Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TA PHUNG PHUC
Hanoi – 2008
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I would like to express my most sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr. Truong Van Tu for
his helpful comments and criticisms for my research study. I also would like to express
my special thanks to Prof. Dr. Pham Quang Trung and various committee councils: Dr.
Tran Thi Van Hoa, Dr. Phan Thi Thuc Anh, Dr. Tran Van Hung, Dr. Tran Thi Song
Minh, Dr. Tran Thi Thu Ha, Ms. Dao Thanh Lam MBA, Mr. Le Quang Huy MBA and
many others who help me make my research more appropriate.
Sincere thanks are extended to G.PRO project team from NPT for their assistances. I
also express my big thank to Mr. Richard Chin - General Manager and to my colleagues
at Regent Garment Factory for their valuable help in understanding G.PRO operations
and in conducting interviews with senior managers and with many employees at the
company.
I also express my appreciation to all faculties, staff and friends, especially EMBA
responsible staff at the NEU Business School for their help and warm encouragement
throughout my EMBA Program.
And last but not least, I greatly express my love to my beloved family members for
their warm encouragement and sharing during my study time.
3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
4
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Error:
Table 1.1 Example of a Dye Lot ticket Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 2.1 Education of 70 interviewees Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 2.2 Experience in G.PRO system of 300 survey participants Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.1 W3 assignment Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.2 Manpower plan Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.3 G.PRO Training schedule Referenc
e source
not found
Table 3.4 Contingency steps Page
Error:
Referenc
e source
5
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.5 Hardware requirement Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.6 Software requirement Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.7 Functional requirement Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table 3.8 CSF and its evaluation method Referenc
e source
not found
Page
Error:
Table A.1 List of interviewees Referenc
e source
not found
6
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Error:
Figure 1 Production floor structure Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2 Production floor operational diagram Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 3 Frame-work of the research Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.1 MIS development approach Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.2 Waterfall model Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.3 Production floor processes Reference
source not
found
Figure 1.4 Marker definition Page
Error:
Reference
source not
7
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.5 Single garment part Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.6 Multiple garment part Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.7 Work stage definitions Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.8 Buyer confirmation process Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 1.9 Fabric layering Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.1 G.PRO data flow chart Reference
source not
found
Figure 2.2 Survey respondent rate Page
Error:
Reference
source not
8
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.3 How urgent G.PRO system should be upgraded? Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.4 Which component of G.PRO do you like most? Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.5 G.PRO system architecture Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.6 Example of G.PRO visual report Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.7 Report customization ability Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.8 Productivity monitoring tool Reference
source not
found
Figure 2.9 A innovation case study Page
Error:
Reference
source not
9
Page
Error:
Figure 2.10 Price related factors Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.11 Bundle system Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 2.12 UPS system Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 3.1 Project Org. chart Reference
source not
found
Page
Error:
Figure 3.2 Upgrading process Reference
source not
found
ABBREVIATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Vietnam garment industry has been booming for the past few years, many favorable
conditions have enabled garment manufacturers to grow rapidly. However it also leads
to the fact that many new comers are entering the industry and gradually making the
competition become so stiff. In order to outperform its competitors, Regent Garment
Factory has selected IT deployment as one of its competitive strategies so managing
and using IT system effectively have become an increasingly important requirement.
Among IT systems that have been deployed at Regent, Garment Professional (G.PRO)
is considered the most important one. G.PRO is a powerful management tool to help
managers at all levels to track progress, make decision and intervene when necessary.
Information and data need to be collected and analyzed to provide feedback at any
points of time of production floor process. It also helps staff and management to track
progress of activities against targets, plans and schedules, and last but not least it helps
to increase transparency and accountability.
The thesis is aimed at improving the current G.PRO system of Regent by first
performing an in-depth assessment of its current situation then proposes Regent an
upgrade plan for their consideration. The foundation of the thesis is based on in-depth
interviews with users at all levels, on study of documents available and through
observation of the researcher. The Thesis consists of five parts. The introduction part
presents readers with the research objectives, research questions, methodology, outputs,
scope and limitation. The second part provides readers with conceptual background of
the terms which are used in the study. The third part provides an insight of G.PRO
system, its opportunities and challenges in the time to come. The fourth part proposes a
detail action plan and recommendations for improvement. The last part is the thesis
conclusion.