Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ncfr.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
National Council on Family Relations is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Marriage and Family.
http://www.jstor.org
W. K. CHIU
TINGANDSTEPHEN
KWOK-FAI
The ChineseUniversityof Hong Kong
Leavingthe ParentalHome:ChineseCulture
in an UrbanContext
TABLE 2. PERCENTAGE OF RESPONDENTS LIVING WITH PARENTS, BY BIRTH COHORT AND SEX
MaritalStatus
Age
Before At
Birth Cohorts 15 20 25 30 35 Marriage Marriage
Total
1950 and before 100 89 63 39 29 83 42
1951-55 100 89 60 35 21 83 49
1956-60 99 92 59 35 17 82 36
1961 and after 100 93 71 39 70 31
Women
1950 and before 100 87 44 19 13 88 28
1951-55 100 84 45 21 12 82 33
1956-60 100 91 42 19 8 85 25
1961 and after 100 93 62 30 81 30
Men
1950 and before 100 91 85 63 49 77 59
1951-55 100 96 81 54 33 83 71
1956-60 99 94 83 58 30 77 53
1961 and after 100 93 81 50 56 31
Note: Data come from our study, Social Change and Economic Life: A Sociological Study, 1994-1996. Before marriage
and at marriage refer to 6 months before the first marriageand the first month after marriage,respectively.
At the age of 25 the percentageof men who were monthsbeforemarriage.In the firstmonthof mar-
living with theirparentswas quitestable,between riage, these percentagesdeclinedsharplyto range
81% and 85%, among all cohorts, but the per- between36%and49%.The youngestbirthcohort
centage droppedsubstantially5 years later,from experiencedgreaterchanges,with70%living with
63% of the oldest cohortto 50% of the youngest theirparentsbeforemarriageand 31%continuing
cohort, with a minor irregularityin between. At to do so aftermarriage.These figuressuggestthat
the age of 35, both male and female adultsof the leaving the parentalhome before marriageis far
youngerbirthcohortswere consistentlyless likely from being a normativeevent in the growingup
to live with their parentsthan those of the older process.
cohorts.Despitethis downwardtrend,one should Consistentwith traditionalnorms,mostwomen
note that in all birthcohortsmen were still more were underclose parentalsupervisionbeforemar-
likely to live with theirparentsthanwere women, riage.Beforemarriage,a high percentageof wom-
which suggests a clear gender divide in family en, between81%and 88%fromall cohorts,lived
duties. with their parents.After these women married,
only 28% of the oldest cohort and 30% of the
MaritalTransitionsand Leavingthe youngest cohort stayed with their parents.The
ParentalHome sharpcontrastbetween these two sets of figures
With the rising awarenessof personaldevelop- suggeststhatit was commonfor women to leave
the parentalhome at the time of their marriage
mentandthe weakeningof traditionalfamilismin
andthatthis move was a partof the marriagetran-
highly capitalisticHong Kong,morepeopleof the sition ratherthanan independentlife event. Men,
youngerbirthcohortspreferto establishtheirown
home at some point. Among respondentsof the on the otherhand,were more likely thanwomen
1956-60 birthcohort,only 17%(or 8%of women to leave the parentalhome before marriage.For
and 30% of men) lived with their parentsat the the cohortsbornin 1960 andbefore,between77%
age of 35. We furtherlook into the questionof and 83% of men lived with their parentsbefore
whetherleaving home has become an indepen- marriageand the percentagedroppedto 56% for
dent, normativelife stage in Chinese society by the cohort born after 1960. Consistentwith the
analyzingresidentialpatternsaccordingto respon- traditionalprescription,men were more likely
dents' maritalstatusin Table2. For the threeco- than women to stay with their parentsaftermar-
hortsbornin 1960 andbefore,82%to 83%of the riage. The percentageran from 53% to 71% for
respondentslived at home with their parents6 the threeolder cohortsand droppedconsiderably
622 Journal of Marriage and Family
to 31% for the youngest cohort; despite fluctua- TABLE 3. RISK RATIO OF LEAVING THE PARENTAL HOME
tions in these percentages, all of the figures were Predictors Total Women Men
consistently higher for men than for women.
Birth cohorta
1951-55 1.21 0.98 2.65**
A Hazard Rate Model of Leaving the 1956-60 1.31 1.25 2.31*
Parental Home 1961-65 1.15 1.05 2.89*
1966 and after 1.28 1.15 3.30*
Table 3 presents the risk ratio of leaving the pa- Period effect
rental home from the proportional hazards model.
