Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Received January 23, 2001; accepted after revision March 28, 2001.
Abstract Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the Results
mammographic and sonographic findings in patients with Discussion
Mondor's disease of the breast. References
Introduction
Sonography was performed with a 7-MHz (or higher) transducer using Logic 700MR
(General Electric Medical Systems), 128 XP (Acuson, Mountain View, CA), SSD-5000
(Aloka, Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, Japan), and SSD-1700 (Aloka). Sonographic examinations
included real-time as well as spectral and color Doppler imaging of the area of concern.
The following information was documented for each of the patients: age, sex, clinical
presentation, and type of treatment and clinical follow-up, where appropriate. For each
patient, the presence of known associated risk factors—a history of breast surgery, breast
biopsy, breast inflammation or infection, or trauma—was documented.
Results
Top
During a 1-year period, we identified five women with Abstract
Mondor's disease of the breast in a large mammography Introduction
practice encompassing three breast centers. The patients ranged Subjects and Methods
in age from 33 to 45 years (mean age, 40 years). All had Results
Discussion
palpable findings; three had localized tenderness associated
References
with the palpable finding at the time of the mammographic and
sonographic evaluation. None of the five women had any
known risk factors. The cause of Mondor's disease in these patients was, hence, presumed
to be idiopathic in all the reported patients.
The mammograms revealed a superficially located tubular density corresponding to the
marker placed on a palpable mass in all patients. The density was seen in the upper outer
breast, indicating involvement of the lateral thoracic veins, in four patients (Figs. 1A and
1B). In the remaining patient, the thrombosed vein was periareolar, coursing deep to the
nipple toward the lower outer quadrant of the breast.
View larger
version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint
slide]
View larger
version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint
slide]
Of the five women, two had palpable findings without pain and did not require treatment.
The three other patients were treated conservatively to relieve pain; one of these patients
is scheduled to have prophylactic bilateral mastectomy because of a strong family history
of breast cancer. This woman had an acute episode of thrombophlebitis with a severely
painful and enlarged breast and had experienced a similar episode affecting the opposite
breast in 1996. At 6-month follow-up, a complete clinical resolution of the superficial
thrombophlebitis was noted. Two of the other treated women also were found to have had
a complete resolution of symptoms at follow-up (1 and 5 months, respectively).
Discussion
The reported association of breast cancer with Mondor's disease is of particular interest to
mammographers. Catania et al. [2] reported that eight of their 63 patients with Mondor's
disease had breast cancer and strongly recommended mammography in all cases, even
when the findings at the patient's physical examination were otherwise negative. They
reported that mammography alone identified two of the eight breast cancers. In the series
reported by Hou et al. [6], two of the 64 women with Mondor's disease had associated
breast cancer. The infrequency of Mondor's disease and the fact that these studies
included patients presenting for breast evaluation make its association with breast cancer
difficult to assess.
Mondor's disease of the breast may present clinically as a palpable cord or a mass usually
associated with pain. Mammographic evaluation is, therefore, indicated in patients with
suspected Mondor's disease primarily for the evaluation of a palpable finding in the
breast. At mammography, the finding of a dilated tubular density may potentially be
mistaken for a dilated duct, a finding that may lead to biopsy. Huynh et al. [9] reported
that at mammography, an asymmetrically dilated duct not situated beneath the areola that
is associated with an interval change, suspicious microcalcifications, or both warrant
biopsy. The researchers in that study found that 24% of the patients with such findings
had breast cancer [9]. Tubular or branching structures in the subareolar region, however,
represent dilated ducts, and, if unassociated with other suspicious or clinical or
mammographic findings, are of minor importance [10]. Miller et al. [11] reported a case
in which a patient had both Mondor's disease and a metastatic lymph node; at
mammography, the thrombosed vessel was mistaken for a dilated duct.
At sonography, the thrombosed vessel appears as a superficially located, long, tubular,
anechoic structure with a beaded appearance that does not show any flow on color or
spectral Doppler studies. We found that sonography enables us to identify the entire
course of the thrombosed vessel, which may not be visible in a mammographically dense
breast. In patients with acute cases, a thrombus distending the vein may be seen, as in one
patient in our series. Bilaterality is rare; one patient in our series had bilateral superficial
thrombophlebitis occurring in each breast at different times. A thrombosed vein tends to
be longer than a duct, have a beaded appearance, and is seen most commonly in the upper
outer aspect of the breast. When in a periareolar location, a thrombosed vein does not
terminate at the areola, unlike a lactiferous duct. Dilated interstitial fluid collections do
not have a beaded or tubular appearance like thrombosed veins seen in patients with
Mondor's disease.
Our series was small; however, Mondor's disease is a rare entity. Breast imagers should
have an awareness of this condition and its imaging findings to avoid potentially
misdiagnosing the palpable thrombosed vessel as a dilated duct and to exclude an
associated breast cancer.
References Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and Methods
Results
Discussion
1. Conant EF, Wilkes AN, Mendelson EB, Feig SA.
References
Superficial thrombophlebitis of the breast (Mondor's
disease): mammography findings. AJR 1993;160:1201 -1203[Free Full Text]
3. Pugh CM, DeWitty RL. Mondor's disease. J Natl Med Assoc 1996;96:359 -363
4. Faage CH. Remarks on certain cutaneous affections. Guys Hosp Rep (3rd series)
1869;15:295 -302
7. Bejanga BI. Mondor's disease: analysis of 30 cases. J Royal Coll Surg (Edinb)
1992;37:322 -324
9. Huynh PT, Parellada AJ, Shaw de Paredas E, et al. Dilated duct pattern at
mammography. Radiology 1997;204:137 -141[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10. American College of Radiology. Illustrated breast imaging report and data
system (BI-RADS), 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998:128
-130
11. Miller DR, Cesario TC, Slater LM. Mondor's disease associated with metastatic
axillary nodes. Cancer 1985;56:903 -904[Medline]