design Features
4.2.2. Innovations
Application of new technological advances, methods and/or design strategies that will make the
building design/features exceptional.
4.2.3. Highlights
Issues to address include: massing, roof form, materials, fenestration strategies, and structural
expression. It is typically more useful to explore a variety of approaches, rather than completing a
greater level of detail for one approach.
The 2nd defense or architectural programming defense shall be scheduled on Week fifteen (15) or after the defense of
AR521S4 (Design 10) of the Semester’s school calendar. The order of presenters will be through drawing lots or by the
Capstone committee’s prerogative based on the student’s proposal/study and the availability of the Capstone panel
members whose field of expertise and/or interest is in line with the student’s proposal/study.
12
3. Architectural Design Development Boards
These shall comprise the concept boards, site characterization and analysis (macro and micro), architectural
program, and all other pertinent architectural design presentations on 30”x40” boards. Computer Aided Design
and Drafting (CADD) and rendering softwares are allowed but manually drafted drawings are encouraged.
Note: Please attached at the back of the brown envelope the envelope tag for 2nd Defense: Architectural
Programming Defense ((refer to Appendix D)
Note: After the last day of submission, late submission shall no longer be accepted.
The students shall follow a prescribed Architectural Capstone Design Project format. Failure to follow the prescribed
format would mean unacceptability of the design project and failure to comply with the capstone requirements.
13
8. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10 (AR521S4): GUIDELINES AND REQUIREMENTS
8.1. Architectural Design 10 Capstone Design Project: FINAL DEFENSE
Architectural Capstone Design Project
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Site Justification
Chapter 3: Design Inputs
Chapter 4: Architectural Programming
Chapter 5: Design Translations
NOTE: The proponent shall include the revised Chapters 1 – 4 based on the comments by the capstone panel
during the Architectural Design 9 defense.
The defense shall be continuous and may be simultaneous with other defense schedule. Scheduled presenter
during the day must be ready in advance.
14
e. Sections (any convenient scale)
Note: 2 sections for a single structure or 1 section per structure for multiple structures (4 or more structures)
f.
Exterior Perspective/s: at least two (2) perspective drawings for single structure or 1
perspective drawing for each structure in complex development; Aerial/Bird’s eye view for
building complexes.
g. Architectural Interior Perspectives/s of a major space in the project.
h. Reflected Ceiling Plan (Main Building)
i. Architectural Bay Section showing the architectural intent and structural concept.
8.3.4. Design Portfolio
The Portfolio shall be three (3) copies in A3 size paper containing the following:
a. Cover page
b. Table of Contents
c. Project Description
d. Diagrams (Site Analysis, Zoning, Circulation, etc)
e. Architectural Design Conceptualization (Design Concept, Form Concept & Translation, Design
Philosophy, Design Considerations)
f. Building Systems (Environmental Systems, Structural Systems, Utilities Systems)
g. Design Features (Architectural Character, Innovations, Highlights, Material Concept)
h. Site Development Plan (any convenient scale)
i. Aerial Perspective and other perspective drawings
j. Elevations
Note: 4 elevations for a single structure or 2 elevations per building for multiple structures (4 or more structures) all elevations
have to be rendered with shades and shadow shown. Elevation should have call-outs for the proposed materials to be used)
k. Sections
Note: 2 sections for a single structure or 1 section per structure for multiple structures (4 or more structures)
l. Floor Plans (minimum scale is 1:200m. Use key plan if necessary)
Note: Fixtures and important furniture must be reflected in ALL floor plans. Likewise, doors, windows and other standard
architectural floor plan elements must be reflected (e.g. stairs, ramps, etc.)
m. Architectural Space Programming
n. Technical Lot Description
o. About the Author
Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 The Project
1.2 Problem Statement
1.3 Project Objectives
1.4 The Client
1.5 Project Scope and Limitations
1.6 Design Process
15
Chapter 2: Site Justification
2.1 Site Selection Criteria
2.2 Macro-Meso Site Analysis: Region/Province/City/Town
2.3 Micro Site Analysis: The Site and its Immediate Environs
2.4 Initial Schematic Design
16
9.1. Architectural Design 9:
1. Prelim Grade Same as Midterm Grade
2. Midterm Grade Average of the grade given by the capstone panel during the 1ST
Defense (Project and Site Justification)
3. Final Grade 1/3 Midterm Grade + 2/3 Final Requirements
Computation for Final Requirements:
Average of the grade given by the capstone panel during the 2nd Defense
(Architectural Programming Defense)
4. The computation for Final Grade shall apply only when the student successfully passed the Architectural
Programming Defense.