Housing/wage index 0.16** 0.31 0.09
The birth cohort and period effects were included
in the model to analyze the overall trends that had Housing typeb
Public rental housing 0.25*** 0.29*** 0.21***
taken place in the past few decades. The model Private rental housing 1.27 1.16 1.76*
also considered urban housing, parental status,
Parentalstatus
household structure,and life course developments,
Father's socioeconomic
which jointly determined the decision to leave the status 1.00 1.00 0.99
parental home. Analysis of these variables will One surviving parentc 0.89 0.95 0.85
help us to understand the dynamics of the home Parentsaged 60+d 1.11 1.36 0.89
leaving process and to assess the extent to which Sibling status
Hong Kong Chinese deviated from the traditional First childe 1.10 1.13 1.14
family norms of residential arrangement. Last childe 0.92 0.85 0.82
Only childe 0.42* 0.40 0.53
Number of siblings 1.06* 1.07* 1.05
Cohort effects. The data suggest that leaving home
Household composition
steadily gained popularity among men born more
recently. For example, men born after 1965 were Live with grandparents' 0.06*** 0.08* 0.04***
3.3 times more likely to move out of the parental Live with relativesg 1.95** 2.06** 1.29
Live with nonrelativesh 2.88*** 1.92** 9.28***
home than those born before 1951, the baseline
for cohort comparisons. This result may conceal Activity status'
In school 0.61 0.51 0.67
the opposing trends, which appear in Tables 1 and
Not employed 1.28 1.45 0.51
2, that more young men stayed at home recently
in their early 20s, but that a greater number from Achievement level
each succeeding birth cohort eventually left home High-school graduate' 0.91 0.80 1.16
College graduatej 1.05 0.62 0.72
after their mid-20s, particularly when they got
Occupationalstatus 1.00 1.00 1.00
married. The positive cohort effect suggests that Pay raisek 1.31* 1.39* 1.21
the latter trend prevailed over the extended period
Family stage
of staying at home. The case for women was dif- 47.63*** 72.80*** 21.17***
Premarriageperiod'
ferent. Although more women of the younger After marriage' 5.36*** 7.16*** 3.74***
birth cohorts left home in their mid-30s, they ac- Prechildbirthperiodn" 1.35 1.38 1.13
After birthof 1st child" 0.45*** 0.45*** 0.40***
tually exhibited a high rate of staying with their
parents throughout their 20s. With these trends N 643 353 290
1107 811 369
offsetting each other, no significant birth cohort X2
27 27
df 27
effects were found in the female sample.
Note: Data are from our study, Social Change and Eco-
Urban housing. As living away from parents re- nomic Life: A Sociological Study, 1994-1996.
i1950 and before is the reference category. bPrivately
quires financial resources, the rates of leaving owned housing is the referencecategory.cBothparentssur-
home should vary with periodic fluctuations in viving is the referencecategory. dAtleast one parentyoun-
rental housing prices. Indeed, we found that less ger than 60 years old is the referencecategory. eThoseborn
affordable rental housing suppressed the desire to in the middle is the contrast category. fNot living with
move out in the full sample. Scarcity in housing grandparentsis the referencecategory. gNot living with rel-
atives is the reference category. hNot living with nonrela-
supply has long been a dominant factor in Hong tives is the reference category. 'Workingis the reference
Kong family life, and this is reflected in the effects category. jNot completing high school is the referencecat-
of the housing sectors. The results indicated that egory. kNo pay raise is the referencecategory. 'Six months
before first marriage is the reference category. mEight
respondents who resided in public rental housing months before first birth is the reference category.
were less likely to move out of their parents'
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.
home. Their risk of moving out was cut to one
Leaving Home in Urban Hong Kong 623
48 times greaterthan duringthe time spent not en staying at home in their 20s, probablyattrib-
activelypreparingfor marriagein the full sample. utableto prolongedschoolingand late marriage.
A genderdifferencewas evident,with women at Leavingthe parentalhome is far frombecom-
a much higher risk than men (73 times vs. 21 ing an independent,normativelife stage in Chi-
times) when they were aboutto marry.This sug- nese society. Most female respondentsstayed at
gests a directrelationship,especiallyamongwom- home before and left immediatelyaftermarriage.
en, betweenmarriageand leaving home. Married This patternchangedvery little over time, which
respondentshad a 5 times greaterpropensityto suggests that leaving the parentalhome is a part
leave home thanthose who were not considering of the marriagetransitionratherthanan indepen-
marriage.As marriedwomen were not supposed dent step toward adulthood.Slightly more men
to live with theirparents,they had a muchhigher than women left home before marriagebut the
risk of movingout thandid marriedmen;the risk proportionwho stayedwith theirparentswas still
ratios were 7 times for marriedwomen and ap- high, which meansthatleavinghome beforemar-
proximately4 times for marriedmen. Expecting riage is uncommonin Hong Kong. Consistent
childbirth,which covered the 8-monthperiodof with Chinesetradition,men weremorelikely than
the first pregnancy,was not a relevantfactor in women to live with their parentsafter marriage.