4. The computation for Final Grade shall apply only when the student successfully passed the Defense (Final
Examination of Design 10)
17
9.4.3.2. No student with a grade of Incomplete (INC) in Design 9 shall be allowed to enroll in Design
10 (AR521S4) prior to the completion of his/her pending requirements. This provision
shall be strictly implemented to ensure continuity and correctness of design project since the
project is composed of a sequence of steps and procedure starting from the Project and Site
Justification in Design 9 up to the Final Defense in Design 10.
9.5. Failing grade (5.0) if:
9.5.1. The student not endorsed by the Capstone Adviser decided not to follow his/her adviser’s recommendation
and proceeded with the defense but received a failing grade from the Capstone Panel
9.5.2. The student endorsed by the Capstone Adviser who did not show up for defense except during emergency
cases (death or accidents), official suspension of classes due to bad weather, calamity, fire, earthquake and
other reason that might be significantly importance, subject to approval of the Capstone Committee and / or
the department chairman
9.5.3. The student endorsed by the Capstone Adviser who show up late for defense
9.5.4. The student not endorsed by the Capstone Adviser with the intent to present and show up late for defense
9.5.5. The student who took the re-defense and still fail it.
10.2. ATTIRE
The prescribed attire in presentation/deliberation shall be the TIP proper uniform as per school policy.
Margin : Top (1”), Bottom (1”), Left (1”), and Right (1”)
Orientation : Portrait
Paper Size : 8.5” x 11”
Page Number : Bottom of Page, Plain Number 3
10.3.1.Bibliography Format
Below are standard formats and examples for basic bibliographic information recommended by the American
Psychological Association (APA). For more information on the APA format, see http://www.apastyle.org .
18
Book:
Format:
Author's last name, first initial. (Publication date). Book title. Additional information. City of publication:
Publishing Company.
Example:
Nicol, A. M., & Pexman, P. M. (1999). Presenting your findings: A practical guide for creating tables.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Allen, T. (1974). Vanishing wildlife of North America. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic Society.
Website or Webpage:
Format:
Online periodical:
Author's name. (Date of publication). Title of article. Title of Periodical, volume number, Retrieved month
day, year, from full URL
Online document:
Author's name. (Date of publication). Title of work. Retrieved month day, year, from full URL
Note: When citing Internet sources, refer to the specific website document. If a document is undated, use "n.d." (for no date)
immediately after the document title. Break a lengthy URL that goes to another line after a slash or before a period. Continually
check your references to online documents. There is no period following a URL.
Note: If you cannot find some of this information, cite what is available.
Example:
Dove, R. (1998). Lady freedom among us. The Electronic Text Center. Retrieved June 19, 1998, from
Alderman Library, University of Virginia website: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/subjects/afam.html
Hilts, P. J. (1999, February 16). In forecasting their emotions, most people flunk out. New York Times.
Retrieved November 21, 2000, from http://www.nytimes.com
19
10.4. OTHER PROVISIONS
10.4.1.The capstone panel schedule shall be posted at least three (3) working days before the defense schedule. The
Capstone Adviser should not inform his/her advisee regarding the composition of the proponent’s panel. The
Capstone Panel should also not inform the proponents about their assigned schedule
10.4.2.The defense shall be continuous and may be simultaneous with other defense schedule. Scheduled presenter
during the day must be ready in advance.
10.4.3.Students are required to bring their own laptop or desktop and other equipment needed for the presentation/
defense. The student will not be allowed to use any school computer or equipment other than the LCD projector
during their presentation.
10.4.4.All students must secure permit from the office of student affairs (OSA) should they bring any of the following:
10.4.4.1.Laptop / Desktop / mouse / speakers/ etc.
10.4.4.2.Audio-visual equipment needed in the oral defense.
10.4.4.3.Other things requiring permit from OSA / Security Office.
10.4.4.4.There will be no re-schedule of oral defense upon failure of the computer (laptop or desktop).