the decision to move out, but the risk of leaving Clearly,Hong Kong Chinese continueto follow
home changedafterthe firstchild was born.Rath- traditionalgender divisions in relationto family
er than encouragingthe search for more family obligationsdespiterapidsocial and economicde-
space,the arrivalof the firstchildactuallyreduced velopment.
the risk of leaving home to 45% of those who Althoughit seems thatmodernizationdoes not
were not expectinga child in the full sampleand always act unfavorablyon traditionalpractices,
its impactwas aboutthe same for the femaleand the rationalethat now supportsChinesefamilism
male subsamples.Apparently,parentalchildcare may be quite differentfrom that of the past. Our
services were highly valuedand offeredpractical hazardrateanalysesaskedwhy Chinesefamilism
incentivesfor not moving out of their childhood survived,the extent to which it had been modi-
home. fied, and how it had adaptedto the urbanenvi-
ronment.We foundthattraditionpassesfromone
generationto the next, as living withgrandparents
DISCUSSION helps to socialize young adultsinto remainingin
the parentalhome. Personalachievementwas rel-
Conventionalwisdomholds thateconomicdevel-
atively unimportantamong the respondents,as
opmentandmodernizationlureyoungpeopleinto they were not very responsiveto educationallev-
leaving home earlier to ensure greaterpersonal el, employmentstatus,or socioeconomicstanding
freedomand privacy.We began this researchby whenconsideringa move awayfromtheirparents.
asking whether leaving the parentalhome has However,pay rises werethe exceptionto thisrule.
gained popularityamong Chinesein Hong Kong Traditionalfamily obligations remainedgender
andwhetherliving awayfromparentshas become
specific, as many women waited until they mar-
a uniquestage in the growingup process. Com- ried to move out.
parativeanalysis revealedthat Hong Kong Chi- However, there were signs of change. More
nese were far more likely thanAmericansto live young men of the recent birth cohortsleft their
with their parents despite both societies being parentsand theirresidentialpatternmovedcloser
highlymodernizedandurbanized.Consistentwith to that of women, that is, they left the parental
Chinesetradition,more men than women stayed homeaftermarriage.Bothmen andwomenshared
at home, even when genderdifferencesin school- a narrowerdefinitionof familythanthe traditional
ing and marriagetimingwere takeninto account. notionthatcovereda widerkinshipnetwork.Liv-
This evidencesuggeststhatleavinghome is more ing with nonfamilymembers,relativesor nonrel-
than a simple functionof modernizationas pro- atives, tendedto push young adultsaway.Having
pelled by economicdevelopment.Rather,cultural dependentparentsdid not stop youngrespondents
elements also play a criticalrole in how people from leaving home, and being the oldest son in
interpretthe event of leavinghome and how they the family had no bearingon the odds of living
act accordingly.Althoughmorepeopleeventually with parents.More and more decisions to move
move out of the parentalhome, modernization ac- out were basedon practicalreasons.The viability
tuallyleadsto a higherproportionof youngwom- of aged care for parents,for example,was deci-
Leaving Home in Urban Hong Kong 625
sive in residentialarrangements.Being the only the elderly by their family. Hong Kong Journal of
child in the family lowered the risk of leaving Gerontology, 1, 4-9.
Glick, P. C., & Lin, S. L. (1986). More young adults
home, but a largernumberof siblings increased are living with theirparents:Who are they?Journal
thatrisk. of Marriage and the Family, 48, 107-112.
Leavingthe parentalhome was also a decision Hong, L. K. (1973). A profileanalysisof the Chinese
deeply embeddedin the urbancontext.We have familyin an urbanindustrializedsetting.Internation-
demonstrated thatthe decisionto move out is sen- al Journal of Sociology of the Family, 3, 1-9.
W.(1989). The Asian-American
Kanjanapan, traditional
sitive to periodicfluctuationsin the affordability household. In F Goldscheider& C. Goldscheider
of housing. Indeed, housing was a resourcethat (Eds.), Ethnicity and the new family economy: Living
was used to keep childrenat home. Althoughso- arrangements and intergenerational financial flows
cioeconomicstandingdid not enhanceparentalin- (pp. 39-55). Boulder,CO: WestviewPress.
fluence,parentswith public housingentitlements Kerckhoff,A. C., & Macrae,J. (1992). Leavingthe pa-
rentalhome in GreatBritain:A comparativeperspec-
offeredgreaterincentivesfor childrento stay be- tive. Sociological Quarterly, 33, 281-301.
hind when comparedto those living in private Kett,J. F (1983). The stages of life, 1790-1840. In M.
housing.This was largelyattributable to the state Gordon (Ed.), The American family in social-histor-
policy that allows childrento inheritthe rightto ical perspective (3rd ed., pp. 229-254). New York:
public housing.Besides housing,childcareis an- St. Martin'sPress.