10.4.5.The students shall be allowed to bring only two (2) assistants inside the defense room during the mobilization and
demobilization periods.
10.4.6.Question during the deliberation shall be in verbal or written form and shall be asked by the capstone panel ONLY
during the discussion/deliberations. All questions must be within the scope of the design project.
10.4.7.Video and/or voice recording will ONLY be allowed upon the knowledge of the adviser and the panel, provided that
the student will submit a copy of the video/voice recording to the committee.
10.4.8.The criteria for grading during the defense shall follow the items listed in the grading sheets prepared and provided
by the capstone committee.
10.4.9.The presenter shall be asked to leave the room for the panel deliberation of grade and shall be called back into the
defense room to receive his/her defense grade.
10.4.10.Comments, correction and revision of the design project book by the panel shall be written directly on the unbound
copy of the design project book to be received by the presenter one (1) day after the defense through his/her
capstone adviser. The presenter must comply with all comments, corrections and revisions submitted by the panel
prior to the signing/approval of the design project book as part of the course completion requirements.
10.4.11.The grade of the students as computed by the capstone committee shall be announced during the awarding
ceremony (exhibit). The grades announced may still be changed to a grade of Incomplete (INC) if they failed to
comply with all the remaining course completion requirements.
10.4.12.The lowest passing grade shall be fifty percent (50%) while the highest grade possible shall be one hundred
percent (100%)
11. AWARDS
1. Outstanding presenters and Capstone students shall be commended. Awards shall be categorized in the following
manner:
1.1. Top Five (5) Capstone Design Project
1.2. Special Awards
1.3. Other Awards
1.4. The Top Five (5) Capstone Design Project Awards shall be based on the computed grades of the students by
the Capstone Committee.
1.5. Special awards shall be given by the Guest Speaker during the Exhibit based on the separate scoring/rating
card prepared by the Capstone Committee.
1.6. Should there be a disagreement on the choice of awardees; the Capstone committee shall have the final
decision.
20
12. EFFECTIVITY AND AMMENDMENTS
These guidelines shall take effect for 1st and 2nd Semester of Academic Year 2019 – 2020.
These guidelines may be modified, amended or updated by the Capstone Coordinator and Committee with the approval of the
Program Chair and College Dean.
Prepared by:
___________________________________
Ar. Melvin DC. Aniciete
ARCH Capstone Coordinator 2019-2020
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Ar. Marvin Rimando Ar. Dominador Cendaña
Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020 Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Ar. Adrian R. Toisa, UAP Ar. Rick Jason M. Padua
Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020 Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020
____________________________________ ____________________________________
Ar. Gerick M. Domingo Ar. Gregory L. Guevara
Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020 Member, Capstone Committee 2019-2020
Approved by:
_______________________________________
Ar. Lawrence B. Dolores II
Program Chair, Architecture Department
_______________________________________
Dr. Jesusa N. Padilla
Dean, College of Engineering and Architecture
_______________________________________
Dr. Cynthia C. Llanes
Vice President for Academic Affairs
21
APPENDICES
22
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix A
A. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT
I acknowledged that I have received a copy of the Architectural Capstone Design Project Manual, which contains
important information about the rules, guidelines and requirements of the course Architectural Design 9 &10.
I understand and agree that I will read and comply with the policies contained in this manual and in any revisions, I
am bound by the provisions contained therein.
_______________________________ _______________________________
Student’s Name Parent/Guardian’s Name
_______________________________ _______________________________
Student’s Signature Parent/Guardian’s Signature
______________________
Date
23
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix B
I am an Architectural Design 9 student for the [1st/2nd] semester of AY [20__-20__], intending to do a Capstone
Design Project under the category of [chosen general area of study]. My intended design project proposals are as
follows:
The proposals listed above are ranked according to personal preference and assessment of feasibility of data
collection and project completion. Attached to this letter are the executive summary of these proposals.
In the same manner, I would like to request to be assigned to any of the following faculty members as their
Capstone Advisee:
I have based this request on the faculty member’s field of expertise that is in line with my general area of study.
Having made this request, I hereby pledge to my future Capstone Adviser that I will consistently consult with him/
her throughout the duration of the entire semester or Capstone and that I shall make each consultation session
worthwhile by prior preparation of materials for discussion during said consultation session.