other key concern in urbanlife, as both parents King, A. (1996). The transformationof Confucianism
in the post-Confucianera. In W. M. Tu (Ed.), Con-
are likely to be employed.Ratherthanlookingfor
fucian traditions in East Asian modernity (pp. 265-
more family space, the respondentspreferredto 276). Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniversityPress.
live with theirparentsafterthe birthof theirfirst Kwan,A. Y. H. (1995). Elderabuse in Hong Kong:A
child. Apparently,parentalchildcareservices are new family problemfor the old East?Journalof El-
der Abuse & Neglect, 6, 65-80.
highly valuedin urbanHong Kong.
Ourassessmentof the Chineseway of leaving Kwok, H. K. (2000). A comparative study of the middle
class and working class sandwich generations, the
the parentalhome is that changehas been taking stress they encounter and their coping strategies in
place graduallybut the extent and pace of that contemporary Hong Kong society. Unpublished doc-
change has not matchedHong Kong's rapidde- toral dissertation,The Chinese Universityof Hong
velopmentover the last few decades. Moreover, Kong, Hong Kong.
the level of change is uneven between men and Lau, S. K. (1981). Chinesefamilismin an urban-indus-
trialsetting:The case of HongKong.Journalof Mar-
women. Leaving the parentalhome has not yet
riage and the Family, 43, 977-992.
become an independentstage in the growing-up Lau, S. K. (1982). Society and politics in Hong Kong.
process and it continuesto be closely associated Hong Kong:The ChineseUniversityof Hong Kong.
with marriage,which is a key transitionin the Lee, M. K. (1987). Governmentpolicy andthe structure
of the family. In Hong Kong: Politics and society in
family career.In addition,the decision to move transition(pp. 179-190). Hong Kong:The Commer-
out is increasinglydominatedby practicalconsid- cial Press (in Chinese).
erationswithinthe urbancontext. Lee, M. K. (1991). Familyandsocial life. In S. K. Lau,
M. K. Lee, P.S. Wan& S. L. Wong(Eds.),Indicators
NOTE of social development: Hong Kong 1998 (pp. 41-66).
This projectwas fundedby the ResearchGrantsCoun- Hong Kong: Hong Kong Instituteof Asia-Pacific
Studies,The ChineseUniversityof Hong Kong.
cil, Hong Kong,the BritishAcademy,UnitedKingdom, Podmore,D., & Chaney,D. (1973). Parentalinfluence
and the Departmentof Sociology,The ChineseUniver-
on the occupationalchoice of young adultsin Hong
sity of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Kong, and comparisonswith the United States, the
Philippines and Japan. International Journal of Com-
REFERENCES parative Sociology, 14, 104-113.
Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS Podmore,D., & Chaney,D. (1974). Familynormsin a
system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. rapidlymodernizingsociety:Hong Kong.Journalof
Anderson,S. A., & Sabatelli,R. M. (1999). Familyin- Marriage and the Family, 36, 400-407.
teraction: A multigenerational developmental per- Post, D. (1994). Educationalstratification,school ex-
spective(2nd ed.). Boston:Allyn and Bacon. pansion,and publicpolicy in Hong Kong. Sociology
Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social his- of Education, 67, 121-138.
tory of family life (R. Baldick, Trans.).New York: Ryder,N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the
Knopf. study of social change. American Sociological Re-
Chan,R. Y. K., Ho, L., & Tam,J. (1997). Chinesefam- view, 30, 843-861.
ilism in transition:The case of Hong Kong. Inter- Salaff, J. W. (1981). Working daughters of Hong Kong:
national Review of Sociology, 7, 375-384. Filial piety or power in the family? Cambridge, UK:
Chow, W. S. (1987). Factorsinfluencingthe supportof CambridgeUniversityPress.
626 Journal of Marriage and Family
Shek, D. T. L. (1996). The value of childrento Hong The Hong Kong Federationof YouthGroups.(1999).
Kong Chinese parents. Journal of Psychology, 130, Youthtrendsin Hong Kong 1999. Hong Kong:The
561-569. Hong Kong Federationof YouthGroups.
Skolnick, A. S. (1991). Embattled paradise: The Amer- Tu, W. M. (Ed.) (1996). Confucian traditions in East
ican family in an age of uncertainty. New York: Basic Asian modernity.Cambridge,MA: HarvardUniver-
Books. sity Press.
Stoodley,B. (1967). Normativefamily orientationsof White, L. (1994). Coresidence and leaving home:
Chinesecollege studentsin Hong Kong. Journalof Youngadultsandtheirparents.AnnualReviewof So-
Marriage and the Family, 29, 773-782. ciology, 20, 81-102.