Sincerely,
[Name of Student]
[Student Number]
[email address]
[mobile number/s]
[facebook name]
24
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix C
_________________________ ______________________
25
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix C
C.2 Envelope Tag for 1st Defense : Design Project Proposal Defense
(cut & attach this form at the back of brown envelope)
26
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix C
27
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix D
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
(To be filled-out by the adviser)
Consultation date : _____________ Time start : _____________ 1st consultation 2nd consultation
Time end : _____________ 3rd consultation ____ consultation
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The following comments/suggestions have been discussed at one point or another to my capstone advisee as aid to his/her queries
but not as absolute solution to his/her design project.
___________________________________ ________________________________
Signature over printed name of Adviser Signature over printed name of Student
28
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix E
To : ___________________________________
___________________________________
Dear ________________________________:
This is to endorse my Capstone Advisee whose name appears above, for a consultation with you regarding his/her design project. Topics for
consultation are also written above for your reference. Kindly write your comments/suggestions regarding the consultation topics after your
discussion with my advisee. Thank you very much for accommodating my student.
Regards,
_____________________________
Faculty Member, TIP-QC Arch Department
The following comments/suggestions have been discussed at one point or another to the student as aid to his/her queries
but not as absolute solution to his/her design project.
___________________________________ ________________________________
Signature over printed name of Consultant Signature over printed name of Student
29
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix F
Project Type Degree Project Type Degree
Agricultural Facility/Building 1 Hostel, Lodge, Inn 2
Airport-Domestic 4 Housing Project 4
Airport-International 5 Laboratory Facility 4
Aquaculture Farm Facility 3 Library 2
Aquarium 4 Local Government Civic Center 3
Art Gallery 1 Marina/Yacht Club 4
Atomic/Nuclear Facility 5 Mausoleum and Monument 4
Auditorium 3 Medical Office Facility/ Medical Arts Bldg 3
Bank and other Financial Institutions 2 Mental Institution 5
Bath, Therapeutic Resort/Facility 3 Military Installation/Building 2
Botanical/Horticultural Facility 1 Mixed-Use Residential, Commercial, Office 3
Broadcasting Center/Studio 5 Museum 4
Camp (Adventure, Recreational) 2 Nature Center/Camp 2
Casino 3 Nursing Home 2
Capitol Building, Provincial 2 Observatory/Planetarium 4
Church, Ecclesiastical/Religious Facility 2 Orphanage/Children’s Center 2
Cinema Complex/Movie House 2 Port (Seaport) Facility/Harbour Building 4
City/Municipal Hall 2 Private Club (Golf, Country, Sports, etc) 2
College/University Building 2 Public Utility Building 2
Commercial Center/Department Store 2 Race Track Facility 1
Communications Building/Facility 5 Recycling Center 2
Community Center 1 Reformatory/Rehabilitation Center 2
Convent, Monastery, Seminary 2 Resort 2
Convention Hall/Center 4 Research Facility/Center 3
Correctional and Detention Institution/Prison 2 Residential Building/Condominium 1
Courthouse, Hall of Justice 2 Restoration/Architectural Heritage Project 4
Dormitory/Apartment/Residential Complex 1 School 2
Embassy Building 3 Science Center/Institute 3
Exhibition Hall and Display Structure 3 Shopping Mall 3
Exposition and Trade/Fair Building 4 Showroom and Service Center 1
Film and Music Studio 4 Specialized Decorative Building 4
Government Office/Building 2 Sports Arena 3
Handicapped Center/Facility 4 Stadium 3
Health Resort 4 Theatre, Opera House, Concert Hall 4
Historical Landmark Facility/Center 4 Transportation Terminal/Station 2
Hospital and Medical Building 5 Welfare Building 1
Hotel 4 Wet and Dry Markets/Supermarket 1
Zoological and Botanical Garden/Park 3
30
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix G
ITEM
PARTICULARS ADVISER’S REMARKS
NO.
PROPOSED TITLES FOR CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECTS
□ 3 design project proposals are ready for presentation
□ Proposals are properly categorized according to Type of Use
1
□ Proposals are not duplication of previously presented or on-going design projects in TIP
or in any other school
□ Proposals are aligned with the capstone theme
Note: Other than completeness and readiness of the proponent, minimum of 2 consultations is required for the proponent to be endorsed.
□ FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the student is
fully equipped and ready to undergo Oral Defense. I hereby endorse the student to the Capstone Committee Coordinator for the
assignment of the Panel of Jurors and schedule.
□ NOT FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the
student is not yet fully equipped/ready to undergo Oral Defense. I hereby advise the student to forego the Oral Defense scheduled
this semester and instead defer their defense to the succeeding semester.
______________________________________________________________ ___________________________
Adviser’s Signature over Printer Name Date
31
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix G
G-2. ENDORSEMENT FORM for 2nd DEFENSE: ARCHITECTURAL PROGRAMMING
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 9: CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECT
PROPONENT : __________________________________________________________ ADVISER : _______________________
PROJECT TITLE : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT SITE : ___________________________________________________________________________________________
ITEM
PARTICULARS ADVISER’S REMARKS
NO.
CONCEPT BOARD
1 □ Design project title, project background, problem statement, design objectives, the client,
design considerations, design philosophy, design concept
DESIGN INPUTS
□ Includes identification of various laws, regulations, codes, etc. that govern the project
6 □ Integration of different building systems such as environmental systems, structural
systems, utility systems, materials, and other technical issues
□ Specialized Allied Services & Case Studies
DESIGN FEATURES
7
□ Includes architectural character, innovations, highlights and material concepts
INITIAL DESIGN TRANSLATION
8
□ Initial Site Schematic/Bubble Drawings
BOOK (CHAPTERS 1&4) AND BOARDS
9
□ Proper use of language, tone and grammar
MOCK DELIBERATION
10
□ Elevator Pitch
ADVISER’S FINAL REMARKS (COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS) :
Note: Other than completeness and readiness of the proponent, minimum of 2 consultations is required for the proponent to be endorsed.
□ FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the student is
fully equipped and ready to undergo Oral Defense. I hereby endorse the student to the Capstone Committee Coordinator for the
assignment of the Panel of Jurors and schedule.
□ NOT FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the
student is not yet fully equipped/ready to undergo Oral Defense. I hereby advise the student to forego the Oral Defense scheduled
this semester and instead defer their defense to the succeeding semester.
□
______________________________________________________________ ___________________________
Adviser’s Signature over Printer Name Date
32
TIPqcARCH_capstone | Appendix H
H. ENDORSEMENT FORM for FINAL DEFENSE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN 10: CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECT
PROPONENT : __________________________________________________________ ADVISER : _________________________
PROJECT TITLE : _____________________________________________________________________________________________
PROJECT SITE : _____________________________________________________________________________________________
ITEM WK 3 WK7 WK 11
PARTICULARS COMMENTS
NO.
CONCEPT BOARD
1 □ Design project title, project background, problem statement, design
objectives, the client, design considerations, design philosophy,
design concept
DESIGN TRANSLATION
7 □ applied theories, form concept, structural concept, material concept,
site development concept, building plan concept
DESIGN PORTFOLIO
10 □ for design portfolio: completeness of contents, proper scale (min. of
1:200 for floor plans), and call-outs (e.g. dimensions, materials, etc.)
MOCK DELIBERATION
11
□ Elevator Pitch and/or 20-minute presentation
Note: Non-compliance within the required duration of submission may lead to non- To Capstone Adviser: Please write in every box the date of
endorsement of the student. Strict submission of deliverables must be observed by completion affixed with your signature. Dated & signed box would
the student. mean ACCEPTABILITY of the required item/s.
Note: Other than completeness and readiness of the proponent, minimum of 3 consultations is required for the proponent to be endorsed.
□ FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the student is fully equipped and ready to
undergo Oral Defense. I hereby endorse the student to the Capstone Committee for the assignment of the Panel of Jurors and schedule.
□ NOT FOR ENDORSEMENT. Upon reviewing the submissions and presentations of the capstone student, it is my belief that the student is not yet fully equipped/ready
to undergo Oral Defense. I hereby advise the student to forego the Oral Defense scheduled this semester and instead defer their defense to the succeeding semester.
______________________________________________________________ ___________________________
Adviser’s Signature over Printer Name Date
33
34